For example, there were some of our factories where there were no women's bathrooms and so no women. Now we've changed that all factories offer equal facilities.See, I would then ask what anti-women policies did you have in place preventing women from being hired in your factories. Since you can pay them 80% of what you pay a man it's just financial suicide to NOT have an all women labor force!
I would also wonder WHY you specifically want more women in your factories. What skills do they alone possess or what attributes do they alone bring? Small enough to fit inside a tight machine? Light enough to stand atop a flimsy scaffold? Less squeamish about doing something unethical or unpleasant?
I'm being semi-facescious to illustrate how odd it is, objectively, to just say "more women in our factory labor force, yay!" as a goal in and of itself.
The ChiCommie bastards make games people want and enjoy thoughCHAI NAH. The last frontier.
Except if you do as he says (hiring based on talent and passion) you're supposed to not care about where people you hire come from, talent should be everything.Because people with different backgrounds bring their different life experiences, which believe it or not, is usually a net positive.
If DEI wasn't a thing in Software, you wouldn't have random tech prodigies who have no formal education getting into top jobs because of their experience. Software development isn't like medicine or engineering where formal training is necessary.
Software development requires problem solving, life experience funnily enough contributes fairly effectively to one's ability to solve problems.
Different life experience = different problem solving skills.
I'd rather work with someone that knows how to code rather than someone with "life experiences", whatever that meansBecause people with different backgrounds bring their different life experiences, which believe it or not, is usually a net positive.
Well, they could still get experience first like everyone else, and then once they've proven themselves, get to those top jobs of they really deserve them.If DEI wasn't a thing in Software, you wouldn't have random tech prodigies who have no formal education getting into top jobs because of their experience.
It is necessary! I've worked with people with no training but a short course and it was pain. It requieres a lot of experience for sure, but a good intial training and good understanding of the fundamentals is a must.Software development isn't like medicine or engineering where formal training is necessary.
Nah. As I said before, good knowledge and experience > whatever experiences you had in your life. Those are fine but if you don't know how to code properly, you are worthless.Software development requires problem solving, life experience funnily enough contributes fairly effectively to one's ability to solve problems.
Different life experience = different problem solving skills.
Sony Corporate Report 2024
Create Infinite Realities
![]()
![]()
DEI, Climate Change
![]()
Operating Income Margin of 10% or More
![]()
PlayStation Sales and Operating Income
![]()
Profit Growth Driven by G&NS and I&SS
![]()
Sales by Segment
![]()
Share Buybacks, Payout Ratio
![]()
Dividends
![]()
Senior Executive Remuneration
![]()
Of course not.Don't get it twisted, Spiderman didn't sell 15 million units because of DEI.
I wouldn't say "small part". His name is literally in the title. It was always a risk that Miles would actually replace Peter. Perhaps it's a smaller part than it is in say the Spider-Verse movies. But it isn't little.People just tolerated that because it was only a small portion of a bigger part.
Who says they don't know code? What do you think coding is exactly?I'd rather work with someone that knows how to code rather than someone with "life experiences", whatever that means
Which is the point. Not turning your nose up at candidates based on their background, but by their ability. It wasn't such a long time ago that extremely talented people would get turned down for positions just because they didn't "fit in". You can insert whatever group it is that you want.Well, they could still get experience first like everyone else, and then once they've proven themselves, get to those top jobs of they really deserve them.
The wizkids who were programming in COBOL on their dad's computer from the age of 14 won't need a training course to learn how to develop. The certificate in this instance is just a check-box activity. This is why FAANG companies often don't mandate degree level education for their developer roles, but will instead look at your github and or ability to solve a coding problem in the interview.It is necessary! I've worked with people with no training but a short course and it was pain. It requieres a lot of experience for sure, but a good intial training and good understanding of the fundamentals is a must.
Again, who says that they don't know how to code? Are you just assuming they don't because DEI resulted them in being hired?Nah. As I said before, good knowledge and experience > whatever experiences you had in your life. Those are fine but if you don't know how to code properly, you are worthless.
You're missing the most obvious thing here. The most talented and passionate people don't all have the same background.Except if you do as he says (hiring based on talent and passion) you're supposed to not care about where people you hire come from, talent should be everything.
So many people who decry DEI have literally no understanding of what it actually is. Probably because they’re getting lit up by grifters on social media.It wasn't my intention to be vague, so I can give further details if you want (within reason).
Fully agree with the rest of what you said. We've been working to make sure our company is welcoming to LGBT people and they they can be themselves. But there's no measure or target of how many LGBT people work for us.
Its the latest boogieman to blame.So many people who decry DEI have literally no understanding of what it actually is. Probably because they’re getting lit up by grifters on social media.
