TheNefariousGamer
Member
At this rate, I'm going to be 50 by the time I feel somewhat safe transitioning.
Still funny how they completely ignore the existence of trans men. Do you think they even realize that they're legally requiring some buff, grizzled guys to enter women's restrooms/locker rooms? Or do you think the sole image of trans people in their heads is creepy guys wearing wigs?
What the fuck is the party of "small government" doing in my bathroom?
Lt. Gov Dan 'Reap what you sow Orlando gays!' Patrick is at it again. Today he unveiled Senate Bill 6.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/01/05/texas-lt-gov-dan-patrick-unveils-so-called-bathroo/
Still no ideas from Lt. Dan on what rights trans community have protecting them from abuse in a man's restroom.
So who's going to clean it up when people are forced to relieve themselves on the floor?
At this rate, I'm going to be 50 by the time I feel somewhat safe transitioning.
They do, but the distraction it provides is just as important to them.
At this rate, I'm going to be 50 by the time I feel somewhat safe transitioning.
I will never understand why state parties would want to die on this hill.
At this rate, I'm going to be 50 by the time I feel somewhat safe transitioning.
Why is this fucker always in the news?
You never hear of Lt. govs besides him doing anything.
Why is this fucker always in the news?
You never hear of Lt. govs besides him doing anything.
A major industry group, the Texas Association of Business, said a study it helped conduct showed such legislation in Texas could result in economic losses ranging from $964 million to $8.5 billion for the state.
What does this guy think "right side of history" actually means? Or has he just heard people on the left use it and thought it would be a cool phrase to imitate?
Reuters is reporting that if this bill becomes law, Texas is predicted to economically lose anywhere between $964 million at a minimum and $8.5 billion at a maximum: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-lgbt-idUSKBN14P21T