Art The Clown
Banned
LRG would have made more money and drew more customers if they would have backed their employee against these fruit loops instead of being pussies and folding like lawn chairs.
Alright, fair enough, can't blame them for firing her after she tweeted something like that.
Seems pretty rightful.Yes, you absolutely can blame them for wrongful termination.
Seems pretty rightful.
Seems pretty rightful.
noIn this case, the employer. They’ve said that they did the investigation.
Libs of TikTok is pretty bad, wouldn’t you agree?
Seems pretty rightful.
me as well its like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee in hear.This is a complete fucking joke. And frankly I’m disgusted with some people in here trying to justify her getting fired for a “transphobic” tweet. What a load of shit! She follows twitter accounts of people some of you don’t like- does that make them bad? Wrong? Just cause you don’t like someone’s opinions doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Who gives anyone the right to get someone fired cause they don’t like what they think??? Fuck these assholes and fuck limited run games. And fuck anyone who agrees with this cunt who dug through her tweets to get her fired. I’ll be buying many copies of Harry Potter just to show my appreciation of JKR and her tweets/thoughts. Fuck you very much.
me as well its like reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee in hear.
My understanding is that no fewer than 11 studies show that 80% grow out of gender dysphoria by the end of puberty if not affirmed and or given drugs/surgery.It's not any one thing, man, that's why it's so complicated.
Like some people are literally born with gender dysphoria in a way that precludes any experience and are obviously biological. From the moment they can talk they say they're the other gender and code that way as much as they can, and it's clearly not a learned thing.
That’s the prevailing theory because it fits a narrative. But if that is the case, then it reinforces this as needing psychological intervention, not physical surgery or off-label drugs.Then there are some kids who develop gender dysphoria as a result of sexual trauma or abuse, and sometimes they grow out of it and sometimes they don't. This is the prevailing theory for why female to male trans identification is so much more prevalent in teenagers, but less so in adults.
Bald faced lie. Matt Walsh is against adults transitioning, against gay people marrying, against protections for gay people in the workplace, literally every single LGBT interest or right, without exception.
Drop the strawman bullshit, it's just not true.
Matt Walsh does not believe that trans is real thing and that people should not be able to get gender affirming care ever. That qualifies, no?
good point but i was not saying from the ban hammer just the rhetoric in hear.If it were like ree in here then the vast majority of folks would be banned for their "dismissiveness".
![]()
sadly this.The most disturbing thing people don’t think about or pretend too is most companies they support would do the exact same thing they did.
Western pubs/studios all adhere by the same rules/ideology.
You either stop supporting them all together or keep bitching about it here while at the same time giving them your money, which in reality is the only language they truly understand.
If people want real change that is. Untill then this will go on and people will continue to get hurt.
good point but i was not saying from the ban hammer just the rhetoric in hear.
If it were like ree in here then the vast majority of folks would be banned for their "dismissiveness".
![]()
just like the big n dmcaing all the fan games do they have right to do that yes but is it a good pr move hell no.Your point is taken, but listen to what you're saying. You used the line "stepping into the minefield that is Hogwarts Legacy."
The fact that somebody, who works for a video game company, should be afraid to discuss a video game tells you all you need to know about the level of toxicity discourse has reached. And you're essentially insinuating that wherever the discourse leads, even if it's somewhere completely insane, illogical, and frankly, flat out wrong(as is the case with the JK Rowling narrative) that people should just cower in fear and not speak about said issues. If we follow this precedent down this path, then no one is going to be able to speak about anything. Who's to say tomorrow some band of psychos online won't say that Square Enix is racist for their portrayal of Barrett(if it hasn't happened already) and then anyone who buys the new FFVII Remake games is a racist by association and everyone must boycott these games? And then people should not longer speak about FFVII Remake either.
LRG can hire or fire whomever they want, the question is, is it right to essentially demand that people keep their mouths shut about certain games/topics, no matter how insane or unfounded narratives surrounding them are? And is that kind of culture healthy for any company?
good point but i was not saying from the ban hammer just the rhetoric in hear.
Holy Christ, why would anyone want to be a part of such a totalitarian site? I shudder to think if any of these repressive dolts went into politics.If it were like ree in here then the vast majority of folks would be banned for their "dismissiveness".
![]()
I shudder to think if any of these repressive dolts went into politics.
Google Brianna Wu. Then google Brianna Wu and moon rocks. Then google Brianna Wu and William Shatner.
i wonder how many junior accounts will get the hammer lolIf it were like ree in here then the vast majority of folks would be banned for their "dismissiveness".
![]()
i wonder how many junior accounts will get the hammer lol
Ok, but only around 5% of teens with gender dysphoria actually receive gender affirming drugs and 0.01% receive surgery, so I don't get where your argument is.My understanding is that no fewer than 11 studies show that 80% grow out of gender dysphoria by the end of puberty if not affirmed and or given drugs/surgery.
Who is arguing for illegal off label hormones for children?But those who are given the off-label drugs are drastically more likely to attempt suicide and extremely unlikely to stop taking the cross sex hormones.
Yeah, no shit. I am not sure why you think I am saying anything different. No one is suggesting every kid who wants hormones should get them.That’s the prevailing theory because it fits a narrative. But if that is the case, then it reinforces this as needing psychological intervention, not physical surgery or off-label drugs.
Only in relative terms. 0.03% is 50% more than 0.02% (for example) , but it's still small in absolute terms.And my understanding is that these treatments are becoming more and more common.
My argument is this ideology shouldn’t get pushed on children at all.Ok, but only around 5% of teens with gender dysphoria actually receive gender affirming drugs and 0.01% receive surgery, so I don't get where your argument is.
Puberty blockers are off-label treatment. They can be used to castrate sex offenders, btw.Who is arguing for illegal off label hormones for children?
Maybe no one here is..Yeah, no shit. I am not sure why you think I am saying anything different. No one is suggesting every kid who wants hormones should get them.
It’s growing in popularity and people need to push back on it.My point is that everyone knows this and that isn't how it works, so the hysteria doesn't make sense.
Only in relative terms. 0.03% is 50% more than 0.02% (for example) , but it's still small in absolute terms.
Lifes come back at you hard and quick, who would've thought?
TLDR? i stop reading when i see a trigger warning
those retards brought me here. love y'all truly
![]()
TLDR? i stop reading when i see a trigger warning
those retards brought me here. love y'all truly
![]()
Holy shit, lmao. I think that's the first time I've seen near universal on message replies
Same reason someone wants to be part of this site - to talk about video games.Holy Christ, why would anyone want to be a part of such a totalitarian site? I shudder to think if any of these repressive dolts went into politics.
Every day I pray some hacker destroys that siteI wish I can see the day this site drops from the face of the earth.
Yeah but it seems you cannot have a different opinion to talk about video games there whereas here… well I’d like to think it’s not that bad.Same reason someone wants to be part of this site - to talk about video games.
You can easily ignore other topics.
I did a similar thing at the Cyberpunk launch, was excited, banned a month. I just left and never looked back.This was me:
![]()
Annnnnd....
![]()
Truth is they did me a favor
Alienate the consumer...She wasn't just discussing the game; she was discussing the game through the lens of the backlash.
Yes. Especially when it involves you taking a stand that can alienate the consumer base.
. . .and lets stop with the "JK Rowling is just stating her opinion. . ." bit. When she was discussing trans rights from a position - as a former victim of domestic abuse - of not eroding what it means to be a "woman," that was fine (if still a hot button topic). She has gone FULL TERF however, including dancing with the uglier arguments.