mansoor1980
Gold Member
That NPC really looks creepy, especially eyes. Reminds me of this guy
![]()

That NPC really looks creepy, especially eyes. Reminds me of this guy
![]()
Its 4k 30Asking since it got lost in the live thread, they havent confirmed 30 or 60fps on console have they? If its 30 i might just break my xbox
If the trailer doesn’t show where it is running on, always assume it‘s running on PC.Was this footage taken from Series X or PC?
If the trailer doesn’t show where it is running on, always assume it‘s running on PC.
I’m sure it will. It’s not really that much of a graphical looker compared to say Hellblade. It’s the scale that makes it a lot more impressive. I’m sure SX will just have lower shadow resolution, draw distance and framerate.Hope SX looks representative of that
I apologize for parachuting into the discussion, but I've never seen a truly alien intelligent species. They look like aliens, with their different bodies, but they still have bilateral symmetry, carry tools in their hands, and act and think like human beings.???
Are you saying nothing in fiction has good intelligent aliens or am I misinterpreting? Star Trek did fantastic with that. Mass Effect in the video game space absolutely KILLED that,
Because that’s boring. And I have a sinking feeling that the mundane stuff is gonna be boring af in this game.Nothing shown convinceed me this isn't just a ripoff of NMS. Why did they avoid showing how quests and missions work if they are even present here or anything substantial about the combat gameplay? I don't care about scanning things all day.
This is a Bethesda game. Its story quest line alone will set it apart from the terrible “story” of NMS. I’ve purchased NMS on 3 different platforms, and there’s no way you could get to boot up NMS after seeing the Starfield direct.Nothing shown convinceed me this isn't just a ripoff of NMS. Why did they avoid showing how quests and missions work if they are even present here or anything substantial about the combat gameplay? I don't care about scanning things all day.
Not saying you're wrong but Bethesda games main quest lines stopped being good post Oblivion. Side quests are still good but for the most part dropping as well. In FO4, Far Harbor is the only good story from the DLCs. Maybe the robot one if you like nostalgia from 3.This is a Bethesda game. Its story quest line alone will set it apart from the terrible “story” of NMS. I’ve purchased NMS on 3 different platforms, and there’s no way you could get to boot up NMS after seeing the Starfield direct.
Switch is a shitty tablet, zelda even running on that thing is a miracle even if it runs like shit.Sooner than expected. Looked great.
Take a deep breath. People were able to enjoy Zelda on the Switch.
Switch is a shitty tablet, zelda even running on that thing is a miracle even if it runs like shit.
What is the excuse for not having a 1440p60 option on the SeX?
I'm gonna play on pc at 4k60 so these are not my problems but still...
I use a controller on pc.Every Bethesda game I've played on PC has had horrible mouse lag/smoothing. I really hope they make the mouse/keyboard experience good this time.
I've been avoiding watching any footage etc but from screenshots and discussion it seems like they are building a no mans sky clone?
I've been avoiding watching any footage etc but from screenshots and discussion it seems like they are building a no mans sky clone?
Anyone else surprised how bad the graphics look for a 30fps game?
I vaguely remember finally meeting my son in Fallout 4, skipping all his dialog, shooting him in the face then looting his corpse.In FO4, Far Harbor is the only good story from the DLCs.
I think how good a story is largely depends on who Bethesda hires as a writer and frankly I don't know who the one in Starfield is.
To me the models, materials and environmental density feel last gen. The quality of the lighting also leaves a lot to be desired, has that oversharpened Bethesda look.No, the graphics look amazing outside of some poor face models. It's open world, with proper physics applied to all objects. I find it mighty impressive.
Does the shootings look a little like Cyberpunks?Ok i finally saw the deep dive, well the game looks fairly incredible, not gonna lie.
Some of the writing and the human models seems the only thing a bit off.
Even the shooting seems competent at the very least.
They definitely saw NMS and said, "Yea, we can fuck them up."Starfield looks phenomenal.
Super excited to play it.
It looks like high budget No Mans Sky in all the right ways.
I'm simply saying people will be able to enjoy it, same way they enjoy Zelda.Switch is a shitty tablet, zelda even running on that thing is a miracle even if it runs like shit.
