Devs still listen to them, especially foreign devs looking to get into the western market.But how much influence do game journalists actually still have? Who reads them? Who takes their opinion seriously anymore? Almost nobody.
I follow some non-political YouTube gaming channels, but the opinion of friends and people on this forum is much more important to me.
I like this woman, she seems to be doing some interesting, er, Tweets? Research? Blogs? Hardcore journalism?
Although on the surface the industry seems to have been sucked into the far-left's twisted ideology, it is probably a case that "normal" people just keep their mouths shut to keep their jobs.
Eurogamer's the worst because they're British, they shouldn't be like those whacky Californians, but they are full on far-left. Shame, because I enjoyed their humourous writing style before they went over the edge.
Well, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
While this place does lean right now, I wouldnt call it another resetera. You can still talk about the other side of the coin here. You might get heckled by a few people, but you can actually argue your point of view without fear of being banned. That alone makes this place leagues better than era.Well, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
If this was the case you'd already be marked or receiving a ban. This is a thread calling a quacking waddling webbed-footed bird a duck, nothing more. So it's not "same thing, other side".
The world needs to loosen up and Neogaf has been pretty chill with all since for as long as I've been browsing here.
I'm anxiously waiting for a warning or a ban for speaking the truth. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Neogaf is not chill at all lately, it's all about left wing and Sjw that want to ruin videogame industry, this is another article added to the pile.
I have absolutely no desire to 'destroy' progressives... I think mostly people just want a little balance or some representation of other views.Well, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
???I'm anxiously waiting for a warning or a ban for speaking the truth. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Neogaf is not chill at all lately, it's all about left wing and Sjw that want to ruin videogame industry, this is another article added to the pile.
You see left wing conspiracy where there isn't, just like they see right wing conspiracy where there isn't. From my experience reading variuos videogame websites skills have always been rewarded and i see there is enough balance in right wing and left wing leaning videogame journalists presence.
I'm anxiously waiting for a warning or a ban for speaking the truth. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Neogaf is not chill at all lately, it's all about left wing and Sjw that want to ruin videogame industry, this is another article added to the pile.
You see left wing conspiracy where there isn't, just like they see right wing conspiracy where there isn't. From my experience reading variuos videogame websites skills have always been rewarded and i see there is enough balance in right wing and left wing leaning videogame journalists presence.
Well, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
I'm a big fan of her stuff over the past year or so, really excellent writing and on twitter shes just a joy. I will always like the fact that despite being trans, doesn't use it to get an agenda across and actually calls other woke trans people out of their shit, its so refreshing
Your anxiety is a reflection of you, not this community.I'm anxiously waiting for a warning or a ban for speaking the truth. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Neogaf is not chill at all lately, it's all about left wing and Sjw that want to ruin videogame industry, this is another article added to the pile.
You see left wing conspiracy where there isn't, just like they see right wing conspiracy where there isn't. From my experience reading variuos videogame websites skills have always been rewarded and i see there is enough balance in right wing and left wing leaning videogame journalists presence.
If no conservative writers exist on Kotaku, that is not necessarily indicative of a specific policy for hiring. It stands to question how many conservative writers would want to write for Kotaku. When a publication has a clear political leaning, then it does not require any discriminatory effort on the side of the HR department to have a staff that does not contain people who are (openly) opposing the politicial leaning of the website.
Replace 'conservative writers' with 'muslim writers' and get back to me.If no conservative writers exist on Kotaku, that is not necessarily indicative of a specific policy for hiring. It stands to question how many conservative writers would want to write for Kotaku. When a publication has a clear political leaning, then it does not require any discriminatory effort on the side of the HR department to have a staff that does not contain people who are (openly) opposing the politicial leaning of the website.
The “clique” is composed of journalists from well-known gaming and tech websites: among them Kotaku, Polygon, Vice, Ars Technica, GameDaily, Gamespot, Eurogamer and loads more.
I wouldn't expect many muslim writers wanting to write for a specifically Christian or even atheist publication either.Replace 'conservative writers' with 'muslim writers' and get back to me.
Also the article is about a clique that extends beyond Kotaku, so your strawman does not accurately account for the substance of the claims:
A curious argument.If no conservative writers exist on Kotaku, that is not necessarily indicative of a specific policy for hiring. It stands to question how many conservative writers would want to write for Kotaku. When a publication has a clear political leaning, then it does not require any discriminatory effort on the side of the HR department to have a staff that does not contain people who are (openly) opposing the politicial leaning of the website.
asking for an openly conservative writer at Kotaku.
