what part of "personal and ideal definitions do not count" are you not comprehending
Oh so like the others, you don't want to define black. You are acting as if were being coy yet you refuse to explain it.
what part of "personal and ideal definitions do not count" are you not comprehending
why has Bish forsaken us?
That's the irony of all this. These characters can't black in a game that borrows heavily from African American culture. As in it pervades every aspects of it. No they're "tanned" east Asians not the people whose some of which culture they borrow heavily from.
What on earth are some of you guys smoking.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people
And just to humor you further, here's a question for you
If you use the say the "black person" to anyone during a conversation, in pretty much any country, what do you believe the chance is of them mistaking them for a southeast asian?
If you aren't asking for what like 90% of the population knows the word to mean, then why are you even asking at all.
Oh so like the others, you don't want to define black. You are acting as if were being coy yet you refuse to explain it.
You were talking about fucking textured hair to represent black people in game that has squid hair. Did you even think that arguement through.I didn't mention why because i never typed this nonsense
seriously, do any of you read before you start typing? Like, at all?
I'm arguing on the side of people who complain about the representation because they don't feel it's adequate. But I also mention compromise for those who generally don't care that much.
what part of "personal and ideal definitions do not count" are you not comprehending
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people
And just to humor you further, here's a question for you
If you say "black person" to anyone during a conversation, in pretty much any country, what do you believe the chance is of them thinking you're talking about a southeast asian?*
If you aren't asking for what like 90% of the population knows the word to mean, then why are you even asking at all. Are you planning on only ever discussing this on NeoGAF or something?
In America, those folks will be "mistaken"as black. Which is why the term "black diaspora" exists. White people made dark skin a bad thing in society through culture and laws, so I'm sure they'll be less angry about being called black than you are.I didn't mention why because i never typed this nonsense
seriously, do any of you read before you start typing? Like, at all?
I'm arguing on the side of people who complain about the representation because they don't feel it's adequate. But I also mention compromise for those who generally don't care that much.
what part of "personal and ideal definitions do not count" are you not comprehending
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_people
And just to humor you further, here's a question for you
If you say "black person" to anyone during a conversation, in pretty much any country, what do you believe the chance is of them thinking you're talking about a southeast asian?*
If you aren't asking for what like 90% of the population knows the word to mean, then why are you even asking at all. Are you planning on only ever discussing this on NeoGAF or something?
Lol, if you think Japanese youth came up with all that on their own, and not copying another culture like they do with all the other trends.From what I understand, Splatoon borrows more from Japanese youth street culture than western black culture.
Oh so like the others, you don't want to define black. You are acting as if were being coy yet you refuse to explain it.
From what I understand, Splatoon borrows more from Japanese youth street culture than western black culture.
You have no clue what you're talking about and everyone is wishing you would just come out and say it so we can move on and hopefully the thread will die before more ignorance flares up.It's a social definition, it means what society wants it to mean. Which also means it's inherently complex and context sensitive.
Which is probably why you desperately want me to attempt to explain in a few sentences a concept that has an entire wiki article dedicated to it.
From what I understand, Splatoon borrows more from Japanese youth street culture than western black culture.
This is the "hero vanishes" timeline
I don't even mind people interpreting them as representation of any other people with dark skin. The ridiculous part is people believing "black" can only mean Africa-American/of African descent/Aboriginal/etc., believing that calling them black means "fuck anyone who isn't this very particular type of black," and saying that they can't be interpreted as African-American representation.
From the wiki page you linked:
"Black people is a term used in certain countries, often in socially based systems of racial classification or of ethnicity, to describe persons who are perceived to be dark-skinned compared to other given populations."
There are black people all over the world. The southeast asian people you mention are black. No matter how narrow you're understanding of that concept is, no matter what you immediately jump to upon hearing the word "black," it doesn't change that there are inklings in Splatoon 2 and MK8D who are black.
Dude linked to the wiki page without reading the first sentence. Of course he's going to refuse to lock down his definition without scrutinizing every detail of his post first; just give him time
It's a social definition, it means what society wants it to mean. Which also means it's inherently complex and context sensitive.
Which is probably why you desperately want me to attempt to explain in a few sentences a concept that has an entire wiki article dedicated to it.
You were talking about fucking textured hair to represent black people in game that has squid hair. Did you even think that arguement through.
How exactly do you think a black person would be represented in such a world?
My issue is more of the use of "tanned" east asians rather than the fact east asians can feel represented by these characters. Because it's not like east asians don't come in all sorts skin shades and who face their own problems of discrimination. No they're "tanned or ganguro" because they can't accept anything else.
It's a social definition, it means what society wants it to mean. Which also means it's inherently complex and context sensitive.
