Support NeoGAF

[Draugoth]

How long til we get an A.I generated movie?

ELDEN RING​

---

Album​

SEKIRO​

---

Album​

​

 

[Draugoth]

BLOODBORNE​

---

Album​

 

[SlimeGooGoo]

.

 

[SlimeGooGoo]

.

 

[Draugoth]

In all honesty though, most concept artists will probably end up losing their jobs

Good thing i quit the art career

 

[Fully engaged]

In all honesty though, most concept artists will probably end up losing their jobs

This kind of take makes me laugh.. Where do you think the AI gets its ideas? Hint it doesnt actually have any of its own.

 

[ThatStupidLion]

Wow thats impressive.

 

[Ghost of Caelid]

Sekiro looks cool.

 

[Griffon]

This kind of take makes me laugh.. Where do you think the AI gets its ideas? Hint it doesnt actually have any of its own.

So... it's the same as humans then?

 

[MHubert]

This kind of take makes me laugh.. Where do you think the AI gets its ideas? Hint it doesnt actually have any of its own.

Where do you think humans do?

 

[Punished Miku]

Really nailed that 80s look. These are some great shots.

 

[SlimeGooGoo]

.

 

[jimmypython]

Bloodborne ones look very nice haha

 

[Soltype]

I miss the look of movies on film, movie's today are way too clean.

 

[GnomeChimpsky]

I miss the look of movies on film, movie's today are way too clean.

TV shows are even worse. Going from Willow the movie to Willow the series is just painful.

 

[Lunarorbit]

These are amazing. Some of the bloodborne monsters look great

 

[BennyBlanco]

How long until we can generate videogames through text prompts?

 

[Fully engaged]

Where do you think humans do?

From God obviously.
That isnt what I mean. The AI uses existing art and images to make these pictures. It has been proven that it is just copyright stealing, and it will eventually come under extreme scrutiny. These images are great, but they are not as original as they seem. parts are grabbed and stitched together. Those parts belonged to artists.

 

[Mister Wolf]

Awesome pics. Do any of you old-timers remember this movie?

 

[Fully engaged]

Emphasis on *most*

The average joe will definitely get replaced eventually. Only masters of their craft will keep their jobs.

This is silly. Most concept art is far more specific and unique than AI can make. These do look great, and they are fun, but they are not replacing real artists anytime soon. Everything I have seen so far.. and I have looked at a lot, looks worse than the images people post on steam pages. So considerably worse than fan art.

Just take a look at the real film poster above. For The Sword and the Sorcerer. Look how interesting and unique it is. That is 30 plus year old poster and it is more interesting than anything I have seen from an AI feeding off text.

 

[MHubert]

From God obviously.
That isnt what I mean. The AI uses existing art and images to make these pictures. It has been proven that it is just copyright stealing, and it will eventually come under extreme scrutiny. These images are great, but they are not as original as they seem. parts are grabbed and stitched together. Those parts belonged to artists.

First of all, that's not how image generation works - as in, the 'ai' doesn't stich together images from all over. It doesn't copy. If it did, this topic would be much simpler.
Whether or not something is copyrighted is irrelevant since nothing is holding you back from training an ai model on data without copyright. The funny thing is the 'original' part you mention: What we see now is some of the earliest and most primitive iterations. In the near future AI will produce content that goes beyond what any human is able to produce, and these discussions will seem almost silly.

I hereby invite you to my new thread: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/is-a...rnet-scraped-data-a-form-of-stealing.1648807/

 

[Klosshufvud]

I miss the look of movies on film, movie's today are way too clean.

The travesty of digital recording. Singlehandedly worst thing to have happened cinema.

 

[SlimeGooGoo]

.

 

[March Climber]

That isnt what I mean. The AI uses existing art and images to make these pictures. It has been proven that it is just copyright stealing, and it will eventually come under extreme scrutiny. These images are great, but they are not as original as they seem. parts are grabbed and stitched together. Those parts belonged to artists.

I actually think the individual(s) who made this 80s movie art using AI had a brilliant idea. Artists are upset because of what you and the poster above are discussing, which is art made from the obvious usage of other art styles(including obvious artist signatures being cut off).

However, AI-art drawing from film is an entirely different beast that can’t really be referenced back to a particular style. This is nothing other than “80s fantasy movie sets”. There’s no way anyone can claim these are a direct ripoff of a single individual’s art because they would have to claim that the individual created all 80s fantasy movies. This was a genius move.

 

[Deerock71]

 

[mansoor1980]

simply incredible , make this happen please

 

[Psykotik]

i'm sad that these don't actually exist

 

[Comandr]

I’d watch the crap out of these.

 

[xpresstuning]

Some look awkward, but most look awesome and actually make me nostalgic of 80s, early 90s fantasy movies.

 

[IAmAnAgnostic]

From God obviously.
That isnt what I mean. The AI uses existing art and images to make these pictures. It has been proven that it is just copyright stealing, and it will eventually come under extreme scrutiny. These images are great, but they are not as original as they seem. parts are grabbed and stitched together. Those parts belonged to artists.

... No it hasn't been "proven," you've never used the tool and you don't understand how the tool works or the technology behind it.

The only thing you could have seen is someone applying a subset tool 'img2img' to something over an image with very low 'denoising' which literally means keep the vast majority of the original image and only change it up slightly. This is akin to saying photography can only be used to copyright steal because someone filmed a movie. Not only is this one tool which is not needed, you don't need to reference any image at all with the tool to create art, but with high denoising the new art becomes impossible to connect to the original even if you were to reference an image, which once again is not necessary.

Its either that or you read a twitter thread of someone seething artist coping and lying, but in any case, the tool is not "copyright stealing."

 

[rofif]

Midjourney is crazy.
But it’s still taking from existing Google results for inspiration.
Artists can create new styles and new stuff

 

[Coconutt]

That spider facing the child one was especially spoopy, something about those eyes.

 

[The Cartographer]

The Elden Ring one is good.
All the heroines look phenomenal (I like Millicent the best).