why it has to be always "fanboys" ?
Reurnal 80€ is not true, posted it before
![]()
awwww thats bad :/ , but there's a reason in that country why it cost so much, but will not saySure it is. Returnal 80€ is pretty much standard, at least here in Greece.
![]()
This is the natural evolution of this meme.
In Greece everything is overpriced. Always.Sure it is. Returnal 80€ is pretty much standard, at least here in Greece.
![]()
Yeah......no.In Greece everything is overpriced. Always.
Well, I mean the original FFVII was exclusive and went multiplat after many years so i guess theres no prob after all.Lost to will to care about FF7 honestly, If Square sees fair to withold games from PC gamers for many years, i can backlog them for many years as well. What goes around comes around.
How many chapters/parts are expected?I wonder if chapter 2 will also be a timed exclusive on PlayStation or if it will be released simultaneously on all platforms.
I’d assume 3How many chapters/parts are expected?
I wonder if chapter 2 will also be a timed exclusive on PlayStation or if it will be released simultaneously on all platforms.
Yes and? I mean we can punch holes in "RE2 is a full remake" because it misses b scenarios, but that's really not the point. The only reason you are saying it's not a full game is based purely on the fact that a game from 1997 exists. VIIR is not a game from 97. It's a new game that is an adaptation of that game. Remakes can do whatever the hell they want and this one wants to expand the story to multiple games. VIIR is a full game. It doesn't tell the complete story of VII, but it's not lacking anything itself. It completes the Midgar chapter and is written and made as if it is the first part of a series. It's not designed, structured, paced, and whatnot as if "pops this is an abrupt end". As a game it feels complete.I don't really understand the "wait till the full game is done" comments. Was Mass Effect 1 not a full game?
ME1 was a full game every ME game has a ending of sort every game was written like it would be the last in the trilogy metal gear soild was the same same RE2 remake is the full game of re2 re1 remake is the same thing ff7r is barely the 1st part of ff7 ff7 is more than midgar
Yes and? Again the point is that comparing the purchase of one independent developer to a Publisher is pretty stupid.Microsoft funded an insomniac game right?
Your dumb post only works when you are not the first person to sayMicrosoft buys Bethesda.
"Yay! Good job Phil. Now those same games will continue to be on Xbox, but not on PlayStation!"
Sony does third-party deals.
"Shady Sony. Now those games will continue to be on PlayStation, but not on Xbox. You bullies!"
That was published by Microsoft... it's not the same thing
You should make smarter comparison
It was the same scenario with Dead Rising
Sony isn’t publishing anything. MS publishing the games offset costs to the developers. Sony only paid for exclusivity. Really aren’t the same thing. But street fighter is a proper comparison to what happened with Tomb Raider.It's the same thing. MS paid for timed exclusivity and then published the game during that period.
Sony isn’t publishing anything. MS publishing the games offset costs to the developers. Sony only paid for exclusivity. Really aren’t the same thing. But street fighter is a proper comparison to what happened with Tomb Raider.
I never said I liked timed exclusives. I never supported anything about them. I hate them all equally.MS paid for exclusivity which most likely included publishing. The PS4 version is published by Square Enix.
Stop trying to justify a change in opinion based on platform. Timed exclusives suck ass no matter who does it, and here we read Xbox apologists trying to spin it like if the company they "support" didn't just buy some of the biggest studios out there and started the whole timed exclusive war.
awwww thats bad :/ , but there's a reason in that country why it cost so much, but will not say![]()
The world ends with you 2 is an exclusive?It will surely be an Epic exclusive too, so 2023 to be more specific. I hope not, but since Kingdom hearts is an exclusivity for the moment and The World ends with you too, we can assume that it would be the case for FF 7.
Yes, sadlyThe world ends with you 2 is an exclusive?
Hmm I think it will be released on PS4, Switch. Not an exclusive.Yes, sadly
I was talking about the pc version, of course it will be available on console.Hmm I think it will be released on PS4, Switch. Not an exclusive.
You are entitled to your opinion.Yes and? I mean we can punch holes in "RE2 is a full remake" because it misses b scenarios, but that's really not the point. The only reason you are saying it's not a full game is based purely on the fact that a game from 1997 exists. VIIR is not a game from 97. It's a new game that is an adaptation of that game. Remakes can do whatever the hell they want and this one wants to expand the story to multiple games. VIIR is a full game. It doesn't tell the complete story of VII, but it's not lacking anything itself. It completes the Midgar chapter and is written and made as if it is the first part of a series. It's not designed, structured, paced, and whatnot as if "pops this is an abrupt end". As a game it feels complete.
Yes and? Again the point is that comparing the purchase of one independent developer to a Publisher is pretty stupid.
Probably cost too much, plus getting exclusivity for the first year nearly kills it on all other consoles and will have a couple of youtubers play it on playstation rather than pc. Then again 80% percent of sales were going to be on playstation anyways.Why don't they just make this full exclusive. Seems odd.
If you want to play FF games, get a PlayStation, easy as that!
I never owned a Playstation and have never played FFVII.
Both companies are trying to fill voids and deny the other from doing the same. A lot of momentum is generated in the first couple years of a console generation.But they play better on xbox
All said but, I honestly couldn’t give a fuck about this game at this point, I don’t care about Sony paying for exclusivity that’s the industry they both do it. But it has the tomb raider feel of it now it’s gone on so long, I don’t know if extending the deal achieved anymore sales of Sony hardware? Or was just knee jerk of Bethesda and MLB.
I’d assume 3
Ahh that's whack. Was looking forward to playing this on PC, but guess I'll just Youtube a playthrough, lol.
Bethesda games were coming to Xbox before. Microsoft buying Bethesda doesn't change their game line-up in the slightest. They only bought them to cockblock Sony. Xbox fans praise this move.
Sony makes timed exclusive deals for games that would come out to their systems anyway. Sony making those deals doesn't change their game line-up in the slightest. They only do those deals to temporarily cockblock Microsoft. Xbox fans condemn this move.
The point, which many Xbox fanboys are surprisingly incapable of grasping, is the hypocrisy of it all.