Steve Youngblood
Member
*throws switch into fire*
Why create a new Brand? Just buy Capcom or Sega.
OK i'm somewhat joking. However just look at what happened with Monolith Soft. It took the general audience a long time to realise they were a first party developer due to the different name and they are still very much viewed as their own seperate thing in a similar way to how Gurella Games and Naughty Dog are viewed as their own entities despite both being Sony first party studios. I'm sure there are a few independent studios with brand recognition who would love the financial stability that comes from being a first party studio to a stable publisher, especially if they were allowed/encouraged to make the games they wanted to make (within reason)
Considering that Nintendo passed up the chance to purchase Atlus, the same Atlus who makes some of the most mature theme JRPGs in gaming today and the same Atlus who supports Nintendo consoles should give off the impression that Nintendo isnt interested in buying other studios.
Hell I would love it if Nintendo bought Capcom but its not happening. Nintendo would really have to see something in a studio for them to buy it. Hell Nintendo doesnt even own Game Freak fully! Game Freak is free to release games on other platforms if they chose to do so! Game Freak owns Pokémon! Thats crazy.
Hell Nintendo doesnt even own Game Freak fully! Game Freak is free to release games on other platforms if they chose to do so! Game Freak owns Pokémon! Thats crazy.
Gamefreak owns Pokemon but Nintendo owns the most important elements of Pokemon, specifically the name, logo, and character names.
https://youtu.be/7FxHY-vLMgs?t=1m1s
Actually, The rights to the Pokemon, particularly the character names, are held by Nintendo.
https://www.pokemon.com/us/legal/
"Pokémon, Pokémon character names, Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo DS, Wii, Wii U, and Wiiware are trademarks of Nintendo."
So yeah, Gamefreak isn't owned by Nintendo, but Pokemon is still within Nintendo's control.
Considering that Nintendo passed up the chance to purchase Atlus, the same Atlus who makes some of the most mature theme JRPGs in gaming today and the same Atlus who supports Nintendo consoles should give off the impression that Nintendo isnt interested in buying other studios.
Hell I would love it if Nintendo bought Capcom but its not happening. Nintendo would really have to see something in a studio for them to buy it. Hell Nintendo doesnt even own Game Freak fully! Game Freak is free to release games on other platforms if they chose to do so! Game Freak owns Pokémon! Thats crazy.
As per the CoD/Pokemon chart, the running gag is that it's little kids that care about the M on the box and adults that play the games stereotyped to only be for little kids.
Obviously it goes normally plenty of the time too, but there's a reason that one C.S. Lewis quote that gets passed around from time to time exists.
Considering that Nintendo passed up the chance to purchase Atlus, the same Atlus who makes some of the most mature theme JRPGs in gaming today and the same Atlus who supports Nintendo consoles should give off the impression that Nintendo isnt interested in buying other studios.
Hell I would love it if Nintendo bought Capcom but its not happening. Nintendo would really have to see something in a studio for them to buy it. Hell Nintendo doesnt even own Game Freak fully! Game Freak is free to release games on other platforms if they chose to do so! Game Freak owns Pokémon! Thats crazy.
Just remember, this is nothing new for Nintendo. They've always welcomed Mature and risque content since at least the DS. They're just actively pushing for it with the Switch.
Gamefreak owns Pokemon but Nintendo owns the most important elements of Pokemon, specifically the name, logo, and character names.
https://youtu.be/7FxHY-vLMgs?t=1m1s
Actually, The rights to the Pokemon, particularly the character names, are held by Nintendo.
https://www.pokemon.com/us/legal/
"Pokémon, Pokémon character names, Nintendo 3DS, Nintendo DS, Wii, Wii U, and Wiiware are trademarks of Nintendo."
So yeah, Gamefreak isn't owned by Nintendo, but Pokemon is still within Nintendo's control.
This thread should explain everything concerning who owns what relating to Pokémon.Oh I knew most of that. I was trying to make a point that Nintendo doesnt even fully own the studio that makes the Pokémon games to the poster I was quoting and if they chose they can make other titles for other platforms.
So Nintendo actually WANTS to shed their light-hearted kid-friendly reputation?
I'll believe it when I see the receipts(games).
I dont think Nintendo passing on Atlus (if they did pass) is necessarily a sign that they arent interested in mergers or acquisitions. There was a lot going on with Atlus during that time and Nintendo may have simply not wanted to get involved in all that. Also, they may have put in a bid and simply got outbid by Sega.
Precisely. Third-parties will look at what Nintendo allow in their own games and go from there.
Nintendo should just get off their asses and start adding some panty shots to their games. They can even make them artistic if they want.
Bayonetta 2 / Devils Third / Fatal Frame are all recentish nintendo published titles that don't spring out as "family feiendly"
Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is the game that Nintendo releases on the Switch, where we can compare directly with the Wii U-game Xenoblade Chronicles X. It is the first chance we have to see if Nintendo is willing to push the envelope further on the Switch than on the Wii U.
I remain sceptical until proven otherwise. Your move, Nintendo.
Well so far Pyra doesnt seem to be censored in any way, from the footage weve seen. Since this is probably what you meant by pushing the envelope.Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is the game that Nintendo releases on the Switch, where we can compare directly with the Wii U-game Xenoblade Chronicles X. It is the first chance we have to see if Nintendo is willing to push the envelope further on the Switch than on the Wii U.
I remain sceptical until proven otherwise. Your move, Nintendo.
Switch is the new Vita
What do you want to see pushed?
