OmegaSupreme
advanced basic bitch
Neil Young thinking he has any pull in 2022 lmao.
If CNN or FOX would be so humble in acknowledging their critics, maybe most people would think of them as actual news and not refuge for ideologues.
I watched the whole Robert Epstein one. It was definitely frustrating at times. I chalked it up to Epstein being kind of the nerdy, socially awkward type who probably didn't know much about Rogan but wanted to reach his audience. They talked about legitimately interesting stuff and I felt like by the end he had a bit of a better understanding and respect for Joe.The podcast with Robert Epstein was so bad, the guy is an arrogant person who is probably on the spectrum. But the way he was making fun of Joe, half way through i felt that Joe would jump and punch him.
And the first 30 minutes with Jordan Peterson, was full of nonsense about the environment and climate change.
The problem is i felt he lacked basic knowledge on the topic he was talking about or was not able to explain it properly. for example the whitelist blacklist, he could have explained on how DNS works and how most providers use google's one. Just missing alot of simple stuff.I watched the whole Robert Epstein one. It was definitely frustrating at times. I chalked it up to Epstein being kind of the nerdy, socially awkward type who probably didn't know much about Rogan but wanted to reach his audience. They talked about legitimately interesting stuff and I felt like by the end he had a bit of a better understanding and respect for Joe.
True. I think in that respect his arrogance showed a bit, and in an effort to explain things he probably felt he had to talk down to people a bit, which was a mistake. I'll be the first to admit I don't know anything about that stuff, but if explained well enough people can generally grasp complicated concepts.The problem is i felt he lacked basic knowledge on the topic he was talking about or was not able to explain it properly. for example the whitelist blacklist, he could have explained on how DNS works and how most providers use google's one. Just missing alot of simple stuff.
Oh no! Anyway.And now Joni Mitchel boards the Neil Young train out of spotify.
If they do, I'd assume Spotify would be in violation of their contract, probably owe him loads of money, and he'd just take his show back to you tube. They would also likely lose a massive amount of subscribers and listeners. Either way, he has a larger audience than anyone else in the media. When you can make people that much money, you have protections that most people do not.The mass media is doing everything in its power to cancel him right now, I wonder if Spotify will budge. If they were American they would.
His influence being leveraged toward antivax positions predicates a danger to society during a pandemic. With almost anything else it wouldn't matter. I'm not looking to see him deplatformed, but I do think it's a very unfortunate turn that inevitably leads to avoidable suffering and death.I guess I'm smarter than the average bear and don't believe everything Joe Rogan or any one person says. Does he really have that much influence? Is he really that dangerous?
Influence, yes absolutely. His reach is very wide. Dangerous? I suppose it depends on how you frame it. I don't see him as dangerous but I do see vaccine skepticism as harmful. That said, I think Rogan is just one of many gateways to vaccine skepticism and it's something that was well established long before Rogan. How much he specifically impacts the dialog is certainly up for debate.I guess I'm smarter than the average bear and don't believe everything Joe Rogan or any one person says. Does he really have that much influence? Is he really that dangerous?
Ironically, I'd say the politicization of this whole thing leads to a great deal more avoidable suffering and death. It's "this guy is taking horse medication!" and other divisive us vs them crap that has led to suffering and death. Where's Neil Young when it comes to condemning media lies that will have the result of politicizing life-saving science?His influence being leveraged toward antivax positions predicates a danger to society during a pandemic. With almost anything else it wouldn't matter. I'm not looking to see him deplatformed, but I do think it's a very unfortunate turn that inevitably leads to avoidable suffering and death.
Case in point why promoting these alternative realities is a danger to society, when you end up thinking ivermectin is the “life-saving science” in this scenario.Ironically, I'd say the politicization of this whole thing leads to a great deal more avoidable suffering and death. It's "this guy is taking horse medication!" and other divisive us vs them crap that has led to suffering and death. Where's Neil Young when it comes to condemning media lies that will have the result of politicizing life-saving science?
If people really wanted to save lives, they would be trying to unite people instead of dividing them.
I was referring to the vaccines as life-saving science. Ivermectin I'd say is something that eitherCase in point why promoting these alternative realities is a danger to society, when you end up thinking ivermectin is the “life-saving science” in this scenario.
But what are these antivax positions? I heard him be critical, but never be against the vaccine for the public, if I'm not missing something here.His influence being leveraged toward antivax positions predicates a danger to society during a pandemic. With almost anything else it wouldn't matter. I'm not looking to see him deplatformed, but I do think it's a very unfortunate turn that inevitably leads to avoidable suffering and death.
