• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sosokrates

Report me if I continue to console war
Xbox fans tears will be able to solve drought issues across the world if they keep misreading Microsoft pr statements like this.

Our most powerful is the mantra not the most powerful.

It's a given xbox series x is their most powerful console, it's a nothing statement meant to confuse the semi retarded and downright dumb cool-aid drinkers into believing they mean it's more powerful than ps5.

It may turn out to be true and then we will see a marketing change for sure, but ms certainly dont have the confidence to say that at the moment, which I personally find very telling as it's fairly certain both are fully aware of each others specs at this point.

Even if xsx is weaker, I don't think it will matter, it's not like the xsx is not extremely powerful.
Sony just went a bit crazy, making a 12+ tflops does not make much business sense.
 

LiquidRex

Member
Aif99iI.png
In order for the PS5 to be 13.3 is as follows..... 64×2×52×2 = 13.3tfs

Going by Tommy Fisher leak of 52 CU's at 2ghz...

That screen capture only states a clock of 1.7ghz 🤔 substituting 52 with 60 and 2ghz with 1.7ghz gives a tf under 13.3 (13.056tfs) 🤔
 

pawel86ck

Banned
This could happen.
No. Sony will not reveal PS5 by surprise, thats why 4 weeks ago they have asked people to subscribe to their PS5 email news. I bet they will start sending emails to people at least one week before the announcement. Also PS5 specs in this leak looks super powerful (not to mention 60 CUs 1.7GHz is 13TF, not 13.3TF). Maybe with 2 SKU strategy sony can deliver 13.3TF, but 499$? That's a pure fantasy.

I wonder why people keep writing these totally fake PS5 leaks. Only a psycho would do something like that.
 
Last edited:

Kdad

Member
WOW! That's my post from Era. So what we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is the following:

GAF > ERA > REDDIT > GAF

Nice:messenger_sunglasses:
You skipped a step, I saw this scratched into the bathroom wall at my local bar last night.
 
Last edited:
  • LOL
Reactions: TLZ

Gavin Stevens

Formerly 'o'dium'
Any leak that includes heart beat sensors is an immediate give away. It’s a patent, it doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. To add such an expensive feature that will barely ever be used is crazy.

Don’t get me wrong, aside from the math, it’s best “looking” fake, but still. It’s not quite there. It would cost a pretty penny, too.
 
Last edited:
Folks are still freaking out huh?

My take is this:

There’s nothing to read into with Sony’s silence. There’s a new exec team and PS4 is doing great, they have no pressure to make a move based on the competition.

Hardware-wise, I find myself being a bit uninformed. My current speculation is that Sony has been aiming for a $399 console that’s likely weaker than the Xbox on paper. But... on-paper specs aren’t the entire story so I’m not personally worried that PS5 is going to somehow look “inferior” to the Xbox.

For people who like to only buy one console, I hope that both boxes are similar for third party content. I can afford to buy both, so I’ll just play those games on the box where they look best.
 

liviopangt

Neo Member
as XSX already RDNA2 ERA & GAF pray that AMD confirm PS5=RDNA2 as rumored AMD Financial Analyst 5 March as since 8 months ago we see MS & AMD said NG RDNA,then official recently RDNA2 Sony official SIE page still listd RDNA Lisa tsu transcript also no mention NG RDNA nor RDNA2 by bluenogro
 
That picture detailing everything somewhat proves my point.

Yeah, it can and very much SHOULD be taken with a grain of salt. I'm leery of anything regarding price for either system, especially in an economy on the precipice of bad news if this virus doesn't slow down.

But there it is again--something else says 13TF, that *one* TF over the XSX and everyone summarily dismisses it as horseshit or goes into Triggered mode.

If we take some insider information at face value and extrapolate it:

Heisen and Osiris said dev kits were not final nor in the hands of anyone except a scant first party. Newer, near final kits were expected sometime around now.

Tommy says the *target* was always 13TF RDNA.

BGs says "puberty" which can mean 12, but most would associate it with teen years(i.e 13).

Why does 13TF make people SO mad? 12TF was classified as fanboy's fiction until Microsoft shoved a pie in your face two different times.

Why the resistance to a single...digit difference?

It feels like the damned T800 around here arguing with John Connor.

"You just can't go around being 13TF!"

"Why?"

"What do you mean why? You can't!"

"Why?"

