Big fat fucking assumption there me ol mate lol.
COD+warzone/fortnite/GTA plus others are so big and popular, that they would be system sellers for years.
Warzone isn't going anywhere. It's the yearly, possibly no longer yearly, releases I'm talking about. Point being that Spiderman is just as popular on the single platform as COD. Its sales are limited by only being on one console but its popularity on that console comparable.If all goes for the worse, for PlayStation only they would be excluded. COD will never go Xbox exclusive it will be always on console (Xbox) Windows PC, android , iOS , MacOS.
I won't deny you're a moron.So what stage of denial are we officially in now?
You know how hard is to gather good development team ?Let's look at the math here
Sony purchases a smaller dev Insomniac for $229 million who have talent but little known IP
They now have a consistent 20 million selling IP in Spiderman
If for some crazy set of circumstances Capcom wanted to sell and Sony bought them it would cost them 5 billion dollars, and they only have a couple 10 million (at best) selling franchises that are less impressive even because they're multiplats.
MS's never ending pockets can afford them to make ridiculous purchases like 70 billion for COD.
A strategy that may be good for one is not good for the other.
Nintendo is breaking sales records for Switch with first party studios alone and a lot of those games are pretty low budget to make.
Playstation's brand value and development talent is what's going to see them through because all their first party franchises are starting to put up the big numbers
GOT 8 million
Horizon well over 10 million
GOW 20 million plus
Spiderman 20 million plus
Okay I got ya! But do you think that Spider-Man sells as many consoles as COD?Warzone isn't going anywhere. It's the yearly, possibly no longer yearly, releases I'm talking about. Point being that Spiderman is just as popular on the single platform as COD. Its sales are limited by only being on one console but its popularity on that console comparable.
If COD goes single console too it essentially becomes your Spiderman or Halo after some market adjustment.
Well definitely the anger stage for youI won't deny you're a moron.
I don't have survey data or anything but if people are going by sales data alone then they seem comparable on a single platform. Data shows that people who buy a PS5 are more likely to get Miles Morales than COD but this may be multiplatform owners skew so there is no way of knowing. I just think it's silly to claim that people only buy spiderman because they bought a console for COD though.Okay I got ya! But do you think that Spider-Man sells as many consoles as COD?
You are correct about warzone, that will stay on PlayStation
I don’t know if Nintendo works here. The WiiU was an utter failure and looking at the 1st party games on Switch, quite a few are just WiiU ports.Poor Nintendo, they failed with the Switch and they don't know it, yet
They are probably wondering where all that money is coming from![]()
I'm always angry when I see useless bait. You're still a moron with nothing to say.Well definitely the anger stage for you
Amazing how fine Switch is doing without GTA and CoD, huh?
Once again you and a lot of others seem to have problems with basic comprehension.Only if you're daft. Spiderman launched in 2020. It outsells COD on Playstation most months.
Vanguard launched this year and so would for 2021. September NPD for Playstation for example before Vanguard launch
1 Madden NFL 22
2 FIFA 22
3 NBA 2K22
4 Deathloop
5 Tales of Arise
6 Ghost of Tsushima
7 Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales
8 Diablo II: Resurrected
9 Call of Duty: Black Ops: Cold War
October NPD
1 Far Cry 6
2 Back 4 Blood
3 Madden NFL 22
4 FIFA 22
5 Demon Slayer
6 Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy
7 NHL 22
8 NBA 2K22
9 Ghost of Tsushima
10 Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales
If people were buying a Playstation for COD and then only end up playing Spiderman as a result why is it that those who buy a PS5 end up getting Spiderman instead of the latest COD?
Because the idea that Spiderman only sells because of COD is daft.
I don't have survey data or anything but if people are going by sales data alone then they seem comparable on a single platform. Data shows that people who buy a PS5 are more likely to get Miles Morales than COD but this may be multiplatform owners skew so there is no way of knowing. I just think it's silly to claim that people only buy spiderman because they bought a console for COD though.
Destroyed that poster with one postOnly like 15% of Playstation profits is from 1st party games. So majority is DLC/microtransactions and third party sales.
This isn’t the best thing to happen to them by any stretch of the imagination.
They are going to lose not only a massive cash cow, but A reason (don’t confuse with the only reason which is not what I am implying here)to buy their console and by extension the people who would’ve have bought it to play with their friends.
Those new I.Ps in development are not guaranteed to be major successes either. Same with any new I.P. Although I do see what you mean by having relied on 3rd party devs for certain genres, any reboots of dormant games from their back catalogue will take years to appear.
