I blame HugoDon't it just.
Right!?Uh, thanks. Doesn't make sense to me but who gives a shit anyway.
We're eating a fucking feast!This literally tweaked and solved all my problems I had with Eternal.
Doom 2016 was my favorite FPS.
Yeah I don't know what were they smoking while working on the nu-lore.Right!?
The lore is dreadful anyway. Just make me feel vulnerable, give me a shitload of guns, let me lay waste to demons, and make me run back through the level to find health pickups I didn’t need earlier after I get my shit rocked.
I wonder if the recommended target for 1440p/60fps is with ray tracing enabled. I have a 3080ti, 12700k, 32gm ram and am hoping to get more fps than this at high/ultra since I game on an ultrawide 3440*1440, I would gladly turn RT off to achieve this. Time will tell...PC specs also revealed
![]()
Or mine. Just looks like another bombbastic over the top festbut this showing did nothing but increase my scepticism.
I wonder if the recommended target for 1440p/60fps is with ray tracing enabled. I have a 3080ti, 12700k, 32gm ram and am hoping to get more fps than this at high/ultra since I game on an ultrawide 3440*1440, I would gladly turn RT off to achieve this. Time will tell...
It being id Tech I'd assume that it runs like a dream and that those requirements are with RTX set on.I wonder if the recommended target for 1440p/60fps is with ray tracing enabled. I have a 3080ti, 12700k, 32gm ram and am hoping to get more fps than this at high/ultra since I game on an ultrawide 3440*1440, I would gladly turn RT off to achieve this. Time will tell...
It being id Tech I'd assume that it runs like a dream and that those requirements are with RTX set on.
Switch 2
![]()
Oof, I will wait for a sale, that’s for sure.Looks absolutely great, I hope you can do a melee-only playthrough
However...
> 80€ for the base version
> Denuvo
![]()
I wonder if the recommended target for 1440p/60fps is with ray tracing enabled. I have a 3080ti, 12700k, 32gm ram and am hoping to get more fps than this at high/ultra since I game on an ultrawide 3440*1440, I would gladly turn RT off to achieve this. Time will tell...
It being id Tech I'd assume that it runs like a dream and that those requirements are with RTX set on.
Points that I'm sure have been discussed before.What problems specifically?
Eternal was okay, but extremely limited in how you played. Doom 2016 was way better imo.
Oh no, not thinking! I loved the game and its complexities. Both were great in their own way. Beat the shit out of both on nightmare.Points that I'm sure have been discussed before.
Doom Eternal requires way too much movement thinking and aiming. You stop and you die. You must dodge and execute Marauders perfectly. Too much mechanics going on, ammo conservation, aim skill, quick map navigation.
You jump and run while dodging and shooting all over the the map which by players fault surely can kill you with small side step.
Doom'16 pace was just right.
I couldn't even finish Eternal on the twin Marauder and dogs inside the small room part. Just called it quits, way too much skill required to be fun for me.
Good for your man. For thinking I prefer Xcom.Oh no, not thinking! I loved the game and its complexities. Both were great in their own way. Beat the shit out of both on nightmare.
The Marine in Doom 1 and 2 is one and the same Marine that is the Doom Slayer in 2016 and Eternal. Doom 3 doesn't count as canon and is more like a multiverse story. The conclusion of Doom 64 is where Doom the Dark Ages picks up. The ending to Doom 64 ends with the Doom Marine getting trapped in the realms of Hell, mostly by choice to keep the demons from invading earth again. Doom Eternal gives the most hints of what happened here but basically he found himself in the Sentinel homeworld of Argent D'Nur where he is captured, became a prisoner and forced into Gladiatorial Battles with the Seraphim. He was such a badass that the Night Sentinels put him on the front lines waging war against the forces of hell. He has earned the title Doom Slayer and is given powers through Mayker Tech. Dark Ages basically explains the story of his exploits with the Sentinels until he is tricked by Demons and sealed away into saprophagous which as you can see from Doom 2016 finds its way back to Mars and begins the events of Doom 2016.Doom Lore geeks help me out:
In the Original Doom it was just a Marine who was going apeshit on the demons
What is canon? I remember in Doom 3 Hell was opened due to Transportation technology that went wrong
In Doom 2016 It was Due to the need to find resources and they found a way to get to the hell Relm to acquire some kind of Never ending energy stones or some shitbecause they were close to depleted in the solar system.
