It failed on PC.Good. Let FF7 remain a failure in the eyes of Square.
It's crazy to me they just couldn't remake the game as was with better graphics like the OG tech demo for PS3.Good. Let FF7 remain a failure in the eyes of Square.
Nope. But after playing both FF7 games, I can’t say they were good. I couldn’t even finish Rebirth on PS5. It was just boring and filled with minigames.It failed on PC.
Do you think xbox would fare better![]()
Good. Let FF7 remain a failure in the eyes of Square.
I mean they couldn't even "remaster" the old 2D games without them running like shit so you cant really depend on square being a smart, functional company.It's crazy to me they just couldn't remake the game as was with better graphics like the OG tech demo for PS3.
Keep that off my Switch 2!Right, because SE is too busy porting FF7R to Switch 2 (where it will actually sell)
Games are not only excellent to most but also critically acclaimed.Nope. But after playing both FF7 games, I can’t say they were good. I couldn’t even finish Rebirth on PS5. It was just boring and filled with minigames.
Millions love Taylor Swift and Justin Beber, doesn’t make her music appealing to me.Games are not only excellent to most but also critically acclaimed.
Right just like millions liked the wii.Millions love Taylor Swift and Justin Beber, doesn’t make her music appealing to me.
I thought the pixel remasters were already known to be going to xbox?
I played the PC demo earlier this week and yeah, dreadful. God speed, Xbros.Ffxvi is a terrible game.
So now the narrative will be:
FF XVI good
FF VII remake bad
Critically acclaimed means not much. Movies with Oscars are also critically acclaimed, yet many people prefer to watch Fast and the Furios in space.Games are not only excellent to most but also critically acclaimed.
Different industry.Critically acclaimed means not much. Movies with Oscars are also critically acclaimed, yet many people prefer to watch Fast and the Furios in space.
Both are about consuming entertainment media, also many games got enough cutscenes to be >4 hours movies these days and critics love those story games.Different industry.
Critically acclaimed usually means that the quality, objectively, is good. It doesn't always have to do with popularity. You're confusing two different things.Critically acclaimed means not much. Movies with Oscars are also critically acclaimed, yet many people prefer to watch Fast and the Furios in space.
And yet it's rated 4.52 stars on the playstation store. It's not a bad game, people are so hyperbolic now.Critically acclaimed means not much. Movies with Oscars are also critically acclaimed, yet many people prefer to watch Fast and the Furios in space.
No, that's still subjectively. A few hundred people, if at all, are responsibe for the Metacritic score. But millions of gamers buying and playing games tell you what the better game is.Critically acclaimed usually means that the quality, objectively, is good. It doesn't always have to do with popularity. You're confusing two different things.
TLOU is more critically acclaimed than Genshin Impact or Fortnite. It means that TLOU is objectively better at what it is trying to be, yet Genshin Impact or Fortnite are more popular / have more users.
One is of a better quality; the other is more popular.
Totally different industry.Both are about consuming entertainment media, also many games got enough cutscenes to be >4 hours movies these days and critics love those story games.
I was speaking in general, i haven't played FF.And yet it's rated 4.52 stars on the playstation store. It's not a bad game, people are so hyperbolic now.
Like Fortnite?Right just like millions liked the wii.
Besides...different markets.
Most praised music is trash.
Usually when a game is highly praised its because it's good.
Eh. I couldn’t be bothered to finish either, but I did buy FF16 and it’s season pass on a deep sale.So now the narrative will be:
FF XVI good
FF VII remake bad
Haven’t played Genshin, but Fortnite is not worse than TLOU.Critically acclaimed usually means that the quality, objectively, is good. It doesn't always have to do with popularity. You're confusing two different things.
TLOU is more critically acclaimed than Genshin Impact or Fortnite. It means that TLOU is objectively better at what it is trying to be, yet Genshin Impact or Fortnite are more popular / have more users.
One is of a better quality; the other is more popular.
And they are "critics". Hence, the word "critically acclaimed" - as in a game is "acclaimed by critics."No, that's still subjectively. A few hundred people, if at all, are responsibe for the Metacritic score.
No, it tells us what the "more popular" game is. Not what the "better game is."But millions of gamers buying and playing games tell you what the better game is.
Fortnite and wii seem to be the same demographic.Like Fortnite?
Eh. I couldn’t be bothered to finish either, but I did buy FF16 and it’s season pass on a deep sale.
Some people seem to think that what a few self-acclaimed experts/critics say is set in stone. It isn't, it's still just the opinion/the taste of some people.And they are "critics". Hence, the word "critically acclaimed" - as in a game is "acclaimed by critics."
It tells you both, because the masses tell you what is good.No, it tells us what the "more popular" game is. Not what the "better game is."
You're still confusing and mixing the two (very different) things.
Eh. I couldn’t be bothered to finish either, but I did buy FF16 and it’s season pass on a deep sale.
Sure, if only for upcoming PS5 releases.Could be true with Tom Warren saying everyone should watch Xbox at TGS.