FeiRR
Banned
Try VPN or let me know which ones you want. I can helpSadly, it seems to be blocked by Sony associating with our internet provider. Seems like our internet provider signed an NDA.
![]()

Try VPN or let me know which ones you want. I can helpSadly, it seems to be blocked by Sony associating with our internet provider. Seems like our internet provider signed an NDA.
![]()
Some bits to add...
- All Oberon test in GitHub are regression tests for Ariel... that means they are making sure everything that worked in Ariel works in Oberon... it is weird but there is no Oberon profile tests leaked.
- Sony doesn’t produce the chips... TSMC does it by AMD request, Sony only buy them from AMD.
- 7nm EUV is included in AMD 7nm.... so everything is possible here.
- What makes find weird with AMD probably not using the 7nm EUV is the fact they said 50 perf. per watt. AMD already have a big hint when they moved from GCN 7nm to RDNA 7nm so they already had 50% increase in the same node. They want more 50% that continuing in the same DUV? That means 75% due architecture improvements only? I don’t buy that... nVidia did the miracle Maxwell without using a new node they got 30% increase in perf. per watt.
So I can only see that 50% increase over RDNA with a more efficient node and that why they didn’t discard 7nm EUV... they just said everything is 7nm for them DUV or EUV.
I maybe forget something to add but my 10 months old son wake up![]()
![]()
PS5, Xbox Series X or Both May Be Delayed Due to COVID-19, Says DFC
PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X or even both could be delayed due to supply chain issues caused by the coronavirus, according to DFC.wccftech.com
With all due respect, FuCk China! I have a few Chinese friends and they all agree this situation is a shit show mostly created by their irresponsible communist government. If they had asked the world for help as soon as the epidemic started things probably wouldn’t as bad as they are. Goddamn bat and pangolin eaters.
Tht might be the angle but I could work with tht, she got a little something something there plus she look like she a beast in the sheets lol
13tfs confirmed![]()
Hey man I hope my comment didn't come off dismissing, I actually read through the whole text. I was just messing with youI actually do a LOT of writing and it's just something out of habit. But really I'm just passionate about console tech especially next-gen related and I write a lot about stuff I have a passion for.
3 cured? Tell the hospital there to send me some of that cure lol.
Only a very small minority of the Chinese eat wild animals. Most find it just as disgusting as you and me. Totalitarian regimes have a tendency to try to hide incidents like this until its no longer possible because shits already hitting the fan left and right. Remember how USSR dealt with Chernobyl in the beginning? I don't think our Western countries would have been better prepared for this if China gave us a few weeks more time to contemplate the outbreak. It seems to me at least that all of Western Europe underestimated the problem.
Not so sure about that, the only reported case near me is someone that just got back from Egypt. That's pretty equatorial.Doesn't seem to be spreading in the hot equatorial climates. There have not been major outbreaks in the southern hemisphere.
Experts believe, like influenza it survives longer in cold weather.
Edit: on another note they are shutting the port of Los Angeles, the port will get way behind but should be caught up by this summer. Them union guys love that OT.
I do wonder once we have the exact specs of the PS5, if we will still be discussing the github leak.
Plus eat two lemons a day one in the morning and one in the eveningWould say have like 2-4 showers a day, eat honey and try to eat good and you'll be fine.
Makes me realize I'm sane. I knew I wasn't just a "fanboy" (god I hate that term) . It really is people being complete asses with an agenda for PS5 to be less than. I have no problems with others opinions but damn, confusion doesnt come from GOD for sure. Thanks again all of you true GafersAt least his posts make sense, and while his points may not always be something you agree with, he offers good conversational points and is factual in his discussion, while still trying to remain somewhat balanced.
He’s not... like... other posters........
Plus eat two lemons a day one in the morning and one in the evening
Looks like revealing a new console in the middle of a pandemy is a bad idea, don't you think?I can't believe there is still no PS5 news. What's up with Sony? We need some specs and game-trailers...
