dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not. Why is it xbox dudes always try to come up with a new definition of what "exclusive" is.Xbox ecosystem exclusive means Xbox, PC and Xcloud devices via Game pass
Politically correct Indiana Jones?
There was no such thing as ecosystem in operating systems either until Apple made it a unified experience across PC, smartphones, Tablets, watches, etc. Microsoft is doing the same for gaming.dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not.
Just to make something clear, Disney/Lucasfilm don't dictate the platforms for the games, everything is up to the publisher/developer, it's not like they said to Bethesda that they have to publish Indiana Jones on PS5, XBX|S, PC or they won't get the license, that's not how these deals work and they never worked like that before, platform strategy and releasing schedule was always up to the publishers or LucasArts when they were publishing the games.
Several Star Wars and IJ games title skipped all sort of platforms back in the 90s and 00s, even stuff published by LucasArts
Its bad now coz they under MS?I've seen many people here comment that Wolfenstein 2 was a bad game, can someone explain why that is? I thought all the interactable characters were well-written and different from any other FPS in recent memory. The gunplay wasn't bad aside from just being repetitive, but that's something every FPS struggles with inherently. The story was crazy and went directions I didn't expect. I personally gave the game an 8/10, but it' weird seeing so much criticism.
Thats what Microsoft calls the "Xbox Ecosystem". PC, Console and xCloud(mobile)dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not.
I think Xbox should change their marketing from console exclusive to "not on PlayStation/Switch"dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not. Why is it xbox dudes always try to come up with a new definition of what "exclusive" is.
because they have no exclusives so they are switching their own jargonThere was no such thing as ecosystem in operating systems either until Apple made it a unified experience across PC, smartphones, Tablets, watches, etc. Microsoft is doing the same for gaming.
wolfstein 2 was mediocre and i loved the first one,and dont get started on the last one but was way worseIts bad now coz they under MS?
Seriously, how anyone can call modern Wolfenstein 1 and 2 games bad?
dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not. Why is it xbox dudes always try to come up with a new definition of what "exclusive" is.
because they have no exclusives and their games don't sell nearly as much as Nintendo or SonyThats what Microsoft calls the "Xbox Ecosystem". PC, Console and xCloud(mobile)
![]()
because they have no exclusives and their games don't sell nearly as much as Nintendo or Sony
The Hate leads to fear. Fear leads to xbox.
Yeah, I have a feeling ND is out of the straight white male business.A new SIE studio in San Diego is.
Sure but you cant call it an exclsuve.I will simplify for you. It will not be on Playstation.
Mr hate, Why the hate?because they have no exclusives and their games don't sell nearly as much as Nintendo or Sony
Oh, like how Horizon Zero Dawn isn't a Playstation exclusive.Sure but you cant call it an exclsuve.
Im simply correcting, also no hate however I do want MS to actually do better to give me incentive to buy their system. After how the 360 ended and with the xbox one, they gave no initiative to buy their console and product.Mr hate, Why the hate?
"But I can't really say this right now, because TECHNICALLY we don't own them yet, but please get a clue guys!""Late last year...."
Phil Spencer said the exact opposite in October....3 months ago.
![]()
Xbox Boss Phil Spencer On Series X Launch, Halo Infinite & Bethesda
There’s nothing normal about interviewing Xbox chief Phil Spencer these days.kotaku.com
to sum it up "We didn't pay $7.5 Billion dollars for timed exclusives. Timed exclusives don't help us recoup our money"
.......did I say it was.......the fuck, the most random point out of no where.Oh, like how Horizon Zero Dawn isn't a Playstation exclusive.
just to make something clear, Disney/Lucasfilm don't dictate the platforms for the games, everything is up to the publisher/developer, it's not like they said to Bethesda that they have to publish Indiana Jones on PS5, XBX|S, PC or they won't get the license, that's not how these deals work and they never worked like that before, platform strategy and releasing schedule was always up to the publishers or LucasArts when they were publishing the games.Although I have no doubt all Bethesda will be exclusive, I'd imagine to obtain a license like this they would need to release on other platforms. Kinda like how the MLB granted Sony it's baseball license but they have to launch it on Xbox.
