Imtjnotu
Member
Screen shot this just in case52 active CUs at 2.0Ghz ~ 13.3TFlops
PS5
52 active CUs at 1.82Ghz ~ 12.1TFlops
XseX
gl
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
- Status
nowhat
Member
Last edited:
Insane Metal
Member
The thing is: they never said "our new XBOX has 12TF". They said it has twice the GPU power of the XBox One X. That's about it.
Last edited:
Tommy Fisher
Banned
Good luck with that
believe it or not, these are the actual specifications for both XseX and PS5 GPUs.
ResilientBanana
Member
My favorite was when he said
“PS4k will have a 4k blue ray player “
Result: doesn’t
“PS4K will have a better CPU”
Result: up-clocked Jaguar
“Deep Down is still a thing”
Result: Isn’t
Last edited:
Red_Driver85
Member
Marry me!
Imtjnotu
Member
Not doubting yiu. I'm open for all numbers.Good luck with that
nowhat
Member
shenmue mugen
Member
A marginal difference in my opinon.
Well, I honestly want PS5 and XSEX to be as close as possible performance wise.
Though I know that wasn't the main reason why Sony won this generation many have chosen the base PS4 for it's superior performance in third party games. The same applied with the pro consoles with many choosing the X for it's superior performance compared to Pro.
That way Sony and MS won't have nothing but games to propel these machines and when I mean games I talking about the first party ones.
The closer the consoles the more important the first party games are going to be and that will push Sony and MS studios even further.
If Sony can offer performance similar to the XSEX Sony and MS studios will battle to the death and gamers will benefit the most.
Negotiator
Member
People are either going to crucify you, or praise you for being a prophet. Bookmarked!52 active CUs at 2.0Ghz ~ 13.3TFlops
PS5
52 active CUs at 1.82Ghz ~ 12.1TFlops
XseX
gl
Btw, any chances of 7nm EUV? I don't see them hitting those clocks with regular 7nm.
Tommy Fisher
Banned
Prepare to be absolutely blown away by not just revealing over 13tflops GPU power for PS5 in PSM [2] February 2020.
7nm EUV
Last edited:
CameFromNearFuture
Banned
52 active CUs at 2.0Ghz ~ 13.3TFlops
PS5
52 active CUs at 1.82Ghz ~ 12.1TFlops
XseX
gl
Are You trying to take my pIace ? Let me remind You that I came here first
Dont steal someone else's credits and reputation
Last edited:
bitbydeath
Member
52 active CUs at 2.0Ghz ~ 13.3TFlops
PS5
52 active CUs at 1.82Ghz ~ 12.1TFlops
XseX
gl
What about RAM?
Pyramid Song
Member
I choose to believe you. Know something about games ?
shenmue mugen
Member
Hey Tommy...tell me about the Bluepoint remaster. Is it Demon Souls?
Tommy Fisher
Banned
New FPS flagship from one of sony fp studios you literally won't believe
TeamGhobad
Banned
i asked him if it was RDNA flops or GCN flops
and this happened
and this happened
Red_Driver85
Member
What are you all funny here. It’s nice to read. Thank you.
Tommy Fisher
Banned
I dunno about that but my gut feelings tell me something about MGS remake
CameFromNearFuture
Banned
i asked him if it was RDNA flops or GCN flops
and this happened
Well deserved block tbh with you
TeamGhobad
Banned
explain
Pyramid Song
Member
A fps from Naughty Dog would be something i won't believe.New FPS flagship from one of sony fp studios you literally won't believe
THE:MILKMAN
Member
This. Curiously Sony haven't even mentioned RAM in all their disclosures and I'm wondering why.....
Negotiator
Member
If his numbers are correct, I expect 384-bit 24GB.
There's no way you're going to feed those beasts with a 256-bit pipe (sub-10TF/RX 5700 tier).
Gamernyc78
Banned
For real lol hey some of this shit will end up being true though like last Gen when leaks were poppin up.
Last edited:
David Ricardo
Member
Both consoles have announced using Zen 2 processors. If they were 7nm EUV, why wouldn't they use Zen 3?
Also, I don't understand this very well myself so somebody correct me if I'm wrong. Wouldn't using 7nm EUV make it more difficult to move the design to 5nm for a future slim version? I think I read somewhere that designs made for 7nm EUV are not usable in standard nodes (7nm/5nm). Is that right?
Also, I don't understand this very well myself so somebody correct me if I'm wrong. Wouldn't using 7nm EUV make it more difficult to move the design to 5nm for a future slim version? I think I read somewhere that designs made for 7nm EUV are not usable in standard nodes (7nm/5nm). Is that right?
The Bloody-Nine
Member
124 people think they're getting the graphical performance of a £700 GPU in an £400 console?
Going to be a lot of disappointed people.
Going to be a lot of disappointed people.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
i asked him if it was RDNA flops or GCN flops
and this happened
How do these people cope with life?
Last edited:
Gamernyc78
Banned
Is this shit for real? Wow next Gen is going to be fucking amazing and these systems will be great for many years.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Pentium 4 3.8 ghz vs. Zen2 3.6 ghz
Which is better?
Which is better?
Insane Metal
Member
oops.
Last edited:
Red_Driver85
Member
Yes, there was already one here, like recently ran. You need to find him.
CameFromNearFuture
Banned
124 people think they're getting the graphical performance of a £700 GPU in an £400 console?
Going to be a lot of disappointed people.
So You think huge corporations in a multimillion contract with hardware companies have access to components coming right from the factory (no taxes) pay the same prices mere final consumer (mere mortais) does.
Really ?
Lol
Tommy Fisher
Banned
You're gonna understand very soon...
bitbydeath
Member
124 people think they're getting the graphical performance of a £700 GPU in an £400 console?
Going to be a lot of disappointed people.
Would that be new for you?
TeamGhobad
Banned
typical millenial behavior. someone slightly challenges them and they hit the block button.
Last edited:
Insane Metal
Member
Shhh
The Bloody-Nine
Member
No. You're right. AMD can't wait to go out of business. So they're going to render their mid range GPU range pointless by selling them to Sony /MS for a pittance. Sound business sense.
The Bloody-Nine
Member
Would what be new for me?
THE:MILKMAN
Member
Hm...~Two months is far too long!
bitbydeath
Member
Expensive tech in a cheap console.
CameFromNearFuture
Banned
You have no Idea How multimilionare contracts work, my friend.
AMD has a percentage gain for every little Xbox and PlayStation unit sold wich actually makes way more money than selling their own Pc components to the final consumer.
The Bloody-Nine
Member
Expensive tech in a new console? Sure. £700 GPU performance in a £400 console (and that 700 quid is just the GPU, not including the power supply, RAM, SSD)? Good luck with that.
Last edited:
David Ricardo
Member
It's been a long time since we got expensive GPUs in cheap consoles. Maybe since 360s launch?
The Bloody-Nine
Member
We will revisit this when the actual specs are announced. And I'm going to say I told you so.
bitbydeath
Member
Yeah, but it’s not unheard of is my point.
TLZ
Banned
Thanks TF man.52 active CUs at 2.0Ghz ~ 13.3TFlops
PS5
52 active CUs at 1.82Ghz ~ 12.1TFlops
XseX
gl
bitbydeath
Member
Sony put a $1000.00+ Blu-ray player in the PS3 and that was just the disk drive. 700 is nothing.
- Status