Yes, and the US govt is doing much better job.![]()
PS5, Xbox Series X or Both May Be Delayed Due to COVID-19, Says DFC
PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X or even both could be delayed due to supply chain issues caused by the coronavirus, according to DFC.wccftech.com
With all due respect, FuCk China! I have a few Chinese friends and they all agree this situation is a shit show mostly created by their irresponsible communist government. If they had asked the world for help as soon as the epidemic started things probably wouldn’t as bad as they are. Goddamn bat and pangolin eaters.
That doesn't mean anything, it's leak country out there...….The right leak can come out of anywhere, yet I see people have tendency to believe leaks from Githaub, twitter and reddit, like it's no tomorrow.....Some people even swear on GitHub for a particular reason......Because it's pastebin. Anybody can post any BS there.
If base is 15TF, I'm willing to pay $800 for 18TF with the same 32GB Vram, so some extra power, but no difference in Vram just as PS4 was to PRO....Maybe this can aid 120fps and 8K games a bit more on the PRO version....I'll be too. $799 16TF 24GB PS5 pro.
One of the pastebins is 15TF, so that's on the cards too surely? This is going to get interesting in a minute.....He said one of the pastebins was pretty accurate, so no.
Not so sure about that, the only reported case near me is someone that just got back from Egypt. That's pretty equatorial.
That doesn't mean anything, it's leak country out there...….The right leak can come out of anywhere, yet I see people have tendency to believe leaks from Githaub, twitter and reddit, like it's no tomorrow.....Some people even swear on GitHub for a particular reason......
,
If base is 15TF, I'm willing to pay $800 for 18TF with the same 32GB Vram, so some extra power, but no difference in Vram just as PS4 was to PRO....Maybe this can aid 120fps and 8K games a bit more on the PRO version....
One of the pastebins is 15TF, so that's on the cards too surely? This is going to get interesting in a minute.....
So can we assume the following:
- The source of WhispersintheWind a is legit PS5 dev.
- The source debunks, once again, the PS5 9.2tf ficction.
- WhispersintheWind shared his well-funded "opinion" after talking with a legit PS5 dev.
- We dont know yet what leak the source points as correct.
- WhispersintheWind has promised that he will share more info if his source replies back.
I'm sure that will make the guy that caught it from Egypt feel much, much better.Purely anacdotal... Look up the numbers for Egypt which has a lot of tourism and it's again not a big outbreak... 110 cases of 100 million people.
Makes me realize I'm sane. I knew I wasn't just a "fanboy" (god I hate that term) . It really is people being complete asses with an agenda for PS5 to be less than. I have no problems with others opinions but damn, confusion doesnt come from GOD for sure. Thanks again all of you true Gafers
Fanboys are in the others side lol spreading 9.2TFs with all their strength like GitHub religion.
I can't speak for others who utilize Github and the testing data as a reference point, but I'll answer what I can in your post.
-I always thought the initial testing data was doing BC testings for PS4 and Pro. This was even before I learned about the Ariel iGPU testing profile and therefore meant even well before bringing that up into discussion, I felt that testing data was only reflective of BC settings and not the full actual chip
-The 36/40 is either the full Oberon CU counts, or a count that's incomplete. It's not the fault of the data miners why that particular question can't be clearly answered; you'd have to ask Sony and AMD staff running these tests and storing the data about that.
-You are actually misinterpreting what RDNA2 actually is. RDNA2 isn't exclusively 7nm EUV. AMD's wording clouded conclusions on that but they shortly clarified after the conference that it was a nomenclature thing, so 7nm"+" can be thought of more as further improvement on the 7nm node process
-Another important thing to keep in mind is that RDNA2 does not necessarily mean "large chip" out of necessity. AMD have never stated this, not even once, and they never will. Why would they keep RDNA2 features like RT, VRS, VRR etc. off their mobile APUs, which have very low CU counts compared to these consoles? Some people have automatically made the correlation when that is just them jumping through an unnecessary hoop. It just so happens there will be chips on RDNA2 that are "big" chips, but RDNA2 features can be implemented on smaller chips as well. Otherwise, AMD have completely failed in designing a smart, scalable GPU architecture
-There's nothing inherently stopping Sony from going with a bigger chip, but that doesn't mean a bigger chip was their goal, either. I actually speculated why there's a chance they've gone with a relatively smaller chip, but there are also cost-related reasons, plus the fact Sony is very likely going to manufacture a very big chunk of units for the first fiscal quarter (I would guess at least 10 million) and then you have to weigh all of that against the size of Sony as a corporation itself and what money they have on hand (and what can be borrowed through big loans from banks or investors) to cover those costs. That alone could have led them down a path of wanting a relatively "smaller" chip.
