Topher
Identifies as young
If you can't see how it would be bad to only have one of Sony or MS in the higher end console gaming space you are crazy.
It would be awful.

If you can't see how it would be bad to only have one of Sony or MS in the higher end console gaming space you are crazy.
It would be awful.
Activision makes $2B a year in profit. They're doing great from a company POV. Individual suits not getting a premium on the share doesn't really count as they don't get paid because of any exclusivity deal.Because I’m sure folks at Activision wants to get paid. Through acquisition or exclusivity deals. I never meant that the exclusivity deal would be cheap. Just as costly as the acquisition, I would imagine.
I seriously don’t care. I’m just having fun on this forum. I can’t remember the last Activision game I purchased.
I don’t get what you’re saying. This move either way wouldn’t change that. Sony has a majority lead over the competition right now. Xbox isn’t going anywhere.If you can't see how it would be bad to only have one of Sony or MS in the higher end console gaming space you are crazy.
It would be awful.
Nah. Funniest of them all are the ones hypothesizing on how Activision will take revenge on Sony if the deal is blocked. As if Activision would change their entire business model and tank their stock price just to teach their most lucrative partner a stern lesson.The funniest are the ones that care way too much about this. They care so much about a mega corp buying a mega corp and fear mega corp will keep video games from other mega corp.
It’s fucking video games.
MaybeIt has me thinking what the actual market share is (excluding mobile)
Sony - 35%
PC - 30%
Nintendo - 25%
Microsoft - 10%
Complete guesses but probably not too far off
Lol really?? Obviously you don't really have anything to say. So take your time and think about it before replyingYou know there's many more ways to game than just on consoles, you know that right?
WTF?
![]()
As multiple people (including me) have said it before.Because Sony is nearing a monopoly. I don't know why you guys are that surprised. Im not. This what I argued from the start. Can you not imagine 10 years into the future with current trends? Google, Amazon, MS are all going to eventually get tired of lighting money on fire.
This is the cringiest and biggest bullshit being spun.A close second are the people trying to spin the narrative to the deal being necessary to prevent a monopoly.
Perhaps, or more than likely Sony would squash Nintendo down to first party and some Indies.This is wrong thinking. There is still Nintendo if they decide to up their game. Also you have to remember that Sony is “also” competing with PC. They can’t fall too far behind or folks will just switch over to PC.
Your the one who isn't thinking.Lol really?? Obviously you don't really have anything to say. So take your time and think about it before replying
You haven’t missed anything …I blocked the Miku guy a few weeks back.
It has me thinking what the actual market share is (excluding mobile)
Sony - 35%
PC - 30%
Nintendo - 25%
Microsoft - 10%
Complete guesses but probably not too far off
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.Agree with Tom. This "Microsoft is going to sell off Xbox" narrative is a knee-jerk reaction that gets regurgitated every few years. It makes no sense.
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.
To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.
Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.
They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.
Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.
I'm not talking about the hardware. The entry price would still be reasonable.. it's the rest where the creep would start.Your the one who isn't thinking.
Raising prices to high would cause a repeat of the PS3.
While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.
To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.
Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.
They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.
Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.
This applies to software as well.I'm not talking about the hardware. The entry price would still be reasonable.. it's the rest where the creep would start.
Xbox is a big operation; there will be very few buyers. Suppose Tencent is not interested in the deal. That leaves very few buyers on the market who can and would want to buy Xbox.Why would they bother with 3rd party and almost no returns. More likely they shutdown the hardware division and sell the studios to tencent. Make a clean break instead of pissing money away being a 3rd party with zero upside for a company the size of Microsoft.
That's all I tried to say. And it wasn't a new narrative. That was my personal rationale for being in favor of this deal since it was announced. Pretty difficult to even speak in this thread with all the insults being thrown around, so I'm glad you were allowed to make the argument at least.While it is how you say, but the situation is very different this time.
To put it into a summarized perspective: they have spent over $10 billion dollars in the division, and XBS is selling worse than Xbox One.
Nobody saw that coming. Honestly, even I didn't. In all prediction threads around launch, I always said that XBS would sell 60-70 million consoles. Now it's tracking to sell around ~40-45 million consoles. Xbox One sold ~52 million consoles.
They can eat the cost only so much and for so long. They did consider shutting down Xbox around 2016-2017, so it's not completely baseless or without precedence. It's a possibility that's stronger than ever.
Having said that, I still believe that Xbox would first go multiplatform rather than shutting down immediately.
After the NPD leak, we have the US data now. We also have the UK data by the 1M and 2M milestones threshold. UK and US cover more than 75% of the Xbox market. We also have Japan's data. So that's like 80% of the total Xbox console sales accounted for.Hard to say about Xbox sales since we don't have numbers. My guess is Xbox Series is actually outselling Xbox One (when aligned) by quite some margin. Also, Tom is right. The investments made into Xbox are concrete examples of Microsoft's committment to Xbox. Xbox isn't a Zune or Nokia situation. It is a significant source of revenue with profitability. I'm guessing the margins are not what they would like them to be, but I see no reason for the Xbox division to be in doubt.
If there is no competition for Sony, we are fucked.
WTF?
![]()
Xbox is a big operation; there will be very few buyers. Suppose Tencent is not interested in the deal. That leaves very few buyers on the market who can and would want to buy Xbox.
