My lord that build. Fml.
Anyhow, pick 780Ti over the Titan Black. And I think you should also pick a bigger capacity cheaper drive.
thanks...
My lord that build. Fml.
Anyhow, pick 780Ti over the Titan Black. And I think you should also pick a bigger capacity cheaper drive.
Updated my build again - should be 4k ready...
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/3hUxc
Not sure if I should commit to the TITAN BLACK seeing as it might hit a price drop soon.
thanks...
Why no Titan Z?
In case it wasn't clear.
I am only being super jelly of that budget. The build isn't bad.
Why only one Titan Z?
Why no Titan Z?
At that point he may as well just buy the whole Nvidia.
Titan Black = 780 Ti with 6GB VRAM and great double-precision floating-point ability.
All games use single-precision calculations. 780 Ti is for the games segment and the Titan line is for professionals running simulations, working in CAD or CUDA stuff who also want to play games.
If you don't need FP64 support, then you're wasting your money on a Titan Black. This is doubly true now that EVGA are releasing a 780 Ti with 6GB VRAM.
Just bought an EVGA GTX 780 3gb card last week.
Soon after I received a notification from EVGA that a new 6gb GTX 780 card will be rolling out soon - and that it is eligible for their Step Up program whereby I can upgrade by paying the difference in costs between the card I bought and the new one.
How interested should I be in the 6gb card? Is there value there for 50$? 100$? more?
Thanks.
I last built a PC in 2007 and stopped using it a couple years later since I wasn't doing much gaming. So while once upon a time I knew my stuff and kept current, it's been a while. So let's just say I'm a bit out of the loop.
Anyway, someone at work was selling a Gigabyte mobo, Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition, and Antec 500W PSU for all of $30. Since I knew the PSU alone was worth that, I bought it.
I have a 1GB 4870 lying around I got for free, as well as a case and a handful of HDDs. So all it needs is some DDR3 and it'll be a full rig.
My question is: is it even worth building this thing? Obviously this is all several year old hardware, is it going to be able to run anything at worthwhile performance? I'm not expecting 4K/120 or even 1080p/60 - will 720p/30 mid-high settings on modern titles be feasible? i.e. will it even look any better than Xbox 360 games?
Also, my primary computer is my MacBook Pro (2.7GHz quad i7 3820QM, 1GB GT650M). I installed Windows 7 on it a while back with the intent of gaming on it but got distracted and never followed through. Would I be better off just going that route?
Thanks!
That rig might be ok for watching movies. Gaming? Not so much. You Macbook won't be great either but a little better.
Maybe I'll put it together and have my fun with overclocking it (apparently it's damn easy to unlock the other two cores on that Phenom and turn it into a quad, all while hitting 4GHz on air) and then see if I can flip it on Craigslist for $200 or something.
Anyone who would buy that when they can get an i5-4670k for around the same price is an idiot.
I meant the whole system with the 4870 in it.
Maybe I'll put it together and have my fun with overclocking it (apparently it's damn easy to unlock the other two cores on that Phenom and turn it into a quad, all while hitting 4GHz on air) and then see if I can flip it on Craigslist for $200 or something.
Even with the CPU OC'd and turned into a quad, do you think it would still be a major bottleneck if I tossed, say, an R9 270 in there?
Absolutely would bottleneck. The Phenom can get 4 core at 4 Ghz, but 4Ghz on the phenom is nothing like 4Ghz on a modern intel processor. The instructions per clock are way lower on the phenom. A friend of mine at that same processor with 4 cores unlocked and a GTX670 and then moved to a 3650k and saw a 15% in fps.
Flip it if you can for $200 and put that towards a new system.
I last built a PC in 2007 and stopped using it a couple years later since I wasn't doing much gaming. So while once upon a time I knew my stuff and kept current, it's been a while. So let's just say I'm a bit out of the loop.
Anyway, someone at work was selling a Gigabyte mobo, Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition, and Antec 500W PSU for all of $30. Since I knew the PSU alone was worth that, I bought it.
I have a 1GB 4870 lying around I got for free, as well as a case and a handful of HDDs. So all it needs is some DDR3 and it'll be a full rig.
My question is: is it even worth building this thing? Obviously this is all several year old hardware, is it going to be able to run anything at worthwhile performance? I'm not expecting 4K/120 or even 1080p/60 - will 720p/30 mid-high settings on modern titles be feasible? i.e. will it even look any better than Xbox 360 games?