-You're right, pretty much anyone speculating Oberon is an RDNA2 chip is doing so with information outside of Github. But for myself personally, I've been using a swell of other sources besides that in my own speculation for a long time now, and more to the point, it's not like most of the insiders really know what the PS5 is, either. If so, we could actually get some more nuanced specifications beyond simply a TF range. And when you have guys like Tommy Fischer commit reputation suicide by almost duping a mod with doctored controller photos, that just puts an extra bit of questioning on other rumors as a whole: even when pressed with proof some of these dudes may try bullshitting their way to the top because the balls are just that brass.
-I never questioned PS5 having hardware ray-tracing, not once. But it wasn't just Githubbers speculating about PS5 being RDNA1; many people in general were. Many were under the assumption Sony had their own RT ASIC solution either integrated into the APU as an IP block (some went as far as to bring up a team member having worked on PowerVR as Sony maybe using PowerVR RT instead of AMD's), or connected to the APU, likely with some PCIe interconnect or something to that effect. And that was mainly Sony people speculating this. Even I did for a while but once it became apparent how inefficient a separate RT ASIC would be to the design (bandwidth issue, potentially) I just accepted that PS5 would have AMD's RT in one form or another, and that's while still relating Oberon to PS5. In other words, I dropped PS5 being RDNA1 a long time ago and that was pretty much at the time Cerny clarified things and when the RT ASIC idea fell through.
-Gotta keep in mind that a lot of us were also uncertain about RDNA2's node process. I assumed both PS5 and XSX were RDNA1 because I thought they would be 7nm. In fact, given AMD's recently said 7nm+ isn't necessarily EUV but rather improvements on the 7nm process, it means almost for certain PS5 and XSX are still 7nm but with some efficiency gains (just not EUV levels). I even doubted XSX was fully RDNA2 even when Microsoft themselves mentioned RDNA2 in that Twitter post, because I assumed RDNA2 was exclusively 7nm EUV and knew that would be even costlier than regular 7nm.
So basically, I think PS5 and even XSX will still be 7nm, but be RDNA2 chips. That should be pretty clear-cut.
-I think people are overestimating RDNA2 efficiency. The 50% perf-per-watt doesn't actually mean 50% IPC over RDNA1. And we now know RDNA2 is not exclusive to EUV, and the "7nm+" is actually indicative of small improvements over the 7nm process, notable improvements but not to the level of what actual 7nm EUV brings. So if anything it suggests both PS5 and XSX are 7nm but benefit from slight efficiency improvements while not being on the EUV process.
-Wasn't the interpretation of the testing data always meant to indicate BC of PS4 and PS4 Pro? Even with that said it asks the question of why 2GHz needed to be tested for that except to perhaps ensure PS4 Pro titles could hit native 4K60 natively on the chip. Probably a question worth asking and one we'll hopefully get an answer for soon (through Sony themselves).
-So I guess that brings us back to the high clock. You ask why would they do it, well, I'm still asking that too. I have always said Github and the testing data do not represent everything in terms of PS5's performance, not even once. However, I think with clarification on what RDNA2 actually is and the fact it can be on both 7nm and 7nm EUV (and the "7nm+" was apparently more about minor improvements on the 7nm process, probably through things AMD have done themselves on the architecture pipeline side) that there might be some justification for the 2GHz clock testing on Oberon outside of acting as a free FPS stability boost for Pro-enhanced games.
What would justify that? Well, the easiest answer is that Oberon might be a 36/40CU chip after all. Or, it could be a slightly larger chip (the Dec revision adjusted the memory bus controller IIRC, upping it higher) but still getting a relatively high clock. That's why I think maybe the best answer to what PS5 actually is (for now) is to go somewhere in the middle. A 44 - 48 active CU chip on a more recent revision, pushing relatively high clocks (anything between 1800MHz and 1900MHz if 2000MHz can't be sustained) might fit that bill.
