• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo really likes Metacritic

Nintendo Really Likes Metacritic

At an investor's meeting today, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata talked a lot about how great Nintendo's Metacritic scores are—even going as far as to brag that Nintendo's current releases have higher Metacritic numbers than Sony's or Microsoft's.

Um, congrats?

Keep in mind that Iwata is talking to boring investor types. That, and this Metacritic chest thumping is depressing.

Sam5Fy6.png

AzI7k57.png


Link

Third Quarter Financial Results Briefing for Fiscal Year Ending March 2015 (Feb. 17, 2015)
 

ramparter

Banned
Expected considering how great most of their games score.

edit: But it's sad that the greatest Wii U game stands at 83 only...
 

Makonero

Member
When all you've got is small potatoes, you tend to emphasize how tasty they are.

(I love their tasty tasty taters)
 
Everyone brags about what they have while downplaying what they don't. If the situations were reversed, we'd be seeing Sony doing the same.
 

Thoraxes

Member
When a brand-new title is released, there are often misconceptions at the outset, so I would not take the Metacritic.com Metascores and User Scores as the absolute tell-all index, but I do want us to do our best to release such highly evaluated titles in succession.
Hold them horses.
 

oti

Banned
Later during the Q&A:
"What is this Metacritic nonsense and who cares about childish games! Where is the money!"
 
I don't like Metascores and it's use in the industry...

...but their games are pretty much always of extremely high quality (inbefore Stickr Star wah wah) and when you talk to investors, it's all about making yourself look good.

Fuck's sake, Iwata.

I get this is used to appeased to shareholders, but still.

Yeah, how dare Iwata make use of something/ point something out that makes his company look good.
 

DSix

Banned
Shareholders are dumb, Nintendo do what it must to make them understand they don't make fast shit for faster money.
 

baconcow

Member
Investors are not all gamers. Metacritic offers a flawed, yet quantitative view of a game's critical assessment. Until someone makes a better mainstream site, this will be the goto one.
 

Kacho

Gold Member
Making high quality games that typically review well and being able to glance at a website to see what the general consensus of both media outlets and consumers must be nice.
 

maxcriden

Member
I don't understand why this is depressing. They've been doing this for a little while now. I was surprised at first, but it does make sense. It's an aggregate of critic and user reviews that shows more empirically how high-quality Nintendo's games are. I can see why this would be information they'd want to convey to their investors.
 
I hope it doesn't become the norm that companies brag about their Metacritic scores....wait....

Edit: Seriously, I wish Metacritic didn't have such a strong influence on companies and their bottom lines.
 

lazygecko

Member
At least an Official Metacritic Seal of Quality would hold more credibility to it than the Official Nintendo Seal of Quality.
 
Bullshit article. You can't take Nintendo to task, in a snarky as hell way I might add, when every company keeps an eye on metacritic too. Aren't developer bonuses tied to metacritic scores too sometimes?
 

TheMoon

Member
They don't like Metacritic. Metacritic likes them.

If they get showered with great reviews for great games of course they're gonna highlight that shit. ESPECIALLY in a world where broken and/or garbage games sell far better than the actually good ones.

This is them saying "stop being stupid, buy the good shit!"
 
Brian Ashcraft.

Not everyone in the investor meeting is as deep in the medium as we are. Showing them that your products are highly regarded by critics, or explaining to them that your sequel is better regarded as it's direct prequel (MH3U to 4U) is not some shameful boasting and certainly doesn't seserve a

Yuck, Nintendo. Just yuck.

Edit: If the article was supposed to be read with a sarcastic voice, than...yeah... it's still not good.
 
Bear in mind, this is Nintendo taking advantage of the higher user scores that their games have. The critic scores taken by themselves (the number of games that have at least an 85 rating) don't show an awful lot of difference between the platforms.
 
Top Bottom