From soft game have never been technically sound...
I would regard their technical prowess as "incompetent" for sure when measuring against most of their contemporaries considering that they have since PS360 gen been having massive success with each title selling more and more and garnering more and more sales and accolades yet the technical issues still remain. Technical issues that should be caught and easily fixed before launch like this, or frame pacing and so on.
Frankly it's becoming Pokémon levels of not caring now.
I don't quite understand your defence force here. they make design decision and those decisions impact the games performance therefore it's good and shouldn't be fixed?Their frame-pacing tech works as intended, like it or not. Run the same binary on faster hardware and the issues (mostly) disappear because the judder is a result of them always seeking to maintain the highest average frame delivery (presumably to mitigate input-lag) not to produce the smoothest cadence in delivery at frequencies below the target.
People need to accept that the special "feel" of FROM's games doesn't happen by happy accident every time. Its actually the product of a bunch of choices in creative and technical design that allow them to engineer it reliably and consistently.
Do you think that a loss in "feel" on the sticks due to lag manifesting on say the input side would be a fair trade-off for a smoother presentation visually? I don't believe so.
I don't quite understand your defence force here. they make design decision and those decisions impact the games performance therefore it's good and shouldn't be fixed?
They make plenty of money now, there is literally no excuse for any of what you are saying, other developers are able to do it, so why does from soft get a free pass?
it's almost the literal definition of incompetence. competent studio after having the runaway disgusting success of Elden Ring would've hired the skills they need to get over these menial hurdles
Here: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/lanc...compiler-optimizations.1660232/post-268315355What are compiler optimizations?M1chl
Here, basically Arma Core runs almost perfect on the PS5 and Series X with the PS5 having a slight advantage in resolution and frame rate.They better not fuck this up with Armored Core VI
Thats disappointing to hear.When you are compiling binary, you have the option to include flags in the compilation process, which will introduce optimization from compiler/Sony, by itself. Many features, like AVX and so on, are only enabled when there are proper flags. Outside of that optimization works by scanning code and finding out patters, which could be replaced, by heavily optimize version to that platform.
Depending on the quality of provided code, it could have 1% advantage with quality engineered code, who knows what they are doing, but with shit code you are in 10ths of % better running code.
lol buddy you need a medal for this defence, so framerates aren't important now and neither is game optimisation, so long as they "meant for it to be bad"My point is that there are always trade-offs. And just because the negative you see, you don't like, it doesn't follow that the alternatives are necessarily better or ideal.
In my experience most gamers are literally clueless about the consequential nature of design decisions, unsurprising to be fair when all they get to judge is what the devs deliver as their best option.
Who makes games of FROM's type that both look and play better?
Sure you can find games that run more smoothly, but off-hand I can't think of any that have better and more acclaimed gameplay along with those visuals. Maybe Lords Of The Fallen will deliver on this, but honestly who knows at this point, and even then why has it taken the best part of 15 years to one-up them?
I say this as a big fan of Team Ninja's post 2017 games, which for my taste play great and do unquestionably run at higher average frame-rates, BUT at a cost to grandiose scale and atmosphere compared to the Soulsborne titles.
Your argument is the epitome of ignorance and presumptuousness based as it is solely upon their games simply not running at frame-rates of your liking.
lol buddy you need a medal for this defence, so framerates aren't important now and neither is game optimisation, so long as they "meant for it to be bad"
im sorry the money they have now they can hire people to fix these issues. AC VI should have never released with such a silly problem, same as elden ring.
I guess Cyberpunk was all just a masterclass in game design too. they just meant for it to not run well
For those worrying about ACVI it looks ok on PS5 if you have a VRR TV but definitely not locked 60fps on the PS5 version while Lance says the PS4 version is completely locked 60 on PS5
I didn't say that. At all. What I wrote was that there are trade-offs, and that sometimes retaining an engine/pipeline with performance deficits can be worthwhile due to the flexibility it offers in other areas, such as the ability to fine-tune gameplay.
Maybe the Japanese game devs should learn how to code
1. Release shitIs From software and/or Bandai Namco completely lacking in code optimization expertise or is this just they don't give a shit since it's selling anyway situation?
Because setting compiler flags is a fairly basic thing. And even if they are lacking, a fairly high level (no need to super deep dive into code) consultant review could have found this issue. Like seriously, WTF!?
And they haven't patched it still... This is a mix between incompetence and indifference basically.
We've had this same thing come up before, with the most famous example being Super Mario 64. MVG actually did a half-decent video on it. In the end, it's nowhere near as simple as "Dev's didn't tick 'Make game run better'". There's usually a reason for these kinds of "optimisations" not being used. From Soft make an interesting set of choices to achieve their priorities with their engine, so I'd imagine some of these optimisations might actually hinder aspects of this. Only From Soft know for sure.
This seems like what happened with Super Mario 64 when it first released.
Difference is this was in 1995 when 3d graphics were relatively new,now they are the standard,from soft is just incompetent
Lower resolution, less grass and forestry density, worse lighting, no RT from the top of my mind compared to the PS5 version. Just to be clear, PS4 version on PS4 Pro runs better than the PS5 'native' version, and much better when played on PS5. Put a slow donkey on a Ferrari, it goes fast.This makes sense to me, but what doesn't make sense is why the PS4 version runs better? Are you saying that maybe there was a negative in tweaking the game for PS5 due to potential tradeoffs in other areas, even though PS5 is a PS4 Pro Plus that plays PS4 titles natively? I mean, that doesn't appear to me to be "we're gonna keep the same engine!" that just seems like completely faceplanting at porting a game. Unless you can explain this better for my small brain.