Behind the scenes, Nintendo localisation team will have a team to prepare a censorship guideline.
For gaming companies it seems pretty clear theres a symbiotic relationship between publisher and studio; if theres not a good 'fit', you don't get good results.
I'm sure you can think of plenty of studios that were bought by publishers that did nothing special and were then dissolved.
C'mon, you must have had something in mind, spill.lol I take what I can get...
Agree, but just because they dont see one studio being a fit, doesnt mean they arent open to any studios at all. Thats why them not purchasing Atlus isnt necessarily a sign that they arent interested in any studios. If the right opportunity presented itself Im confident Nintendo would be interested. Like you say though, it has to be a good fit for both Nintendo and the studio.
You missed the insane discussion about Lyn in FEWarriors.
It really makes you contemplate giving up on video games.
Xenoblade Chronicles 2 is the game that Nintendo releases on the Switch, where we can compare directly with the Wii U-game Xenoblade Chronicles X. It is the first chance we have to see if Nintendo is willing to push the envelope further on the Switch than on the Wii U.
I remain sceptical until proven otherwise. Your move, Nintendo.
You missed the insane discussion about Lyn in FEWarriors.
It really makes you contemplate giving up on video games.
If Nintendo were to license any IP, they should liscence The Sound of Music and make an Assassins Creed clone
It fits all their needs perfectly.
1. Its blue ocean as The Sound of Music is one of the most beloved films of all time. This is an IP that would sell systems to people who would never buy videogames. Its almost as big of an IP as Star Wars. Especially to certain demographics.
2. One of the main things consumers love about the Assasins Creed series is the hostorical tourism and 1940s Austria in the shadow of WW2 is a great location for that
3. Its a third person stealth game where Nazi's are the villans. Thats about as "Mature" as video games get
*action combat would be replaced by dancing but given the similarities between dancing and fighting its fair to say player engagement wouldn't suffer.
**Being able to show industry people behind closed doors that you were willing to fund an expensive cinematic open world game would do wonders to show that you were serious about being competitive in the modern AAA landscape
C'mon, you must have had something in mind, spill.
I can't tell if this is serious or not...
Before that even.Just remember, this is nothing new for Nintendo. They've always welcomed Mature and risque content since at least the DS. They're just actively pushing for it with the Switch.
Before that even.
Eternal Darkness was rated M, and was a 2nd party title published by Nintendo.
Behind the scenes, Nintendo localisation team will have a team to prepare a censorship guideline.
I thought guideline should mean what is advisable for people to follow. It doesn't mean that Nintendo will block games from being sold that doesn't follow their advise.Can people please stop ignoring this. "Director Genki Yokota, who works for Nintendos Japanese division (NCL), says all three companies are communicating about localization decisions that may prove to be controversial."
Also, most of the changes Nintendo made to their games were good and approved by the original developers.
As much as I'd love for Nintendo to do a musical-based game, there's two problem with doing so...100% Serious.
Edit: Musicals are widely loved by huge segments of the population and they are an unexplored space in the gaming industry that is more interested in rehashing the same fantasy/scifi and Action movie tropes at higher fidelity.
You could probably get access to most of the great musicals for a pittance. The Sound of Music, My Fair Lady, Mary Poppins, Les Miserables, West Side Story, Greece, The Wizard of Oz is now under Fair Use.
Start Edit: There are a bunch more i am forgetting, hopefully that was enough to demonstrate the idea.
Besides it is not unprecedented to have dance/musicals/culture in video games. its just rare. Final Fantasy VI's most famous scene is an Opera made on the SNES. FF IX is about a travelling theatre troop Final Fantasy x-2 is musical, Lightning Returns has a good mix of Opera influence.
Most Recently Nier Automata is being praised for its Soundtrack and the Music that goes along with exploring the world and Yakuza 0 one of this years other Hits has both a karaokee and a disco dance minigame that were hugely popular among players who experienced those games.
Nintendo even published Tokyo Mirrage Sessions which while currently burried on the WiiU was greatly loved by those that played it.
Edit2: The fact that Nintendo is using an original jazz song written specifically for Super Mario Odyssey to sell the game seems to indicate that this would fit firmly within tbeir current direction.
So, in other words, Nintendo is looking for Adult games and Sony is thinking on the children... 2017 has been insane!
I don't see that ever happening, but as Disney has shown, Disney has been able to both maintain their "wholesome values" of traditional Disney, and release violent comic book movies at the same time, so yes, Nintendo certainly could expand their range/image.The way i see it, Nintendo can only stop being kiddie if it starts producing some 1st party M titles as well. A dark souls/bloodborne edgy Zelda, or a Mario/GTA sandbox game. Heck, Fire Emblem should just go all in and have sex scenes.
That's because they don't usually attach the Disney name to their Marvel stuff.I don't see that ever happening, but as Disney has shown, Disney has been able to both maintain their "wholesome values" of traditional Disney, and release violent comic book movies at the same time, so yes, Nintendo certainly could expand their range/image.
The way i see it, Nintendo can only stop being kiddie if it starts producing some 1st party M titles as well. A dark souls/bloodborne edgy Zelda, or a Mario/GTA sandbox game. Heck, Fire Emblem should just go all in and have sex scenes.
The way i see it, Nintendo can only stop being kiddie if it starts producing some 1st party M titles as well. A dark souls/bloodborne edgy Zelda, or a Mario/GTA sandbox game. Heck, Fire Emblem should just go all in and have sex scenes.