VanSiriusGabriel
Member
Look I still don't fucking get it:This just goes to show how AWFUL their messaging has been. Jesus F Christ.
All games work on BC or not?
Look I still don't fucking get it:This just goes to show how AWFUL their messaging has been. Jesus F Christ.
I personally think next generation will be won by price.
Here is a good recap reddit had, which saintjules last pasted here last week.So does anyone have an updated general run down of all of the supposed leakers from over the last year?
I think O'dium, Heisenberg, BG's, and VFXVeteran are still posting?
*Not looking for any witch hunts - just wondering what their current status is. I think I saw some of these members explain themselves but what about Tommy, Orisiris, and others?
I personally think next generation will be won by price.
If Sonys intention has been to keep to the $399 budget then I think this will put some strain on Microsoft.
1. MS could price the xsx at $450, but I think they will suffer a pretty heavy loss per console sold, Sony would be bleeding them as there will be a fixed budget / operating cost and the other departments will be looking at just how much loss the xbox produces.
2. MS could price the xsx at $500 or $600 in both cases the loss will be far less or it may even make profit on each unit sold, but the sales will be far weaker and its almost guaranteed Sony will outsell them at $100 or $200 price difference.
Atmos can do up to 35 audio sources, while the Tempest engine goal is to do around 100.
Here is a good recap reddit had, which saintjules last pasted here last week.
Click on the links as most of them are still up with their predictions in more detail. Tidux guy is hilarious.
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
15 tf, 32 gig of ram. Lol. That's the devkit's specs, not retail PS5.www.neogaf.com
Lower quality graphics and lower performance? Jump conclusions at max lolYou are honestly excited about loading in lower quality graphics and lower performance faster?
These SSDs have to provide something other than fast load times for them to be worth the increase in cost... if people are so impatient they can't wait 10-30 seconds for a level to load then I don't know what to tell them.
A decrease in loading times is welcome, but I don't want to pay an extra $50 - $100 for it.
The "couple of percent" drop was to give an example of a 10% saving of power. It was not a statement that clocks would never drop by more than 2%.
He definitely didn't say that.
Which devs have said the PS5 memory arrangement is better? Simpler, yes, but better for performance? I'll bet none.
How many times I got asleep in a loading screen after PS1.
Any idea what cerny meant with 825gb is the most natural size on a 12ch interface
Hardly unthinkable. Nadella sees the consoles as trojans for subscriptions.What if MS pulls off the impossible and puts the XsX out at $399 alongside the PS5?
I think they will be pretty close to eachother in price. Sonys ssd, cooling (wich works) and new ds5 will drive up the price of ps5. Xbox is a monster so I asume it will cost alot. My guess would be at best 499$ for both or at worst 599$.now, since we know the specs can anyone try to estimate the actual cost of these?
The closet speculators were anyone believing the original 9.2tf Oberon leak, which in that chart goes back to a Digital Foundry article from April 2019! So almost a year old. The data was right there, but few people believed it.Yikes so like 99% of these leaks and insiders were completely full of crap?
The only ones that were even close were the 9.2 to 10~ and there were very few of them.
Even the Bryttany Messina leak started out reasonable but then went out into B.S. land.
So strange how this all turned out.
If a 2% clock drop is saving 10% power then at 2.23Ghz they are waaaaaaay up the voltage frequency curve.
$399 or $400 for ps5 im basing on ps4 price (399.99 is 400 stupid marketing)I agree, sort of. Sony will sell the most, no matter what, but price is a deciding factor of course.
But what are you basing the 399, 450, 500 and 600$ prices on?
Hardly unthinkable. Nadella sees the consoles as trojans for subscriptions.
But what about the 12ch? does it mean size can be in multiples of 825gb?He was talking about the SSD size. Basically he’s saying the SSD is 1TB, but the amount of space being used will be 825GB. He kinda worded it weirdly.
PS5 will still sell more at the same price IMO.What if MS pulls off the impossible and puts the XsX out at $399 alongside the PS5?
I get the bad feeling that it may be $500-$600 ranges and hence the reason for a 2nd SKU.
my ps4 pro and xbx are both quiet and barely noticeable
Any idea what cerny meant with 825gb is the most natural size on a 12ch interface
He was talking about the SSD size. Basically he’s saying the SSD is 1TB, but the amount of space being used will be 825GB. He kinda worded it weirdly.
PS5 will still sell more at the same price IMO.
$399 or $400 for ps5 im basing on ps4 price (399.99 is 400 ffs)
$500 or $499 is what the xbox1 came out at
$600 is something I heard from 1 of the massive xbox fan channels, ign editor -> this guy when he was on some panel discussing price breakdowns.
I very much doubt they will release at $600 if the PS5 was around 12 / 13TF I think both would be looking at around $600 and both would be selling at a slight profit.
I think it will be around $500 for xsx anything more and they will haemorrhage a lot of money per sale.
they can price match the $399, but it comes down to how much money they can make back from games sales, otherwise the board at MS will have to explain to shareholders why they allow the xbox to post such massive losses.
