or medical bills
Lower fees so the rich can really break the rules with no consequence. It being for profit or not wouldn't change anything about this. If you can't get arrested for not paying fines than we might as well have like no rules at all. Long term payment plan whst is long term could you get a 30 year payment plan?
It's actually REALLY complicated.
As if life was fair. Being poir automatically puts you in a disadvantage.Just let him go to work and pay it back over time, stop being evil.
or medical bills
This makes no sense. You already said it yourself, those people are rich. They don't care if the fine is $80 or $800 or $8000, they can and will pay it and then proceed to completely forget about it. The only people punished here are those who are too poor to pay the fine. It's an unfair situation.Lower fees so the rich can really break the rules with no consequence. It being for profit or not wouldn't change anything about this. If you can't get arrested for not paying fines than we might as well have like no rules at all. Long term payment plan whst is long term could you get a 30 year payment plan?
It's actually REALLY complicated.
I mean, if you dont have money you shouldn't really be expecting medical care.
That's lame but I mean first he was speeding and didn't have a renewed license like all this could have been avoid if he just wasn't speeding.
Everything should be free amirite guys ? Speeding tickets shouldn't cost anything. Driving should be a right, not a privelege. Redistribute someone's wealth to pay for this 19 year olds mistakes. It's the right thing to do.
Setting aside if the ticket fee was too high you don't see how the private agency in this case was explicitly exploitative? I mean, taking $30 from an $80 payment? That's insane
Yes that is insane, but come on, you can't drive with an expired registration and speed and the same time. Especially when you're broke.
Yes that is insane, but come on, you can't drive with an expired registration and speed and the same time. Especially when you're broke.
Because that's clearly the most absurd part of this story.Don't speed if you know you can't afford a speeding ticket, not a very crazy request.
too true, we need suicide pills for poor sick people
Don't speed if you know you can't afford a speeding ticket, not a very crazy request.
Revenue adjusted tickets. The rich get fined more the poor get fined less and it theoretically hurts everyone just the same. Unless there's a problem with this I don't know about. Which someone in the thread will enlighten me to.
Besides that, since when can you get tossed into jail for debt? Stuff like this makes it seem like it's just easier to ignore letters and calls so your case never gets handed off to a for-profit.
this is why i completely ignore debt collectors
mail --> trash
calls --> blocked
personal visits --> lol
suck my broke american eyeballs, collectors
None of which would have happened if he used just a single ounce of common sense.Because that's clearly the most absurd part of this story.
What I am saying is that he shouldn't be breaking the law if he knows he won't to able to pay a speeding ticket.So what you're saying is that because he was speeding, he deserves to be railroaded by not only an excessive punishment, but also an almost 50% fee?
An appropriate caption for your posts in here.None of which would have happened if he used just a single ounce of common sense.
The fees right now are very little consequence for rich people.
The for profit certainly changes things. It added an extra 30 dollars a week to his bill and 500 dollars to his total ticket. How is that not a big deal for an unemployed poor person? It also includes a group who does not want to see that person's fine reduced, extended or renegotiated. That way, they will lose money.
There is a difference between people who refuse to pay fines that can afford them and people who cannot afford to pay fines and get sent to prison. Judicial discretion usually can solve this without any outside pressure group breathing down their neck. No slippery slope argument by you is going to convince me that the world will end because we gave judges the power not to put people in jail when they are obviously trying to pay back the fine, but can't
Yes, 30 years. That is exactly what I meant
None of which would have happened if he used just a single ounce of common sense.
What I am saying is that he shouldn't be breaking the law if he knows he won't to able to pay a speeding ticket.
So its fine that its ridiculous and exploitative because its happening to one of them "bad people"
An appropriate caption for your posts in here.
I was asking what would a reasonable time to pay off a ticket would be in this simple situation you present.
also if you read the article it says they kept 30 dollars for fees. his speeding ticket and license thing was still 800+ dollars. I don't know how it goes down in other states but here in California you can set up installment payments with the traffic court directly in nearly all the counties.
This dude if I'm running the rough numbers right was driving about 20+ over the speed limit with an expired license. There's a protocol that comes with a car that we all have to follow. I got nothing else to say about it outside of tough break man. Like if they can find some kind of social injustice and he was given a fine that some one else wouldn't be given he would have all my sympathy, but as it is those fines are blind and we all bow before them just the same.
The Justice Department is discouraging state court systems from jailing defendants who fail to pay fines or fees, warning against practices that it says run afoul of the Constitution and erode community trust.
A letter being sent Monday by the federal government to state court administrators makes clear that judges should consider alternatives to jail for poor defendants who don't pay their fines. It also says defendants should not be locked up without a judge first establishing that a defendant who failed to pay did so willfully.