Isn't always "convenient" how these Reddit and 4Chan leaks keep popping up giving these oddly convenient dates and oddly convenient specifications, and somehow also give a detail that gives away them more or less being fake?

People are questioning these leaks because they conveniently keep coming around anytime there is actual information from Microsoft in regards their next-gen system, always show up in dubious places, still don't have any hard data or proof of actual chips or products that've been discovered fitting their specifications, and tend to have errors in the specifications that give them away.

Here's an example of that specification error I was talking about: 565 GB/s bandwidth. Wait, WHAT?!? xD. This person does realize that such a number is not possible, correct? A 256-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips (btw the memory amount listed would indicate a 256-bit memory bus with 8x 2GB modules). A 288-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips, either. The number is also not possible with a 320-bit memory bus, either, nor a 256-bit one.

(**Also, yes, it's been proven you can overclock at least certain Micron GDDR6 modules, as Rambus managed to do in a report dating back to last October. But that particular overclock pushed to 18Gbps per pin, and would still not give a number matching 565. And if the assumption from that is Sony's overclocked their RAM, why bother with such a small overclock to get a pittance of an advantage over a rival's supposed bandwidth specs?**)

So the person who made up that leak literally had the 560 GB/s bandwidth in mind (which is a legitimate number, and one sited for XSX), thought "hmm, how can I give PS5 the edge here?!?", and said, "I'll slap 5 on the end of that bitch!" and boom, 565 GB/s. Which is great for a joke, but fails at being an actual number for anyone who understands how GDDR6 chips and memory buses work, and what combinations of buses, chip bandwidth and chip amount can give what numbers, with what chips are actually available!!!

Oh yeah! Speaking of the 13TF, Md Ray Md Ray already pointed out how that's impossible, too (with the specifications the leak itself went through the trouble to list). 60CUs * 64SUs *2 IPC * 1700MHz = 13.05, not 13.3. The person who made this leak up doesn't even know or care to do enough simple math with an understanding of how TF compute is calculated on Navi, to arrive at a correct number. Again, it has less to do with "13 TF" (though I've already said prior why that should be taken with a grain of salt), and more to do with the fact every single one of these type of Reddit/4Chan leaks have a dead giveaway in them being fake.

You want to pretend it always comes down to certain people being disgusted with the idea of a PS5 that's more powerful than XSX, but you cling on to fanfic leaks with obvious errors in their specifications and giveaways to things that can most likely be easily disproven (such as the March 3 date for the reveal event listed in this one, if in fact nothing comes to pass on March 3). If anything your insistence on clinging to leak-baits is becoming embarrassing. There are more legitimate ways you can theorize a 11 - 13 TF PS5 than taking to practically any (very likely) bogus 4Chan or Reddit leak that gives you the numbers you want to see.
 
Last edited:
It's called opinions, tastes and wants. What you eat doesn't make me shit. I want whatever console I get yo be the most advanced. It's like cell phones thy all make calls and take pictures but why do ppl or many ppl upgrade every year? They want the best, most powerful, new features.

And then you have others like yourself that may not prioritize tht but thts OK.
Flawed analogy, most expensive phones are used as social status, nothing more.
And remember, what suits you doesn't suit everyone (worldwide).
-I'm just responding to that specific message, i don't fuel console war, it doesn't concern me.
No. Sony will not reveal PS5 by surprise, thats why 4 weeks ago they have asked people to subscribe to their PS5 email news. I bet they will start sending emails to people at least one week before the announcement. Also PS5 specs in this leak looks super powerful (not to mention 60 CUs 1.7GHz is 13TF, not 13.3TF). Maybe with 2 SKU strategy sony can deliver 13.3TF, but 499$? That's a pure fantasy.

I wonder why people keep writing these totally fake PS5 leaks. Only a psycho would do something like that.
I was only refering to the Teraflop count, 56CU's@1850Mhz clock can deliver 13,2TF.
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
When the PS5 is announced at 9TF I’m going to laugh my arse off, and everyone will be justifying the 9TF as good enough and secret dedicated first party sauce Will surely save the day anyway. You guys will always be PS fanboys and it’s sad.

Either 9TF is Bad or it’s totally 1000% OK.

Which is it?

Just call it good enough now and call it a day instead of trying to compete with 12TF.

Stop arguing against everything and start kissing 9TF ass now if you believe that 9TF PS5 is fine.