Which is probably why you desperately want me to attempt to explain in a few sentences a concept that has an entire wiki article dedicated to it.
My man...
As a brit. Educate me on society's definition of Black please
My issue is more of the use of "tanned" east asians rather than the fact east asians can feel represented by these characters. Because it's not like east asians don't come in all sorts skin shades and who face their own problems of discrimination. No they're "tanned or ganguro" because they can't accept anything else.
My man...
As a brit. Educate me on society's definition of Black please
None of these people ever feel the need to say what they think it means but they have absolutely no problem discrediting someone elses.
Funny how that works.
If people had come into the thread to say that going by their personal understanding of "black" meant something other than what's said in the OP, this would've been different. There could've been an understanding reached about how different countries/regions generally have slightly different usages of "black" in regard to people.
What actually happened was a select handful of posters went straight into aggressive indignation mode and showed their asses trying to explain how these squid can't be black, or can't be considered representation of black people the world over. Ironically, they believe calling the squid kids black is exclusionary to certain people with dark skin in the real world even though these posters are themselves being exclusionary by saying these inklings are just tanned japanese people (squid mutants?).
Read that benign, innocuous OP and tell me it warranted any garbage like this
![]()
That's true; I hadn't even considered that angle.
Read the first sentence of the wiki page you linked, my man. Tell me how the thread title goes against that.
My dude.
If you don't understand how nonsensical of a question this is, then i'm just not bothering replying to you anymore.
You're a brit? Excellent; go outside and strike a conversation with someone outside of a forum board for a change, then you'll have your answer, okay?
If a developer really wanted to make a character "black", they could just include ethnic hair textures and slap literally any skintone options on that they wanted, and nobody would have to debate anything. Everything with brown/dark skin isn't "BLACK", please calm down.
My dude.
If you don't understand how nonsensical of a question this is, then i'm just not bothering replying to you anymore.
You're a brit? Excellent; go outside and strike a conversation with someone outside of a forum board for a change, then you'll have your answer, okay?
Right. I have two Filipino friends who claim black. I don't knock em, fault em, or argue with them because they are black. They respect their blackness, and they wouldn't call themselves 'tanned'.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nintendo isn't as stupid or clueless as some of your guys are making them out to be. They are not trying to represent tanning culture or ganguro, regardless of how committed you get to your faux expertise about japanese culture and societal views; those bits of knowledge are blinding you.
Ethnic hair texture..lol. The fuck does that mean?
Brillo pads and the worst of sheep wool. It's the only way some people can identify black hair. The overt racism in this thread is amazing. You'd think people would be more aware, but nah. A black character in a Nintendo game is almost as bad as that black guy in the Shadow of War trailer.
The overt racism in this thread is amazing. You'd think people would be more aware, but nah. A black character in a Nintendo game is almost as bad as that black guy in the Shadow of War trailer.
lol I from all this silliness I forgot the fact that they actually don't have hair but tentacles on top of their headI legit want to know what a tentacle version of this would be. Hell, I'd actually want it to be in the game as a "hair" option.
I legit want to know what a tentacle version of this would be. Hell, I'd actually want it to be in the game as a "hair" option.
is that really true?People get really angry if black gamers identity with a character and will do their best to deny them that small bit of happiness lol.
Even trotting out arguments like "they're not even human" or "It doesn't take place on earth", well neither does Witcher but look how hard people argued why black people can't exist in that game. Amazing how "White" is super exclusive in real life but in videogames and anime everyone is assumed white regardless if the story takes place on earth, if they're human or otherwise.
lol I from all this silliness I forgot the fact that they actually don't have hair but tentacles on top of their head
I legit want to know what a tentacle version of this would be. Hell, I'd actually want it to be in the game as a "hair" option.
lol I from all this silliness I forgot the fact that they actually don't have hair but tentacles on top of their head
We're talking about a community centered on spending thousands of dollars to stay indoors and press buttons all day. You really think these people get out, much less have actual meaningful relationships with black people, assuming any live where they do? Honestly, this shit is almost guaranteed.
is that really true?
It's the funniest thing they don't even have human hair and yet people are talking about afro's to designate black characters.
The fuck? Are you guys all high?
How do inklings get haircuts if their hair is flesh?
is that really true?
Then why did you come into this thread imply he character was not suppsoed to Africans as well as any other darker skinned race by saying this.
Since anecdotal evidence is enough for you, what're your thoughts on this poster's experience?:
Right. I have two Filipino friends who claim black. I don't knock em, fault em, or argue with them because they are black. They respect their blackness, and they wouldn't call themselves 'tanned'.
And what are your thoughts on the conversations I've had with other black people in the U.S., from France, Morocco, Guinea and Mexico (as a black person, no less) in which they considered "black" to mean "people with dark skin"?