What is the Doom canon storyline?
typical modern day gamerPoints that I'm sure have been discussed before.
Doom Eternal requires way too much movement thinking and aiming. You stop and you die. You must dodge and execute Marauders perfectly. Too much mechanics going on, ammo conservation, aim skill, quick map navigation.
You jump and run while dodging and shooting all over the the map which by players fault surely can kill you with small side step.
Doom'16 pace was just right.
I couldn't even finish Eternal on the twin Marauder and dogs inside the small room part. Just called it quits, way too much skill required to be fun for me.
Well, it's a prequal to Doom 2016, it would be strange if he was faster and stronger than he was in 2016 and Eternal.I hate that instead on going faster and stronger it looks like they went slower and more heavy. I blame the complaints on the difficulty of Eternal DLC pre nerf.
I dunno this looks so mhe that I'm kinda worried.
No Deathmatch for DOOM for me would not be greenlit, make it old school DOOM limited but not having multiplayer in the game that invented the Deathmatch is a bit of an insult to its legacyReally stoked for this. But I'm not gonna lie, I'm pretty bummed that there's no multiplayer whatsoever. It feels like they really dropped the ball across all the new games in that regard, lol.
2016's wasn't too bad, but it wasn't in-house and kind of suffered from an identity disorder. Eternal's WAS in-house, but they did some silly asymmetrical stuff that really didn't take off. They claimed they wanted to not do anything deathmatch-like cause they were worried it'd take away Quake Champions' spotlight, LOL. So, this will have no multiplayer at all. No big deal, still hyped, and will still love it.
I just wish that with each iteration of DOOM we could continue to get co-op and multiplayer. I remember being so hyped that 2016 felt like the first full AAA FPS title that wasn't a COD game in YEARS.
Complete opposite of what I wanted. It looked slow. I’ll immediately miss the speed of DOOM 2016 and Eternal’s verticality. Tank feel is easily the worst style they could do for my tastes.
I hope that if you raise the gameplay speed it does not influence too much the enemy projectiles. I like this rebalancing.Complete opposite of what I wanted. It looked slow. I’ll immediately miss the speed of DOOM 2016 and Eternal’s verticality. Tank feel is easily the worst style they could do for my tastes.
3070 am cryPC specs also revealed
![]()
Probably in 4 years if even then.Quake when?
Dunno, I think both him and Levy did an excellent work on Eternal's DLC.
But yeah, no complains here either if the rest of Dark Ages OST is like what's on that trailer.
On steam the game is priced £70Just watched it. Things I don't like:
Things I like:
- 80€ (lol)
- Denuvo (lmao)
- Some high-contrast colors that I think look bad. For example, just at the start of the video the shield emits a green wave and the demon (Baron?) also emits a lot of green stuff. That sucks.
Anyway, here are some new pics from the Steam store:
- The music.
- Everything really.
![]()
![]()
![]()
They turned the pinkies into a mount for the enemies? Not complaining, kinda genious even.
Sorry! I did it from mobile and didn't see if there was. Glad you found it!
I'm not so negative. Just giving my impression. People put too much weight to my posts.Why are you so negative? Question is specifically referring to your very first post in this thread.
Its negative.
I know.
Wonder why I picked the username, given that people tend to get butthurt over my posts.Have you seen his username?
Textual replies differ in intent from contextual (oral) ones. If your intent is different from what you write, then there is a mismatch.I'm not so negative. Just giving my impression. People put too much weight to my posts.
This implies you are aware of that, which is why you chose the name you chose.Wonder why I picked the username, given that people tend to get butthurt over my posts.![]()
Im glad you value yourself accordingly.People care way too much about random people's opinions.
Textual replies can be exactly the same as oral replies. The only difference is the lack of non-verbal communication.Textual replies differ in intent from contextual (oral) ones. If your intent is different from what you write, then there is a mismatch.
However:
This implies you are aware of that, which is why you chose the name you chose.
In that case, why are you surprised you ger called out then?
I'm not any different from anybody else.Im glad you value yourself accordingly.