Dr.brain64
Member
Could 343 make other games? Will ms let them?
343i has made the best Halo game to date, Halo 4.
Reach, Odst and Wars are all good though.Halo has been kill since Halo 3 as far as I'm concerned.
Halo 4? Halo 5? What is that? It simply doesn't exist.
If Halo 5 had good mp it would actually be played....
It’s dead. 343 killed it.
Nice heheYour last prediction was that Stadia was going to be a runaway success![]()
You can't be serious. The gameplay is by far the worst in any Halo game. In Bungie's games you can run and gun on legendary and feel like a badass, in Halo 5 the ONLY effective option to combat on legendary is grabbing a long distance gun and hiding behind something.343i has made the best Halo game to date, Halo 4. Halo 5's story was transitional in nature to setup the rest of the universe events, and the gameplay felt amazing. Loved squad commands also. The more 343i puts their own twist on the Halo Formula, the more exciting it gets. I think they are better for Halo than Bungie is.
OP sounds like a fanboy who hasn't even played the games or was never going to get Halo Infinite. I'm happy 343i are at the helm.
It had one of the best MPs though and that’s what most care about when playing a shooter.They’re talentless hacks. Halo 5 had the worst AAA campaign in any shooter ever and killed the series. Halo is dead. Highest charting Halo game is halo 5 on MS’ own platform at 42.
343 is a cover band. And a shit one at that.
Higher than Death Stranding too. OP can eat a pee pee.![]()
fuck off OP.
So much hyperbole. This is a garbage thread.
H5's mp is simply too difficult for the masses, if you get shit on online, you aint going to keep playing it.
That’s one hell of a title. You’re a writer?
We don’t treat them with respect.
H5's mp is simply too difficult for the masses
All their halo games are terrible, playstation had killzone graphically 100x better than halo 5 till this day i ask myself how they used the big budget given by microsoft to make that rubbish game, complete fraud,
of all the shooters since my existence ive always thought of halo being top of it all but seems those idiots couldnt do shit on a 8gb console and deffienetely after seeing the halo infonote teaser cannot do shit on next gen consoles
Doom is 60 fps and looks better than halo 5, battlefield, call of duty are both 60 fps have 100x the graphics than halo 5, your excuses are meaningless 343 are losers the last good halo game i played was 3 and after that they couldnt catch the vibe of the first 2 games.Because KZ is targeting 30fps and H5 is targeting 60.
That said, Halo 5 is still a better game than Shadow Fall lol
I don't think they are the losers here...Doom is 60 fps and looks better than halo 5, battlefield, call of duty are both 60 fps have 100x the graphics than halo 5, your excuses are meaningless 343 are losers the last good halo game i played was 3 and after that they couldnt catch the vibe of the first 2 games.
Yeah they look better on a PC, not on a base Xbox lolDoom is 60 fps and looks better than halo 5, battlefield, call of duty are both 60 fps have 100x the graphics than halo 5, your excuses are meaningless 343 are losers the last good halo game i played was 3 and after that they couldnt catch the vibe of the first 2 games.
on any console whether ps4 or xbone and stop diverting the narrative here u have no substancial evidence just spouting whatever you can to avoid ur loss, saying a game looks better on pc is irrelevant any game would look better on pc fact of the matter here is that doom eternal and cod all run at 60fps on a base xbox one with all the action and at 1080p hate it or love ut halo 5 is cowshitYeah they look better on a PC, not on a base Xbox lol
They are losers, how can u take a franchise like halo and fuck it up, its like giving ur sibling a controller and telk him to finish a boss fight which youve already taken 98% of health away and he fails miserably. Somehow microsoft invests in developers who have no clue what they are doing.I don't think they are the losers here...
It's not confusing. It's a pretty good game (disregarding how feature incomplete it was for over a year), but it's a really bad Halo game. The map design, combat pace and flow, controls, abilities, etc all negatively impact what made classic Halo so good in the first place. This applies to casual and competetive play.
That's fine that you enjoy it, but it is more of a modern arena shooter with a Halo influence.
They didnt have to change perception, changing perception is why most franchises die its called fucking up, nintendo never changed perception and its why they are successful we loved halo they way it was and they could always improve on it and all they did is exactly fuck it up, telling us it cost 400 million $ to make only to bring garbage out.Halo Infinite is their last chance.