Lower resolution, less grass and forestry density, worse lighting, no RT from the top of my mind compared to the PS5 version. Just to be clear, PS4 version on PS4 Pro runs better than the PS5 'native' version, and much better when played on PS5. Put a slow donkey on a Ferrari, it goes fast.![]()
And the winner for most unhinged response in this thread goes to...
WTF From, we assumed you were just another japanese team creatively proficient but technically limited.
What we didn't know is that the limitations were in your undeveloped brains, so plain retarded to not tick a few boxes, and stupidly irresponsible to not check, find this, recompile with the ticks and flags and update for more than a year.
Guess we must start calling them Fuck Software.
Wasn't Series X also having performance problems and more or less PS5/Series X had the same performance?
For a time I thought about selling my PS5 copy and picking it for Series X, but I think I read or hear that it was the same case on both consoles and I just assumed it was From Software stupenduos coding skills again and just braved through it. Guess if it's the same case, if they make optimization changes to PS5, then Series X and Series S probably have the same unoptimized mess and will get the same treatment of a japanese dumbo ticking a few boxes in the compiler, recompiling and pushing the update.
Just a thought...
Maybe From Software are so utterly retarded that they don't know to optimize flags is just a few ticks in the compiler, and what we've been thinking as their thrashy coding skills is just they never ever ticked those boxes EVER in any of their games on every system, since the PS4 version on PS5 runs at lower resolution without raytracing and a few others bells and whistles, and we were just brute forcing everything. Because lets be honest, we all have thought or felt that, for the graphical quality From Software gave us, we should have been getting much more performance than we were. On PC, since we had more horsepower available than the consoles of the time, we just brute forced them to a confortable 60fps and called it a day.![]()
Morons who think they know better because they read some articles about development is a good reason.There's a good reason people use the term lazy devs.
ps5 version still had exact same issues without rt patch.Lower resolution, less grass and forestry density, worse lighting, no RT from the top of my mind compared to the PS5 version. Just to be clear, PS4 version on PS4 Pro runs better than the PS5 'native' version, and much better when played on PS5. Put a slow donkey on a Ferrari, it goes fast.![]()
I played it through on my ps5, ps5 version and all this horrible performance talk is just that, talk. Game looked and played great.
Lol there's No point hereI didn't say that. At all. What I wrote was that there are trade-offs, and that sometimes retaining an engine/pipeline with performance deficits can be worthwhile due to the flexibility it offers in other areas, such as the ability to fine-tune gameplay.
Thanks for proving my point for me! I challenged you to find a comparable title that both presents and plays better, and you come back with AC VI and Cyberpunk - 2 titles developed with massive staff headcounts and funded to a degree that no FROM title ever has been - both unable to hit the mark as stated.
ps5 version still had exact same issues without rt patch.
and if they had to lower resolution a bit and fine tune graphics settings to get locked 60 and perfect frame-pacing, they should have done that.
its what optimization is all about.
im sure they could still manage a “better than ps4 version looking” ps5 native game if they have put any effort to it.
you are spinning out of control
This makes sense to me, but what doesn't make sense is why the PS4 version runs better? Are you saying that maybe there was a negative in tweaking the game for PS5 due to potential tradeoffs in other areas, even though PS5 is a PS4 Pro Plus that plays PS4 titles natively? I mean, that doesn't appear to me to be "we're gonna keep the same engine!" that just seems like completely faceplanting at porting a game. Unless you can explain this better for my small brain.
Lol there's No point herethese companies earn big money, these performance issues shouldn't be happening at such a silly level.
I don't see why you feel you need to defend anything.
When you are compiling binary, you have the option to include flags in the compilation process, which will introduce optimization from compiler/Sony, by itself. Many features, like AVX and so on, are only enabled when there are proper flags. Outside of that optimization works by scanning code and finding out patters, which could be replaced, by heavily optimize version to that platform.
Depending on the quality of provided code, it could have 1% advantage with quality engineered code, who knows what they are doing, but with shit code you are in 10ths of % better running code. Granted these things are to everything outside of GPU, but it could speed up even rendering process, because there are ton of loaders for everything on the screen less waiting = faster running code.
Lol it doesn't need any contexualising. The publisher and the studio have a fuck ton of money.You call it defending, I call it contextualizing and explaining that things in development are never that black and white. A position I hold due to many years of experience in the field.
Its a complex undertaking to make a large scale game requiring hundreds of man-years worth of coordinated effort from talented, dedicated professionals. This is why the complaint of "Lazy devs" is so offensive to me. No number of lazy people would or will ever make a title as good as Elden Ring or any other highly rated title for that matter.
Such a simplistic diagnosis flies in the face of reason.
Does everything that's imperfect in you and your life boil down to lazyness?
Can you redo this pic so it says "Gamers" on the left?
You can explain why there's a fly in my soup it doesn't mean that's acceptable at a restaurant
You're just further proving my point about being unhinged.Guess you took it personally, after all 'the only games that really excite you are From Software games'...
![]()
And the winner of the moistier From defense goes to...