Eh, it's not really that concerning. Probably just Sony putting a stopper on any "new" PS4 game announcements, so they can "surprise" people at E3. They seem to have mostly blown their first party load for the time being, so third parties will step up.
Assassin's Creed IV, Battlefield 4, and Thief have all been announced post-PlayStation Meeting for PS4.
Granted, but MGS has always been a Sony "thing", so it's entirely conceivable they want to make a show of it.
Granted, but MGS has always been a Sony "thing", so it's entirely conceivable they want to make a show of it.
I agree what he says. What the Japanese console industry needs is one hugely successful console (15+LTD) not two average selling consoles (8-9 million LTD) to bring third parties to consoles and for better penetration in the West. The only way I see this happening is if the majority of third parties support PS4 otherwise we might have split userbases.
You both know perfectly well that a game being multiplatform doesn't stop Sony and Microsoft (especially Microsoft) from trying to claim it as their own at E3.![]()
If it was a strategically planned coalescence by 3rd-parties to ensure that one system dominated the market, then the choice would be WiiU.
You both know perfectly well that a game being multiplatform doesn't stop Sony and Microsoft (especially Microsoft) from trying to claim it as their own at E3.![]()
What are you basing that off of?
Well, even a good remake like Tales of Destiny didn't do that well on PS2. Looks like Tales fans want original titles.
Taiko was an unequivocal success on PS2. PS3 owners are still waiting for a Taiko game.
I don't see why Namco shouldn't try to release another Taiko for Wii. It's not like the console wasn't dead last year.
Yes they're normal for clearing out software, but it's more a matter of how much of the stock from the first fiscal year was sold in that manner. As we established before, sales hadn't even hit 1.5 million as of July on a stock from March of 1.6 million. That's pretty slow, wouldn't you say?
Just what I said. 3rd-parties all coalesced around PS3 and left Wii to rot, but the home console market was still split down the middle, because Nintendo is the most powerful publisher in Japan. So they have the potential to split the home console market on their own.
Sony is a very weak publisher in Japan, and wouldn't have a prayer of selling a system on their own against a WiiU that had full 3rd-party support + Nintendo on board.
But I'm only bringing it up to show that if the main focus and modus operandi of 3rd-parties was to ensure a home console market in Japan which was dominated by a single system - that choice would be the WiiU. There would be pretty much a 100% chance of achieving that single-system dominance. But that's not their modus operandi, and it certainly won't be happening this generation - ha ha.
Except third parties know a lot of their games would sell better on a Sony console than a Nintendo one. Even if the Wii U ended up selling a lot because of Nintendo, it doesn't really matter because third parties would know the Wii U sold what it did because of Nintendo games alone. It doesn't guarantee that their games would sell optimally on the Wii U. So instead, third parties would prefer coalesce on a console that would have their games sell up to their potential, which is likely to be the PS4 (and the 720 for extra sales in Western markets).
When you bring up the fact that third parties will want to push tech/power and focus on the West (including major third parties like Square Enix, Konami, and Capcom), your argument just becomes weaker.
Taiko was successful on PS2, but PS2 also had a quite different (and larger) userbase than PS3.
What are you basing that off of?
It's just a hypothetical thought experiment. There are a million reasons why it would never happen, including 3rd-party interests in the west. But that's why I restricted it to a modus operandi where their #1 priority was hypothetically to create a single dominant home system in Japan. If that was their primary focus in all things, then they can pretty much guarantee that result by throwing their support to the WiiU and withdrawing it from PS4. There is no such guarantee by reversing that equation, as we just saw with the Wii/PS3. Nintendo is the top-publisher in Japan, so there will always be a top-dog backing the other system. That wouldn't be the case if the roles were reversed.
But it's a crazy hypothetical that would never happen - first and foremost, because as you pointed out, 3rd-parties' #1 most important focus isn't to build a single dominant home system in Japan. They have a million other interests at work.
Sure, that's exactly my point. Wii does have quite a different (and larger) userbase than WiiU. Success on previous consoles means little to struggling consoles.
Also the latest Taiko entry on PSP did 300k+
Not bad for a taiko game which can only be played with buttons.
I still disagree because games like Tales, FF, MGS, Atelier, Disgaea, and others would still sell better on the PS4 over Wii U, even if third parties decided to throw their eggs in the Wii U basket. It'd be very hard to move your fanbase over--and a significant number of people would refuse to move.
No, they would sell zero copies on PS4 since they wouldn't be released on PS4 in that situation.