If you say "black person" to anyone during a conversation, in pretty much any country, what do you believe the chance is of them thinking you're talking about a southeast asian?*
If you aren't asking for what like 90% of the population knows the word to mean, then why are you even asking at all. Are you planning on only ever discussing this on NeoGAF or something?
We're not asking for a general "definition" we're asking specifically for your definition. So tell us what it is.Me implying what my personal interpertation is in this context doesn't change the meaning of the word, nor does it inherently oppose anyone elses.
i'm guessing this thought has never crossed your mind? Or anyone else's mind who is adamant about arguing with me? You guys seem way more interested in an argument of semantics then you are about actually having a conversation about anything that's going to go anywhere.
The same way I feel about my Cambodian friends who are all darker than me who do not identify as "black", would laugh in your face for trying it, and would rather be called "Cambodian".
or the conversations i've had with dark-skinned people from the Dominician Republic who DONT identify as "black" either. Who would only be "mistaken" for "black" in the states, and is a distinction that some people in the states actually would take offense to.
or some creoles in Louisiana, some of which i probably share relation with, who also do not identify as "black", and would rather be called creole.
My feelings are that language is complex and context sensitive. There is no 100% correct usage of the word "black people". Even this definition of "people with dark skin" is offensive to many people around the world, of whom i'm assuming you might have not known about. It requires context, and me assuming a context is no more of an offense then you assuming in broad strokes who it includes and doesn't include, just because you falsely think you're being more inclusive for it.
Somewhere, this thread has just flipped from arguing about accurate representation to the arguing about accuracy itself. I don't even know why I bothered.
My dude.
If you don't understand how nonsensical of a question this is, then i'm just not bothering replying to you anymore.
You're a brit? Excellent; go outside and strike a conversation with someone outside of a forum board for a change, then you'll have your answer, okay?
If you don't see the characters in the OP as black, I'm confused as to why you would try to ruin it for the people who do and are happy with it. What do you gain from doing that?
Me implying what my personal interpertation is in this context doesn't change the meaning of the word, nor does it inherently oppose anyone elses.
i'm guessing this thought has never crossed your mind? Or anyone else's mind who is adamant about arguing with me? You guys seem way more interested in an argument of semantics then you are about actually having a conversation about anything that's going to go anywhere.
The same way I feel about my Cambodian friends who are all darker than me who do not identify as "black", would laugh in your face for trying it, and would rather be called "Cambodian".
or the conversations i've had with dark-skinned people from the Dominician Republic who DONT identify as "black" either. Who would only be "mistaken" for "black" in the states, and is a distinction that some people in the states actually would take offense to.
or some creoles in Louisiana, some of which i probably share relation with, who also do not identify as "black", and would rather be called creole.
My feelings are that language is complex and context sensitive. There is no 100% correct usage of the word "black people". Even this definition of "people with dark skin" is offensive to many people around the world, of whom i'm assuming you might have not known about. It requires context, and me assuming a context is no more of an offense then you assuming in broad strokes who it includes and doesn't include, just because you falsely think you're being more inclusive for it.
Somewhere, this thread has just flipped from arguing about accurate representation to the arguing about accuracy itself. I don't even know why I bothered.
So what's this guy? I'm curious
![]()
Now we trying to get deep. As a cajun creole, I identified as black until recently when I did some more reading and found out how Africans see us, as those taken away, so I identify as African American now, but I'm still black and proud in a country that​ is systematically trying to erase anything about my people while reaping the rewards of our labor to build this shit hole of a nation. But you're ​not talking about this, because you don't know shit.or some creoles in Louisiana, some of which i probably share relation with, who also do not identify as "black", and would rather be called creole.
"Mako tanned"
Your logic was terrible the moment you tried to argue with "ethnic hair" and "black people with a wig/perm".
Also, Black =/= Ethnicity. Dominicans are black, lol. They're Spanish speaking black people, they share an island with Haiti for goodness sake.
It just sounds like you and your black friends feel uncomfortable claiming their blackness. If someone from Egypt called themselves black, I wouldn't go, "No you're EGYPTIAN!" just like if someone asked me my race, I wouldn't say, "Brazilian." I'd say I was AfroLatino/AfroBrazilian or Black.
People are triggered by the word black, because it has negative connotations, stigmas, and prejudices throughout ALL cultures. So of course many people will gasp at the idea that they could possibly be grouped in with "those blacks."
You're literally proving everyone's point, lol.
Thanks for the laugh. No really.
Your definition of black requires me to talk to someone. Hmm, well I guess that isn't working for me. ELI5?
I really want to hear this complicated and sensitive answer for what black is.
We're not asking for a general "definition" we're asking specifically for your definition. So tell us what it is.