If not:
giphy.gif
But people were already saying 9 is fine. You have no real reason to believe it's that but it would be a big jump over PS4. If GitHub ends up being right it's still kind of just a guess that turned out right. No one should feel too confident in it. It's just as much of a guess as 13 tf
 

Mendou

Banned
In order for the PS5 to be 13.3 is as follows..... 64×2×52×2 = 13.3tfs

Going by Tommy Fisher leak of 52 CU's at 2ghz...

That screen capture only states a clock of 1.7ghz 🤔 substituting 52 with 60 and 2ghz with 1.7ghz gives a tf under 13.3 (13.056tfs) 🤔
For the record, I'm not advocating anyone believe in any 4chan leak. I just found it interesting and thought that everyone on here would be interested in knowing about this leak.
 
For the record, I'm not advocating anyone believe in any 4chan leak. I just found it interesting and thought that everyone on here would be interested in knowing about this leak.
Lol what ?
Dude you took the time to report something that is relevent to the thread, thank you for your contribution.
 

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
He is not reliable at all. I don't care whether mods consider the likes of him worthy of being vetted here or not.

He was vetted because as he said, he proved he worked in the graphics industry. Not game development.

We don’t “vet” every single post they decide to make after that. That also doesn’t mean people can’t carry their preferences and biases either.

Someone like HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 mentioned several times that he prefers the PlayStation platform, but also passed on his information in a neutral manner. Respect.
 
I’d pay $600 for the 4chan version of ps5 lol. Too good to be true
I would too. I'd rather drop the dough now, and get a very high end Xbox and Playstation 5. Those types of consoles will have a longer running future imo.

I much rather have that upfront power than upgrading sooner to the 10th generation of consoles. I would like to be settled into those ecosystems for a long while. 👍
 
No. Sony will not reveal PS5 by surprise, thats why 4 weeks ago they have asked people to subscribe to their PS5 email news. I bet they will start sending emails to people at least one week before the announcement. Also PS5 specs in this leak looks super powerful (not to mention 60 CUs 1.7GHz is 13TF, not 13.3TF). Maybe with 2 SKU strategy sony can deliver 13.3TF, but 499$? That's a pure fantasy.

I wonder why people keep writing these totally fake PS5 leaks. Only a psycho would do something like that.

But that's so low for a PS5 Pro. Not even a 2x increase over base PS5, while PS4 Pro was a 2.3x jump over the base. And if the consensus is that gamers want power, would not the early adopters just gravitate to the Pro model? Which would make manufacturing the base unit essentially a waste of resources? And that's provided a PS5 Pro is even made in sufficient quantities of a ratio relative to the base system, it's just too much that could go wrong for a PS5 Pro at launch.

It's not quite the same situation as Lockhart/XSX where the latter looks like it'll be a 3x increase over the former (and where we don't even know Lockhart's form factor; it could be a portable-esque hybrid device for all we know). Who wouldn't prefer a 2023 PS5 Pro with 22TF - 24TF RDNA3/RDNA4 and 32GB HBM3? I'm not even joking when I say that; those could actually be the specs for a 2023 PS5 Pro.

A Pro model right at launch when the logistics don't make any sense for one no matter where base PS5 actually lands specs-wise (because we already know the lowest worst-case range, which is still much higher than Lockhart's peak).
 
Can anyone link the post or the youtube video of how Microsoft is able to improve the graphics of a game by offloading it to the server/cloud? Its not variable rate shading, it has to do with online connectivity
 

Smoke6

Member
@R_Zoro making a self ban bet makes you sound more genuine to some. Why would you put your account on the line if you wasn’t sure about what you were talking about is real?!

To be fair, putting a bet on a show date is simple, you can always just say “plans change”. With the virus putting stop to lots, it’s a golden ticket for some to make up anything. “Oh, PS5 doesn’t come with a free blow job? Well it did before the corona virus. Plans changed I guess!”

It’s why it’s a little bit more tricky than usual because, even though it’s a shitty thing to say, it’s also a LEGITIMATE reason that plans could change, so you’ll never know either way 🤣
I don’t know why you keep saying the virus is the perfect excuse when nobody even seen that coming and even studios and publishers started canceling events left and right!

sonys May have been there sole event for this and just flat out said let’s not do this yet due to fears and then shit started getting real! It’s only a get out of jail free card for those who predicted
Dude, the conversation is TF in a spec leak thread. Unfortunately not all people here are PS fanboys. Id recommend that you go to the playstation forums, but...