So why not keep releasing Taiko on DS as well? The third one still solve well above 300k units. Maybe because the userbase must be moved sooner or later?
Anyway, last LTD we know from Taiko PSP wasn't just above 250k? That's not bad but when on DS, Wii and 3DS you can sell at least double that amount...
Depends, the ps4 is likely to be cheaper from the start so that should help it off to a better launch than the 3.
I think the problem might be games though. I Made a post about this a couple of weeks ago and Nirolak mentioned something similar last page (but in reference to wiiu) that there isn't alot of 3rd party franchises that are likely to be getting announced soon.
heres the post
Now that Tales is said to be not planning on next gen what do we really have for the p4? a final fantasy and then maybe a Persona and a fighting game or two? Just seems like everyone got in before the end of the PS3 and their isn't alot there for early PS4.
That was before the game "bombed" on PS360.Wasn't there rumor of RE6U coming at some point?
Eh, I don't think it's the same. And last year Namco released Taiko 3DS (July) and Taiko Wii (November), so another round of Taiko games is not impossible.Early 2011
C'mon, you think Capcom is not working on MH Vita?
Early 2006
C'mon, you think <third party developer> is not working on <successful casual PS2 franchise> PS3?
I have my doubts, yes. Why should Namco move a casual franchise to the disaster that is the WiiU when the last Taiko on Wii did better than the previous three and there's also the 3DS?
I mean, everything is possible. But I don't see why Namco would do it unless it's a collaboration with Nintendo or something like that.
Media CreateCan anyone provide me with the numbers for Monster Hunter 3G (standard and best price) LTD?
Media Create
3G - 1.587.556
Best Price - 259.835
Famitsu
3G - 1.585.493
Best Price - 248.335
Looking at Garaph, Taiko doesn't seem to have really taken off at until it hit Nintendo platforms. The previous PS2/PSP sales all look incredibly low (mostly under 100k per entry). Portable DX is the best selling PS entry by a huge margin, though still lower end compared to the DS/Wii/3DS entires.Last Taiko PSP has sold 337k at retail (90k in 2012). I wouldn't be surprised if it ends at 370k+ this year.
Looking at Garaph, Taiko doesn't seem to have really taken off at until it hit Nintendo platforms. The previous PS2/PSP sales all look incredibly low (mostly under 100k per entry). Portable DX is the best selling PS entry by a huge margin, though still lower end compared to the DS/Wii/3DS entires.
Depends, the ps4 is likely to be cheaper from the start so that should help it off to a better launch than the 3.
I think the problem might be games though. I Made a post about this a couple of weeks ago and Nirolak mentioned something similar last page (but in reference to wiiu) that there isn't alot of 3rd party franchises that are likely to be getting announced soon.
heres the post
Now that Tales is said to be not planning on next gen what do we really have for the p4? a final fantasy and then maybe a Persona and a fighting game or two? Just seems like everyone got in before the end of the PS3 and their isn't alot there for early PS4.
Yes, from a fairly reliable source too (also correctly leaked KH HD, LOS2/MOF and Silent Hill HD info). It was part of a group of rumors, including Revelations HD for 360/PS3/U (came true) and a sequel to ORC.Wasn't there rumor of RE6U coming at some point?
Looking at Garaph, Taiko doesn't seem to have really taken off at until it hit Nintendo platforms. The previous PS2/PSP sales all look incredibly low (mostly under 100k per entry). Portable DX is the best selling PS entry by a huge margin, though still lower end compared to the DS/Wii/3DS entires.
Well, with the way Wii U has been going with 3rd party announcements, I don't think a Taiko announcement is immenent. PS3 or Vita seem nearly as likely imo.Taiko 2 PSP - 232k
http://geimin.net/da/db/2011_ne_mc/index.php
nº 614
Still, I don't see why are we arguing about Taiko on PSP. I'm also not expecting the franchise to jump to Vita.
Some of you think Taiko WiiU is assured to be announced this year. I don't think it makes sense but not denying the possibility.
It's okay. We can move on and discuss about a new topic, like I don't know, MH Vita or something.
what is this shit
Tales of Destiny remake sold 367k units on PS2 in 2006. I think it's a really good result, since it sold more than Tales of Legendia, which was a mainline title.
Yes, from a fairly reliable source too (also correctly leaked KH HD, LOS2/MOF and Silent Hill HD info). It was part of a group of rumors, including Revelations HD for 360/PS3/U (came true) and a sequel to ORC.