But I can't have a grounded speculation like that by simply considering one source type (insiders) as gospel and the other (pertinent & persistent testing data) as throwaway junk. Unfortunately a lot of the people who say things like "Team Github" are doing it unironically, so as to discredit anyone even partially referencing the Github stuff or any of the datamined testing data whatsoever, for any purpose at all. That type of reasoning is nothing short of insanity.
I also think it's because we really do have a group of people who are desperate for a power crown battle at any costs, unwilling to even consider the worth or validity of any source that isn't for 'their team" coming out on top in a proverbial e-penis TF pissing contest, and assume anyone and everyone who refers to anything besides insiders exclusively as being against their preferred brand or "team". The truth is you may get that with literally a very small minority of people but the vast majority of that type aren't here on these forums.
Yes it's unfortunate people with actual troll-like behavior in the past such as TimDog (and even some people here like Longdi who I hope has calmed that type of posting down) are clinging to the Github 9.2TF stuff to antagonize PS fans, but I'm not TimDog and TimDog is not representative of the majority of us who simply see it as a valuable asset in discussing the possibility of next-gen PlayStation. Hell, most of us are even doing so while still listening and giving consideration to the rumors as well, it doesn't have to be an either/or situation.
In the end, I ultimately agree with your end point: Github doesn't provide the full picture on PS5. It didn't provide the full picture on XSX either and barely provides anything on Lockhart (speaking of which, I'll actually take a minute here and say how funny it was to see some Xbox people try arguing the 22/24 CU APU leak that very clearly listed Microsoft in it, with a 950MHz TDP-down, was in fact not related to Lockhart. It took until DF did a video simulating a 4TF Lockhart running games at 1080p and mostly 60FPS clocks for them to accept that particular leak. However I took that leak to pretty much be Lockhart upon first seeing it and it also has me thinking Lockhart is not a "traditional" game console, but that's something for another time).
However, there're people who will take anyone merely stating simply that, and interpret it to mean "Github is useless. The testing data is useless. None of these chips are PS5 related at all", and some of them know what they're doing when they do this. So IMHO, they're just as guilty as having an agenda in dismissing Github as some people are in using Github and the testing data to antagonize Sony and PS fans (and pushing 9.2TF like it's a derogatory insult). It goes both ways on this, and as much as I don't want to give the fanatical, trolling Xbox fanboys ammunition (in needing to clarify things on the Github info and testing data from my own POV), I don't want to give the fanatical, trolling PlayStation fanboys ammunition in attacking all aspects of that info and testing data as being FUD that only folks with an agenda against Sony and PS would bother bringing up in the first place, because for the vast majority of us that is NOT the case whatsoever.
I just simply talk about what I observe, and I try to observe from multiple sources, and be fair in doing so to see where they can meet in the middle and agree upon. However, I can't help if one of those source types has data on its side that I can look at, check up on/research, verify on my own (in terms of following any coding the producers of the chips the data comes from would follow), and itself has been very consistent. And I can't help if that comes off to some people as me "choosing" one side over another when that isn't me doing so out of some emotional need or negative bias towards a preference. And I honestly think most of the other people who regard the Github info and testing data with at least some weight would feel similar.
Looks like revealing a new console in the middle of a pandemy is a bad idea, don't you think?
The idea the PS5 would be 9.2 is ridiculous. What people need to get through their heads is that the GPU in GitHub is not the GPU that will be in the PS5. However, this concept is too difficult for a LOT of people.
Holy shit Whisper, you have my attention. How do you tag people btw
I can't speak for others who utilize Github and the testing data as a reference point, but I'll answer what I can in your post.
-I always thought the initial testing data was doing BC testings for PS4 and Pro. This was even before I learned about the Ariel iGPU testing profile and therefore meant even well before bringing that up into discussion, I felt that testing data was only reflective of BC settings and not the full actual chip
-The 36/40 is either the full Oberon CU counts, or a count that's incomplete. It's not the fault of the data miners why that particular question can't be clearly answered; you'd have to ask Sony and AMD staff running these tests and storing the data about that.
