TBiddy
Member
That’s what I JUST saidwere you talking to me, mista?
No, I was talking to the guy I quoted.
That’s what I JUST saidwere you talking to me, mista?
No, I was talking to the guy I quoted.
I like that you call this person "it" hahait replies to posts from here and resetera on its twitter. How crazy is that. Who is even listening to the rants of this person. And even more crazier thing, people share its posts here.
Fact of the matter is, it’s not. For the most part it will be, but the main worry, those first party titles? It will be a lot more.
The whole point of making a fuss about it is because people were scared about the whole “works on old Xboxes” line. If you look at the info drop from the other day, pretty much everything was said to combat rumour. Games on old hardware, tf count, rdna etc... it was all just telling people to chillax.
Ok hear me out.
Microsoft partners with Valve.
Xbox Series X come with Steam pre-installed.
Valve VR Hardware. Xbox Compatible.
Day. One.
Then I wake up.
Wake up, Chief.
Doubt
They're going to keep the process streamlined. We're not getting anymore cases like Forza Horizon 2. We have backwards compatibility now.
You didn’t quote anybody in that post? But no worries chief, game on!
You probably have him on ignore then (It's Coulomb_Barrier)![]()
You’re thinking about it all wrong. The BC stuff works when you don’t have a future system to sell or a higher end product to use.
Do you really think they will make games for the Xbox one and port up? Honestly?
My friend at *redacted fp studio* has mentioned they are making their game for the SX, and then another part of the studio is essentially making a different version for the older hardware. That’s two separate games tailored to two machines, but same sku. Same as Forza Horizon 2. Of course his studio may be having an easier time, it’s easier to do this sort of thing without realistic real life looking assets. From what I can gather though this is the norm to leverage the higher spec of the machine.
Can you imagine the uproar if these games were Xbox one games that simply ran in 4k/60 with a few basic changes? It wouldn’t make sense.
God what is with this place and using your fake insider knowledge to back up this garbage?
Yes, the games are fundamentally going to be held back by the One, hence why they're doing to drop it 1 or 2 years down the line. No, it's not going to be as simple as making it for the One and scaling up and they're done. There are plenty of ways they can take advantage of the Series X without wasting resources designing a second version.
BTW some of you are not quite grasping what smart delivery is. It means that you will get the correct version of the game no matter what console you are on, with a single copy of the game.
A lot of you are comparing this to pro and x releases, but that’s not quite right. A more appropriate analogy would be Forza Horizon 2, as that was actually two totally different engines and games, by two totally different teams, for two totally different systems.
So while yes it will cover things like Bc and FC, it will also help with unique skus for each console.
Bypassing "bad intention" when choosing frames, one could say yes. Talent is important. Very closely followed by time (optimization) and budget. But...![]()
I think that the talent is more important than TF.
Ok hear me out.
Microsoft partners with Valve.
Xbox Series X come with Steam pre-installed.
Valve VR Hardware. Xbox Compatible.
Day. One.
Then I wake up.
Wake up, Chief.
Double digits is NOT 12, and Klee never mentioned the number 12 before Spencer said it and a gazillion of media wrote about it. Double digits was rumored for a loooong time. Anyway one has to look at how active Klee was, preaching his gospel, before MS revealed the XSX form and how he basically shut up after that. Then , as February loomed in the horizon, he asked fo a self ban instead of staying to enjoy his upcoming «triumph» that never came to be because plans change.
Bypassing "bad intention" when choosing frames, one could say yes. Talent is important. Very closely followed by time (optimization) and budget. But...
![]()
Now imagine "xx.xTF" of VR power in the hands of talented people and efficient hardware. It scares literally just thinking about it.
![]()
Bypassing "bad intention" when choosing frames, one could say yes. Talent is important. Very closely followed by time (optimization) and budget. But...
![]()
Now imagine "xx.xTF" of VR power in the hands of talented people and efficient hardware. It scares literally just thinking about it.
![]()
Now imagine the next GTA with SSD and powerful CPU...
And yet this Harvard professor believes upto 40% of the population will be infected: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/02/covid-vaccine/607000/If the virus is slowing down so rapidly in China then it shouldn't spread to other regions. The numbers for regions outside of Asia is still miniscule compared to Asia.
