S0ULZB0URNE
Member
And I'm getting ZD9/Z9D vibes.

Sony Shows Off Next-Gen TV Technology - And It Isn’t OLED
Sony targets way more brightness for less power consumption with new Mini LED display

Last edited:
There have been some reports that MiniLED has been getting closer and closer to OLED for years now as the number of LEDs increase, so if Sony has pushed that forward even more then it'd be interesting to see the final specs.Bold move they must be extremely confident in this breakthrough
But does it look better than OLED?
And I'm getting ZD9/Z9D vibes.
![]()
Sony Shows Off Next-Gen TV Technology - And It Isn’t OLED
Sony targets way more brightness for less power consumption with new Mini LED displaywww.forbes.com
![]()
Sound and Vision: Sony looks to Mini LED for brighter, smarter HDR in 2024
OPINION: Steve May travels to Sony HQ Japan for insight into its 2024 TV plans, and hands-on with the brightest professional mastering monitor yetwww.trustedreviews.com
"There’s no perfect display device, admits Sony Distinguished Engineer Toshiyuku Ogura, but he seems to believe that Mini LED has the greatest potential, when it comes to colour volume, brightness and viewing angle."
Z9D does to meBut does it look better than OLED?
I can't believe he speaks this bullshit about viewing angles, unless they develop some new LCD tech (other than VA and IPS) it will never have "greatest potential" in this regard.
No it isn't IPS.Whatever... it's still ips with ips glow and all those problems.
Or even worse - they put this backlight under va... yuck
Whatever... it's still ips with ips glow and all those problems.
Or even worse - they put this backlight under va... yuck
You think you know more than him about display tech?
We don't want to start listing oled issues again do we?IPS glow and low contrast without LD or shit viewing angles of VA and black smearing.
They slapped "mini led" branding on old tech and many people forgot general issues of LCD technology.
Sony is into it because it's cheaper to produce so they can get higher margins.
As long as it's close I don't care, at least it won't have burn-ins.But does it look better than OLED?
IPS glow and low contrast without LD or shit viewing angles of VA and black smearing.
They slapped "mini led" branding on old tech and many people forgot general issues of LCD technology.
Sony is into it because it's cheaper to produce so they can get higher margins.
I have seen many LCD screens in my life and not even one of them had good viewing angles. IPS is much better than VA but worse in other aspects.
Core LCD tech hasn't advanced that much in years, most advances are done in back light tech.
I wouldn’t say blooming was entirely removed on our demonstration display, but it was the most suppressed by far I’ve seen with any mini LED screen to date.
We don't want to start listing oled issues again do we?
No va doesn't look good at an angle.No it isn't IPS.
VA looks great on angle.
If off angle it could be a issue for some but isn't for me.
I never found that to be a problem. Maybe vincent ses his stupid hgig even for movies....Like Black Crush
![]()
See that all sounds plausible up to the last part. And I prefer my Sony LCD over my OLED's, but there is no way currently that they'll beat emissive for off angle viewing.![]()
Sound and Vision: Sony looks to Mini LED for brighter, smarter HDR in 2024
OPINION: Steve May travels to Sony HQ Japan for insight into its 2024 TV plans, and hands-on with the brightest professional mastering monitor yetwww.trustedreviews.com
"There’s no perfect display device, admits Sony Distinguished Engineer Toshiyuku Ogura, but he seems to believe that Mini LED has the greatest potential, when it comes to colour volume, brightness and viewing angle."
Yes it does look great on Angle.No va doesn't look good at an angle.
Even straight on, middle is darker than edges. VA cone gamma exists for a reason.
Off angle, the gamam suffers too. not to mention extreme blur which cannot be helped on va.
I will take ips over best va any day... that said - oled is light years ahead of both.
Btw. IPS glow is on every ips monitor. It's not a defect. It's just how the tech works. Even with very low brightness. We can add ips bleed to that which is a production defect and that's... on every ips screen essentailly.
I never found that to be a problem. Maybe vincent ses his stupid hgig even for movies....
OLED tv should be viewed with minimal light possible. If your shadow area in a movie is 20 nits and your room is 500 nits, that's obviously going to fight and obfuscate some of the shadowed areas.
Remember, the oled light floor is 0. Pixels can have any brightness. Not only on/off or few basic levels like mini leds.
Besides - LG created Dynamic Tone Mapping exactly for that reason. For movies especially. DTM would lift that area right up and it would look awesome.
I've switched from hgig to dtm after 2 years and I couldn't be happier. i also disabled tpc and gsr (dimming over time when no radical brightness change was detected). I have only c1 though. This is fixed on c3/g3.
I am not saying there isn't some black crush but it's way overblown out of proportions and dont exist when using dtm or many of other lift black or other settings available to you in the tv.
And that's still camera capture. When viewing in the middle of the night, your eyes have very good dynamic range.
When I got the tv, I was playing some horror games and even lowered in-game brightness to have it pitch black. lol it's like vr in the middle of the night
Tired of buying LG panels to put in their TVs.
Yes it does look great on Angle.
4:15 in
IPS and it's glowing blacks are terrible in comparison to a good VA.
You obviously never had one on the level of the ZD9/Z9D.no. I had like 10 va monitors. I am not getting fooled again. Looks like shit in reality.
Angles are fine on bright scenes but terrible on dark/shadowy/grey scenes.
It doesn't matter. VA is VA. Zones or not. It was, is and will be shitty tech.You obviously never had one on the level of the ZD9/Z9D.
Besides...you lost all credibility saying IPS was better than VAand anyone who is in the know won't take you serious anymore
![]()
It does matter.It doesn't matter. VA is VA. Zones or not. It was, is and will be shitty tech.
Good IPS, with glossy screen, no backlight bleeding and limited ips glow can look good.
I will die on that hill. I extensively tested tens of monitors few years back before I got oled.
Stupid lg 27uk650 looked way better than 2x the price va monitors
Sony choosing VA for this is dooming the whole project.It does matter.
Sony(the leaders in TV makers) again is choosing a VA panel for its flagship for a reason.
IPS is trash and Sony is better than LG.
Profit?Sony(the leaders in TV makers) again is choosing a VA panel for its flagship for a reason.
You think you know more than him about display tech?
It didn't doom the Sony in 2016/17Sony choosing VA for this is dooming the whole project.
Off angles gamma of dark scenes, middle of the screen being darker because of gamme (at least when viewing up close, not a problem on tv far away) and pixel response are not going to be fixed.
va is va. lcd is lcd. Why are you arguing facts.
They are inventing better backlight. It's not fixing ANY va issues.
AWARDSProfit?
Not a fan of local dimming.
Seems the most likely reason.That, or their ridiculously overpriced OLEDs failed to reach sales expectations.
AWARDS