TehGoomba7s
Member
Controls are awful. GTAV had the same clunky controls. All Rockstar games on console do. 30fps feels horrific on them. If you can play them on PC do. Higher framerates alleviate it but it's far from perfect.
Pretty much this. If you're just going to mainline it and want to get through main quests without the horse travel and camping you're going to be miserable. I wasn't sold on it at first tbh.You need to accept the tempo and speed of the game. If you try to rush from place to place and play it like a shooter then you'll miss the whole point of how it was designed. It is one of the best and most immersive gaming experiences I've had and much is thanks to its controls and longer animations.
Take some sessions when you only ride somewhere, set up camp, go and fish, come back to the camp to cook the fish and end the evening with a bottle of bourbon by the fire before going to sleep. On your ride back to the big camp look for some herbs so that you can cook some good venison and maybe stop to play cards at a saloon on the way.
I've found have the most fun avoiding the incredibly linear missions and just doing my own shit.Pretty much this. If you're just going to mainline it and want to get through main quests without the horse travel and camping you're going to be miserable. I wasn't sold on it at first tbh.
The best way to treat the game is in two parts - The main missions are like episodic western tv shows. You play through a little predetermined western story and then get put back into the main world. It's not a third person shooter, it's a peep and pop shooting gallery.
The second part is getting to your mission. This is an emergent journey where you'll get random encounters, camp at night, hunt for rations and skins etc. If you just hold down gallop between places you will hate it.
Sure it forces you to adopt a playstyle but if I do think it's a 'you get out what you put in' type of game.
having never played Fortnite, I'm willing to say yes because literally anything would be an improvement![]()
I swear some of you want this game to feels and control like Fortnite.
Except is not really, the whole point of simulation is different system working together but in RDR2 the wanted system is busted and makes zero sense, no matter what you do in camp and you can be total dick but story is not effected and when you do story mission the whole "realism" and "immersion" goes out the window.I always say this, this game is a Western/Cowboy/Wildlife Simulator. It's NOT an action game.
EDIT: I forgot to say it's FUCKING AMAZING!! I took my sweet time and loved it all!
Or maybe it's good to have both? Not everything has to be about running around and jumping and shooting while doing a 360 like a headless chicken. You don't like it? It's fine, there is plenty of other game that will better fit your playstyle.having never played Fortnite, I'm willing to say yes because literally anything would be an improvement
What is the peak of gaming?RDR2 is the type of game you show to your dad to tell him look at how gaming has become so realistic and mature, but you know it deep down that its just an average game with high budget.
I mean i like it, its good, but yeah its not the peak of gaming like many casual gamers claim, i noticed a lot of RDR2 biggest fans are the type that played total of 30-50 games in their life.
I think it feels slower because things were slower in the time period the story occurs in. Horses and steam locomotives, everything is lower tech. I always thought that was part of its charm.
Nope, sluggish is definitely the right word. The game's input latency and animation latency is too high even at higher framerates.Never troubled me none. It's a game meant to be taken at a more measured pace. Sluggish, I feel, is not the right word - grounded would be more appropriate.
LolI think it feels slower because things were slower in the time period the story occurs in. Horses and steam locomotives, everything is lower tech. I always thought that was part of its charm.
Exactly.Or maybe it's good to have both? Not everything has to be about running around and jumping and shooting while doing a 360 like a headless chicken. You don't like it? It's fine, there is plenty of other game that will better fit your playstyle.
For once we have a studio that doesn't compromise on its vision to please the masses, and I'm so happy that RDRII is the way it is because I was very afraid before release that it would just be a watered down version with easy gameplay, especially after loving the first RDR so much.
So yeah, it's just not for you (and again, it's fine).
Ya being able to drive different cars and listen to the radio makes GTA a lot more fun to play. Without those travelling is so tedious and boring.What still bothers me is long treks on horseback. Overly simplistic gameplay. That feels like 90% of the game.
I prefer GTA5 cause car driving is atleast fun.
What RDR2 is really Tarantino style hollywood western movie simulator rather actual realistic western cowboy simulation.
It’s the Kingdom Come Deliverance of Westerns. It’s an outlaw sim. What the fuck did you expect?
Hello Kitty Island Adventure.What is the peak of gaming?
Oh FFS. In the inital tutorial, like the first mission in the game. The game suggest you loot all cupboards, because that's what you should do. At the same time, your team is yelling "what's the fucking holdup? Get over here!". But I can't get over there, because for Arthur has to place himself very strictly in front of a container, probably taking a few steps in place just to get it right, before I can actually even initiate the looting animation.
Don't give me the "it's realistic!" answer, because it isn't. I personally don't pace myself before opening a drawer, I just, like, open it. It's just a waste of time. It in no way adds to the experience.
Hello Kitty Island Adventure.
It’s shit on PC too.Maybe it was the 30 fps frame frate or perhaps latency too, but in the tutorial levels at the beginning like the part where I think it's you running through the snow and wolves are chasing you it felt like shit.