How private debt collectors contribute to a cycle of jail, unemployment, and poverty
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2015/02/locked-up-for-being-poor/386069/
Absolutely disgusting. Debtors prison is back in business and apparently it is a very lucrative one.
(Channeling inner politician) The only victims are poor people and criminals, so who cares! I mean, it is more important that we give tax cuts to the wealthy or at least not raise their taxes. That would just be bad politically! I mean, who cares about justice and the long-term health of our citizens when political issues and short-term funding issues are on the line?
19-year-old Kevin Thompson didnt think that he was going to jail the day he pulled his car out of the garage to go to his job in an auto-repair shop. He was pulled over for a speeding ticket and found out that he had not properly renewed his license. When Thompson appeared in traffic court, he was unable to pay the $810 fine and was put on a 30-day probation period to pay his ticket. The judge handed his case over to Judicial Correction Services, Inc., a for-profit corporation that oversees the collection of fines and the probation of people who have committed minor infractions, such as traffic tickets.
Thompson met with his parole officer from JCS weekly and made payments totaling $85, most of which he borrowed because he was unemployed. JCS kept $30 of those payments as a fee, so that amount didnt count toward the total owed. Eventually, Thompson told his probation officer that he was unable to pay, and she informed him that he would have to appear before a judge to have his parole revoked. He ended up in a jail cell for owing $838 in fines and fees.
What Thompson experienced is called pay-only probation. Its part of the growing private business of whats euphemistically dubbed incarceration alternatives, a lucrative industry that ranges from electronic monitoring to drug treatment and halfway houses...
But for people like Thompson, this industry helps contribute to a cycle of jail, unemployment, and poverty. In late January, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against JCS and DeKalb County, alleging that pay-only probation unfairly targeted people who were too poor to pay at sentencingand were, therefore, likely to be unable to pay later. Across the county, the freedom of too many people is resting on their ability to pay, said Nusrat Choudhury, an ACLU attorney who represents Thompson. We seek to dismantle that two-tiered system of justice, which disproportionately punishes people of color.
In their current incarnation, private-probation companies operate as debt collectors with handcuffsand little oversight. According to a report issued last year by Human Rights Watch, pay-only probation practices specifically exploit those who are unable to pay a fine on a set court date and must agree to make installments. These installment payments include overhead fees that go directly to the company and compound over time. As a result, someone who is unemployed and lacks resources will ultimately owe more money than someone who is able to pay on their court date. The ACLU has additionally found that these practices disproportionately impact minorities, who end up paying more money in totaland represent a greater percent of the jail populationthan non-minorities.
Hiring JCS, which bills itself as Proven Offender Management, enables cash-strapped municipalities to collect more overdue fines and increase their available revenue. Human Rights Watch estimates that JCS collects over $1 million in fees every year from people in DeKalb County on probation for minor offenses like traffic tickets. On JCSs website, a Georgia judge is quoted as saying, We are now collecting more than 90 percent of our fines, and I see far fewer return visits from those I sentence to probation.
While the full extent of municipalities reliance on fees is unclear, a report by the ACLU points to the growing use of fee collection to balance overextended budgets. The same report points out that the New Orleans Parish Criminal Court collected $1.47 million in fees from private citizens in 2009, amounting to one-third of its total revenue. However, because people like Thompson face jail time if they do not pay, its unclear if private-probation companies are actually generating more revenue for the municipalities than the costs of housing someone in jail.
In some jurisdictions, people have been forced to pay for room and board for time served in a jail awaiting trial. Called pay-to-stay, these practices require people to pay for staying in jaileven if they havent been convicted yeton top of costs of toilet paper, clothing, and medical care. One county in California even allows jail inmates to pay for premium jail cells for an optional $155 daily fee. Because minorities often have less wealth and fewer economic opportunities, these policies disproportionately affect them.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2015/02/locked-up-for-being-poor/386069/
Absolutely disgusting. Debtors prison is back in business and apparently it is a very lucrative one.
(Channeling inner politician) The only victims are poor people and criminals, so who cares! I mean, it is more important that we give tax cuts to the wealthy or at least not raise their taxes. That would just be bad politically! I mean, who cares about justice and the long-term health of our citizens when political issues and short-term funding issues are on the line?