CaptainTiptop
Member
Haha, go ahead.
Yes and you're a terrible person along with all those damned infertile married people."Once you say that marriage is detached from children"
My wife and I haven't had any kids, and don't plan to. Shouldn't this couple already be divorced, since I've already destroyed their definition of marriage?
He also feared that recognising same-sex couples would mean that the definition of marriage could be expanded even further.
Why are people so concerned about this? Don't marry someone gay if you don't agree.
I wonder which one of them had the ideaDoesn't sound like they have a healthy marraiage if they want to divorce over something like this.
"Once you say that marriage is detached from children"
My wife and I haven't had any kids, and don't plan to. Shouldn't this couple already be divorced, since I've already destroyed their definition of marriage?
"We're so pissed off we're gonna do something that's strictly forbidden in our religion but that isn't taboo anymore because everyone has accepted it!...wait a second..."
This has been a big decision for my wife and I. Some will accuse of us being bigoted or too hateful to share. But this couldnt be further from our intentions.
The truth is, marriage is simply too important. It is a sacred institution, ordained by God. It has always been understood to be that exclusive relationship where one man and one woman become one flesh. Any attempt to change the definition of marriage by law is not something in which we are able to partake.
Here we stand, we can do no other, and I know we are not alone.
Its worth saying that our decision is not as extreme as it may seem. We will still benefit from the same tax and legal provisions of the states de facto laws.
What I find interesting is that they believe same sex marriages will lead to polygamy. Should we be outlawing polygamy?
Amazing."We're so pissed off we're gonna do something that's strictly forbidden in our religion but that isn't taboo anymore because everyone has accepted it!...wait a second..."
Polygamy is illegal already.
And they're using what's called a slippery slope fallacy. "well if we do A., then A leads to B., B leads to nuclear annihilation and the end of 'MURICA!"
It's a typical way for people who don't have an argument to try and make it sound like they have one.
I know but why is it outlawed? That never made sense to me.
Why would anyone care if they got divorced. Why is it being reported by the news lol
Religious influence and taxes would be my big guesses.
I think what the couple mean is to divorce from a legal standpoint as opposed to separate themselves or disavow their vows. They no longer recognise the state's authority to judge marriages, so they are renouncing that previous judgement of their own marriage.