kvltus lvlzvs
Member
I personally voted 80-85, Im thinking I may have called this one after the dust settles.too bad the poll doesn’t show how people voted, I’m curious to see who voted for what
I personally voted 80-85, Im thinking I may have called this one after the dust settles.too bad the poll doesn’t show how people voted, I’m curious to see who voted for what
ofc its different because its a sony 1st party game right
fuck off will ya
proud voter of 85-90, though im worried it'll slip below when angry brits come with a vengencetoo bad the poll doesn’t show how people voted, I’m curious to see who voted for what
I personally voted 80-85, Im thinking I may have called this one after the dust settles.
I went with 85-90 myself because despite the game of the generation and other hype coming from the usual suspects/paid trolls I just had a feeling this was going to be closer to Fallout 4 than Skyrim from what had leakedproud voter of 85-90, though im worried it'll slip below when angry brits come with a vengence
Yep. You nailed it.I’ve only read a few reviews so far, but it doesn’t seem like Starfield breaks any new ground. It’s just a solid Bethesda experience in space. Does that seem like the case? (Albeit a gross oversimplification.)
Is this game being weighted on the scale of 'average'? That's not what I've seen.88 is closer to perfect than average. People's reactions to the review scores don't change that.
There were much more games coming out. Only this year is pretty good but still nothing compared to years of the oldYou’re comparing a time when there were much fewer games coming out, and full games free with magazines were usually years-old PC games (which magazine ever gifted a full console game to its readers?), to… a service that lets you play AAA games day one in a time when dozens of games come out every single month? Really?
A month of Game Pass Ultimate costs as much as two issues of a 90s monthly gaming magazine with a demo CD, just so we have a fuller picture of the preposterous comparison you’re making here.
So space explorations is just menus, and everything actual ship piloting are basically fancy loading screens ? That is so disappointing
It definitely will largely because Bethesda blocked mod support on release and planning to release it later. Expect a resurgence then.Feels like one of those games that will be appreciated more in 6-12 months, once the hype has died down (and people have actually played it).
Yes, I predicted 84 when all the reviews are in. For me is has low-mid 80s written all over it. The current inflated score is due to the hand-picked reviewers. Wait one or two weeks and it'll be at 84 or even lower.I personally voted 80-85, Im thinking I may have called this one after the dust settles.
Yeah and maybe it’s just fine and not as big of a deal when you’re actually playing it. We’ll see.Yeah. That kind of sucks. No crashing into things. I guess that would be too demanding to do.
It makes sense. It would be hard to model that on a personal computer.
It is just a video game.
Modders on PC were able to add flying cars in CP2077 so maybe there is hope...on PC.Yeah and maybe it’s just fine and not as big of a deal when you’re actually playing it. We’ll see.
But from the outside looking in it just seems very disappointing in a space game.
no man sky is a indie dev mate, bethesda hasthousandsof developers they could and should have done better.
Hear that?? That's the sound of moving goal postsFeels like one of those games that will be appreciated more in 6-12 months, once the hype has died down (and people have actually played it).
yep, sounds like an absolute egregious waste of resources by the sound of thingsThey really should have ditched the whole "1,000's of planets to explore" nonsense and essentially copied Mass Effect and Destiny. Have 4-5 crafted planets with solid content and make the story bounce you around so you visit each one and get a taste of what they have to offer. I honestly could give two shits how many planets there are if I'm never gonna even go to 90% of them due to sheer boredom of them being more than likely repetitive experiences.
i may have missing this info, but wasnt take off and landing real time ?
Yeah.. I’ll probably be reading about the ‘fixes’ here on Gaf while I’m stuck playing the Series X version.maybe there is hope...on PC.
DigitalFoundry's video on it did not mention that. It was really stable for them.It has frame drops down to 15fps and pauses as it loads environments in, in open areas
I mean, we never could have predicted this, right?I'll reserve judgmenent until I've played it, but watching a few reviews it looks like your typical Bethesda game with a space flavor that mostly involves visiting dead planets with little to see or do.
I voted for 90-95, I expect to greatly enjoy the game but reviewers didn't seem to enjoy it as much as I expected.too bad the poll doesn’t show how people voted, I’m curious to see who voted for what
Ignore the clickbait title of the video.
woah hold the fuckin phone, RDR2's combat is extremely polished, its just designed to be heavy, slow, and "realistic". Its not jank in the slightest, if you think it is you don't actually understand the definition of jank.Red Dead Redemption 2 Reviews
Developed by the creators of Grand Theft Auto V and Red Dead Redemption, Red Dead Redemption 2 is an epic tale of life in America’s unforgiving heartland. The game’s vast and atmospheric world also provides the foundation for a brand new online multiplayer experience. America, 1899. The end of...www.metacritic.com
They really should have ditched the whole "1,000's of planets to explore" nonsense and essentially copied Mass Effect and Destiny. Have 4-5 crafted planets with solid content and make the story bounce you around so you visit each one and get a taste of what they have to offer. I honestly could give two shits how many planets there are if I'm never gonna even go to 90% of them due to sheer boredom of them being more than likely repetitive experiences.
He might be but he has the exact same complaints I've seen in other reviews. I only posted that one because the other user was asking about space gameplay and he happened to talk about it right at the beginning of his review.His other videos. Just another DoomTuber scamming you for subs.
It's basically Destiny but instead of every planet actually having curated content and interesting things to potentially do, you might land on one of the randomly generated planets somewhere and there is fuck all to do except "feel" like you are exploring by wandering around aimlessly.Wait what the fuck, theres no space exploration in a space exploration game? THe more I read the more I regret my purchase, what the fuck are you even playing then? Just fast travel from empty planets, find a a stupid cave/base, do a stupid side-quest and thats it? No way. They must be exaggerating.
Read Dead Redemption 2 controls are dog shit.woah hold the fuckin phone, RDR2's combat is extremely polished, its just designed to be heavy, slow, and "realistic". Its not jank in the slightest, if you think it is you don't actually understand the definition of jank.