DJ12
Member
Don't forgetOsiris said 12.6 iirc.
BGs was hinting at 13 tflops, but this morning said he was just joking.

Don't forgetOsiris said 12.6 iirc.
BGs was hinting at 13 tflops, but this morning said he was just joking.
OK, guys, can anyone tell what does “1st hand info” or 2nd hand info or 3rd hand? Since I’m a foreign guy I do not understand what that means.
But you described a sizeable part of the demo you saw. That already is enough for higher ups to know you are talking about THEIR game. so they would know of a leakNot without blatantly giving up my source their first and last name and their place of work so .... no.
R600 explained it like 1000 times already.
First hand info would be from a dev themselves posting here who have access to devkits and specs.OK, guys, can anyone tell what does “1st hand info” or 2nd hand info or 3rd hand? Since I’m a foreign guy I do not understand what that means.
Lol At that point no one should care
First hand is a dev directly with a kit.
Second hand is a friend of a dev or journalist getting info from his source.
Third hand is the “witness” for the BS Trump Ukraine impeachment coup.
![]()
Photoshop it!Not without blatantly giving up my source their first and last name and their place of work so .... no.
Yeap but we don't know how many CUs Xbox Series X have.CU amount was determined by the number of stream processors which was 3584. Navi has 64 SP per CU, that's 56CUs.
Not only that, but he specified the role of the person who was showing him the demo (think he said it was the art lead or something).But you described a sizeable part of the demo you saw. That already is enough for higher ups to know you are talking about THEIR game. so they would know of a leak
The range is very wide. You could say scientifically that it can start between 9 and 15. And it can end between 19 and 21. Although it usually goes between 10 and 17. I personally think I started it around 11. I would like to add that the first menstruation usually occurs between 12-13, while the first ejaculation usually appears at 13. It is in the only average that we agree men and women. All this is real scientific data that subscribe to a trend, but obviously it is not a fixed norm, it is variable according to the person, but it would become a good reference.
[...]
Here you go...He seemed to take the bitch way out, so explain it.
The first devkit he used was at around 11;
one device now between 12 and 13
one device now at around 13
??
Here you go...
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
AMD has said PS5 has hardware ray tracing? The problem I have with this is he didn't strike me as all that confident about it. I know it might seem silly, but Microsoft and AMD have basically been screaming hardware ray tracing from the mountain tops for Xbox series X, whereas Sony so far...www.neogaf.com
That's fair but if we take some of those Navi efficiency curves into account. The sweet spot frequency with 56CUs would equate ~12TF.Yeap but we don't know how many CUs Xbox Series X have.
Neither the clock of the GPU for both Xbox Series X or GitHub.
Using memory clock to calc with the 56CUs the TFs is so wrong.
So Xbox Series X revealed specs did not confirm anything on GitHub because there is no related specs to compare.
People 100% believe it even though it contains errors.Here you go...
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
AMD has said PS5 has hardware ray tracing? The problem I have with this is he didn't strike me as all that confident about it. I know it might seem silly, but Microsoft and AMD have basically been screaming hardware ray tracing from the mountain tops for Xbox series X, whereas Sony so far...www.neogaf.com
That is not a explanation but a guess.Here you go...
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
AMD has said PS5 has hardware ray tracing? The problem I have with this is he didn't strike me as all that confident about it. I know it might seem silly, but Microsoft and AMD have basically been screaming hardware ray tracing from the mountain tops for Xbox series X, whereas Sony so far...www.neogaf.com
People 100% believe it even though it contains errors.
That is true... if you assume the GitHub is right and Xbox One X 12TFs you can easily find the clock.That's fair but if we take some of those Navi efficiency curves into account. The sweet spot frequency with 56CUs would equate ~12TF.
and does that make sense to you?Well, what I understood from BG is that ps5 had better performance but xbsx was more powerful.
Misdirection:Not only that, but he specified the role of the person who was showing him the demo (think he said it was the art lead or something).
Performance is not related to GPU power only...and does that make sense to you?
how can something more powerful offer worse performance?
its clear we need to learn from today and ignore everyone's riddles.
And they “both can’t be in production at the same time”, but somehow both names are in there to be pulled.
Come on now, while it's not looking good for Tommy, Heinsenberg was told by a SIE employee two or three weeks ago that the PS5 was 9.2 TFs, when it's 100% certain it isn't as BGs has stated many times now.
How convenient.
Especially the backup dancers, lol.
Thanks for thisActually what I said was.
"I'm going to help dig yourself out of this hole, remember when someone (I have no idea who) said they heard the machines were 11.6 and 12.4 sometime last year? That number was SPOT ON at that time with PSV having a slight lead but also having heat and sound issues. (Heat and sound are no longer issues) MS announces 12 TF hey look a .4 increase not bad at all they made it. BOTH are > 10 (said this last year) with PSV still having a slight advantage. (Said this last year also.) Both were aiming for a very high number (13) and from what I can gather one of them may have actually hit that number. (Its not MS) Either way BOTH consoles are stupidly powerful and still very close. 12 vs 12.4 or 13.2 (Within 1TF of the numbers with a . up in both cases not down) isn't bad at all."
