I'm just glad shipping hasn't taken over. That kind of pandering kills franchises.
If it's built for it, sure. But that kind of thing I just couldn't care less for.No it doesn't, whole franchises are build on shipping.
What is shipping?
What is shipping?
Sometimes to the point where the actual story doesn't matter.Basically we debate whether Jace should marry Nissa or Chandra.
Oh God.
I hope they leave the romance angle to be Jace + Liliana = awkward bullshit and that's that. Or hook up Gideon and Chandra and be done with it. Please don't make this a soap.
It isn't just Jace and Liliana. Gideon only ever got to Zendikar because he's a stalker.
Which makes it all the worse they send Jace to recruit Chandra.
Basically we debate whether Jace should marry Nissa or Chandra.
What's your list if I nay ask? I just put together a list and was wondering if I was missing something incredibly obvious.I bought the same baby Jace cards. I'm getting together that Izzet Machinegun deck for game day because fuck you Bant I won't play you.
I see what you're doing and I will not take part in it
I'm just glad shipping hasn't taken over. That kind of pandering kills franchises.
Oh God.
I hope they leave the romance angle to be Jace + Liliana = awkward bullshit and that's that. Or hook up Gideon and Chandra and be done with it. Please don't make this a soap.
I think shipping two tsunderes is actually a no-no within shipping culture.See OnPoint, God's Beard is doing shipping right.
I think shipping two tsunderes is actually a no-no within shipping culture.
Yeah, I picked em up at 18 and need the playset.I should've sold or traded mine long ago. Oh well, I got 'em for £10 each - I really doubt it will ever go that low again, so I'm not too bothered.
I still say him plus always watching is a deck.Could be worse. I bought Ojutai for 20-22 a piece and it's now $6 according to mtggoldfish.
Something is wrong with the game if a 5/4 hexproof dragon that mini Impulses every attack is considered unplayable.
I'm just glad shipping hasn't taken over. That kind of pandering kills franchises.
That's what builds franchises.
Honestly I've never bought the expression "I don't understand shipping" despite how often people on GAF say it. The only way you don't understand shipping is if you have never had any kind of intellectual or emotional engagement with a work of fiction.
I just don't care about relationships in certain kinds of fiction I read. simple as that. I'll read fiction ABOUT relationships if I want that sort of thing.
I just don't care about relationships in certain kinds of fiction I read. simple as that. I'll read fiction ABOUT relationships if I want that sort of thing.
I mean, you can write it out, but I don't believe you.
I have to agree with Ahodin on this one. Certain types of fiction just don't lend themselves to shipping culture. One of my favorite short stories I've read in recent memory was Long Tom Lookout about a women who ends up taking care of her husband's 5-year-old son from a previous relationship while he's away on business.I mean, you can write it out, but I don't believe you.
You're consuming horrible (e.g. MTG-quality) fiction if you literally do not care about the interpersonal relationships of the characters involved.
You're consuming horrible (e.g. MTG-quality) fiction if you literally do not care about the interpersonal relationships of the characters involved.
It's not a hard concept to get - if Fiction A is about fighting a demonic power that threatens to rule the world, I don't want to read about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of the demons who killed his previous lover. That's not why I'm reading the book.
If Fiction B is about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of something who killed their previous lover (later revealed as demons), then they meet Character B who IS a demon, then I'm reading the book for the relationship, not the demons.
I just don't understand the term "shipping" in this context.
Personally I'm not a big fan of love triangles and romance subplots.
It's not a hard concept to get - if Fiction A is about fighting a demonic power that threatens to rule the world, I don't want to read about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of the demons who killed his previous lover. That's not why I'm reading the book.
If Fiction B is about how Character A is troubled and can't accept anyone into their life because of something who killed their previous lover (later revealed as demons), then they meet Character B who IS a demon, then I'm reading the book for the relationship, not the demons.
You're basically saying you only want to read low-quality fiction if you specifically in advance don't know or care to know the motivations of the characters involved, even if you try to limit the character trait you don't care about specifically to one particular type of relationship generally shared by every living person.
This is where I'm at, too. There's a huge difference between being engaged with how characters manage their relationships with other characters and dreaming up your own, fantasy relationships for them.I mean, there's a difference in caring about interpersonal relationship or just straight up imagining full stories about it. I deeply care about the relationships of my friends, but I'm not going to make up shit about who should marry each other.
I never said I wouldn't read Fiction B. I'm saying there's a time and a place (for me) for each one.