• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Official Neogaf 3DMark Timespy league table - the ULTIMATE epeen showdown

T

Three

Member
So as promised the result of flipping that physical switch on the 5090 card from "silent" to "gaming"

T Three - TimeSpy - 34,645

GPU clock seems to go from 2,017MHz to 2,932MHz
nets a 721 point increase in GPU points. I'm not sure how that translates to realworld gains in games but the MHz bump doesn't seem worth it for 3DMark. Does bump me up in the league though. GPU score seems high now relative to other 5090s, might start messing with other mem/CPU settings now. What have you done to me Gaiff Gaiff ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHG
U

Unknown Soldier

Member
GHG said:
Updated again, let me know if I've missed anyone.

U Unknown Soldier dont be afraid to get involved, if you already have 3dmark then then throw yourself in the mix.
200.gif
Click to expand...
I don't know why I did this. I've had 3DMark for many years but I don't run it a lot these days because my machine is positively ancient

I'm overdue for an overhaul but maybe Jensen should get off his ass and make some more 5090's because I ain't doing shit to start my rebuild until I have one in my hands

U Unknown Soldier - TimeSpy - 18,267
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHG
Gaiff

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Three said:
So as promised the result of flipping that physical switch on the 5090 card from "silent" to "gaming"

T Three - TimeSpy - 34,645

GPU clock seems to go from 2,017MHz to 2,932MHz
nets a 721 point increase in GPU points. I'm not sure how that translates to realworld gains in games but the MHz bump doesn't seem worth it for 3DMark. Does bump me up in the league though. GPU score seems high now relative to other 5090s, might start messing with other mem/CPU settings now. What have you done to me Gaiff Gaiff ?
Click to expand...
That's quite strange. Your clocks are much higher, but the performance increase isn't too large. If it isn't a big bump in 3D Mark, then it'll likely be lower for games.
 
Makoto-Yuki

Makoto-Yuki

Gold Member
Kilau said:
I don't know what the games should be running at, but real-world game performance is all that matters. You do have all your ROPs right?
Click to expand...
Yeah all my ROPs are here and yeah I’m not gonna worry too much about a benchmark. I’m just happy that my score improved from that low result. I thought my card was faulty lol.

Might actually see if I can push my Pc higher. Maybe do a light OC on the GPU and turn on PBO with the CPU. I won’t be running at that all the time. Possibly keep PBO on.

EDIT: turned on PBO

holy shit. it's using 250W, going to ~82C, and hitting 5.9GHz. daaaamn :messenger_fire:

EDIT 2: i hit 35684 but now i'm getting less than 35K when overclocking and PBO on. When running time spy my GPU usage is dropping to ~80% and only using 450-520W. I don't get it. Maybe Time Spy is just too dated now. I think Time Spy 4K or Steel Nomad is better these days.
 
Last edited:
U

Unknown Soldier

Member
Pedro Motta said:
I had no idea this was so unbalanced for the Intel side.
Click to expand...
The AMD X3D chips don't perform well in 3DMark compared to the Intel chips even though they destroy the Intel chips in actual games

3DMark is a synthetic benchmark and doesn't behave like games do. This has been true since around 1999 when it was originally invented
 
Pedro Motta

Pedro Motta

Gold Member
Unknown Soldier said:
The AMD X3D chips don't perform well in 3DMark compared to the Intel chips even though they destroy the Intel chips in actual games

3DMark is a synthetic benchmark and doesn't behave like games do. This has been true since around 1999 when it was originally invented
Click to expand...
GHG GHG I would suggest to separate the ranks in 2 column, one for AMD another for Intel systems.
 
64gigabyteram

64gigabyteram

Reverse groomer.
Rossco EZ said:
question for those middle to bottom users on the leaderboard, how are your systems holding up with the games you play currently?
Click to expand...
the lowest score (besides Adamsapple's joke score) is 13,000 something.

That's better than my system which is capable of playing most modern releases at 1080/1440 medium-low
 
HeisenbergFX4

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Insane Metal said:
Hey, thought you were sporting a 4090?
Click to expand...
Yeah the 4090 just died several months ago and even though I had it for about 18 months since Best Buy didn't carry that one anymore they gave me a full refund which I used to buy a 5090 prebuilt but that 5090 had lines running through my display

When I returned the 5090 prebuilt they had this 5080 9800X3D as an open box buy which I grabbed.

