SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
i stand corrected. i remember reading that 2 billion figure somewhere. but it looks like i mistook it for the i/o die.Zen2 is 3.9B transistors for 8 cores and 32MB l3.
i stand corrected. i remember reading that 2 billion figure somewhere. but it looks like i mistook it for the i/o die.Zen2 is 3.9B transistors for 8 cores and 32MB l3.
I mean "fixing". PS5 is mostly data copied from 5700xt the rest is github. Sacrlett is data copied from xonex and rest github. It's placeholder info given the validity of final spec. It's silly.You mean fixing backwards?
No it's not. It's progressing the same as N7. There is a huge difference between having the same maturity and being on a similar maturation tragectory. There is no way N7+ has defect densities as low as 0.07/cm2. It only recently went into volume production.
There is also the fact that wafer supply for N7+ is lower than N7 - because it's a newer node. Each of those wafers are gonna be very expensive and AMD will want to use as much of those wafers as they can on Milan. Whatever is left will go to Ryzen and later Threadripper, because they leverage the same chiplet design. What's left will probably go to desktop GPU.
Then after all that, will consoles be considered.
Why? Because Epyc (and Radeon Instinct) has the highest margins. Then comes Threadripper. Then comes Ryzen. Then comes Radeon (though it seems AMD is following suit with Nvidia in keeping prices high).
Consoles have the lowest margin of all the chips they sell. AMD are no longer back in 2012, reeling from the devastatingly bad Bulldozer, and the underwhelming Tahiti. They're not as desperate for console volume, because they are making money in desktop and they're making money in datacenter. They're having difficulty meeting demand in fact.
It is for that reason that I seriously doubt either console will be N7+. At best N7P because it uses the same design rules as N7 and won't need brand new photomasks.
I mean maybe AMD have given N7+ wafers to Microsoft and/or s
Sony, but you can bet your ass they're going to be paying for them, cause AMD want their gross margin to be on the up. They are a publicly held business after all. They don't operate for the benefit of gamers.
It's possible, but unrealistic.
Yea but nowhere in Github did Arden have 384bit bus that is why.I mean "fixing". PS5 is mostly data copied from 5700xt the rest is github. Sacrlett is data copied from xonex and rest github. It's placeholder info given the validity of final spec. It's silly.
the 5500xt has 24 CUs, 2 disabled right? how many work groups is that? 12? so 1 wgps = 2 CUs or 1 dual cu?Well the 1st question is can 1 shader engine support 15 wgps? The max we have seen is 12 in navi14 but only 11 are active in the 5500xt.
If not it means we need 3 engines for 60CUs and that is 225mm² with all 96 ROPs and no ray tracing.
370mm² is only doable if a shader engine can support 15 wgps otherwise it will be closer to 400mm².
I think AMD is actually direct customer. They cant give anyone x86 IP.According to Anandtech TSMC said that N7+ had caught up with N7 yields after just 2 quarters and they put it down to the learning they had when bringing N7 online.
MS/Sony will sort their own wafer supply out and AMD have nothing to do with it. At best AMD might make a recommendation based on the provided targets and they can design with a process in mind but securing the wafers and the supply contract is not something AMD do for their semi custom clients. AMD get their money via upfront costs and then via licensing for the IPs used in the custom SoC.
Jesus you are beyond help...Please find document yourself and check it out. I have it here and know what I am talking about.
That's copied from xonex. 12gb, 12 chips, 384bus.Yea but nowhere in Github did Arden have 384bit bus that is why.
Like you? Keep pushing that 9.2TF narrative but you don’t have the balls to bet, hilarious.
I had people telling me that that leak was related but it's not connected to final specs, for either machine. I believe it.
People bet over gaming machines?
![]()
I think AMD is actually direct customer. They cant give anyone x86 IP.
Wish there was some sort of beast mode for PS5
:/
There is.Wish there was some sort of beast mode for PS5
:/
He'll be there when it comes to promoting the launch.There is...
It's called Cerny when he puts all the arm chair analyst in their place and everybody ends up wanting to by a Playstation yet again![]()
the 5500xt has 24 CUs, 2 disabled right? how many work groups is that? 12? so 1 wgps = 2 CUs or 1 dual cu?
a console with 2 shader engines should be able to have at least 48 cus then. 52 if there are 12?
Bet who? Same song and dance as 2012 when Durango was leaked 1.2TFLike you? Keep pushing that 9.2TF narrative but you don’t have the balls to bet, hilarious.
Yea but nowhere in Github did Arden have 384bit bus that is why.
I think 512bit bus is even betterA 320 bit bus limits the amount of ram you can use. Unless the consoles are going to have a lot more ram than we think (say 40GB for a 320 bit bus) I think 384 bit offers the most reasonable amount without needing to have very high ram clocks to hit enough bandwidth to feed a 12 TFlop GPU.
Yup.Bet who? Same song and dance as 2012 when Durango was leaked 1.2TF
"No way is MS gonna let them have 50% more TF"
"Document is fake"
"Its early"
Look, bookmark this, I HOPE PS5 is better, even if by 1%. Why? Because I only have PS4 and I want my games there, and I want best version of 3rd party games on my default console. Aaaand because I would buy lockhart for MS exclusives.
BUT its not what numbers show. 6 month data is NOT old. If V dekvkits were out in summer, chip was already inside, there is nothing they can do. Clocks are high up anyway, so they cant raise it. Not that they have to, console looks beast. If MS had single SKU strat they would not be able to beat that, because its near the top we expected.
