EverydayBeast
ChatGPT 0.001
A big step from PS3 and not counting 4 lol
Dude it happened this gen with the cross platform games, and the difference between the 360/ps3 and the XB1/PS4 was much bigger than the differece will be between the X/Pro and next gen consoles.
Good post. Yeah i feel base console users will mostly move to next gen over time. I just feel the niche nature of the X and Pro will mean they will get continued support, due to the fact that they aren't a threat to next gen. Plus the X and Pro must be into a few million sales between them by now, which i would of thought would be enough to continue getting support well into next gen. I feel next gen consoles at BEST will be twice as powerful as the X, and that kind of difference isnt big enough that cut down versions of next gen games cant be made for the X and Pro, it happened this gen with the PS3 and 360 and the difference there was much bigger than will be between the X/Pro and next gen consoles.
'One console to play them all'We all know that what we want and what we'll get will be two very different things.
I'd be happy with PS5 if it was something just a bit more powerful than the X1X, but also able to play all previous Playstation console's games, physical and digital (no PSNow rubbish). One box to play the entire history of Playstation games. Woot! I'd pay up to $1000 for that. Yes I would. The space under my TV is getting quite cluttered (PS2/PS3/PS4pro....PS1 by proxy) and it would be nice to reduce all that to just one console to play them all.
The thing is, to most people the X and the Pro won't be their frame of reference. The Xbone S and the PS4 will be and going from one of those to a true next generation machine will probably be pretty eye opening.
What............What if they announce the next gen for Xmas 2019 as Xbox 1XS AND an Xbox 1X Pro? The 1XS is an even smaller water-cooled 1X spec'd machine at $399 and the 1X Pro has 10-12 teraflops of power sitting at $499 with complete bc.
Sony Ps5 is bc to PS4 and has 10-12 teraflops at $499 launch. Both Sony and Ms have same amount of ram but Ms ram is faster so they can say most powerful system like they promised.
Would everyone be upset with those specs? As a 1X owner I'd be fine with that. Course I'd buy the 1X Pro to upgrade and sell my 1X to reduce out of pocket costs.
Depends on when they actually launch, and in what fashion they actually arrive. The switch has shifted things under the feet of sony and Microsoft and is a genuine game changer.
I wonder what the absolute maximum Nintendo could smash into switch2 if it launches 2 years after the other 2.
All I know is I have purchased the most games I ever have on the switch. The ability to game at home, or on the go without it being a dumped down game, is intoxicating.
No more than the difference from Xbox One to 1X. I expect to see a couple years of cross-platform games, not really that different than what we have now with the mid generation refreshes.
If Ray tracing was added it would reduce the resolution to 1080p which for most consumers would feel inferior regardless of how its technically superior.Well if the Xbox x is anything to go by ... a pretty big leap from the base consoles. But it won’t seem like it unless raytracing gets added.
Would love to get native 4k/60 fps standard, but probably will have to settle with 4k/30 in most games. In terms of raw power I suppose will sth similar to GTX1080 in next-gen consoles, meaning 10-12 teraflops.
I mean, an Xbox One to Xbox One X size leap would be massive. It was a 4.6x leap. A similar leap over Xbox One X would put us at 28TF, which I don’t think even the most optimistic ones here are dreaming about. That jump is probably an anomaly, because the OG Xbone was severly underpowered to save budget for the ill advised Kinect pack in, and Xbox One X was them going truly balls out. Xbox One X is a remarkable achievement, as RDR2 shows.
there will never be a bigger leap than moving from the 6th generation to the 7th
playing online for the first time is one of the best experiences of gaming
but in terms of graphics and performance, i'm expecting something similar to 7th to 8th, not that big, at least not as big as the one from 6th to 7th
i know but there was very limited games who supported online and most people didn't even know about online until the 6th generation6th gen had online though?
Funny people said the same about the PS4With the PS5 I'm just not sure if Sony have the engineering chops to maintain PS4 BC AND make a console powerful enough to be a noticeable leap over the PS4.
I'm not sure on what Sony will do, but Xbox 5 will be a noticeable leap over Xbox One.
With the PS5 I'm just not sure if Sony have the engineering chops to maintain PS4 BC AND make a console powerful enough to be a noticeable leap over the PS4.
I full admit I'm not very technically savvy when it comes to this kind of thing and I'm basing my speculation on nothing more than the PS4 Pro. Cerny himself basically said part of the reason the Pro is just a PS4 with an extra GPU duct taped to it is to make sure BC with base PS4 isn't broken.
With the new Sony move controllers & VR headset if these are bundled with the PS5, do you think the PS5 is going to be slightly lower spec than Xbox to keep the costs down? It could be the same as the Xbox one & Kinect trade off.
Funny people said the same about the PS4
maybe not in the first year, but they wil in the years afterI'm concerned not many games will actually take advantage of the hardware.
I agree, I really don't see it being much more. The X is a year old and is like 500 bucks. Double that is the best we can hope for without it pricing itself out of the market10tf seems like a good guess. I could go as high as 12. I think more than that is wishful thinking.
PCs brute force current gen games, games are not designed around PC hardware so PC games are still console games with a fancier pain coat on themYour not going to see that much difference at all. Top end PC gaming still has issues hitting 4k 60 for modern games (with single cards).
We don't need next gen for that, a revision will suffice, just release the PS4 Pro Pro and Xbox XXWhat will probably happen for consoles is all games will be able to play a native 4k 30 without checkerboard rendering.
No matter the CPU, 60 fps will never be the norm on base fixed spec, developers will always push the GPU to its limits.They won't get 4k 60 unless they dump a CPU in the next system which is doubtful
Your not going to see that much difference at all. Top end PC gaming still has issues hitting 4k 60 for modern games (with single cards).
What will probably happen for consoles is all games will be able to play a native 4k 30 without checkerboard rendering. They won't get 4k 60 unless they dump a CPU in the next system which is doubtful.