Also, my primary computer is my MacBook Pro (2.7GHz quad i7 3820QM, 1GB GT650M). I installed Windows 7 on it a while back with the intent of gaming on it but got distracted and never followed through. Would I be better off just going that route?
Thanks!
I had almost that exact same setup until about a year/year½ ago (an X3 instead of X2), I had to replace the 4870 with a GTX 660 because it just wasnt keeping up with the non-UE3 games that were coming out (and I think it was dying anyway), then after a few months I replaced everything else because it was bottlenecking the 660. It's only worth building if you know you won't be able to build a full system for 5-6 more months.
Okay, so I think a GTX 780 or R9 290x will fit in my pitiful XPS 8300 case, but I'm now having issues with the PSU. It is so fricking tiny, with no extra space, that I'm having a really tough time finding a 750w that will fit. Am I screwed?
Why do you need a 750W? A good 550 is more than enough for either card.
Or you could wait and get the SFX sized Silverstone 600W that is coming out soon, So Tiny!
Your Current Specs: Nothing
Budget: £500-600, UK
Main Use: Rate 1-5. 5 being Highest:
Light Gaming (4), Gaming (5), General Usage (2).
Monitor Resolution: I have a Panasonic 42" Plasma TV to plug into @ 1920 x 1080. That resolution is fine for me as a maximum. Possibly looking to downsample using it as well if possible.
List SPECIFIC games or applications that you MUST be able to run well: Any multi platform games I'd hope to be able to plug into the TV and enjoy on the big screen with PS4 controller (with better performance than consoles). I'd like to be able to run whatever is current at high settings (games like Rome:Total War II, LoL, ACIV, Witcher 3 - not really fussed about FPS as I'm gradually moving more and more away from them).
Is 30FPS acceptable? 60 as a minimum for the above games with high settings.
Looking to reuse any parts? No
When will you build? When it gets delivered next week hopefully
Will you be overclocking? If possible
Hey guys
Just getting ready to go for my order. Kharma45 put together a decent rig for me in the last thread and I'm just wondering if this is still relevant as the price drops mean it's now ready to commit for me - is there a way to eek out more insane value for little outlay here? Just to be clear here's the original use case
Proposed rig: http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/2twsz
Oh really? I thought I read that a 750 was necessary. Thanks!
That is good to know thanks, would this work better?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231416
I'm kinda sad that I would miss out on PhysX effects if I really pick up a Gigabyte R9 290 Windforce and not a nVidia card in that price range. Why are those so damn expensive in comparison ? That anandtech benchmark comparison favors the R9 290 everywhere and it would only cost me like 360...
That's the way it's been for a long time. NVIDIA gives you features and special tech, AMD gives you raw performance:$.I'm kinda sad that I would miss out on PhysX effects if I really pick up a Gigabyte R9 290 Windforce and not a nVidia card in that price range. Why are those so damn expensive in comparison ? That anandtech benchmark comparison favors the R9 290 everywhere and it would only cost me like 360€...
That's the way it's been for a long time. NVIDIA gives you features and special tech, AMD gives you raw performance:$.
At this very moment, I keep flipping back and forth between a 780 Classified and R9-290 myself.
That's the way it's been for a long time. NVIDIA gives you features and special tech, AMD gives you raw performance:$.
At this very moment, I keep flipping back and forth between a 780 Classified and R9-290 myself.
And CUDA, good OpenGL drivers, good reference coolers for those who want a blower, etc.Maybe because people want features like PhysX, Shadowplay and G-sync?
I'm kinda sad that I would miss out on PhysX effects if I really pick up a Gigabyte R9 290 Windforce and not a nVidia card in that price range. Why are those so damn expensive in comparison ? That anandtech benchmark comparison favors the R9 290 everywhere and it would only cost me like 360...
IMO, it all comes down to G-Sync and Shadowplay vs Raw Power.NoRéN;106142096 said:do you have a preference between those? pros and cons based on your personal experience?
Okay so I've deinstalled everything Nvidia related and now getting everything back through GeForce Experience. I'll do some testing later today and report back.
IMO, it all comes down to G-Sync and Shadowplay vs Raw Power.
It's been fixed, even on crossfire.I kind of doubt what I would buy if I want a new card.
I know AMD would be doing about the microstuttering, but is it really completely removed now? It is something I am extremely bothered by with my current 6950.
It's been fixed, even on crossfire.