-You are actually misinterpreting what RDNA2 actually is. RDNA2 isn't exclusively 7nm EUV. AMD's wording clouded conclusions on that but they shortly clarified after the conference that it was a nomenclature thing, so 7nm"+" can be thought of more as further improvement on the 7nm node process
-Another important thing to keep in mind is that RDNA2 does not necessarily mean "large chip" out of necessity. AMD have never stated this, not even once, and they never will. Why would they keep RDNA2 features like RT, VRS, VRR etc. off their mobile APUs, which have very low CU counts compared to these consoles? Some people have automatically made the correlation when that is just them jumping through an unnecessary hoop. It just so happens there will be chips on RDNA2 that are "big" chips, but RDNA2 features can be implemented on smaller chips as well. Otherwise, AMD have completely failed in designing a smart, scalable GPU architecture
-There's nothing inherently stopping Sony from going with a bigger chip, but that doesn't mean a bigger chip was their goal, either. I actually speculated why there's a chance they've gone with a relatively smaller chip, but there are also cost-related reasons, plus the fact Sony is very likely going to manufacture a very big chunk of units for the first fiscal quarter (I would guess at least 10 million) and then you have to weigh all of that against the size of Sony as a corporation itself and what money they have on hand (and what can be borrowed through big loans from banks or investors) to cover those costs. That alone could have led them down a path of wanting a relatively "smaller" chip.
-You're right, pretty much anyone speculating Oberon is an RDNA2 chip is doing so with information outside of Github. But for myself personally, I've been using a swell of other sources besides that in my own speculation for a long time now, and more to the point, it's not like most of the insiders really know what the PS5 is, either. If so, we could actually get some more nuanced specifications beyond simply a TF range. And when you have guys like Tommy Fischer commit reputation suicide by almost duping a mod with doctored controller photos, that just puts an extra bit of questioning on other rumors as a whole: even when pressed with proof some of these dudes may try bullshitting their way to the top because the balls are just that brass.
-I never questioned PS5 having hardware ray-tracing, not once. But it wasn't just Githubbers speculating about PS5 being RDNA1; many people in general were. Many were under the assumption Sony had their own RT ASIC solution either integrated into the APU as an IP block (some went as far as to bring up a team member having worked on PowerVR as Sony maybe using PowerVR RT instead of AMD's), or connected to the APU, likely with some PCIe interconnect or something to that effect. And that was mainly Sony people speculating this. Even I did for a while but once it became apparent how inefficient a separate RT ASIC would be to the design (bandwidth issue, potentially) I just accepted that PS5 would have AMD's RT in one form or another, and that's while still relating Oberon to PS5. In other words, I dropped PS5 being RDNA1 a long time ago and that was pretty much at the time Cerny clarified things and when the RT ASIC idea fell through.
-Gotta keep in mind that a lot of us were also uncertain about RDNA2's node process. I assumed both PS5 and XSX were RDNA1 because I thought they would be 7nm. In fact, given AMD's recently said 7nm+ isn't necessarily EUV but rather improvements on the 7nm process, it means almost for certain PS5 and XSX are still 7nm but with some efficiency gains (just not EUV levels). I even doubted XSX was fully RDNA2 even when Microsoft themselves mentioned RDNA2 in that Twitter post, because I assumed RDNA2 was exclusively 7nm EUV and knew that would be even costlier than regular 7nm.
So basically, I think PS5 and even XSX will still be 7nm, but be RDNA2 chips. That should be pretty clear-cut.
-I think people are overestimating RDNA2 efficiency. The 50% perf-per-watt doesn't actually mean 50% IPC over RDNA1. And we now know RDNA2 is not exclusive to EUV, and the "7nm+" is actually indicative of small improvements over the 7nm process, notable improvements but not to the level of what actual 7nm EUV brings. So if anything it suggests both PS5 and XSX are 7nm but benefit from slight efficiency improvements while not being on the EUV process.
