Saudumm
Member
That PS5 next to the TV looks absolutely fake.
I expect most "next gen patch" to be something most studios are easily able to do with not too much work:I'm not sure what you guys call "next-gen patches" but a lot of these games are getting remakes for the PS5. Are you talking about a patch to run the PS4 game with increased resolution and FPS? Or an overall remaster?
I really wish u would just talk about related topics to the thread rather than ur usual warrior posts. Its tiring to read ur posts and everyone of them has the same tone to them . Anyways u do u.You literally two posts ago in this same page:
It's not my fault that you are the fucking champions of hypocrisy and fanboyism.
You are literally trying to project unto others your own frustrations. You are the ones bringing PC to the discussion and you are the ones claiming that other people need "therapy" because they dare to voice a different opinion outside of the Official Sony narrative.
Well, we have this.
It's not half bad.
I still think we're going to see the same difference - minimum - as we are getting now with Xbox One X (2160p) vs PS4 pro (1440p) titles.
thats a photoshop, I can see the aliasing on the controller
Fake.
That PS5 next to the TV looks absolutely fake.
Yes he says "that's how my room will look like in November" I don't think he is trying anything weird ^^Fake.
Difference between pro and x1x was also x1x had 60% more ram. That was one of main reasons between the difference.No way, the difference between PRO and X was around 40% GPU its a fraction of that between PS5 vs XSX.
Difference shouldn't be noticeable like at all.
I really wish u would just talk about related topics to the thread rather than ur usual warrior posts. Its tiring to read ur posts and everyone of them has the same tone to them . Anyways u do u.
How do you know that? Are you working on the game? Driveclub used that kind of camera in its replay mode. It's very possible that it's from a replay.that gif you posted is not GAMEPLAY though. its not even replay mode. its just part of the trailer.
His reasoning seems to make sense. Its a lot more work to ask a studio to make a game for all the various PC specs that they want to support, and then 3 variations of Xbox One, and then 2 more new Xbox Series systems. Thats a lot of extra work.
Compared that to Insomniac who when making Ratchet & Clank only have 1 PS5 system to worry about. Easier. It certainly could help PS Studios output and/or lead to longer dev times for Xbox Studios games.
If I read another "Fake" reply to this post, I'm going to give up on humanity.
He literally says that's how his room WILL LOOK in November.
Bloody hell. This is why this thread gets derailed all the time.
*Insert "Thats bait" gif here.Don't worry, I'm not concerned, I'm just saying that GT7 looks dissapointing as fuck.
Remember the days when Gran Turismo was a graphical powerhouse? Seems those days are long gone.
If I read another "Fake" reply to this post, I'm going to give up on humanity.
He literally says that's how his room WILL LOOK in November.
Bloody hell. This is why this thread gets derailed all the time.
*Insert "Thats bait" gif here.
These are not RAY TRACING. Forza does dashboard shadow reflections since 2013.
I replied to a specific question, with a specific answer. if you don't mind, read it again before you comment more:
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
So is it safe to say with regards RDNA 2 we've seen all there is to see with the XSX architecture 🤔 XSX's APU is not just a PC part. It has it's own additions too. Just not as much as PS5 has. Again, there's more about PS5 than meets the eye, like RDNA 3/Zen 3 things. AMD won't let Sony talk...www.neogaf.com
I comment on what has been shown.
edit: that gif you posted is not GAMEPLAY though. its not even replay mode. its just part of the trailer.
You have either set your expectations incredibly high or you're trolling. This is a $500 console not a $1500 PC.Who needs reading comprehension in this shilling times?
Or simply that the game doesn't look that impressive for a next gen title?
Of course it's more work. But do we know if that is the reason they aren't ready? What is Sonys excuse then?
Point is - he's pulling tales from his ass and as always arguing in bad faith.
It's in Spanish. OP didn't even bother to bloody translate it and just assumed that we all understand Spanish.
Most likely PC, the game is supposed to release on PC, Xbox One, Xbox Series X and PS4. The next gen version is console exclusive to the Series X at least of now.Which hardware is that running on? Target Spec?
I repeat, the potential is there. And the engine can handle it at 8k@120fps (or 4k@240fps (or 2k@240fps x eye)....
I comment on what has been shown.
edit: that gif you posted is not GAMEPLAY though. its not even replay mode. its just part of the trailer.
You have either set your expectations incredibly high or you're trolling. This is a $500 console not a $1500 PC.
![]()
That GT7 gameplay looked underwhelming as fuck.
That's not a generational leap.
the gap between those consoles is much bigger than XSX/PS5
No way, the difference between PRO and X was around 40% GPU its a fraction of that between PS5 vs XSX.
Difference shouldn't be noticeable like at all.
I still think we're going to see the same difference - minimum - as we are getting now with Xbox One X (2160p) vs PS4 pro (1440p) titles.