Anyway, if you think there aren’t PS boyz fanning flames and baiting Xbox fans perpetually you’re clearly not reading the same forum that I am. It’s just that the inflammatory PS posts don’t bother you.

Either way, the topic is TF numbers and they either go your way or they don’t.

If TF numbers aren’t what I expect, Oh well. Can you all really say the same?
well your choice of console has been confirmed! Sooo... what’s the point of you still being in here if it’s not to piss people off or start a console war?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLZ
But that's so low for a PS5 Pro. Not even a 2x increase over base PS5, while PS4 Pro was a 2.3x jump over the base. And if the consensus is that gamers want power, would not the early adopters just gravitate to the Pro model? Which would make manufacturing the base unit essentially a waste of resources? And that's provided a PS5 Pro is even made in sufficient quantities of a ratio relative to the base system, it's just too much that could go wrong for a PS5 Pro at launch.

It's not quite the same situation as Lockhart/XSX where the latter looks like it'll be a 3x increase over the former (and where we don't even know Lockhart's form factor; it could be a portable-esque hybrid device for all we know). Who wouldn't prefer a 2023 PS5 Pro with 22TF - 24TF RDNA3/RDNA4 and 32GB HBM3? I'm not even joking when I say that; those could actually be the specs for a 2023 PS5 Pro.

A Pro model right at launch when the logistics don't make any sense for one no matter where base PS5 actually lands specs-wise (because we already know the lowest worst-case range, which is still much higher than Lockhart's peak).
22 TF...
I want an open world sandbox Crysis in a city with accurate physics, destruction, advanced A.I., 60 fps and no loadings with fully explorable 200 mt skycrapers.
 
Last edited:

husomc

Member
But that's so low for a PS5 Pro. Not even a 2x increase over base PS5, while PS4 Pro was a 2.3x jump over the base. And if the consensus is that gamers want power, would not the early adopters just gravitate to the Pro model? Which would make manufacturing the base unit essentially a waste of resources? And that's provided a PS5 Pro is even made in sufficient quantities of a ratio relative to the base system, it's just too much that could go wrong for a PS5 Pro at launch.

It's not quite the same situation as Lockhart/XSX where the latter looks like it'll be a 3x increase over the former (and where we don't even know Lockhart's form factor; it could be a portable-esque hybrid device for all we know). Who wouldn't prefer a 2023 PS5 Pro with 22TF - 24TF RDNA3/RDNA4 and 32GB HBM3? I'm not even joking when I say that; those could actually be the specs for a 2023 PS5 Pro.

A Pro model right at launch when the logistics don't make any sense for one no matter where base PS5 actually lands specs-wise (because we already know the lowest worst-case range, which is still much higher than Lockhart's peak).
is there a confirmation about a PS5 and PS5 Pro launch release that we are unaware of ?
 
Isn't always "convenient" how these Reddit and 4Chan leaks keep popping up giving these oddly convenient dates and oddly convenient specifications, and somehow also give a detail that gives away them more or less being fake?

People are questioning these leaks because they conveniently keep coming around anytime there is actual information from Microsoft in regards their next-gen system, always show up in dubious places, still don't have any hard data or proof of actual chips or products that've been discovered fitting their specifications, and tend to have errors in the specifications that give them away.

Here's an example of that specification error I was talking about: 565 GB/s bandwidth. Wait, WHAT?!? xD. This person does realize that such a number is not possible, correct? A 256-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips (btw the memory amount listed would indicate a 256-bit memory bus with 8x 2GB modules). A 288-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips, either. The number is also not possible with a 320-bit memory bus, either, nor a 256-bit one.

(**Also, yes, it's been proven you can overclock at least certain Micron GDDR6 modules, as Rambus managed to do in a report dating back to last October. But that particular overclock pushed to 18Gbps per pin, and would still not give a number matching 565. And if the assumption from that is Sony's overclocked their RAM, why bother with such a small overclock to get a pittance of an advantage over a rival's supposed bandwidth specs?**)

So the person who made up that leak literally had the 560 GB/s bandwidth in mind (which is a legitimate number, and one sited for XSX), thought "hmm, how can I give PS5 the edge here?!?", and said, "I'll slap 5 on the end of that bitch!" and boom, 565 GB/s. Which is great for a joke, but fails at being an actual number for anyone who understands how GDDR6 chips and memory buses work, and what combinations of buses, chip bandwidth and chip amount can give what numbers, with what chips are actually available!!!

