Draugoth
Gold Member
Discover how the revolutionary immersive features of PlayStation®VR2 can transport you to thrilling worlds that feel, look and sound real through PlayStation VR2 Sense™ technology.
Discover how the revolutionary immersive features of PlayStation®VR2 can transport you to thrilling worlds that feel, look and sound real through PlayStation VR2 Sense™ technology.
Looks cool, can't wait!
Anyone think we'll eventually have gloves for VR, so you have full natural motion of all your fingers and hands, with haptics applied throughout?
You don't need gloves to track the fingers. And BTW PSVR2 controllers already track the fingers.Looks cool, can't wait!
Anyone think we'll eventually have gloves for VR, so you have full natural motion of all your fingers and hands, with haptics applied throughout?
You don't need gloves. Infrared can track your fingersLooks cool, can't wait!
Anyone think we'll eventually have gloves for VR, so you have full natural motion of all your fingers and hands, with haptics applied throughout?
EverythingBut how much it cost Sony?
500 would be sweet spot. Less than that I'll buy 2This looks far more competent than the PSVR 1, it's not going to be cheap though, probably $500-$600 USD.
Sony said they plan to make more games compatible on flat screen and VR, but if you're just looking for AAA games with a VR mode slapped on, you'll probably never be satisfied.Looks really interesting but I've never bought into this as I've always felt it was gimmicky with not a lot of game support (for PSVR 1)
It is a bit gimmicky. But sometimes it's fun to embrace the gimmick, because it's actually a new experience.Looks really interesting but I've never bought into this as I've always felt it was gimmicky with not a lot of game support (for PSVR 1)
Agreed. Would be a major mistake if not, especially if they plan to bring GT7 to the PC eventually.Please work for the entire GT7 game and not like how it did on GT Sport.
$400 or more sounds insane to me.
You realize the Oculus is a standalone console with everything (the cpu, gpu, the storage, the shop) fully inside the headset? To sell just a VR headset that uses the console for all its heavy lifting--even if it's a very nice headset--is crazy at that price. I already have a PS5, but I still can't take it seriously to spend the same price as the console all over again just for a headset.
I'd say $299 or under is where they can be taken seriously with this. Otherwise the console+headset price is just too high for this to have any impact at all on the broader market exposure of virtual reality.
Why? It’s a valid point. This has no wifi, no processor, I’m the ps5 does most of the work I think. 299 is probably low, especially with current Sony, but 399 is what I’m thinking too.
Would be nice if we could scan the steering wheel position.Agreed. Would be a major mistake if not, especially if they plan to bring GT7 to the PC eventually.
It's not a valid point, and we've beaten this horse so many times before. Oculus went and raised their price $100, and the tech inside the unit pales compared to this one. Especially the less than stellar cell phone processing. You want to play PS2 era looking shit, no? Well then you do what most enthusiasts do with the cheap headset, and plug it into the PC to let your PC process better graphics. And the streaming to the headset with artifacts and latency, yes, it does have its issues.i really want to try no man’s sky in psvr. It will be awesome.
Why? It’s a valid point. This has no wifi, no processor, I’m the ps5 does most of the work I think. 299 is probably low, especially with current Sony, but 399 is what I’m thinking too.
I asked this in a thread a while back that see what the biggest cost is in a headset and it seems like no one knows. Where does most of the cost come from?
Better yet, be able to take the headset into your real car and scan that. Boom.Would be nice if we could scan the steering wheel position.![]()
Almost all headsets are not standalone like the Quest and almost all of them were far more expensive than the Quest.$400 or more sounds insane to me.
You realize the Oculus is a standalone console with everything (the cpu, gpu, the storage, the shop) fully inside the headset? To sell just a VR headset that uses the console for all its heavy lifting--even if it's a very nice headset--is crazy at that price. I already have a PS5, but I still can't take it seriously to spend the same price as the console all over again just for a headset.
I'd say $299 or under is where they can be taken seriously with this. Otherwise the console+headset price is just too high for this to have any impact at all on the broader market exposure of virtual reality.
If it's 599.98, then I'm calling you out.Looks lush but bring Alyx to it, PLEASE!
599 USD, you heard it here first.
The PSVR has a big catalogue of great games, I've got about 30 installed on my PS4 that are worth playing, to say it wasn't supported is just wrong tbhLooks really interesting but I've never bought into this as I've always felt it was gimmicky with not a lot of game support (for PSVR 1)
$400 or more sounds insane to me.
You realize the Oculus is a standalone console with everything (the cpu, gpu, the storage, the shop) fully inside the headset? To sell just a VR headset that uses the console for all its heavy lifting--even if it's a very nice headset--is crazy at that price. I already have a PS5, but I still can't take it seriously to spend the same price as the console all over again just for a headset.
I'd say $299 or under is where they can be taken seriously with this. Otherwise the console+headset price is just too high for this to have any impact at all on the broader market exposure of virtual reality.
I don’t agree or disagree as we still don’t know what costs what in this things. I’m sure some do but I certainly don’t and you seem to know so please let me know, I’d really appreciate it.It's not a valid point, and we've beaten this horse so many times before. Oculus went and raised their price $100, and the tech inside the unit pales compared to this one. Especially the less than stellar cell phone processing. You want to play PS2 era looking shit, no? Well then you do what most enthusiasts do with the cheap headset, and plug it into the PC to let your PC process better graphics. And the streaming to the headset with artifacts and latency, yes, it does have its issues.
Shitting on this thing, is the same as shitting on the Vive or the Index, yet nobody brings them up in the "needing a box to process" equation. Especially with their hefty price tags.
In the end, Oculus doesn't work on the PlayStation, so... it’s irrelevant to the conversation.
Are they all sold at a loss?Almost all headsets are not standalone like the Quest and almost all of them were far more expensive than the Quest.
Just kind of shows you how much of a loss they were willing to take to push it.
I am guessing $499 based on the tech inside. Would be pleasantly surprised with $399 though.I don’t agree or disagree as we still don’t know what costs what in this things. I’m sure some do but I certainly don’t and you seem to know so please let me know, I’d really appreciate it.
The tech may pale (it does) but there is also less of it so it might counter it. Again, we need the numbers.
I’m going to assume Sony won’t sell it for a loss either haha
No idea honestly. I just see the price tags and they're almost all higher than Quest 2.Are they all sold at a loss?
Yeah, everything seems to be pointing to March.Still believe it releases same day as REmake 4