After the NPD leak, we have the US data now. We also have the UK data by the 1M and 2M milestones threshold. UK and US cover more than 75% of the Xbox market. We also have Japan's data. So that's like 80% of the total Xbox console sales accounted for.
We also have PS's official data that we can use to easily calculate Xbox's console sales data. A few GAF posters have already done it actually and compared it with Microsoft's submitted documents to regulators.
We can say with a very high confidence level that XBS is now tracking behind XBO.
Where? PC. Where the barrier to entry is significantly higher. Or Nintendo, who would quickly find themselves squeezed by a Sony gaming behemoth. I.E a very limited library of 3rd party games.This applies to software as well.
Raising the prices to high would cause the userbase to find other means of gaming.
I'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.That's all I tried to say. And it wasn't a new narrative. That was my personal rationale for being in favor of this deal since it was announced. Pretty difficult to even speak in this thread with all the insults being thrown around, so I'm glad you were allowed to make the argument at least.
Yeah - and the concession will be divestiture.Most of UK game journalists think this deal will go through with concessions.
Exactly Microsoft can't keep trying to buy its success by buying out the competition or all the IP it has to create its own success the hard way by fucking working and earning it like a lower class/middle class workerI'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.
As for the reason for favoring this deal -- I think it's just wrong. What if Xbox's situation doesn't improve after ABK? Like it didn't improve after Zenimax? Should they be allowed to acquire other studios -- like Ubisoft, Rockstar, CDPR, Capcom, etc. -- until they are able to compete head-to-head with PlayStation?
That cannot be the case.
Xbox's problems are not going to be solved by this acquisition. Just like those problems didn't go away with Zenimax. Xbox needs to improve its business model, make great games, focus on proper marketing, localization efforts, etc.
At the moment, they have more studios and IPs than PlayStation. They have all the resources they can possibly to need to compete. They just need to put those efforts in the right direction.
WTF?
![]()
I’d be down.Nintendo about to open that cheque book.
Nintendo playing the long game to re-acquire Rareware.It be funny if deal falls through Microsoft do decide to shutdown the Xbox Division in a few years and then Nintendo buy the Xbox Division. A funny full circle moment given MS tried to buy Nintendo
Yes, it was. We also discussed it even in this thread I think. There was a thread IIRC but found this post for you.I haven't seen this NPD leak. Was it posted on GAF?
Yeah - and the concession will be divestiture.
Yeah - and the concession will be divestiture.
Yes, it was. We also discussed it even in this thread I think. There was a thread IIRC but found this post for you.
US data:
- Xbox Series LTD = 8,763,000
- PS5 LTD = 10,592,000
PS4/Xbox One split in the US was 53:47. PS5/XBS split in the US is now 55:45, so they have already lost 2 percentage points of market share in the US. Considering that PS5 has gained market share from Xbox despite selling less than PS4 guarantees that XBS has sold less than Xbox One in the US.
Sony's CFO has also shared similar statements that validate this data.
![]()
PS5's Market Share Is Expanding Significantly in Xbox's Backyard
Sony takes control in USAwww.pushsquare.com
Xbox Series X has also not sold 2 million units in the UK yet even after 116 weeks. Xbox One reached 2 million units in the UK in 104 weeks. So XBS has also sold less than Xbox One in the UK.
We also did a bunch of other calculations and estimates and found Xbox Series consoles around 17 million consoles sold LTD (18 million at best). Microsoft also hasn't released any statement that "Xbox Series is still the best selling Xbox console" in their earning reports, further validating this.
I don’t get what you’re saying. This move either way wouldn’t change that. Sony has a majority lead over the competition right now. Xbox isn’t going anywhere.
Is this the new “Nintendo is doomed”?
I thought there were some posts saying Ms May sell of xbox or leave the industry.
Ignore me I'm obviously high lol
Yeah - and the concession will be divestiture.
I personally wouldn't support other large MS acquisitions, but that's just my opinion on it. I think they needed that 1 killer third party game on Gamepass. When 360 was thriving, they had the Call of Duty marketing rights as well. I do think they see Call of Duty as being somewhat fitting with their brand identity the one time they had some success. What I assumed was going to happen was Call of Duty staying multiplat like they said. Xbox would have marketing rights, and could say every year at E3 it's on Gamepass. That alone would be enough in my opinion to give them a fighting chance even if the game remains available for PS, which I think it would.I'm always up for an actual, meaningful conversation if you want. Difference of opinion is okay.
As for the reason for favoring this deal -- I think it's just wrong. What if Xbox's situation doesn't improve after ABK? Like it didn't improve after Zenimax? Should they be allowed to acquire other studios -- like Ubisoft, Rockstar, CDPR, Capcom, etc. -- until they are able to compete head-to-head with PlayStation?
That cannot be the case.
Xbox's problems are not going to be solved by this acquisition. Just like those problems didn't go away with Zenimax. Xbox needs to improve its business model, make great games, focus on proper marketing, localization efforts, etc.
At the moment, they have more studios and IPs than PlayStation. They have all the resources they can possibly to need to compete. They just need to put those efforts in the right direction.
Then my job here is doneAw man. WheneverDenchDeckard posts, I’m going to see that guy’s face from now on
I think MS’s next target should be From Software.