I really want another 5090 system but this 5080 was literally half the price of a 5090 not to mention stock issues atm with 5090s
dEvAnGeL said:
What happened to the 5090? Genuinely curious.
Click to expand...
 
OverHeat

OverHeat

« generous god »
HeisenbergFX4 said:
Yeah the 4090 just died several months ago and even though I had it for about 18 months since Best Buy didn't carry that one anymore they gave me a full refund which I used to buy a 5090 prebuilt but that 5090 had lines running through my display

When I returned the 5090 prebuilt they had this 5080 9800X3D as an open box buy which I grabbed.

I really want another 5090 system but this 5080 was literally half the price of a 5090 not to mention stock issues atm with 5090s
Click to expand...
Peasant 😂😂😂😂 joking hope you find one soon enough
 
Bavarian_Sloth

Bavarian_Sloth

Member
Rossco EZ said:
question for those middle to bottom users on the leaderboard, how are your systems holding up with the games you play currently?
Click to expand...
Depends on the native resolution of your monitor/TV, I would say.

With my setup I can still play everything maxed out @4k Dlss with 60 - 120 frames.

The only game where I had to activate FG to get over 60 fps + Hardware RT so far was Wukong.
 
CrustyBritches

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
Rossco EZ said:
question for those middle to bottom users on the leaderboard, how are your systems holding up with the games you play currently?
Click to expand...
I think my 4060 Ti 16GB was the lowest on the rankings, excluding Adamsapple's joke post. I usually play 1440p DLSS Balanced or Performance with mostly medium and a couple high settings. x16 AF, High textures, motion blur+depth of field+vignetting+chromatic aberration turned off. Then if I wanted the extra smoothness I'd use FG.

Here's Monster Hunter Wilds with High preset that defaults to DLSS Balanced, FG off. If I played this I'd probably use DLSS Perf and slightly lower settings to get the avg up into the 80s with better lows, then let G-sync handle any egregious drops.
9lMzBUl.jpeg
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
//DEVIL//

//DEVIL//

Member


36214 is my result


not sure if its the highest or anything

9800x3d
5090 Astral (didn't do any manual OC or anything. )

edit: just looked at the score board -_- wtf how come you guys have better score ? manual OC ?

eh. what is the max boost clock for 5090 OC ( preferablly Astral ) in general without manual OC ?

i think i saw my card reaching 2930 ? but no ideal. I really don't do these kind of things. I usually just even undervolt the card mem tweaking just because i want the card at the lowest temp / noise possible.
 
Last edited:
ValiantInstance

ValiantInstance

Member

I scored 23 821 in Time Spy

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}
www.3dmark.com

I can probably bump it up to 25k when I get round to undervolting this thing.

Would be fun to have seperate charts for AM4 and AM5. Although it'll probably make me want to upgrade :messenger_grinning_sweat:
 
Last edited:
Kilau

Kilau

Member
//DEVIL// said:


36214 is my result


not sure if its the highest or anything

9800x3d
5090 Astral (didn't do any manual OC or anything. )

edit: just looked at the score board -_- wtf how come you guys have better score ? manual OC ?

eh. what is the max boost clock for 5090 OC ( preferablly Astral ) in general without manual OC ?

i think i saw my card reaching 2930 ? but no ideal. I really don't do these kind of things. I usually just even undervolt the card mem tweaking just because i want the card at the lowest temp / noise possible.
Click to expand...

Share the link, your CPU is holding you back a little.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NeoGAF Pokémon Showdown Gym League
2 3
109
13K
Kwame120 replied
NeoGAF's Essential RPGs 2016 Edition - Voting open until January 15th-
7 8 9 10 11
527
119K
Vecks replied
NeoGAF's Essential RPGs - 2015 edition
18 19 20 21 22
1K
232K
Thores replied
NeoGAF Pokémon League | There are 18 badges in GAF; Gary Oak has 20
12 13 14 15 16
754
70K
spiritfox replied
Fighting Games Weekly | Apr 6-12 | Fighting Games Weekly | Apr 6-12 | DaiGOAT
55 56 57 58 59
3K
206K
Sixfortyfive replied
Top Bottom