Certainly not any gaming publication (that would be pretty easy to do actually, since there are clearly right-wing publications). She starts it with "his" publication (so Kotaku) and then names three more specifically progressive* websites (Polygon, Vice, Eurogamer) and, admittedly, two publications that I would not know have any political leanings (Gamespot, Game Revolution, the latter I do not even know at all). As a kotaku writer for many years, he can hardly be expected to know the policies or political views of authors of other websites, so him being unable to answer this question with names likely comes down to him being unable to answer this question with names from his own publication, which is not a strong argument.She didn't, she asked for an openly right leaning or centrist at any gaming publication.
Certainly not any gaming publication (that would be pretty easy to do actually, since there are clearly right-wing publications). She starts it with "his" publication (so Kotaku) and then names three more specifically progressive websites (Polygon, Vice, Eurogamer) and, admittedly, two publications that I would not know have any political leanings (Gamespot, Game Revolution, the latter I do not even know at all). As a kotaku writer for many years, he can hardly be expected to know the policies or political views of authors of other websites, so him being unable to answer this question with names likely comes down to him being unable to answer this question with names from his own publication, which is not a strong argument.
How about Sophia Narwitz from Niche Gamer?I don't know if you genuinely can't understand what she meant in that Tweet, but it's very obvious she means "name any" when she ends the Tweet with "Or..." and trails off. Ask her if you want, she's in this thread at times.
If Jason can't think of a single openly right-leaning gaming writer from a gaming publication, her point kinda stands. I certainly can't.
How about Sophia Narwitz from Niche Gamer?
I can name a grand total of five different video game journalists in English speaking countries. I know Jim Sterling, Sophnar, Schreier, Moriarty (and not for his journalism, but the woman free time thing) and that Celebi guy.You can't see how responding with "what about you?!" to that kind of question only reinforces the point? You had such difficulty thinking of one that you had to fall back on the person asking the question? That's a high school ploy, come off it.
If you really have to play that game, name another, and no, Colin does not belong to a publication.
I can name a grand total of five different video game journalists in English speaking countries. I know Jim Sterling, Sophnar, Schreier, Moriarty (and not for his journalism, but the woman free time thing) and that Celebi guy.
It's not a highschool ploy either, Sophnar is a right wing author who I know writes for video game publications, so clearly she qualifies.
Schreir has really taken his ego to his head he put out a few books and thinks he's the shit in gaming. News flash Kotaku's best articles over the past few years is some guy reviewing japanese food.
It depends on what question is being asked. If the question actually is "are there any right wing game journalists anywhere on earth" then if the person asking is a right wing game journalist, it is obviously the most reasonable answer to say "yes, you are one". "Why aren't there more black people in the field" can of course not be answered by "you are in the field", it is not a logically sound answer to the question. But that is a completely different question.And I can't name many more than that either, but the point stands, and I bet both of us would struggle to find more. She's asking Jason Schreier though, probably the most famous game journalist on the planet, who does know these people. And instead of instantly dismantling Narwitz's point and publicly demonstration that she's wrong, by simply pointing a few out, he turns and runs with his tail between his legs because he can't.
Notably, he also doesn't say "what about you?", because she qualifies, but she's the one asking the question. Try and pull that "but what about you?" shit if, say, a black person, gay person, or woman minority asks why there aren't more fellow minorities in their field and see how it works out. It's such a juvenile tactic to get out of answering a question.
Gaf has no particular political stance, though if you'd like to talk politics there is a board for thatWell, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
That's kind of the issue. That sort of logic makes sense with a news site FOR politics; this is video gamesIf no conservative writers exist on Kotaku, that is not necessarily indicative of a specific policy for hiring. It stands to question how many conservative writers would want to write for Kotaku. When a publication has a clear political leaning, then it does not require any discriminatory effort on the side of the HR department to have a staff that does not contain people who are (openly) opposing the politicial leaning of the website.
Discrimination based on politics happens when an employer makes job decisions because of an employee’s political beliefs, party affiliation, or civic activities. An employer that, for example, refuses to hire applicants who vote Republican, fires anyone who supports gun control, or demotes someone who runs for the local school board is engaged in political discrimination.
That's taking it to the bit of extremes. While I'll do that myself, politics and religion SHOULD be kept separate. Trying to use religion as analogy for your stance is....not a good stance. It's injecting more conjecture into the discussion than the base question.I wouldn't expect many muslim writers wanting to write for a specifically Christian or even atheist publication either.