Lol I actually feel for you! Enjoy life on my ignore list, coz I’m worried your stupidity is contagious.Being a 500$ console doesn't justify those graphics. It's precisely because it's a next gen 500$ console that we expect better graphics than this:
![]()
Maybe you are happy with whatever is thrown at you, but I expect next gen games to look a generation better than previous gen games.
Nice manipulation from YT video miniature which is being manipulative in the same manner.Being a 500$ console doesn't justify those graphics. It's precisely because it's a next gen 500$ console that we expect better graphics than this:
![]()
Maybe you are happy with whatever is thrown at you, but I expect next gen games to look a generation better than previous gen games.
I repeat, the potential is there. And the engine can handle it at 8k@120fps (or 4k@240fps (or 2k@240fps x eye).
One thing is what you see and another thing is the interest to see.
"I replied to a specific question, with a specific answer. "
Nope. You answered a question with an unnecessary answer.
Reason in that part and version of the demo you are not missing, but it is unnecessary, since nobody has asked you "where there is NO raytracing in GT7?". Do you know what I want to tell you? It is a clearly unnecessary provocation, which makes you doubt the good intentions of your comment. Then you wonder why they attack you. Yet it is very unwise to think, based on that portion of the demo, that there will be no such reflections in the final version of the game. We will see if by the time the Gold version with full reflections comes out you will come to report them, also for free, or if on the contrary then you will come to criticize their low resolution.
On the other hand, it is interesting to see how in real life (look below) it is also difficult to find these reflections if one does not want to appreciate them. Which leads us to analyze what relevance these reflections have in some circumstances. Why should I calculate something that cannot be seen? Better to do it when strictly necessary. And we could say the same of any game on any platform.
Fair balance.
Of course it's more work. But do we know if that is the reason they aren't ready? What is Sonys excuse then?
Point is - he's pulling tales from his ass and as always arguing in bad faith.
It's in Spanish. OP didn't even bother to bloody translate it and just assumed that we all understand Spanish.
U seek negativity and u complain about being victimised when u catch that negativity. Big yikesBeing a 500$ console doesn't justify those graphics. It's precisely because it's a next gen 500$ console that we expect better graphics than this:
![]()
Maybe you are happy with whatever is thrown at you, but I expect next gen games to look a generation better than previous gen games.
![]()
I'll admit that I'm really scared that we're going to end up with Xbox 360 v PS3 levels of jankiness when it comes to third parties.
Being a 500$ console doesn't justify those graphics. It's precisely because it's a next gen 500$ console that we expect better graphics than this:
![]()
Maybe you are happy with whatever is thrown at you, but I expect next gen games to look a generation better than previous gen games.
![]()
That GT7 gameplay looked underwhelming as fuck.
That's not a generational leap.
Of course it's more work. But do we know if that is the reason they aren't ready? What is Sonys excuse then?
Point is - he's pulling tales from his ass and as always arguing in bad faith.
Lol I actually feel for you! Enjoy life on my ignore list, coz I’m worried your stupidity is contagious.
Nice manipulation
Agreed.
Honestly I think this time they could get away with a 599 dollar console.Sony have always been very price conscious except on PS3, which was a disaster. They simply aren't going $599 again unless some people really fucked up and want to lose their jobs
![]()
I'll admit that I'm really scared that we're going to end up with Xbox 360 v PS3 levels of jankiness when it comes to third parties.
How’s everyone doing this morning?
Ps5 and xsx both have 64 rop thats a benefit for ps5 due to 36 cu ,correct?OK, so what is the difference between XSX and Ps5, well, I have an easy picture for you of what it is likely to be
![]()
The CUs will be same, XSX has more, ps5 they run 20 % faster clock,
The shader array has the CU fed by L1.
Blue is the ps5 lilely arrangment, 20 % faster clock and feeding 10 CU
Green is XSX, slower clock and feeding 14 CU
Note the PC Big Navi is also rumoured to be L1 feeding 10 CU.
The internal bandwidths feeding teh CUs are just as important as memory bandwidth, and Ps5 will have a much better bandwidth on the silicon chip feeding those CUs.
I believe the larger shader array design of the XSX is the result of the focus on running 4 XB1s games as a server, and hence 4 larger shader arrays and this looks to be the design focus. We will need to see if any PC parts on RDNA2 have larger 14 CU shader arrays, and even then the proof will be in benchmarks..
I would bet my house on ps5 having better utilisation of shaders as a console as its Sonys sole focus, but we await benchmarks and white papers. I am not saying ps5 is stronger, but the difference will be not as you expect coming from the simple 12 > 10 brigade..
It looked its best a while after release, when dynamic weather was patched in. Very good looking game, and I'm not sure how Evolution did it, but it being at 30fps did not bother me in the end.I remember people complaining about Drive Club not being a generational leap pre-release. When it released it looked pretty damn good, in fact it still does.