Its not bad , it could also be 80 and still be good. For a new IP from Bethesda is a good score."Since when is 86 a bad score!?"
This thing is going to land somewhere between 84-85. Now consider the next mainline Mario or Zelda comes in at 84. It would be an absolute disaster for Nintendo. Your system sellers have to be mid 90's. GOW, TOTK etc.
Huh you found 1 example. How am lying? Lol. Where’s ALL these EVERYBODYS that were overhyping!? You can find 1 maybe 4 if you stretch the definition of over overhype enough here.Post in thread 'Starfield - Official Gameplay Trailer Reveal (2023)'
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/star...ay-trailer-reveal-2023.1637812/post-266270794
“gAmE OF tHe gENerAtiOn”
didn’t take very long to find some.
Honestly, you are so easy to catch out on your lies it’s laughable.
Not looking very hardThe lack of human diversity in the game chills me, there's everything but white people...
I think some of those reviews may be more favorable because it’ll be after the hype. Expectations are out and now you know to go in expecting.Just wait for the reviews Bethesda avoided come in
Going to end up 83-84
Huh you found 1 example. How am lying? Lol. Where’s ALL these EVERYBODYS that were overhyping!? You can find 1 maybe 4 if you stretch the definition of over overhype enough here.
Don’t get mad because you are exaggerating.
"Since when is 86 a bad score!?"
This thing is going to land somewhere between 84-85. Now consider the next mainline Mario or Zelda comes in at 84. It would be an absolute disaster for Nintendo. Your system sellers have to be mid 90's. GOW, TOTK etc.
Between 2019 and 2021, the players in the aforementioned group spent approximately $15.9 billion on PlayStation hardware, accessories, games, and services.
Eurogamer Portugal - 3/5:
Starfield - Promessas não cumpridas
Starfield fica aquém das expectativas e deixa a sensação de que algo se perdeu no espaço. promessas que acabam por não ser cumpridas. Um esboço do potencial.www.eurogamer.pt
Huh you found 1 example. How am lying? Lol. Where’s ALL these EVERYBODYS that were overhyping!? You can find 1 maybe 4 if you stretch the definition of over overhype enough here.
Don’t get mad because you are exaggerating.
Baldur's Gate is a niche game, even if it was a 99+ game, Starfield would still be more popular even at 85.Just wondering how a Starfield thread gets so many more pages than the BG3 thread?
wouldn’t bother trying to prove anyone how this game was hyped to high heavens by fanboys.What? On podcasts, on forums, on YT videogames channels...It was nothing but Starfield for God knows how long. Now I learn that there was no hype behind one of the most hyped titles ever. I certainly need to consult a psychiatrist because of my hallucinations...
Welcome to all the new players
Grab an early suit before it gets patched
That's some good ol' fashioned game cheesing, but also completely avoidable by the devs.It's a great suit. And that exploit is a fucking lol moment if there ever was one. Fuckin' Bethesda
The lack of human diversity in the game chills me, there's everything but white people...
Having 1000 planets fully explorable like 1000 skyrim maps with zero repetition was always off the table for everyone with a bit of brain, let's be real, and they literally said in the deep dive that exploration changed and was tuned for a big scope, if people doesn't listen to official info, it's not the game fault, they lied about other things, not about that.
I said that at best he is naive, if he has an agenda about shitting on the game, i take the second option, sorry not sorry.
The game has way worse flaws than lack of exploration.
correct, interesting enough though Eurogamer Portugal’s 6/10 is now showing on OpenCritic but the Top Critic Average didn’t budge at all from 88% seems a bit peculiar mathematically, you’d think that would have dropped it to 87% at the very least?Eurogamer is "top critic", EIP is not.
Welcome to all the new players
Grab an early suit before it gets patched
I am genuinely the game.
Baldur's Gate is a niche game, even if it was a 99+ game, Starfield would still be more popular even at 85.
"Since when is 86 a bad score!?"
This thing is going to land somewhere between 84-85. Now consider the next mainline Mario or Zelda comes in at 84. It would be an absolute disaster for Nintendo. Your system sellers have to be mid 90's. GOW, TOTK etc.
Calm down and show us where Phil touched you on the doll.Yeah, games like Spider-Man, Miles Morales, Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart, Horizon Forbidden West, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghost of Tsushima, Gran Turismo 7, Final Fantasy VII Remake, Final Fantasy XVI, Death Stranding, etc.. clearly aren’t system sellers either.
Genius comment.
It is not peculiar. depends what the actual current score is if it included decimalscorrect, interesting enough though Eurogamer Portugal’s 6/10 is now showing on OpenCritic but the Top Critic Average didn’t budge at all from 88% seems a bit peculiar mathematically, you’d think that would have dropped it to 87% at the very least?
Yes, but not all 106 reviews would be top critics and, therefore, in the aggregate OC, right?It is not peculiar. depends what the actual current score is if it included decimals
106 review x 88 = 9328
+ 60 for new review = 9388 / 107 reviews = 87.74. The new 6/10 review only reduces the average by 0.26 based on the number of reviews, so if the previous score is 77.76 or higher it wouldn't get rounded down to 77 from the one additional lower review.
Huh you found 1 example. How am lying? Lol. Where’s ALL these EVERYBODYS that were overhyping!? You can find 1 maybe 4 if you stretch the definition of over overhype enough here.