$399 or $400 for ps5 im basing on ps4 price (399.99 is 400 stupid marketing)
$499or $500 (499.99 is 500 stupid marketing) is what the xbox1 came out at
$600 is something I heard from 1 of the massive xbox fan channels, ign editor -> this guy when he was on some panel discussing price breakdowns.
I very much doubt they will release at $600 if the PS5 was around 12 / 13TF I think both would be looking at around $600 and both would be selling at a slight profit.
I think it will be around $500 for xsx anything more and they will haemorrhage a lot of money per sale.
they can price match the $399, but it comes down to how much money they can make back from games sales, otherwise the board at MS will have to explain to shareholders why they allow the xbox to post such massive losses.
You got paid for this? You shouodsmh. Some of the most vocal fanboys and Schills are Xbox fans as well so stop the bs and I'm glad you have full grasp of the potential of the hardware.
Thy definitely need to hire you lol
HeisenbergFX4 stayed like 90% of the time in the ~10TF range for PS5. Only recently he started to say he heard it could go higher than that, closer to 11-12TF (probably a bad source).
He's been the closest to the truth.
There's so many insider claims on sites, I missed Heisenberg's 10tf.Thank you.
You and I talked often in PMs and for a long time I warned you of this.
I just thought the systems were going to be closer.
There's so many insider claims on sites, I missed Heisenberg's 10tf.
Spot on. Well done.
as for now stands:
cpu is 2.8 % faster in xsex VS 6% for Xbox one last gen
gpu is 15% better in xsex VS 40% for PS4 last gen
ram size are the same but bandwidth is 22.2% higher for xsex(XsX has different speeds for ram 6Gb bw is less than PS5) VS 89% adv. For PS4 last gen
ssd is 65% faster for ps5(this is also crazy)
ray tracing is 15.6% better in xsex (on what basis? We don't know that exactly)
Audio chip is still unknown (Looks like PS5 might have big advantages there, yet to be seen)
Looks like a Ray traced reflections demo...in an alternate dimension where everything is made from Diet Pepsi cans.Holy shit that AMD RDNA2 Ray Tracing demo is absolute trash.
Definitely but probably not at a 3:1 rate... I think it would bring the gap much closer right out of the gate.
All depends on how MS and Sony handle their respective marketing between now and launch.
Don't forget a 249 Lockhart that plays all the same games as the big boy xbox!Definitely but probably not at a 3:1 rate... I think it would bring the gap much closer right out of the gate.
All depends on how MS and Sony handle their respective marketing between now and launch.
Agree 100%Definitely but probably not at a 3:1 rate... I think it would bring the gap much closer right out of the gate.
All depends on how MS and Sony handle their respective marketing between now and launch.
Definitely but probably not at a 3:1 rate... I think it would bring the gap much closer right out of the gate.
All depends on how MS and Sony handle their respective marketing between now and launch.
$249? I think that's even cheaper than an Xbox One S!Don't forget a 249 Lockhart that plays all the same as the big boy xbox!
Not at the launch. They're creating a list of the most played games to prioritize the BC method.Look I still don't fucking get it:
All games work on BC or not?
On the hardware side not even upset it puts them in a pretty shit position for the entire generation though. They will be playing catch up and their is no sauce created that can span that gulf. XSeX is definitely more powerful. Also clearing up a bunch of bullshit Ive read PSV does constantly run in boost mode but I don't think that is a good thing. (Own Opinion) Cant imagine sustaining that high a clock speed is going to be quiet after hours of playing anything. Never cared who won will still be getting both systems for exclusives but XSeX should be the multiplat king.
You can direct get assets from SSD to GPU processing without need load into the RAM.I wonder if the ssd as somewhat of a replacement of memory can be used to stream in 4k assets on the fly without any performance hit on the gpu?
I guess i wonder to what extent will the ssd help in graphics the normally would fall under the gpu?
If i ask dumb questions just ignore
Playstation are the incumbent they are the current gen kings - and sales will be dependant on games as I said previously, all Sony has to do is demo the ssd tech using HZD 2 for ps5's to fly off the shelves, the hardcore ps / xbox fans will make initial sales huge but after that its down to those on the fence and if the ssd tech works as they claim and they demonstrate 1 or 2 1st party games that make perfect use of the ssd tech and the audio tech, lets not forget about vr and you can see where this is headed remember the gpu performance parity isnt huge, its not ideal and MS can shout about being the most powerful and market it hard, but I think Sony can do some sly marketing as well.
Its just Sony are really shit at marketing and seem to be even worse this generation.
It's funny how some people saying "less performance & quality" I mean the PS4 pro is weaker than Xbox one X in 40-50% & you can't see the difference until digital foundry zoom in 400x. The only game that showed the difference is Rdr2.
Now let's not talk about 16%![]()
There's so many insider claims on sites, I missed Heisenberg's 10tf.
Spot on. Well done.
Don't forget a 249 Lockhart that plays all the same games as the big boy xbox!
I play mostly at mid-night so I always sleep playing just that load time makes you get asleep for some minutes... sometimes even hours lolnarcolepsy?