Trying to correlate the success of the PS2 without cod back then makes no sense. The PS2 was propelled great heights by being released before Xbox and GameCube, coupled with GTA providing the rocket fuel. Madden and Gran tourismo helped to. Obviously with a large market share and install base, other good games will sell in their millions too.
I am not saying that Sony is dead, they will be fine. But they will lose market share and install base, and by extension they will see lower sales of games. So no, it’s not fine or the best thing that could have happened at all imo. And I would imagine that the executives at Sony are thinking the same too.
But the numbers are: Key financial experts like CitiGroup estimate that Sony will lose 10 billion yen to 30 billion yen ($87.5 million to $262.6 million) if Call of Duty doesn't release on PlayStation systems.
Source and whose numbers are you talking about?That cash cow has only equated to most 260Million in generated profit, compared to the entire year(12months) which was 8.8 Billion. It's a good chunck but compared to the entire year its not a deal breaker.
you're telling me that if a console doesn't sell, a game selling on that console alone can't sell that much?Once again you and a lot of others seem to have problems with basic comprehension.
I didn’t say Spider-Man only sells “because of COD. I said spider man can only sell 20 million because games like cod/fifa/madden/fortnite are the reason for all those consoles being sold in the first place. Without them shifting hardware by the millions every year, Spider-Man wouldn’t have 20 million people to sell to.
COD sells more than spider man every year. Fact.
Once again you and a lot of others seem to have problems with basic comprehension.
I didn’t say Spider-Man only sells “because of COD”. I said spider man can only sell 20 million because games like cod/fifa/madden/fortnite are the reason for all those consoles being sold in the first place. Without them shifting hardware by the millions every year, Spider-Man wouldn’t have 20 million people to sell to.
COD sells more than spider man every year. Fact.
Taken on its own it is not. But if the people that buy the console for the game are not there, then the downturn is across the board. Some people probably just play cod only but I doubt that they are the majority.That cash cow has only equated to most 260Million in generated profit, compared to the entire year(12months) which was 8.8 Billion. It's a good chunck but compared to the entire year its not a deal breaker.
Sony first party sales are benefited by huge 3rd party games. 3rd party games are hugely benefited by console sales. First party games create console sales too. Nobody is denying COD isn't mainstream. It's the idea that Spiderman, God Of War etc can't be mainstream too but are entirely dependent on COD to sell consoles.You’re absolutely right and I can’t believe this even has to be hammered in so many times in this thread. It’s either head in the sand situation or a copium overdose.
Sony first party sales ARE benefited by huge 3rd party sellers, duh. What is there even to argue? CoD is HUGE for mainstream. Denying that is mind boggling.
Sony first party sales are benefited by huge 3rd party games. 3rd party games are hugely benefited by console sales. First party games create console sales too. Nobody is denying COD isn't mainstream. It's the idea that Spiderman, God Of War etc can't be mainstream too but are entirely dependent on COD to sell consoles.
COD/FIFA/Madden/Fortnite are on all platforms, so the differentiators are exclusive games, no?Once again you and a lot of others seem to have problems with basic comprehension.
I didn’t say Spider-Man only sells “because of COD”. I said spider man can only sell 20 million because games like cod/fifa/madden/fortnite are the reason for all those consoles being sold in the first place. Without them shifting hardware by the millions every year, Spider-Man wouldn’t have 20 million people to sell to.
COD sells more than spider man every year. Fact.
then if we want to put it this way ..... Sony has nothing comparable to Nintendo's IPs. The switch continues to outsell whatever Sony or Microsoft throws at it. The switch market is d different from that of the PS5 and Xbox.Poor Nintendo, they failed with the Switch and they don't know it, yet
They are probably wondering where all that money is coming from![]()
ok you are another one of the small circle ... that thinks after a 70b acquisition and Sony begging Ms to keep cod available that "nothing happened .. everything is fine" ..spiderman will take COD place Okay. we will seeWarzone isn't going anywhere. It's the yearly, possibly no longer yearly, releases I'm talking about. Point being that Spiderman is just as popular on the single platform as COD. Its sales are limited by only being on one console but its popularity on that console comparable.
If COD goes single console too it essentially becomes your Spiderman or Halo after some market adjustment.
the user base is ? You only answered half a question, im fully aware of what class leading "means"The class leading? best in class, top of the bunch, highest achiever, etc
Little known? Ratchet and Clank, Spider-Man (they did the first before being purchased), Resistance.Sony purchases a smaller dev Insomniac for $229 million who have talent but little known IP
Post in thread 'DO THE MATH.... Sony expanding first party development is a FAR better strategy than acquiring a big third party publishers' https://www.neogaf.com/threads/do-t...third-party-publishers.1628434/post-265433148the user base is ? You only answered half a question, im fully aware of what class leading "means"
They just spent over HALF of Microsoft's cash on hand on Activision. It's not never ending. The deal has to be lucrative or it could damage even a company as big as Microsoft.MS's never ending pockets can afford them to make ridiculous purchases like 70 billion for COD.
