J
JeremyEtcetera
Unconfirmed Member
People also need to take into account that the appearence of a character is usually associated with his personality and his role in the story.
That's why Guts from Berserk looks brute and intimidating, and why Griffith looks elegant and angelic.
Also, for the same reason Guts wears black and Griffith white (which is usually associated with something good or pure, and in this case, in a deceiving way)
![]()
Why artists do that? Because men searches for meaning.
When men creates something, he attributes a meaning to it.
And when he does that, he also expects other men to have a similar interpretation of his work. To achieve this masterfully, the creator has to understand human psychology, society, culture and how humans process information using their senses.
The creator then guides the observer (sometimes also deceptively) in order to help him to come to a specific interpretation, that is, a meaning.
Simply replicating reality for the sake of it is boring and uninteresting.
Some people do it in order to look "daring" and "ambitious", but it just feels edgy and/or pretentious most of the time.
Taking the Berserk example, imagine doing it wrong.
I'll make Guts fat and make him use a normal sword and Griffith bald and muscular. Would people interpret it the same way? Would it improve the story? Would it make it more interesting?
Artists should have the freedom to do what they want without having to be shamed and forced to follow a stupid agenda of "deobjectify women", "toxic masculinity", "unrealistic expectations" or whatever crap SJWs seem to want to push forward.
If an artist wants to make ugly characters, fine.
If an artists wants to make beautiful characters, fine.
And that's it.
Some BASED user comments:
You must also like the duality of Abby and Ellie then, right?