-Wasn't the interpretation of the testing data always meant to indicate BC of PS4 and PS4 Pro? Even with that said it asks the question of why 2GHz needed to be tested for that except to perhaps ensure PS4 Pro titles could hit native 4K60 natively on the chip. Probably a question worth asking and one we'll hopefully get an answer for soon (through Sony themselves).
-So I guess that brings us back to the high clock. You ask why would they do it, well, I'm still asking that too. I have always said Github and the testing data do not represent everything in terms of PS5's performance, not even once. However, I think with clarification on what RDNA2 actually is and the fact it can be on both 7nm and 7nm EUV (and the "7nm+" was apparently more about minor improvements on the 7nm process, probably through things AMD have done themselves on the architecture pipeline side) that there might be some justification for the 2GHz clock testing on Oberon outside of acting as a free FPS stability boost for Pro-enhanced games.
What would justify that? Well, the easiest answer is that Oberon might be a 36/40CU chip after all. Or, it could be a slightly larger chip (the Dec revision adjusted the memory bus controller IIRC, upping it higher) but still getting a relatively high clock. That's why I think maybe the best answer to what PS5 actually is (for now) is to go somewhere in the middle. A 44 - 48 active CU chip on a more recent revision, pushing relatively high clocks (anything between 1800MHz and 1900MHz if 2000MHz can't be sustained) might fit that bill.
But I can't have a grounded speculation like that by simply considering one source type (insiders) as gospel and the other (pertinent & persistent testing data) as throwaway junk. Unfortunately a lot of the people who say things like "Team Github" are doing it unironically, so as to discredit anyone even partially referencing the Github stuff or any of the datamined testing data whatsoever, for any purpose at all. That type of reasoning is nothing short of insanity.
I also think it's because we really do have a group of people who are desperate for a power crown battle at any costs, unwilling to even consider the worth or validity of any source that isn't for 'their team" coming out on top in a proverbial e-penis TF pissing contest, and assume anyone and everyone who refers to anything besides insiders exclusively as being against their preferred brand or "team". The truth is you may get that with literally a very small minority of people but the vast majority of that type aren't here on these forums.
Yes it's unfortunate people with actual troll-like behavior in the past such as TimDog (and even some people here like Longdi who I hope has calmed that type of posting down) are clinging to the Github 9.2TF stuff to antagonize PS fans, but I'm not TimDog and TimDog is not representative of the majority of us who simply see it as a valuable asset in discussing the possibility of next-gen PlayStation. Hell, most of us are even doing so while still listening and giving consideration to the rumors as well, it doesn't have to be an either/or situation.
In the end, I ultimately agree with your end point: Github doesn't provide the full picture on PS5. It didn't provide the full picture on XSX either and barely provides anything on Lockhart (speaking of which, I'll actually take a minute here and say how funny it was to see some Xbox people try arguing the 22/24 CU APU leak that very clearly listed Microsoft in it, with a 950MHz TDP-down, was in fact not related to Lockhart. It took until DF did a video simulating a 4TF Lockhart running games at 1080p and mostly 60FPS clocks for them to accept that particular leak. However I took that leak to pretty much be Lockhart upon first seeing it and it also has me thinking Lockhart is not a "traditional" game console, but that's something for another time).
However, there're people who will take anyone merely stating simply that, and interpret it to mean "Github is useless. The testing data is useless. None of these chips are PS5 related at all", and some of them know what they're doing when they do this. So IMHO, they're just as guilty as having an agenda in dismissing Github as some people are in using Github and the testing data to antagonize Sony and PS fans (and pushing 9.2TF like it's a derogatory insult). It goes both ways on this, and as much as I don't want to give the fanatical, trolling Xbox fanboys ammunition (in needing to clarify things on the Github info and testing data from my own POV), I don't want to give the fanatical, trolling PlayStation fanboys ammunition in attacking all aspects of that info and testing data as being FUD that only folks with an agenda against Sony and PS would bother bringing up in the first place, because for the vast majority of us that is NOT the case whatsoever.
