nice, but my X370 chip![]()
I ear you, luckily for me I upgraded my x370 based board to an x470 a couple of months ago because I needed more full PCIe slots than what my old board had.nice, but my X370 chip![]()
I got the top of the line asus ch6 hero board. It is beefy enough for zen3 imo.Point #4 worries me--how will they verify who has purchased a Zen 3 CPU?
![]()
I hope Asus will make that upgrade path available.
I ear you, luckily for me I upgraded my x370 based board to an x470 a couple of months ago because I needed more full PCIe slots than what my old board had.
When the "no zen 3 on any board before the 500 series" information came through I felt betrayed, my feeling is that even the x370 should work (at least the boards that can, I'm sure many could).
I was fully expected, they cut the support for old CPUs and add new ones.Point #4 worries me--how will they verify who has purchased a Zen 3 CPU?
![]()
I hope Asus will make that upgrade path available.
I ear you, luckily for me I upgraded my x370 based board to an x470 a couple of months ago because I needed more full PCIe slots than what my old board had.
When the "no zen 3 on any board before the 500 series" information came through I felt betrayed, my feeling is that even the x370 should work (at least the boards that can, I'm sure many could).
The only reason they said it wouldn't work was the size of the bios chips on 400 series boards being too small (16 MB instead of 32). It was a stupid excuse, since some X570 boards also have 16 MB chips, while some B450 boards have 32 MB chips. If size was a concern, all they'd have to do is drop support for older CPUs to make room for the new ones, which is presumably exactly what they'll be doing now.Wait what? So they can just backtrack on something like platform support? I don't understand what just happened as I thought this stuff was set in stone once the design and CPU has been put in place.
They didn't backtrack on the storage space of bioses issue (whatever they call it)... They said that there would be dedicated zen3 bioses, when you upgrade your bios with it the mb won't boot on previous generation zen architectures and downgrade may or may not be supported.Wait what? So they can just backtrack on something like platform support? I don't understand what just happened as I thought this stuff was set in stone once the design and CPU has been put in place.
Asus mentioned already that they would've preferred simply going forward with 500 series and not support the 400 series for Zen 3. MSI was pushing to include support of 400 series. Gigabyte and Asrock were neutral.I'm glad folks from reddit and YT fights hard complaining about this
also a nice gesture from AMD to admit they are wrong
in the other hands, ASUS still doesn't update their X370 boards with AGESA BIOS until now after announced it like one years ago, so this implementation will be vary from one vendor to another
They didn't backtrack on the storage space of bioses issue (whatever they call it)... They said that there would be dedicated zen3 bioses, when you upgrade your bios with it the mb won't boot on previous generation zen architectures and downgrade may or may not be supported.
It gets complicated but yes the end result is that these beta BIOSes on the 400 series will remove support for older CPUs. Gamers Nexus did a bunch of digging on it before today's news:The only reason they said it wouldn't work was the size of the bios chips on 400 series boards being too small (16 MB instead of 32). It was a stupid excuse, since some X570 boards also have 16 MB chips, while some B450 boards have 32 MB chips. If size was a concern, all they'd have to do is drop support for older CPUs to make room for the new ones, which is presumably exactly what they'll be doing now.
Sanity prevails. AMD - please be clearer next time, way ahead of time. (And don't let the cheaper chipset get delayed for so long!)