I would argue that striving towards unity and not division is always the best possible strategy.There’s not really a reasonable way to unite with a nihilistic death cult is there?
Edit: that’s not to say that’s necessarily what we’re dealing with here, but just to point out unity in and of itself is not an answer in all circumstances
Congrats on dredging up dirt from nearly 40 years ago to discredit an elderly man for trying to do the right thing now.
Of course, but it's funny because when you read what he wrote against Rogan, he didn't really listen to Rogan, he just read the doctor's letter and assumed Rogan spread misinformation, yet he has no idea what that misinformation actually is. He's trying to come off as virtuous yet his rebellious nature would cancel his entire musical career if he acted as he did in his heyday. It's fake. He has no idea what Rogan said, as do almost everyone who goes after him for misinformation.Congrats on dredging up dirt from nearly 40 years ago to discredit an elderly man for trying to do the right thing now.
Now this is some misinformation.He has no idea what Rogan said, as do almost everyone who goes after him for misinformation.
That's not the pandemic though, is it?Now this is some misinformation.
Care to start looking up what Joe’s thoughts on the moon landing and 9/11 were in the past?
Sure, but was he talking about actual gene therapy or mRNA effects.I don't need to rely on second hand sources when Joe says ridiculous shit about the vaccine on such a regular basis. I run into it any time I have a listen lately.
Approximately 10 minutes into the episode recently published on Tim Dillon's channel, Joe says "it's not even a vaccine. It's gene therepy."
Dangerous falsehoods that will scare uneducated listeners.
I bring it up because Joe’s said stupid shit he’s had to walk back in the past too, and more recently than the quote you dig up. It shows he’s somewhat susceptible to conspiracy thinking and nonsensical beliefs. For a time, yes, he spread misinfo about the moon landings that he’s had to walk back (9/11 shit too).That's not the pandemic though, is it?
Are you saying he spreads misinformation about the moon? (lol)
His dumbassery has always been his strength, that's why he's fun to watch. But his value in interviewing and bringing light to topics FAR outweighs his dumbassery. He's very susceptible to conspiracy. Which is alright as long as it's not based on thin air like Alex Jones. He usually comes around.I bring it up because Joe’s said stupid shit he’s had to walk back in the past too, and more recently than the quote you dig up. It shows he’s somewhat susceptible to conspiracy thinking and nonsensical beliefs. For a time, yes, he spread misinfo about the moon landings that he’s had to walk back (9/11 shit too).
That being said, I still think his standup is funny and I liked his show before it became the COVID conspiracy corner. It’s unfortunate he’s let this issue ruin it.
NoWho are any of these musicians? Are any of them still relevant in any way?
This!I'll cancel my Spotify subscription If Spotify bow down to the mob and remove Joe Rogan. I don't always agree with what he says, but I also believe in free speech and debate.
Epstein was such condescending dick it was embarrassing to listen to. I’m in the free speech period camp though if you don’t like Joe’s opinions don’t listen: the concept of disinformation and dangerous speech is asinine in a free society. If a grown ass adult chooses to listen to a standup comedian’s bro research over someone with a PHD that’s on them. If he were actively calling for armed resistance or something that would be dangerous but simply having an opinion and sicking cancel culture and the thought police on Joe is anti democratic. Ben Shapiro is way more out there than Joe and has a punchable face.The podcast with Robert Epstein was so bad, the guy is an arrogant person who is probably on the spectrum. But the way he was making fun of Joe, half way through i felt that Joe would jump and punch him.
And the first 30 minutes with Jordan Peterson, was full of nonsense about the environment and climate change.
And he's still not that "out there". I don't know what happened but for some reason, it's normal to brand people as dangerous and crazy because they "might inspire others". Thinking like that is more dangerous than what they proclaim actually is dangerous.Ben Shapiro is way more out there than Joe and has a punchable face.
Do you mean to say that you don't know of Neil Young and Joni Mitchell?Who are any of these musicians? Are any of them still relevant in any way?
I know the name Neil Young, but couldn’t name a single song. As for Joni Mitchell, literally no idea.Do you mean to say that you don't know of Neil Young and Joni Mitchell?
They are legends, with some amazing music, but they are also old, ignorant, and loves to fall on the sword.
Neil Young become known for being a part of Buffalo Springfield in the late '60s and went on to have a significant singer-songwriter career and was pretty big in the '70s and '80s.I know the name Neil Young, but couldn’t name a single song. As for Joni Mitchell, literally no idea.