I still disagree because games like Tales, FF, MGS, Atelier, Disgaea, and others would still sell better on the PS4 over Wii U, even if third parties decided to throw their eggs in the Wii U basket. It'd be very hard to move your fanbase over--and a significant number of people would refuse to move.
Are you talking about Dual Pixels? If so, lol at "fairly reliable source":
"Mainline 3DS Pokemon game needs roughly two more years before its released."
"Direct hardware Backwards Compatibility will be available by a $70 $99 dongle that is plugged into the Omni that contains a PS3 on a chip with Cell to run games."
"Capcom is going to bring a voice command/dynamic slash version of Monster Hunter to the new X-Box."
"EA while limiting the budget will also bring Pulse and Battlefield 4 to the Wii U."
They were right about some Nintendo stuff like Yoshi's Island, and Donkey Kong Land Returns for Nintendo 3DS, but uhhh yeah...
Rock_Man kind of answered the question in a different way already, but whether they would sell more or less on Nintendo vs. Sony would be irrelevant to my scenario. If they were worried about sales of individual titles, then those individual titles would just be one of those millions of other interests at work that I mentioned (along with western focus, or keeping important devs happy who might want to work on more powerful hardware, moneyhats from Sony, etc., etc.).
In your case, the #1 overriding priority of the 3rd-parties isn't focused on creating one dominant system in the marketplace. They have other interests at work - such as a concern about some select individual titles. As I was trying to point out, my thought experiment was based on the premise that their main focus is on building one massively dominant home console system that owns like 85-90% of marketplace. That would be their main focus. The other stuff would only be focused on after achieving their main goal.
But it's a silly exercise anyway - and not really worth the discussion that we've already given it - ha ha.
Plans change, wouldnt be surprised if BF4 at some time was also planned to be released on WiiU.
Japanese devs sticking with the PS3 for another 2-3 years guarantees limited appeal and continued Western irrelevance for yet another generation. This is the time where they should be staking out mindshare, not short-term Eastern-only profits. A Tales game at launch would draw in a lot of new people that otherwise wouldn't bother.
It's just like when they wasted all that time trying to target handhelds. The PS3 game might sell well, but I doubt it will ever pull in Xillia numbers again. That ship has sailed.
Theres no dispute that PS3 got the majority of third party releases right?
If we say the split of support of Japanese third parties is 70: 30 between PS3 and WiiU respectively surely it would be easier for that 30% to migrate to the PS3 than that 70% to migrate to the WiiU. Also Nintendo's first party are not enough to carry a home console alone. The N64 and GC showed us this and Nintendo were only able to get away with it this gen due to the casual flocking to the Wii.
Japanese devs sticking with the PS3 for another 2-3 years guarantees limited appeal and continued Western irrelevance for yet another generation. This is the time where they should be staking out mindshare, not short-term Eastern-only profits. A Tales game at launch would draw in a lot of new people that otherwise wouldn't bother.
It's just like when they wasted all that time trying to target handhelds. The PS3 game might sell well, but I doubt it will ever pull in Xillia numbers again. That ship has sailed.
Japanese devs sticking with the PS3 for another 2-3 years guarantees limited appeal and continued Western irrelevance for yet another generation.
This is the time where they should be staking out mindshare, not short-term Eastern-only profits. A Tales game at launch would draw in a lot of new people that otherwise wouldn't bother.
Exactly, just like MHP3 was planned to be a Vita launch title. And RE6 Wii U was teased by other sources too.Plans change, wouldnt be surprised if BF4 at some time was also planned to be released on WiiU.
Plans change, wouldnt be surprised if BF4 at some time was also planned to be released on WiiU.
Japanese devs sticking with the PS3 for another 2-3 years guarantees limited appeal and continued Western irrelevance for yet another generation. This is the time where they should be staking out mindshare, not short-term Eastern-only profits. A Tales game at launch would draw in a lot of new people that otherwise wouldn't bother.
It's just like when they wasted all that time trying to target handhelds. The PS3 game might sell well, but I doubt it will ever pull in Xillia numbers again. That ship has sailed.
They're already developing the fourth installment in the Super Smash bros. franchise.
Wasnt the MHP3 rumor simply based on that one Capcom guy showing of MHP3rd runing on Vita through emulation at the Vita unveiling, to show off that the 2nd analog stick could be used in the game? Or was there anything more to it?Exactly, just like MHP3 was planned to be a Vita launch title. And RE6 Wii U was teased by other sources too.