That's me doubling down on 12.4 (which i said from the get go) or Higher. Nothing lower.
What does this mean?
this theory never made sense to me. Why is a fucking intern grabbing data for both Arden and Oberon? There is NO way AMD is allowing that kind of cross talk between engineers, let alone giving access to fucking interns.Here you go...
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
AMD has said PS5 has hardware ray tracing? The problem I have with this is he didn't strike me as all that confident about it. I know it might seem silly, but Microsoft and AMD have basically been screaming hardware ray tracing from the mountain tops for Xbox series X, whereas Sony so far...www.neogaf.com
You are free to believe whatever. A day ago you were excusing Tommy Fisher after I provided you proof of his garbage trackrecord.![]()
then why not say PS5 is more powerful? specs arent just GPU tflops. if the PS5 is doing everything else better like memory bandwidth, ssd speed and cpu speed then PS5 is the more powerful console.Performance is not related to GPU power only...
For example memory bandwidth play a big whole in performance so a 15TFs GPU can perform worst than a 14TFs just because the 14TFs has better memory bandwidth.
Now take in account CPU, SSD, memory, etc etc etc.
Plus the software side... the SDK, the API, etc.
It is perfectly possible to have more TFs and have less performance.
PS. I'm not saying PS5 have better performance with lower TFs... I'm just saying it is possible to that happen.
Maybe because everybody keep asking the dam TFs numbersthen why not say PS5 is more powerful? specs arent just GPU tflops. if the PS5 is doing everything else better like memory bandwidth, ssd speed and cpu speed then PS5 is the more powerful console.
cuz it looks exactly identical I’m just guessingThis is the one I am surprised we haven't seen pictures of yet floating around.
Has anyone ever been able to explain this?
People 100% believe it even though it contains errors.
Come on now, while it's not looking good for Tommy, Heinsenberg was told by a SIE employee two or three weeks ago that the PS5 was 9.2 TFs, when it's 100% certain it isn't as BGs has stated many times now.
Tommy might be an unwitting partner in some more Sony based trolling.
I think at the very least, should he choice to, he should stick around until the reveal, if anything he's said is true, then you cannot really argue he's a legit insider in my opinion.
LOL, 5 hours of investor related powerpoints aimed at the guests on site.I'm looking forward to what AMD reveal on Thursday, if it goes ahead![]()
Most common explanation has been that, someone made an error.
Besides, while I don't think it is wise to hand wave the Github data, one shouldn't treat it as gospel either. To this date, no one can point out the total CU count on Oberon (iGPU) that was being tested there, unlike Arden. We know the 18WGP was marked as "Full chip result", which would imply 36 active CUs but how many were disabled?
There is no product from AMD out there which has 36/36 active CUs, so it had to be using an iGPU which has some redundant CUs. Most people assumed it was a 5700 chip where 4CUs had been disabled, and logically it makes sense too, given the yields, and previous iteration we saw sharing the same codename. But, at the the same time, who can confidently say, that it wasn't a bigger NAVI chip? It's not like, there weren't in existence at the time, given the same repo gave us details about Arden.
The data is very informative, but it doesn't give us full picture. Those who are saying it does, are just trying to connect different dots and filling their own ideas when there is a gap.
to be clear, heisenberg was told ps5 was 9.5 tflops and we dont know if his source is from SIE.Come on now, while it's not looking good for Tommy, Heinsenberg was told by a SIE employee two or three weeks ago that the PS5 was 9.2 TFs, when it's 100% certain it isn't as BGs has stated many times now.
Tommy might be an unwitting partner in some more Sony based trolling.
I think at the very least, should he choice to, he should stick around until the reveal, if anything he's said is true, then you cannot really argue he's a legit insider in my opinion.
this theory never made sense to me. Why is a fucking intern grabbing data for both Arden and Oberon? There is NO way AMD is allowing that kind of cross talk between engineers, let alone giving access to fucking interns.
If it's a script pulling data then the script must have known the names of PS5 chips AND xbox chips. Why is he compiling all that stuff in one file? Who is he doing that for? the teams are separate. this is confidential stuff. if i was Sony, i would sue AMD for negligent behavior and charge this intern with corporate espionage.
LOL, 5 hours of investor related powerpoints aimed at the guests on site.
Good luck with that pal. Investors don't care about how pretty something looks, they care how much money they are going to make from it.
As an example of what to expect, please look here:
![]()
Thats a previous event, this is the current one:
![]()
Please note only a speaker symbol near the webcast link, they aren't even broadcasting a video of the event.