And I was answering to Sophnar's tweet reply, where she counters the claim her article is nonsense by asking for an openly conservative writer at Kotaku. It is not a comment on the article at large.
I think that's part of the point she's trying to make; regardless of political affiliation, writing about video games is writing about entertainment media. There should be absolutely no reason to have politically leaning video game news outlets; it's video gamesCertainly not any gaming publication (that would be pretty easy to do actually, since there are clearly right-wing publications). She starts it with "his" publication (so Kotaku) and then names three more specifically progressive* websites (Polygon, Vice, Eurogamer) and, admittedly, two publications that I would not know have any political leanings (Gamespot, Game Revolution, the latter I do not even know at all). As a kotaku writer for many years, he can hardly be expected to know the policies or political views of authors of other websites, so him being unable to answer this question with names likely comes down to him being unable to answer this question with names from his own publication, which is not a strong argument.
* I wouldn't call any of those websites actually left leaning, because they usually do not discuss important issues such as fiscal policies and social security systems. Some writers may be right wing on such issues, but I doubt that Sophnar was interested in people who are right wing on such issues.
And I can't name many more than that either, but the point stands, and I bet both of us would struggle to find more. She's asking Jason Schreier though, probably the most famous game journalist on the planet, who does know these people. And instead of instantly dismantling Narwitz's point and publicly demonstration that she's wrong, by simply pointing a few out, he turns and runs with his tail between his legs because he can't.
Notably, he also doesn't say "what about you?", because she qualifies, but she's the one asking the question. Try and pull that "but what about you?" shit if, say, a black person, gay person, or woman minority asks why there aren't more fellow minorities in their field and see how it works out. It's such a juvenile tactic to get out of answering a question.
It depends on what question is being asked. If the question actually is "are there any right wing game journalists anywhere on earth" then if the person asking is a right wing game journalist, it is obviously the most reasonable answer to say "yes, you are one". "Why aren't there more black people in the field" can of course not be answered by "you are in the field", it is not a logically sound answer to the question. But that is a completely different question.
Come on. You're not that much of a robot.
Yes, discriminating according to political beliefs when making hiring decisions is not OK, but it is OK to write a political publication in the scope of video games.That's kind of the issue. That sort of logic makes sense with a news site FOR politics; this is video games
Video games is not politics, it's entertainment software. They wouldn't have any standing in court; it would be straight discrimination based upon political beliefs. Even if you're a politically leaning it'd be hard. Just because someone is republican doesn't mean they can't write from a democratic perspective.
I was not bringing up religion though,That's taking it to the bit of extremes. While I'll do that myself, politics and religion SHOULD be kept separate. Trying to use religion as analogy for your stance is....not a good stance. It's injecting more conjecture into the discussion than the base question.
Some people are interested in political issues in video games, so since there is a market for such publications, of course there is a reason to have such publications. If you want to read non-political video game outlets, you can do that as well. But then you'd not be able to resort to Kotaku or Polygon for that, which, I think, is fair in itself.I think that's part of the point she's trying to make; regardless of political affiliation, writing about video games is writing about entertainment media. There should be absolutely no reason to have politically leaning video game news outlets; it's video games
You are arguing it is a bad business decision to write a political video game website. If it is a bad business decision (which I do not agree with, in principle), then there's no reason to complain about it either, because such websites will vanish on their own for not having a large enough audience.On both sides of the fence, these people claiming to be diverse and inclusive (Both Dem and Rep) are doing dumb bull shit like this, and making it to where moderates, want nothing to do with either one.
Plus, you severly limit your consumer base, as well as hiring base if this whole network of people is true; give it 50% dem and 50% rep and if you make a game directed towards either one, you're likely cutting your potentional by half.
If someone in a debate asks me more than twice "does X exist" where that person actually is an example for X, I wonder what kind of debate that person wants to have. I would probably not answer the for a third time "yes, you are an example of X", I would answer why the hell the person is so full of himself and constantly asks me to verify he exists.Yoshi
Yoshi He does have a point; I wouldn't say it's juvenile tactic, but one that does display that you didn't take the time necessary to form a good response
You could also get disqualified in an actual debate meet up if you fell back to those tactics more than say, twice, without it being an obvious hypocritical statement from the opponent's statements
I'm anxiously waiting for a warning or a ban for speaking the truth. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Neogaf is not chill at all lately, it's all about left wing and Sjw that want to ruin videogame industry, this is another article added to the pile.