It just works.Produced by Todd Howard.
Marvel let Spider-Man be a console exclusive and he's the most popular super hero around.....anythings possible I'd say.LucasFilm couldnt possibly allow this to be a Console exclusive.
Im assuming it will still get PS5 versions
It's bad because now it's made by a MS studio.I've seen many people here comment that Wolfenstein 2 was a bad game, can someone explain why that is? I thought all the interactable characters were well-written and different from any other FPS in recent memory. The gunplay wasn't bad aside from just being repetitive, but that's something every FPS struggles with inherently. The story was crazy and went directions I didn't expect. I personally gave the game an 8/10, but it' weird seeing so much criticism.
Magic electric whip count ? (Dragon's Dogma - Brontide)Interesting, have any games actually made a game with a good whip though?
Maybe lords of shadow? Threaded cane is a no before anyone suggests it, and I mained that weap. Darksiders with the whip - eurgh.
Raiders of the Lost Ark was Nazis
Temple of Doom was the Thuggee Cult
Last Crusade was Nazis
Crystal Skull was Soviets
Only half the time does Indy confront Nazis.
And that is the most overused enemy in all of gaming. Time for something new.
Don't worry. It's the "now Bethesda has become exclusive it's shit". People also said that about elder Scrolls and Fallout when the news arrived. Hilarious and sad.![]()
![]()
Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus Reviews
Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus is rated 'Mighty' after being reviewed by 174 critics, with an overall average score of 87. It's ranked in the top 4% of games and recommended by 92% of critics.opencritic.com
Asobo made plague tale and then created 90 + Metacritic flight simulator.Machine Games? Hmmm. Machine Games are known for visceral, gore-fest, smash-em up guns ablaze, brutal fps games. But hey, whatever it takes to keep the relics out of dirty Nazi hands.
Last time I heard - exclusives are good. So all good here.I will simplify for you. It will not be on Playstation.
Copy pasted from Era. I posted it but in quotes giving credit to original poster. Loljust to make something clear, Disney/Lucasfilm don't dictate the platforms for the games, everything is up to the publisher/developer, it's not like they said to Bethesda that they have to publish Indiana Jones on PS5, XBX|S, PC or they won't get the license, that's not how these deals work and they never worked like that before, platform strategy and releasing schedule was always up to the publishers or LucasArts when they were publishing the games.
Several Star Wars and IJ games title skipped all sort of platforms back in the 90s and 00s, even stuff published by LucasArts
While I understand people complaining about a multiplatform studio goes exclusive, then the only reason I see people be really bitter about it is because they simple just want it on playstation.Last time I heard - exclusives are good. So all good here.
No Indiana Jones For You!Im simply correcting, also no hate however I do want MS to actually do better to give me incentive to buy their system. After how the 360 ended and with the xbox one, they gave no initiative to buy their console and product.
thought i quoted u my bad lolCopy pasted from Era. I posted it but in quotes giving credit to original poster. Lol
Not that the jargon matters to me, but...dont switch jargon around sir, exclusive means one platform. there is no such thing as an "ecosystem" in gaming. Its either exclusive or it's not. Why is it xbox dudes always try to come up with a new definition of what "exclusive" is.
no they aren't hell even if you think of true exclusives Demon Souls Remake was the only true exclusive launching this gen because Miles Morales was also on ps4Not that the jargon matters, but...
PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale was on PS3 and Vita. Was it not a PlayStation exclusive?
Hyrule Warriors was on Wii U, 3DS and now Switch. Was that not a Nintendo exclusive?
no they aren't hell even if you think of true exclusives Demon Souls Remake was the only true exclusive launching this gen because Miles Morales was also on ps4
If it has to be 'exclusive' I'd rather choose MS than Sony just for option to play them on PC.While I understand people complaining about a multiplatform studio goes exclusive, then the only reason I see people be really bitter about it is because they simple just want it on playstation.
With Microsoft we have pc xbox and xcloud to play on while with Sony it would be PlayStation only, so more people will be able to play the game versus only on playstation.