Don’t get mad because you are exaggerating.
Just finished the main story.
Very underwhelmed.
The salt is going to be real when the masses get to start playing and finish this game.
Going to be lots of "How the fuck did this get a 88 on Metacritic" posts.
Nah, there's no need to rush through the story for NG+. There are a few neat things about it but I would recommend just to play normally.how does the NG+ works? i like to know before starting the game tonight. the cock teasers were teasing we need to rush through the first playthrough to enjoy the real meat of SF?
Nah, there's no need to rush through the story for NG+. There are a few neat things about it but I would recommend just to play normally.
Starefield
Fast travel puts you outside a house so you have another loading screen.
This is a pretty good review / analysis of the game and its weaknesses with actual examples that I haven't seen others talk about.
For example, he mentions:
I like the specific examples in his video, instead of just meaningless rants about why the game is 0/10 or meaningless hype about why the game is 10/10.
- A very cool side questline where the player exposes a major corruption scandal and personnel in an authoritative position. But after doing everything, nothing changes. The personnel stays in that position, the world doesn't react to whatever you did, and everything in the world remains the same.
- He tried to smuggle contraband into a city by parking his ship (with the contraband) far away from the city and finding another ship that could be cleared by security. He thought it'd be a creative way to get past. But the contraband automatically transfers to the new ship, and the security forces blast him. He said there is not enough freedom in the game.
Easy allies gave it 8/10.
Latest.
This is a pretty good review / analysis of the game and its weaknesses with actual examples that I haven't seen others talk about.
For example, he mentions:
I like the specific examples in his video, instead of just meaningless rants about why the game is 0/10 or meaningless hype about why the game is 10/10.
- A very cool side questline where the player exposes a major corruption scandal and personnel in an authoritative position. But after doing everything, nothing changes. The personnel stays in that position, the world doesn't react to whatever you did, and everything in the world remains the same.
- He tried to smuggle contraband into a city by parking his ship (with the contraband) far away from the city and finding another ship that could be cleared by security. He thought it'd be a creative way to get past. But the contraband automatically transfers to the new ship, and the security forces blast him. He said there is not enough freedom in the game.
But games like TLOU or GOW are relatively linear story-driven action games. They are not built around freedom, choices, and exploration. TLOU/Starfield belong to two different categories of games.I understand those examples, but for me the problem is that people are reviewing the game for the things they want the game does, not for the actual game. It's like if I review The Last of Us (my favourite game) badly because I can't change clothes, is not open world, I can't command Ellie, I can't grab the guns of the corpses, etc, etc...
So, the question is, can you do those things in Horizon Forbidden West, Baldur's Gate 3? In Cyberpunk? Because the actual backslash to Starfield reminds me to the backslash to Cyberpunk because it didn't do thinks that were possible in GTA, so people expected all the stuff that Cyberpunk did plus all the stuff that GTA did. Now, I think it's the same scenario: people made an imaginary vision of the game before release, and when they play it, if it doesn't accommodate to that preestablished idea, it's a deception.
In my case, as my hype was very low because I know how Bethesda games are, now I'm amazed for the quality and scope of the game. It's a lot more than what I expected it will be. So, in resume, I think even those reviews so complete with examples are still subjective, as all reviews are, including mine, as it is a matter of perspective.
But games like TLOU or GOW are relatively linear story-driven action games. They are not built around freedom, choices, and exploration. TLOU/Starfield belong to two different categories of games.
Starfield (or Bethesda games) are sandbox RPG games that with exploration, choices, and freedom at their core. They do not have high-quality stories or acting or motion capture like TLOU or God of War games.
Also, Bethesda themselves market Starfield as a game that offers unparalleled freedom.
Based on that, I think it is very reasonable to expect that level of freedom and exploration from a Bethesda game. The questline complaint he has is especially valid. Why go through the entire questline when it has 0 effects other than giving you some XP? It just becomes shallow and meaningless at some point.
From the same articleMetro has published something but has no score think it will come later.
"In terms of both story and gameplay Starfield is disappointingly shallow, with lots going on but very little of it being of any substance."
We are enjoying it more now than we did in its opening hours but once we get to the full review, we still can’t imagine giving it any higher than a 6 out of 10.
This is a good one:I’ve actively been using search to try find some “overhype” posts.
Damn missed that line.From the same article
They are classed as a top critic on opencritic aswell.
It depends what it means "freedom" for you as a player, because in my case it's the game with more freedom I played in a lot time. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 (a game I played twice) feels like a linear game in comparison. I think what you are referring is that freedom of choice doesn't have an impact in the game world, and I must agree on that, it doesn't have real impact. But I think that's something it happens in all the games. It would be incredibly difficult and demanding to do it properly. I still remember the final choices of Mass Effect 3But games like TLOU or GOW are relatively linear story-driven action games. They are not built around freedom, choices, and exploration. TLOU/Starfield belong to two different categories of games.
Starfield (or Bethesda games) are sandbox RPG games that with exploration, choices, and freedom at their core. They do not have high-quality stories or acting or motion capture like TLOU or God of War games.
Also, Bethesda themselves market Starfield as a game that offers unparalleled freedom.
Based on that, I think it is very reasonable to expect that level of freedom and exploration from a Bethesda game. The questline complaint he has is especially valid. Why go through the entire questline when it has 0 effects other than giving you some XP? It just becomes shallow and meaningless at some point.