I'm beginning to wonder if any of them have been in a corporation before.You guys are so sheltered you can't even tell what is a genuine commitment and what is corporate speak for "We want to qualify for tax incentives worldwide."
Or..just saying, or become one of them.Oh man. This absolutely kills my switch to the playstation eco system.
Now I'm stuck between a console on life support, a DEI machine, or the wild west.(PC)
That fucking switch 2 better be amazing.
Where's the proof.Been months since I logged in the forum, mostly to avoid getting banned back when the MS-Activision deal was going on because I'm a pony
This news is F#cking wild, like they're totally oblivious to the devs and pubs going down in flames thanks to DEI and politics (Californian politics mostly, F#ck You ROTW, you're not diverse enough)
It's over, seems like I'll have to witness Playstation going down in flames as well
Me in a third world country trying to enjoy gaming like I used to, when I read this news:
![]()
Because they are half of the potential label force in most countries and there shouldn't be a restriction on what women can possibly because it isn't "gender appropriate."See, I would then ask what anti-women policies did you have in place preventing women from being hired in your factories. Since you can pay them 80% of what you pay a man it's just financial suicide to NOT have an all women labor force!
I would also wonder WHY you specifically want more women in your factories. What skills do they alone possess or what attributes do they alone bring? Small enough to fit inside a tight machine? Light enough to stand atop a flimsy scaffold? Less squeamish about doing something unethical or unpleasant?
I'm being semi-facescious to illustrate how odd it is, objectively, to just say "more women in our factory labor force, yay!" as a goal in and of itself.
Wolverine: Hey Cyclops, beam that laser in my ass please! Dont be shy. I'm immortal!Good heavens, I forgot about Wolverine.
Damn, Wolverine is so fucked...![]()
May I ask what are the tax incentives?You guys are so sheltered you can't even tell what is a genuine commitment and what is corporate speak for "We want to qualify for tax incentives worldwide."
I dont know where i saw it but there was a study about what level of income people have what type of console.Great test for the ‘go woke go broke’ crew - if they think they can take on the Sony diehards they’re about to realise they’ve met their match![]()
This is not just Sony. Go check out the MS agenda. Nintendo seems like the purest outside of Steam, but then you gotta stick with Linux to get rid of MS again.Well I’m not interested in any of that stuff. Maybe PlayStation isn’t right for me?
I think you’re going to be disappointed, but we’ll see. I’m not at all convinced the “protests” on either side have done a thing. Concord didn’t sell because it was shit, not because of some woke boycott. Hogwarts sold well because it was a good game/popular IP - any hope the ‘other side’ had of bringing it down because of JK Rowling was pie in the sky.I dont know where i saw it but there was a study about what level of income people have what type of console.
Playstation owners are mostly middle class either libertarian or conservative.
Based on that yeah you will meet your match sony cuz we actually vote with our wallets
I'm moving to the fat man. Can't take much more of this shit.This guy just said the quiet part out loud. "We are actively pushing divisive propaganda in our corporate products at the behest of ESG social impact investment." Sounds like it's time for some of you to sell your PS5 and join us over at Team Gaben. After all, we eventually get the same games you do anyway. I don't personally play them myself, but the option is always there.
What I'm saying is that if you only care about talent and passion, you automatically include people from every background. You're not engaging them because they have this particular background but because this background translates well into something useful for the game. And that's the difference with what happening these days where particular people are hired just because they're part of a certain minority, allowing the company to brag about being inclusive and receiving ESG funds.You're missing the most obvious thing here. The most talented and passionate people don't all have the same background.
If you only hire the people right in front of you, you are missing out on a whole lot of talent.
You guys are so sheltered you can't even tell what is a genuine commitment and what is corporate speak for "We want to qualify for tax incentives worldwide."
Who says they don't know code? What do you think coding is exactly?
Which is the point. Not turning your nose up at candidates based on their background, but by their ability. It wasn't such a long time ago that extremely talented people would get turned down for positions just because they didn't "fit in". You can insert whatever group it is that you want.
all of them watched the Ring VHS?Tell me with a straight face that this team has a lot of different backgrounds.
They even wear the same clothes, like fucking stormtrooper clones.
![]()
The hypocrisy in the diversity discourse is nauseating.
The world has gone mad with DEI. It’s like a drug these people can’t quit.Why? Why the need to have people from different backgrounds? I'd say talent and passion are much more important than race and background, specially when it comes to software development.
Yeah lots of DIVERSITY in that pic. If it were all men they would have a problem with that im sure. Not INCLUSIVE enough for them.Tell me with a straight face that this team has a lot of different backgrounds.
They even wear the same clothes, like fucking stormtrooper clones.
![]()
The hypocrisy in the diversity discourse is nauseating.