I just simply talk about what I observe, and I try to observe from multiple sources, and be fair in doing so to see where they can meet in the middle and agree upon. However, I can't help if one of those source types has data on its side that I can look at, check up on/research, verify on my own (in terms of following any coding the producers of the chips the data comes from would follow), and itself has been very consistent. And I can't help if that comes off to some people as me "choosing" one side over another when that isn't me doing so out of some emotional need or negative bias towards a preference. And I honestly think most of the other people who regard the Github info and testing data with at least some weight would feel similar.
@ then type the name before finishing you'll get suggestions then choose the right one. But let's not tag mods and insiders on everything as they should be busy.![]()
![]()
Thank you sir. Your service is quite welcome![]()
He always do that. For what porpuse I still don't know.
At least his posts make sense, and while his points may not always be something you agree with, he offers good conversational points and is factual in his discussion, while still trying to remain somewhat balanced.
He’s not... like... other posters........
![]()
PS5, Xbox Series X or Both May Be Delayed Due to COVID-19, Says DFC
PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X or even both could be delayed due to supply chain issues caused by the coronavirus, according to DFC.wccftech.com
With all due respect, FuCk China! I have a few Chinese friends and they all agree this situation is a shit show mostly created by their irresponsible communist government. If they had asked the world for help as soon as the epidemic started things probably wouldn’t as bad as they are. Goddamn bat and pangolin eaters.
15TF is possible but not likely. I think that the critical number is 13. A 13 TF PS5 would have over seven times the TF of the PS4 and would have over three times the TF of the PS4 Pro. My guess is that the PS5 will be somewhere between 13 and 14TF.
Combine that with the SSD and the better CPU and you have a very competent system.
I’m tiredYes, I'm hoping some Oberon profile tests come out relatively soon, because it is odd and that deserves to be questioned. Sony and MS got out of the chip production game a long time ago but I think some people still believe they manufacture and assemble the chips for these machines in-house and on their own fab plants. But those days have been gone a long time ago. They defiitely architect the systems in-house and work with engineering samples in-house (plus make requests to AMD to support certain features in silicon for their designs), but the actual manufacturing and fabbing isn't done by them.
I kind of see AMD's cheeky wording regarding RDNA2 (and RDNA3) as basically them saying RDNA2 will have DUV and EUV products (as you've mentioned here), and that they are working on moving quickly to 5nm for RDNA3. So I guess that kind of makes 7nm EUV a bit of a stopgap for them but the question is how much so and for how long. There's still financial reasons however why I think both consoles are 7nm DUV process-wise, though.
We don't know a lot on AMD's wording when they say the "+" regarding 7nm is in terms of further process refinements. Whatever it is, I'd suspect the 7nm DUV the consoles are most likely using are both RDNA2 and somewhat more efficient than earlier 7nm DUV GPU cards from AMD, but not necessarily at 7nm EUV levels. And they might be hyping up some of their numbers just a tad in terms of perf-per-watt increase of RDNA2 over RDNA1. Either that, or the 50% claim is the high-end for chips on the EUV process, and it'd be lower for those on the DUV process.
But go back and take care of little junior there. Heck he might have the answers we're all looking for!
Of course that'll be a fairly good system, but 15TF will light leagues of fire under asses for 7 years......If we were impressed with what Sony did for the last 7 years on 1.84TF......15TF will impress even more at the end of the gen, especially with that fast CPU and SSD in tow...…….Yet, no doubt, a 13-14TF GPU will not be contested in graphics either as long as PD, ND, Santa Monica, Guerilla are in SWWS...….15TF is possible but not likely. I think that the critical number is 13. A 13 TF PS5 would have over seven times the TF of the PS4 and would have over three times the TF of the PS4 Pro. My guess is that the PS5 will be somewhere between 13 and 14TF.
Combine that with the SSD and the better CPU and you have a very competent system.
I’m tired
A bit because I have right now an infection that makes me a bit weak(it is not Corona).
Your last point is really interesting and probably what AMD will do... DUV in low/mid-end chips and EUV in high-end chips... it even makes sense why they are grouping both process as the name 7nm.
All experts say otherwise, but clearly you know more so do share this secret inside information you have?co
coronavirus panic will be nonexistent in a month or two, let alone in November.