You see left wing conspiracy where there isn't, just like they see right wing conspiracy where there isn't. From my experience reading variuos videogame websites skills have always been rewarded and i see there is enough balance in right wing and left wing leaning videogame journalists presence.
If Sophnar was asking "why are there not more trans game journalists", then "you" is not a logically sound answer to that. If Sophnar asked "are there any trans game journalists", then "you" would be a logically sound answer.imagine if Narwitz asked "why aren't there more trans game journalists?" and someone's genuine response was "well what about you?". Can you honestly tell me with a straight face that that's a good answer to that question and that the person isn't just trying to come up with a clever response that doesn't address the issue?
Well, it seems like Neogaf is the right wing Resetera. Despite you guys claiming you just want to have fun with videogames, i can see politics and SJW related articles on gaming side growing at an alarming rate.
For a place that wants to be chill and just have fun you have quite the persecution complex and are obsessed with destroying progressives, just like the other forum is obsessed with destroying "nazis".
If Sophnar was asking "why are there not more trans game journalists", then "you" is not a logically sound answer to that. If Sophnar asked "are there any trans game journalists", then "you" would be a logically sound answer.
The only doctor that diagnosed me with that isPapa
Right...Yes, discriminating according to political beliefs when making hiring decisions is not OK, but it is OK to write a political publication in the scope of video games.
Ah, my apologies,I was not bringing up religion though,DunDunDunpachi did. I was merely answering that I do not think my claim would be wrong if applied to religion rather than politics, i.e. someone will probably not want want to write for a publication that opposes one's views diametrically.
Ok, granted, I'll give ya thatSome people are interested in political issues in video games, so since there is a market for such publications, of course there is a reason to have such publications. If you want to read non-political video game outlets, you can do that as well. But then you'd not be able to resort to Kotaku or Polygon for that, which, I think, is fair in itself.
Uh; there is something to complain about. It still exists, and is happeningYou are arguing it is a bad business decision to write a political video game website. If it is a bad business decision (which I do not agree with, in principle), then there's no reason to complain about it either, because such websites will vanish on their own for not having a large enough audience.
Also, shout out forPersonally, I'm not as polarized as most in this.
If a developer wants to inject their political ideas in their games, that's perfectly fine, and I support it. Games are a form of freedom of speech, and developers should be able to put some of themselves into them, and express their ideas. That's true for most creative endeavors.
On the other hand, I know for a fact that many developers do NOT want their games to make political statements, either because they do not want to be divisive, or simply because they don't care for politics (like me), or they just want to tell a good fictional story, or many other reasons.
That is also entirely good and something I personally support. I find the attempt by certain press to deride those developers absolutely disgusting and shameful.
The one thing I do not condone at all is journalists forcing their own politics on game developers that aren't willing. That's a massive no no for me.
Right...If someone in a debate asks me more than twice "does X exist" where that person actually is an example for X, I wonder what kind of debate that person wants to have. I would probably not answer the for a third time "yes, you are an example of X", I would answer why the hell the person is so full of himself and constantly asks me to verify he exists.
Source: https://www.rt.com/news/481220-games-journalism-clique-industry/sophnar0747
More at link......
Game Journalism, Game Development, and gaming in general (communities and forums) are full of White Liberals. Not liberals of all backgrounds... White Liberals. And while they may claim minorities among them, the bulk of their minorities are White Liberal LBGTQ.
I can't help but wonder if it isn't subconscious fantasy roleplay that is at the center.
Remember when gaming and gamers all had a negative impression from non gamers? Back 10,15,20 years ago. All gamers were fat and lazy... "better get off your ass and do something with your life". Live in their moms basement. Basically all gamers a decade ago had the man babies label of today. Anyway that nerd culture was mostly white. Not like today where everyone is playing video games, from kids in 5th grade to professional athletes.
And what did these now Game Journalist and Game Developers play years ago. Mostly games that somehow involves you the player being a No One. A No One who is tasked with saving the Damsel in Distress.
![]()
Yeah just like that lol. It was they (Mario) saving all the minorities (Princess) from the bad guys. Now they are writers or developers who are saving those who aren't able to speak up.
Why is it that the people who are constantly talking about the need for representation of minorities in the medium have no minorities among their ranks except for Whites who have minority status because they are LGBTQ?
Why do these Whites have such a superiority complex? Makes me wonder...