What is the excuse for not having a 1440p60 option on the SeX?
I'm gonna play on pc at 4k60 so these are not my problems but still...
Switch is a shitty tablet, zelda even running on that thing is a miracle even if it runs like shit.
What is the excuse for not having a 1440p60 option on the SeX?
I'm gonna play on pc at 4k60 so these are not my problems but still...
The graphics are amazing in most areas - but the character models/animations look bethesda-y and definitely don’t look next gen in all respects. I don’t think it’s running 30 simply due to that though - I think it’s the lighting being global illumination and the systems at play so it’s cpu bound as people say. Kind of expected for something of this scope to be that framerate on console - I do believe we’ll be seeing more of this as the consoles age and games are built more for high spec pc’sAnyone else surprised how bad the graphics look for a 30fps game?
I like NMS, bought it 3 times. Starfield is 100x more fun looking and actually is a role playing game.I've been avoiding watching any footage etc but from screenshots and discussion it seems like they are building a no mans sky clone?
For an RPG, the shooting looks better than it needs to be.Ok i finally saw the deep dive, well the game looks fairly incredible, not gonna lie.
Some of the writing and the human models seems the only thing a bit off.
Even the shooting seems competent at the very least.
Yeah problem with NMS is that the resource gathering aspect is the game. I wish it gripped me more - cus the tech is really cool - but I need some sort thing to drive me story wise, world wise. It doesn’t feel alive in any way - just like I’m hopping from random planet to random planet with no real goalI like NMS, bought it 3 times. Starfield is 100x more fun looking and actually is a role playing game.
NMS is a space resource gathering and exploration game. That’s about it. Resource gathering and exploration look to be just parts of Starfield.
I think it looks just a bit worse than cyberpunk but better than f4.For an RPG, the shooting looks better than it needs to be.
It kinda does but you can only fully judge gunplay when you actually play the game.Does the shootings look a little like Cyberpunks?
Awesome showing from Xbox. Probably the best showcase since their 2020 one.
With all that was shown, we still have the following yet to be shown.
Indiana Jones
State of Decay 3
Perfect Dark
Contraband
The Outer Worlds 2
Wolfenstien 3
Gears 6
Zenimax Online New IP
Project Mara
New id game
New Roundhouse game
New Double Fine games
That's one hell of a road map for Xbox.
I mean I loved fallout 4 so I’m not concerned - how has this all been done before though? Where?Sinse its a Bethesda game I will wait for release and see reviews...do not know why some people tag it as GOTY just because the show.
Hope B learned and its not a glitch fest and also really worked on story and dialogs..because if the story is like Fallout 4 the game will be lame.
Basically what we saw has been done before but if they manage to put all those elements to work along the game will be good.
You could say the same for Skyrim by 2011 standards. I do not think the scope of the game is to its detriment at least conceptually. If Bethesda can technically pull this off on most PCs and the Xboxes, i welcome it.Too big honestly. Why do they feel games need to be this huge? Could've made 5 normal games in this size.
This is intimidating and scary to start playing a game this huge. I think it's size is t it's detriment
Hope so. Skyrim seems tiny and manageable in comparison.You could say the same for Skyrim by 2011 standards. I do not think the scope of the game is to its detriment at least conceptually. If Bethesda can technically pull this off on most PCs and the Xboxes, i welcome it.
The point of a huge world (or a huge galaxy in this case), is that you can get lost in it and basically play your own version of the game, defined by your own little unique experiences. And you're supposed to do it over several days/weeks/months/years, across multiple playthroughs and sessions. It can become a mini second life for you that you enjoy on your own terms (even more so with mods on PC). There are people who have put 100s of hours put into Skyrim but have not finished the main storyline. Because they don't have to, because all the other content is equally immersive and enjoyable. That's the point of a large game. That you can choose to experience any portion of it, large or small, regardless of the total amount of content it has. And there are people out there like me who love to experience games like that.
Perhaps you're fear stems from thinking of huge open worlds that are horribly devoid of unique content like the last 3 Assassin's Creed games. That is because Ubisoft are not good at populating an open world. Bethesda have proven that they are (atleast with Skyrim).
I think Starfield will be the same. Hopefully, better.