Oh yeah! Speaking of the 13TF, Md Ray Md Ray already pointed out how that's impossible, too (with the specifications the leak itself went through the trouble to list). 60CUs * 64SUs *2 IPC * 1700MHz = 13.05, not 13.3. The person who made this leak up doesn't even know or care to do enough simple math with an understanding of how TF compute is calculated on Navi, to arrive at a correct number. Again, it has less to do with "13 TF" (though I've already said prior why that should be taken with a grain of salt), and more to do with the fact every single one of these type of Reddit/4Chan leaks have a dead giveaway in them being fake.

You want to pretend it always comes down to certain people being disgusted with the idea of a PS5 that's more powerful than XSX, but you cling on to fanfic leaks with obvious errors in their specifications and giveaways to things that can most likely be easily disproven (such as the March 3 date for the reveal event listed in this one, if in fact nothing comes to pass on March 3). If anything your insistence on clinging to leak-baits is becoming embarrassing. There are more legitimate ways you can theorize a 11 - 13 TF PS5 than taking to practically any (very likely) bogus 4Chan or Reddit leak that gives you the numbers you want to see.
Well said man.
 

Hendrick's

If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
Can anyone link the post or the youtube video of how Microsoft is able to improve the graphics of a game by offloading it to the server/cloud? Its not variable rate shading, it has to do with online connectivity
Power of the cloud is back?
 
Last edited:

Zero909

Banned
22 TF...
I want an open world sandbox Crysis in a city with accurate physics, destruction, advanced A.I., 60 fps and no loadings with fully explorable 200 mt skycrapers.
22 TF won't do shit you will need detected cores for accurate physics, destruction, advanced A.I.
bundled with Amd Ryzen 9 level of CPU POWER
 

Gamernyc78

Banned
He's right in contesting me as I'm doing the same. I just don't see why I should care about Sony having a better price on a worst machine only because it would probably sell more. So what?

I didn't say he was right or wrong hence "opinions, tastes, etc" My point was we all prioritize things differently. I'm on team powerful even tough no matter what I'm getting a psv because I just love their games and features and psvr.
 

xool

Member
Isn't always "convenient" how these Reddit and 4Chan leaks keep popping up giving these oddly convenient dates and oddly convenient specifications, and somehow also give a detail that gives away them more or less being fake?

People are questioning these leaks because they conveniently keep coming around anytime there is actual information from Microsoft in regards their next-gen system, always show up in dubious places, still don't have any hard data or proof of actual chips or products that've been discovered fitting their specifications, and tend to have errors in the specifications that give them away.

I wonder this too..

Here's an example of that specification error I was talking about: 565 GB/s bandwidth. Wait, WHAT?!? xD. This person does realize that such a number is not possible, correct? A 256-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips (btw the memory amount listed would indicate a 256-bit memory bus with 8x 2GB modules). A 288-bit memory bus does not provide that with EITHER 14Gbps or 16Gbps chips, either. The number is also not possible with a 320-bit memory bus, either, nor a 256-bit one.
I gave up on this number .. but what if it's 16Gbps 256 bit, AND they added the DDR4 bandwidth (or something like that) .. there's probably someway to get to that number but life's too short to try ..
 
Last edited:
is there a confirmation about a PS5 and PS5 Pro launch release that we are unaware of ?

No. It was a rumor that mainly started kicking up again because VFXVeteran VFXVeteran made a mention of it few days ago. But he also said he strongly doubts it'll happen.

I wonder this too..


I gave up on this number .. but what if it's 16Gbps 256 bit, AND they added the DDR4 bandwidth (or something like that) .. there's probably someway to get to that number but life's too short to try ..

Nah, the number would still be too low. I figure they would go with at least 32-bit DDR4 modules (there are some as small as 8-bit but those are mainly intended for cheap mobile devices and toys most likely). Even 8-bit DDR4 modules would give about 12.8 GB/s, not 5 GB/s (MHz * 2 * bit bus), so the number should've said 572.8 GB/s if it was doing as you suggest.