Understand its not narrative. Its internal AMD testing document for next gen consoles that was removed from twitter and github for a reason. I am trying to be objective, if Oberon was MS I would say the same thing.
Bet who? Same song and dance as 2012 when Durango was leaked 1.2TF
"No way is MS gonna let them have 50% more TF"
"Document is fake"
"Its early"
Look, bookmark this, I HOPE PS5 is better, even if by 1%. Why? Because I only have PS4 and I want my games there, and I want best version of 3rd party games on my default console. Aaaand because I would buy lockhart for MS exclusives.
BUT its not what numbers show. 6 month data is NOT old. If V dekvkits were out in summer, chip was already inside, there is nothing they can do. Clocks are high up anyway, so they cant raise it. Not that they have to, console looks beast. If MS had single SKU strat they would not be able to beat that, because its near the top we expected.
Understand its not narrative. Its internal AMD testing document for next gen consoles that was removed from twitter and github for a reason. I am trying to be objective, if Oberon was MS I would say the same thing.
I think 512bit bus is even betterbut yea, 384bit bus is 16mm² bigger then 320bit bus, and thats not small amount.
In addition, they might not even need it. 320bit bus gives you max 20GB, which if using 18Gbps memory is 720GB/s. Much more then enough.
Oberon shows 256bit bus and 18Gbps chips for 576GB/s max theoretical BW. Why would they go for higher if they dont need more RAM or BW? There is a sweetspot and I think they have hit it.
Yup.
The old Durango and Orbis leaks from June 2012 had them exactly where they ended up as. Xbox One said 1.1-1.2. Ended up being 1.3TF. And PS4 was dead on at 1.8TF.
Whomever did the leaks even got the ram boost leak right saying each system had 2-4 gb of ram, but they might be boosted to 8gb. Spot on again. Both were 8gb.
And that was about a year and a half before launch!
It was created in 2018 because Navi 10, which is in document, was released in july 2019 (and has most info by far actually). Last time it was updated was in June, and given that we have Ariel A0, Oberon A0 and B0 results, we know Oberon couldnt be from 2018 even if Ariel was (and it doesnt seem to be, its more likely to be January).So now you're being what you accused bitbydeath of, obtusive. The document was created in 2018, it's old. Matt has already implied that its not the final specs and he's glad "people are over the github", but here you are still pushing that narrative that it will be final specs. But you're too scared to bet because you yourself don't even believe in the bs you're spouting.
It was created in 2018 because Navi 10, which is in document, was released in july 2019 (and has most info by far actually). Last time it was updated was in June, and given that we have Ariel A0, Oberon A0 and B0 results, we know Oberon couldnt be from 2018 even if Ariel was (and it doesnt seem to be, its more likely to be January).
As for Matt or anyone from Resetera role playing insiders, I dont give a shit. If he knows the specs he should put them like they are in Github and not be vague, which he always is (even when he "denied" the leak).
Bet where moron? Yes, I believe the bs like AMDs official testing data and not in Oracle that is Matt from Reee.
Yap.Personal insults now?
They're already fixing things. Scalett had 64 rops yesterday, up to 96 today.
both should run 64 this gen with MS finally stepping it up.No way...
![]()
both should run 64 this gen with MS finally stepping it up.
Cause if it's 96, that's where Nvidia's big ass Titan cards are, which would be fucking nuts in a console.
I read it's 104 CUs in Scarlet on Techpowerup somewhere, at least in devkits.
They're already fixing things. Scalett had 64 rops yesterday, up to 96 today.
I'm not sure how they managed to pull it off but they have successfully stuffed the Era moderation team with Xbox Ambassadors. After one is promoted they start nominating and recommending their friends to the moderation team I suppose.
Ghostcrew for the record is not an Xbox Ambassador but his promotion remains a puzzle to many because he was notorious for anti-Sony baiting and had numerous infractions to his name. Then one month he suddenly starts acting overtly pro Sony. A few of us joked that his account had been hijacked because it was most unusual behaviour. The reason became clear after he was promoted to the moderation team. His buddies must have nominated him and so he adopted an overt stance of neutrality while privately he issues warnings and bans to PlayStation enthusiastic forum members, all the time ignoring similar infractions on the other side.
Era is just a pretence. More and more people are beginning to see it.
They took it from BastienTech, who took it from pastebin, the phony pastebin I created.They don't even link to any source (I'm guessing pastebin or reddit).
i think 64 is good tho.Yeah, treat that with a fair amount of skepticism. They sometimes post the specs of cards that were never released.
Personal insults now?
They don't even link to any source (I'm guessing pastebin or reddit).
They took it from BastienTech, who took it from pastebin, the phony pastebin I created.
Whose this sensitive ResetEra poster
Yap.
They took it from BastienTech, who took it from pastebin, the phony pastebin I created.
At present, Samsung's 7nm production capacity is roughly 150,000 wpm. It is also actively increasing 7nm capacity. According to industry rumors, Samsung plans to quadruple capacity in 2020. Nvidia and Qualcomm's next-generation products may be produced using Samsung's 7nm EUV process, but details remain to be seen.
TSMC's 7nm production capacity is fully booked. Relief may only come when Apple migrates to 5nm in 2H'2020. TSMC's 7nm capacity will increase to 140,000 wpm in 2H'2020. By order proportion, the ranking of customers using 7nm will be re-shuffled. AMD's orders are set to double, replacing Apple as the largest customer [for 7nm]. Huawei's HiSilicon and Qualcomm are similar by order proportion.