Microsoft trying to so consumer friendly is even more amazing when taking into account how poorly their first party games have been selling. I guess they are banking everything on GamePass and XCloud since I can't see their games selling well going forward with them being available day one on GamePass.
And yet this Harvard professor believes upto 40% of the population will be infected: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/02/covid-vaccine/607000/
Oh my! I see you have put PS5's TF numbers as double digits (xx.x TF)......looks like you are hinting at somethingBypassing "bad intention" when choosing frames, one could say yes. Talent is important. Very closely followed by time (optimization) and budget. But...
![]()
Now imagine "xx.xTF" of VR power in the hands of talented people and efficient hardware. It scares literally just thinking about it.
![]()
Xx.x TF is 12.6 tf ? Or 12.4 tf ?Bypassing "bad intention" when choosing frames, one could say yes. Talent is important. Very closely followed by time (optimization) and budget. But...
![]()
Now imagine "xx.xTF" of VR power in the hands of talented people and efficient hardware. It scares literally just thinking about it.
![]()
Every single contribution that you have made in here so far has been done to antagonize and troll.
Oh piss off, you are allowing people to call others bitches and xbots but God forbid someone exposes these fake insiders , the ones who were insisting on stuff like a 4k drive on the pro and a February event for the ps5. I guess both forums are banking on bullshit to get some members and some traffic. As you can guess I don’t give a shit if I am banned. I will justic back and watch laughing when the ps5 specs are revealed
Probably just going to announce march Plus games, they are just fucking with us now.Yellow colour suggests PS+ related news, doesn't it?
I hope I'm wrong though.
12-3 is....
Oh shit let’s goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooitsnotfuckingnine.
You know what I think? I think that all this saying about Sony targeting 9tf, not having RDNA2, pricing 399$ is just, pardon me, bullshit. Sony is the market leader, full stop. All this thing of them being so quiet and silent reflects that. They don't need to eun after anybody, MS is in the position to do so, and their are doing so. As a market leader, they don't need to lower the bar of the competition. When Apple was (is?) the market leader in smartphones has ever been scared of pricing up the cost of the iphone year by year up and over 1000$? NO. When nVidia, the gpu market leader released rtx gpus 2 years ago was scared to price their gpus close and over 1000$? NO. So why, in the console market, Sony should somehow be scared of pricing ps5 up to 600/700$ for the best console ever created if they believe it is the case? Playstation is synonym of gaming console since 1994,the last playstation outsold the first competitor, so why Sony should be scared to deliver a 14tf (example) for 700$ if they believe is the absolute best the market can offer, and they can prove it with the best experiences somebody can have on consoles, because what really matters in tge end is the value per money. Ps3 and Xone shared the problem at launch to have a really shit value per money, I believe Sony could really suffer Microsoft more if they deliver a 9tf at 399 console than delivering a 14tf console for 700$
I guess something else haha
I'm sorry but if Sony had low Spec machine they wouldn't be just silent about it and not announce anything.
The longer they leave it the worse it would be to win mindshare with a lower spec machine.
There would be no point.
Unless
A) they changed/upgraded the PS5 (which would be impossible at this stage)
B) Sony are confident in the PS5 because the spec's, games, and features match and surpass the XSX they can afford MS to have the limelight
[citation needed]harvard professors have been predicting global warming will end the world in 10 years since the 60’s and also predicted an American great depression if trump were elected. so ill take that with a grain of salt.
And then you kill the main advantage consoles have over PCs, uniformity. We've already seen how mid-gen updates couldn't be properly exploited, now you want to make this situation worse?I’d actually be okay with this if Sony and MS made their consoles upgradeable from the get go
I shouldn’t need to pay for a new cpu, power supply, and RAM when the major difference is the GPU
Just let me upgrade the GPU when the node shrink occurs
BGs also had Ian lick his lips ONCE, but put TWO pictures. One and Two... that’s....
2.1tf! OMG!
It’s only a matter of time before Sony come out, but would they announce it on their German twitter of all places...? Not so sure. They have done a few of these teases in the past that were essentially about other things.
I do hope so, just so the air can be cleared for everybody. But something tells me even when they do, there will still more more questions than answers.
This shits getting like an episode of Lost. I just hope the ending is decent this time.
Off topic, but I fucking loved Lost.