How do you change someone’s perception about Halo? Most adults gamers are pretty skeptical, so you can’t change their perception about something by just telling them to think differently. Facts? No one seems to believe them anymore; which ones can you trust? Opinion is colored by personal experience – people have to see something or experience it to believe it. Even kids have perceptions about Halo, not always formed by their own personal experience, but rather by the experiences of those closest to them whom they trust.
Halo infinite is really THEIR LAST CHANCE TO BE RELEVANT in the industry.
That's because it is indeed trash.
Press X to survive
Endless needless animations
Aim assist more cancerous than Halo 2
Sprint
Gigantic maps
clamber trash
etc etc etc.
Nobody ever said mario is stuck in the past yet they still sell millions every year we dont need a change in halo classic, the biggest mistake in game design is not sticking to the plan, this is what has fucked alot of series like the terminator franchise and so on.I mean, I hear what your saying. The problem is, if they didn't add any of those things, people would say its stuck in the past, since they did add it, the old skool Halo fans feel like they ruined it. They are damned if they do, damned if they don't. I really enjoy having sprint, clamber, ground pound and shoulder charge, it just makes it feel more fast paced and fun to me. I think they did a good job of making those things work within Halo. For instance, if your shield is down and you sprint, your shield will not recharge until your stop sprinting. If you ADS, and get shot, you will get kick out of ADS. Things like that make it feel modern and still have the Halo feel, to me.
IMO, what makes Halo special is the weapons, the way grenades bounce off walls or stick, the vehicles, the melee etc. I think it was very smart of them to modernize Halo so it didn't get stale. I think for the Halo purist (which I am also), just play MCC. There are so many good classic Halo games in that package, there should be enough to satisfy everyone that prefers the older style Halo games. With Infinite, hopefully they can find a good balance to satisfy both sides, I definitely do not want to see them lose the modern things that they added to Halo 5.
I agree with everything here except the comments about 343. Halo 5 while flawed, still had fantastic Multiplayer even though the Campaign and Game Engine were to be desired. I do, however, think that they have their feet in the fire and will deliver a memorable experience with Halo Infinite. Personally, I did like Halo 4's campaign but the MP was abysmal.Complaints about sprint ...
If I can’t sprint and slide in a modern shooter ... NEXT! It’s not going anywhere nor should it. It’s like complaining about snipers. When you know the lanes and choke points, a slide is your best option at escaping that lane without getting sniped. More movement options is also great. Hell, to some extent I want wall-running in every sci-fi shooter post Titanfall.
ADS is a great new standard as well. It lends itself more to the console space of course because you’ll never have the super human precision of a m&kb setup.
No, they should not go backwards. And they won’t. 343 maybe a shit tier development studio but Microsoft will continue to fire and rebuild until they get it right even when 343 destroyed the Ip to the point of irrelevancy already.
Aim assist more cancerous than Halo 2- Never noticed it.
Nobody ever said mario is stuck in the past yet they still sell millions every year we dont need a change in halo classic, the biggest mistake in game design is not sticking to the plan, this is what has fucked alot of series like the terminator franchise and so on.
Obviously a potato tier player hence why you think anything in that list is good or are apparently too clueless to understand it.
That's because it is indeed trash.
Press X to survive
Endless needless animations
Aim assist more cancerous than Halo 2
Sprint
Gigantic maps
clamber trash
etc etc etc.
Your comparing a graphics revolution, 2d-3d and less powerful machine to more powerful machine, halo was still in 3d on the xbox it is still on 3d machines on xbox one today and will be tomorrow and itll still be shitter than the first 2 not mario,as mario nintendo games are as childish as theyve always been and even when nintendo of america tried to mature the brand nintendo japan stopped them. Lesson is stick to the basics.Mario is COMPLETELY different than it used to be. There was Mario Brother, Super Mario Brothers, Super Mario 2, Super Mario 3, Super Mario Land, Mario 64, Mario Sunshine, Mario Galaxy 1 and 2, I could go on. All of theres VASTLY different games... I don't think your comparison is a good one.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What were you doing with the other hand? Writing this bullshit or wanking?I got onyx while playing with 1 hand. Halo 5 isn't "difficult" at all.