StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
1 gamer past 24H. Who was it?
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%

He left Microsoft to be able to feed his and his Co workers families and being able to live.
How did that work out?
Well maybe don't act like a hivemind then!
You act like the general grouping of "gamers" seems specifically referential to you.
Seems like you only want the collective invoked when it suits. Hmmm....
Yeah you're right, I got mixed up in linking him with Gears of War and Microsoft together.He was at epic, not Microsoft.
I don't know who he is or what this is. Good for him I guess. I think?
You'd know who he is if you followed Xbox gaming 15 years ago, or PC shooters 20 years ago.I don't know who he is or what this is. Good for him I guess. I think?
I mean this will sound controversial but I liked it more than Overwatch. I very much enjoyed the brief time I had with LawBreakers even though I saw the writing on the wall. Sure it had its flaws but which multiplayer game doesn't these days. To me it was everything I wanted from an OW type game, ie: more focus on the shooting/gunplay aspects rather than the MOBA side of things.1 gamer past 24H. Who was it?
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%
![]()
Not really. I'd just rather folks like Cliffy recognize that grouping people into convenient groups under a common label, doesn't mean those groups magically become a homogenized hivemind.
That was instantly what I thought when I seen the thread title. Guess that catch phrase worked.$29.99 none of that $60 multiplayer only bullshit
So when some sub-group of gamers does something worthy of criticism stop acting like its a criticism of you specifically or ALL gamers in general.
If he'd meant ALL gamers, I suspect he'd have written "ALL gamers".
You can't have it both ways. You demand not to be treated as a collective but always leap to defend the collective's honour even if you yourself aren't involved in the behaviour that's being called out.
Sorry, "Gamer" is a description, not an identity.
His kind of did that to himself, I remember when Lawbreakers was coming out he became obnoxiously cocky and even started shitting Overwatch. There is nothing wrong be confident but this guy took it too far.I dont get why people are so obsessed with trashing this guy. He's trying to make games. Oh no ...
I think you're just projecting some weird argument onto my post that I never even made. I have no idea why.
Go back to my initial point, which was made to you in response to a post where you called Cliffy a dipshit because he wrote in a Tweet:
"Gamers are weird, yo."
That's it.
Its mild as milk in itself, but you also need omitted the clearly stated context from the tweet which defines 2 groups both of whom you could fairly describe as "gamers":
"It confuses the hell out of me how people were rooting for the game to fail and when it did now there's a ton of support for it."
First of all, why is this worthy of criticism? It seems to be a reasonable observation given that as a developer he is creating a product for "gamers" generically, yet the observable result from his perspective is this sort of weird contradictory response.
From my perspective you seemed offended by his invocation of "gamers" as a group, you certainly were the one to invoke the "hivemind" designation, and so I responded to that by pointing out the weird double standard in my follow-up posts.
If Cliffy can't see that the group who derided Cliffy's shitty Lawbreakers game aren't the same folks who now are excited about something related to it, then he's being a dipshit.
He didn't say that. He just said: "gamers (plural) are weird".
You are the one treating all gamers like a homogenous group then blaming him for that!
It confuses the hell out of me how people were rooting for the game to fail and when it did now there's a ton of support for it. Gamers are weird, yo.
I legitimately didn’t hear about this game before this thread and i’m someone who follows gaming news almost daily.wtf is lawbreakers?
So unless you're being intellectually dishonest, you have to agree that he is calling "gamers" (as a group) weird because he's implying the same people who "rooted for his game to fail" are now "in support [of] it".
There's no other way to read that sentence.
1 gamer past 24H. Who was it?
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%
![]()
Then why's there a cuck chair in the background, Cliffy?
The game is not available for purchase dude, it was pulled from storefront shelves. That one person is most likely a bot or something.1 gamer past 24H. Who was it?
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%
![]()
Man i think i was the only person who loved BattlebornI haven't heard a single person talk about LawBreakers in several years, let alone supposedly ask for a remaster or a remake. The only reason it's being talked about now is because CliffyB posted a vague click-baity tweet. The notion that there's suddenly "a lot of interest" in a middling game that couldn't compete with its contemporaries and died nearly 5 years ago is laughable at best.
Battleborn had a stronger playerbase, ffs.
Pointing this out isn't reveling in the death of the game or hoping it fails, but simply stating facts. It had a niche audience and arena shooters no longer hold the sway they once did -- which is also evident in the sharp drop off of Halo Infinite's multiplayer community despite being free to play. Edit: Forgot about Splitgate, which came out, burned brightly for a short bit, and then fell off as well. Arena shooters just don't seem to be what people want anymore.
Lawbreakers and lawyers involved? Oh shit.
![]()
Man i think i was the only person who loved Battleborn
1 gamer past 24H. Who was it?
Gamer: 0.1%
Cliffy B: 99.9%
![]()