Apparently, I am not a trusted G4tv member on Reddit. I think they locked people out of posting.
Wow they really want to see this thing failing spectacularly uh??!Abby Russell joined G4. I doubt she would have joined if the money wasn't there.
The funny thing is that I didn't post anything. They say you can request to post, but I tried that and it seems like I am totally locked out.They did. After banning numerous people and closing close to a 100+ threads that weren't spouting the same tired cliche lines. Take a look at revedit to get a good look at how pathetic they are.
No Abbey Russle love in this thread. She always amused me. Her and the Spookin' with Scoops guy.Wow they really want to see this thing failing spectacularly uh??!
The funny thing is that I didn't post anything. They say you can request to post, but I tried that and it seems like I am totally locked out.
Another thing I noticed that is getting less buzz - at one point she lists off some of the "amazing team" that makes this new G4 that are behind the camera. She rattles off like five or six people and implies that's not all of them.
But....their dismal youtube views can't possibly support that many people. Do they have some big sponsorships? Maybe a handful of patreon whales? How is this making any money, let alone enough for a full payroll of employees?
How about you link the actual video instead of that garbage YouTube channel.
LMAO!!
It is weird because you don't know how much of it is actually them.What was arguably worse for me was hearing that they don't actually write their own reviews. They're basically talking heads reading reviews that are done by committee.
I watched about three minutes of Sessler and Froskurrin's review of Death Stranding, and it felt weird. Why should I care about your thoughts and little quips about the game when you probably didn't even play it? It just came off as disingenuous after that.
Remind me, did everyone in these gaming positions have Cluster B personality disorders 20 years ago?
LMAO!!
Amen. Why WOULD I click on their link?!I notice that after four years, ResetEra has seeped out from the depths of the internet and assumed a human form
I think I will pass on your condenceding, shrieking woke host, “G4”, thx bye
She is actually funny. The sarcasm was a too thick to notice on the G4 video but this is hilarious
I need another update!!! That is a ridiculous ratio hahaUpdate:
![]()
She does a killer Grace Randolph as well.Its actually comedian Chrissie Mayr
The internet definitely saw through this.I need another update!!! That is a ridiculous ratio haha
When Fake FROSK is so much better than Real FROSKThe best thing to come out of this mess![]()
They did. After banning numerous people and closing close to a 100+ threads that weren't spouting the same tired cliche lines. Take a look at revedit to get a good look at how pathetic they are.
This was actually one of my first thoughts as well. I did some quick searching and it looks like Comcast might be the one funding this, which makes sense. One thing the last few years has shown is is how an independent youtuber can generate a ridiculous amount of views and revenue on a shoestring budget. Something like this pretty much has to depend on funds from a mega corporation.
Interested to see how long they stick around. When you're paying a decent sized crew corporate is less likely to be patient enough to see if they can grow their audience.
LMAO!!
Frosk continuing to discuss men jerking off to G4 women tells you all you need to know about a) her personal insecurity
Yeah. Frosk's statement made them sound like hypocrites and as long as they have Gina Darling on the show, they are hypocrites.Here's the thing, her main premise is not entirely wrong. Telling someone you like jerking off to them without having a pre-existing sexual relationship with them is gross and weird in real life and is clearly sexual harassment in school or the work place, as is telling someone they're too ugly to fuck or jerk off to. You would not or should not do this in real life and if you do, you're an asshole and if it's in school or the workplace, you should be sued for sexual harassment, lose your job, and be expelled and if it was my wife or our daughter that was the victim, I'd find the fucker that said it and punch him in the fucking mouth. So, if there are people making these kinds of comments in their videos or chats, she's in the right. That being said, this is the internet and not real life and there are at least three very easy solutions to this problem.
(1) You ignore them. Don't read the comments. Don't read the chat.
(2) You state up front you will not tolerate sexist or racist speech or other hate speech and then ban or block people who violate those rules.
(3) You disable comments and chat altogether.
What I find laughable is her revisionist G4 history. Morgan Webb, Olivia Munn, Sara Jean Underwood, Layla Kayleigh, Kristin Holt, and probably 95% of the rest of the female hosts were clearly hired because, number one, they're attractive and, number two, they can talk about tech/games/geek culture. Nearly all of them also either engaged in risque content on their respective shows or did risque photoshoots and modeling in men's magazines. They sexualized themselves. They understood that gaming and tech is a male-dominated hobby and had no issue being eye candy for their male audience.
So that brings us back to the present. The old G4, because of their often risque content and hot female hosts, developed a largely male audience who, upon hearing about the G4 revival, probably expected the new G4 to harken back to the days of Morgan and Layla bikini photoshoots, Olivia shoving hotdogs in her mouth, and Sara Jean going on a naked bike ride. As we now know, that's not what the new G4 is about and the largely male audience is negatively comparing the two G4 eras, which new G4 doesn't like. In that case, you shouldn't have called yourself G4. New G4 invited the comparison by using the name G4, so deal with it.
I've started thinking about this a lot with regards to everything in social media. Whenever you generalize groups of people and point to egregious examples that often represent a fringe demographic, you're not only going to get a response from those who may deserve it, but you're also going to get an unintentional response from the group as a whole, guilty or not. In this case she's referring to men in the industry making no distinction between who or what groups specifically are responsible. And what's the natural response of man who has to sit and listen to that? Well, here you have it.People like her like the attention because they can use any made-up examples
Reddit has been compromised a long time ago. You go to the Joe Rogan sub, and 90% of the posts are bashing him. It’s a complete upside down than what Reddit was 5 years to a decade ago. It’s now CULTivated.They did. After banning numerous people and closing close to a 100+ threads that weren't spouting the same tired cliche lines. Take a look at revedit to get a good look at how pathetic they are.
Thank fuck she’s wHyte, or you’d also be called a racist.Its disgusting the level of discourse these cunts are pushing. Literally any time you suggest you disagree with frosk, you are immediatley labeled as a sexist. That you are a perverted man. That you are a bigot. These people need to be put into a fucking mental hospital.
I don't disagree with what this Indiana Black woman said (I forget what her dumb internet handle is), but the producers never should have let her say it on air, and now they're double fucking themselves on Reddit. Just a management shitshow all around.