Definitely in terms of engagement and microtransactions it dwarfs them. It can create a hole on the platform if it goes. That hole is filled by another multiplatform game that becomes a more popular bestseller for releasing on all. Somebody mentioned Gears. Gears is about player engagement, a multiplayer game with microtransactions like COD. That should be comparable yet its sales will never reach multiplatform COD now. At its peak it sold more on the 360 than COD did on the 360 though.Its not that they aren't msinstream but they aren't really comparable games.
The amount of time spent playing cod/warzone dwarfs time spent playing some of those games. Maybe even all of those games combined. That makes a difference. Thats the hole that could be created. A massive loss in hours played.
I don't think they own any of those IPs. Sony had the rights to all of those already. Insomniac wasn't an IP purchase but a studio talent one.Little known? Ratchet and Clank, Spider-Man (they did the first before being purchased), Resistance.
This is the big question for me. How does the transition from product to service pricing affect quality and/or production time in the long-term, if at all? If it turns out that neither suffers then I'm inclined to agree based on sheer volume.
This is such nonsense.If you think MS is buying Activision Blizzard just to snatch a couple of exclusives to spite Sony then you're not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. This is clearly bigger and more future directed than just being Sony's competitor. Think Meta, Google, Netflix, Amazon.
I'm still waiting on the SH/Hasan/Kojima reveal, ain't got time for denial.So what stage of denial are we officially in now?
Fuck off trying to put words in my mouth. Never said anything about "metaverse" [edit: well, it's about that too, point is, it's not just about that]. Did you forget that Netflix is into gaming now.This is such nonsense.
The Metaverse is buzzword being used to pump up investors.
The whole thing is a gimmick that will never take off. It has absolutely nothing to do with COD.
So call of duty doesn’t make people think about a console purchase?Please don't move goalposts to bloodborne and FIFA, GTA etc. You're only exaggerating everything. The console isn't missing the games you listed and we aren't talking about bloodborne here. We're talking about Spiderman. In the top 5 of your source of most played games and it's on a single console.
"Spider Man and co only sold that many copies because people bought the console they are on because of games like Call of Duty. This argument falls flat on its face instantly."
Spiderman could be one of those games that influences a console purchase. If anything a lot of these games outsold COD on a given platform. Spiderman is more popular on PS4/PS5 than COD is outside of its launch month. It constantly outsells it if you look at NPDs throughout the year.
Long version:
Sony will just have to move their ass like they have in the past, this might be a blessing in disguise for PlayStation.
Activision Blizzard has been nothing but a COD factory anyway, at least on consoles, and if MS doesn’t make COD exclusive then not much changes for PlayStation.
The ugly side of this obscene consolidation going on is if an Apple comes in and buys Sony or some crazy shit like that. I’m sure a lot of people would throw a party because that’s the age we live in, a bunch of morons excited about dystopian mega corps that have more lobbying power than you can imagine. Holla back in twenty years so I can read your tears about the golden days of gaming.
Short version:
Sony needs to buy SE, EA, Capcom, Etc etc etc suck my banana
Yeah I did forget because nobody cares.Fuck off trying to put words in my mouth. Never said anything about "metaverse". Did you forget that Netflix is into gaming now.
I don't care about streaming myself right now, but that's not the point, nobody should care about what you and me think about current states per se. That's why I'm trying to leave my preferences aside and try to discuss what substance there could be in these things (including "the metaverse") to be evolved and iterated into edible form in the future. Thus we revisit the point of MS buying AB. The tech and entertainment giants are all obviously trying to get the biggest pieces of the future entertainment cake.Yeah I did forget because nobody cares.
Where did I say nothing will happen or that Spiderman will take CODs place? MS will gain marketshare. I imagine that's why they did it. Sony will continue to sell consoles though. New games and new multiplatform IPs akin to Fortnite will come and be bestsellers. Your only point against exclusives being that they don't sell as much as multiplats due to being exclusives to begin with.ok you are another one of the small circle ... that thinks after a 70b acquisition and Sony begging Ms to keep cod available that "nothing happened .. everything is fine" ..spiderman will take COD place Okay. we will see
For $70b, ambitions must extend beyond consoles, and by extension, Sony and Nintendo.This is such nonsense.
The Metaverse is buzzword being used to pump up investors.
The whole thing is a gimmick that will never take off. It has absolutely nothing to do with COD.