And AFIAK, there are no 4GB DDR4 chips that are only 8-bit in data bus width.
 
Last edited:

xool

Member
This is a petition to start calling fake leaks as fleaks.

Who's with me?
Already 1 year ahead

 
GoW looked like that on base PS4! Pro just gave us a higher resolution and frame rate options.
Days Gone is absolutely nuts too. There are videos documenting the tiny details, like pupils changing depending on the light, and the zombies have insanely microscopic veins and scars on them with amazing texturing that almost no one will notice because in some instances you fight 300 of them lol and it's an open world.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
That picture detailing everything somewhat proves my point.

Yeah, it can and very much SHOULD be taken with a grain of salt. I'm leery of anything regarding price for either system, especially in an economy on the precipice of bad news if this virus doesn't slow down.

But there it is again--something else says 13TF, that *one* TF over the XSX and everyone summarily dismisses it as horseshit or goes into Triggered mode.

If we take some insider information at face value and extrapolate it:

Heisen and Osiris said dev kits were not final nor in the hands of anyone except a scant first party. Newer, near final kits were expected sometime around now.

Tommy says the *target* was always 13TF RDNA.

BGs says "puberty" which can mean 12, but most would associate it with teen years(i.e 13).

Why does 13TF make people SO mad? 12TF was classified as fanboy's fiction until Microsoft shoved a pie in your face two different times.

Why the resistance to a single...digit difference?

It feels like the damned T800 around here arguing with John Connor.

"You just can't go around being 13TF!"

"Why?"

"What do you mean why? You can't!"

"Why?"

You are not allowed to speculate outside an already established narrative from a certain group, within a speculation thread.

DUH!!!

But they’re totally not “orthodox fanboys”, gaming citizen.
 
I'm just discussing and trying to have a semblance of fun and discourse in a thread that tends to go up in flames every few pages.

Of course it's fake. I even said most likely so before I even went into anything. Anything that touches on price is a fake, but why not discuss something. I didn't do the math on clocks, because I dont know how and quite frankly, I suck at it. It's one reason I didn't follow my dad into medicine.

But I like to talk about stuff, because it promotes discussion rather than flame wars like I've seen take this thread off the rails for a few pages.

I don't mind if it's 11, 12, 13. I like to promote discussion and it doesn't "fit what I want to see". I'd rather discuss a 4chan, a Pastebin, a Reddit, an insider statement, rather than just watch people go at each other's throats.

I'll tell you what I want to see. I just want to see the system..we all do and it's been long enough. It's *March* and we know Sony isn't going to any major convention at all due to Covid and other reasons.

If my discussions or posts upset you *that* much, I'm sorry. I just like to discuss, throw a little humor in, play counterpoints, etc. I don't have an agenda, I really don't. Too old for such things, man.

I honestly believe they'll be close if not equal, where the difference will come down to the developers, the software. Even if it is 9.2, look what ND pulls out of an OG PS4. It's gonna be exciting either way.

I mean, my old college roommate and I have a damned hard time believing FFVIIR is running on a PS4 sometimes. It just looks too good, but it is..people have played it.
 
Last edited:

cragarmi

Member
Days Gone is absolutely nuts too. There are videos documenting the tiny details, like pupils changing depending on the light, and the zombies have insanely microscopic veins and scars on them with amazing texturing that almost no one will notice because in some instances you fight 300 of them lol and it's an open world.
It's a shame how badly it chugs on the jaguar, just think if they had delayed it to PS5 launch. It could have been all 1 map instead of divided up, added some ray tracing, upped the zombie count in some areas. Added the general polish needed and brought back the choice mechanic. Finished PS4 gen with The Last of Us then started the PS5 gen with Days Gone.
 

xool

Member
Nah, the number would still be too low. I figure they would go with at least 32-bit DDR4 modules (there are some as small as 8-bit but those are mainly intended for cheap mobile devices and toys most likely). Even 8-bit DDR4 modules would give about 12.8 GB/s, not 5 GB/s (MHz * 2 * bit bus), so the number should've said 572.8 GB/s if it was doing as you suggest.

And AFIAK, there are no 4GB DDR4 chips that are only 8-bit in data bus width.

How about 8 2GB GDDR6 @16Gbps, 2 2GB DDR4 @3200MHz
.. that's (8*4*16)+(3.2*8*2) = 563.2 (nearly there, I probably made a mistake anyway)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom