charlequin
Banned
Thinking about it, I'm realizing the problem with Meld as executed here is that they wanted to use DFC slots for other things and that leads to this kind of ambivalent feeling.
What you'd want to do is do a full block where this is the DFC treatment and the total volume is similar to DFC volume in SOI. Then you can fully design the set around having all these front cards work as normal parts of the set and then use some of the interesting mechanical space on the back (melds that break back apart instead of leaving play, 3-card melds, mix-and-match melds, etc.) over the course of both sets. Probably the right place to do it is an artifact block, there's some obvious flavor executions there.
FWIW, Brisela is single-handedly going to be popular enough to have this mechanic come back eventually.
Meld doesn't solve the contraptions problem because it's not an action a creature can perform.
What you'd want to do is do a full block where this is the DFC treatment and the total volume is similar to DFC volume in SOI. Then you can fully design the set around having all these front cards work as normal parts of the set and then use some of the interesting mechanical space on the back (melds that break back apart instead of leaving play, 3-card melds, mix-and-match melds, etc.) over the course of both sets. Probably the right place to do it is an artifact block, there's some obvious flavor executions there.
FWIW, Brisela is single-handedly going to be popular enough to have this mechanic come back eventually.
Though that does make me think. If Kaladesh has contraption assembling, perhaps they're using meld to solve that, or rather the same technology. There could be component artifacts that have a block of text on the back, and they are assembled to form a single contraction made up of multiple cards, with the rigger providing some extra text somehow.
Meld doesn't solve the contraptions problem because it's not an action a creature can perform.