Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
) the only possible route that would prove 100% wrong along every SINGLE step of the way. First that there is one PS5 model; then that there are two PS5 models, but the one that actually turned out to exist would release in 2022; then that there will be in fact two PS5 models at launch, but one will be different in term of hardware and performance, not just a disk-less version. Which are ALL 100% WRONG.
MS didn't do a XSX deep dive, so people assume the console have bottlenecks not tackled like PS5 did just because there's no info at all about that. I give MS the benefit of doubt till we have clearer info.
Imagine still trying to keep up such a sad act..
At least he is consistent about the Naughty Dog friend. Only thing that lends his TLOU2 port credence imo.There is a word for someone who in the face of evidence still repeats the same bald faced lie.
You wrote "My sources verified to me on the phone that everything this guy mentions is 100% true" "PS5=9TFLOPS and XSX 10TFLOPS"
In what world is that accurate? PS5 reveal date was wrong, release date is unverified, price is unkown but has been speculated to be $499, launch games are unknown but MLB is a yearly franchise, GT7 rumored for a long time and some have speculated a late 2020 or early 2021 release Demon Souls remake has been rumored for a long time various thread on this forum about it, Godfall is a known launch titlee, Legendz was not shown or teased, Horizon Zero dawn was 2 was known and expected for a while, no Spidernan 2 and PS5 slogan is Play Has No Limits. What exactly is accurate when majority of the above have been proven false and those that seem plausible were speculations and rumors that have been going around for a while.
You said there will be 2 PS5 SKU revealed and one would be the Pro and more powerful than the other and that is false. Then the story changed to this one released is the pro and you don't believe a pro will be released 2 - 3yrs after. Xbox lockhart had been rumored since GPU codenames were found in driver updates.
Now you say it was a mistranslation. For the record i think we will see another mid gen refresh so you don't get to claim that is what you meant.
Xbox Series X and PS5 Pro =800$
You are full of it. Last time i called you out then you started changing your story.
You
Less than 10TFLOPS in AMD numbers you said
Someone said
And you said
This is enough evidence that you claimed next gen consoles will not be more than 1080 performance and less than 10TFLOPS
Story changes from 1080 to between 1080 and 1080Ti
Oh but you are redeemed because PS5 is really only just 9TF
Lmao
Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
31- 01 - 2020:
- PS5 event in February - WRONG
- PS5 release in October - still UNKNOWN
- PS5 at $499, one model - price part still UNKNOWN, second part WRONG
- Launch games are GT7, MLB The Show 21, Demon's Souls Remastered, Godfall, Legendz - as far as we can tell and all logic now suggests you got 1/5, congratulation. So mostly WRONG
- Teasers for Horizon 2, Spider-Man sequel, 3 new IPs, FF XVI, RE - if we count Miles Morales as a sequel, 3/7 of those you mentioned are confirmed to exist. Let's say UNKNOWN so far?
- PS5 almost on par with XSX, XSX more espensive, XSS worse than PS5 - we don't know the prices, but the rest is CORRECT
- PS5 slogan is "It's time to play" - WRONG, it's actually "Play has no limits"
25 - 02 -2020:
- Base consoles and "mid-gen refreshes" will both be "introduced" at launch for both PS5 and Xbox - First of all, by pure definition a launch console won't be a "mid-gen" refresh, so that makes no sense to begin with. Or why "introducing" a mid-gen console at launch would "cover the whole 7 years cycle" any better than not doing it? However, we don't know yet if Lockhart will really release in 2020, but assuming that is true and being generous on the terminology let's say that it's CORRECT for Microsoft. Still WRONG for Sony. Also, here we have your first unexplained CONTRADICTION (a month earlier you said there's just one PS5)
- One PS5 is 9TF, the other one is to "compete with SXS" - No matter what you are going to call the one real PS5 we are getting, since you are measuring stuff in TFLOPS this is WRONG (PS5 is not 9TF, but neither it's close to XSX's 12).
- Top 2 consoles will be around $600 - I and any industry analyst I read seriously doubt that, but to be fair so far it's still UNKNOWN
- No date for PS5 release - Let's assume you meant "base" PS5 comes out in October, so no contradiction there. But since there is no PS5 Pro (and you yourself will go on to say that what we get now IS the PS5 Pro), there is either your CONTRADICTION or where you are WRONG
- XSX = PS5 Pro > PS5 > Lockhart - there is no PS5 and PS5 Pro, so by virtue of that automatically WRONG
- XSX and PS5 "Pro" could cost up to $800 - technically still UNKNOWN, even though by any possible solid data and estimate we now have this sounds like sheer lunacy. Also, you JUST SAID, THAT VERY DAY, YOU THINK THEY WOULD COST $600. That's $200 dollars, how the hell can you be told one figure and then assume another one so different. So here is another CONTRADICTION.
- PS5 Pro might come out only in 2022 - I don't know, it might? But you will say that this PS5 we are now getting is the Pro? So WRONG?
18 - 03 -2020:
- Now the actual PS5 is what you called the PS5 Pro, there is still also an unannounced base PS5, and they are both coming out in 2020 - congratulations, you managed both to be almost certainly WRONG (99% by now now we know there is not another, less powerful PS5) and to CONTRADICT your earlier statement (PS5 Pro is years in the making) in one single take.
So to conclude, in regards to PS5 in particular you were not just wrong: you managed to be so wrong that you gave THREE completely different stories and you STILL pigeon-holed (no intentional references
I'm gonna be very blunt: based on this track record, I'd rather hear what you have to say and then bet on the exact opposite. Because you were not just wrong, you were statistics-wise abnormally wrong.
Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
31- 01 - 2020:
- PS5 event in February - WRONG
- PS5 release in October - still UNKNOWN
- PS5 at $499, one model - price part still UNKNOWN, second part WRONG
- Launch games are GT7, MLB The Show 21, Demon's Souls Remastered, Godfall, Legendz - as far as we can tell and all logic now suggests you got 1/5, congratulation. So mostly WRONG
- Teasers for Horizon 2, Spider-Man sequel, 3 new IPs, FF XVI, RE - if we count Miles Morales as a sequel, 3/7 of those you mentioned are confirmed to exist. Let's say UNKNOWN so far?
- PS5 almost on par with XSX, XSX more espensive, XSS worse than PS5 - we don't know the prices, but the rest is CORRECT
- PS5 slogan is "It's time to play" - WRONG, it's actually "Play has no limits"
25 - 02 -2020:
- Base consoles and "mid-gen refreshes" will both be "introduced" at launch for both PS5 and Xbox - First of all, by pure definition a launch console won't be a "mid-gen" refresh, so that makes no sense to begin with. Or why "introducing" a mid-gen console at launch would "cover the whole 7 years cycle" any better than not doing it? However, we don't know yet if Lockhart will really release in 2020, but assuming that is true and being generous on the terminology let's say that it's CORRECT for Microsoft. Still WRONG for Sony. Also, here we have your first unexplained CONTRADICTION (a month earlier you said there's just one PS5)
- One PS5 is 9TF, the other one is to "compete with SXS" - No matter what you are going to call the one real PS5 we are getting, since you are measuring stuff in TFLOPS this is WRONG (PS5 is not 9TF, but neither it's close to XSX's 12).
- Top 2 consoles will be around $600 - I and any industry analyst I read seriously doubt that, but to be fair so far it's still UNKNOWN
- No date for PS5 release - Let's assume you meant "base" PS5 comes out in October, so no contradiction there. But since there is no PS5 Pro (and you yourself will go on to say that what we get now IS the PS5 Pro), there is either your CONTRADICTION or where you are WRONG
- XSX = PS5 Pro > PS5 > Lockhart - there is no PS5 and PS5 Pro, so by virtue of that automatically WRONG
- XSX and PS5 "Pro" could cost up to $800 - technically still UNKNOWN, even though by any possible solid data and estimate we now have this sounds like sheer lunacy. Also, you JUST SAID, THAT VERY DAY, YOU THINK THEY WOULD COST $600. That's $200 dollars, how the hell can you be told one figure and then assume another one so different. So here is another CONTRADICTION.
- PS5 Pro might come out only in 2022 - I don't know, it might? But you will say that this PS5 we are now getting is the Pro? So WRONG?
18 - 03 -2020:
- Now the actual PS5 is what you called the PS5 Pro, there is still also an unannounced base PS5, and they are both coming out in 2020 - congratulations, you managed both to be almost certainly WRONG (99% by now now we know there is not another, less powerful PS5) and to CONTRADICT your earlier statement (PS5 Pro is years in the making) in one single take.
So to conclude, in regards to PS5 in particular you were not just wrong: you managed to be so wrong that you gave THREE completely different stories and you STILL pigeon-holed (no intentional references
I'm gonna be very blunt: based on this track record, I'd rather hear what you have to say and then bet on the exact opposite. Because you were not just wrong, you were statistics-wise abnormally wrong.
I have nothing against people claiming they have inside information, when it turns out to be wrong admit you were wrong and keep it moving. Don't make excuses and try to rationalize it or claim you were right when the proof is literally right there. I can tell when someone is lying about this shit because they somehow know Specs, Price, Release date, launch games etc. For one person to know all that information, there has to be cross department leaks or a hack like what happened this gen.
He didn't. Later it comes out his information was real. An external leak later revealed that he was telling the truth. Please do not judge things you cannot understand.
Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
31- 01 - 2020:
- PS5 event in February - WRONG
- PS5 release in October - still UNKNOWN
- PS5 at $499, one model - price part still UNKNOWN, second part WRONG
- Launch games are GT7, MLB The Show 21, Demon's Souls Remastered, Godfall, Legendz - as far as we can tell and all logic now suggests you got 1/5, congratulation. So mostly WRONG
- Teasers for Horizon 2, Spider-Man sequel, 3 new IPs, FF XVI, RE - if we count Miles Morales as a sequel, 3/7 of those you mentioned are confirmed to exist. Let's say UNKNOWN so far?
- PS5 almost on par with XSX, XSX more espensive, XSS worse than PS5 - we don't know the prices, but the rest is CORRECT
- PS5 slogan is "It's time to play" - WRONG, it's actually "Play has no limits"
25 - 02 -2020:
- Base consoles and "mid-gen refreshes" will both be "introduced" at launch for both PS5 and Xbox - First of all, by pure definition a launch console won't be a "mid-gen" refresh, so that makes no sense to begin with. Or why "introducing" a mid-gen console at launch would "cover the whole 7 years cycle" any better than not doing it? However, we don't know yet if Lockhart will really release in 2020, but assuming that is true and being generous on the terminology let's say that it's CORRECT for Microsoft. Still WRONG for Sony. Also, here we have your first unexplained CONTRADICTION (a month earlier you said there's just one PS5)
- One PS5 is 9TF, the other one is to "compete with SXS" - No matter what you are going to call the one real PS5 we are getting, since you are measuring stuff in TFLOPS this is WRONG (PS5 is not 9TF, but neither it's close to XSX's 12).
- Top 2 consoles will be around $600 - I and any industry analyst I read seriously doubt that, but to be fair so far it's still UNKNOWN
- No date for PS5 release - Let's assume you meant "base" PS5 comes out in October, so no contradiction there. But since there is no PS5 Pro (and you yourself will go on to say that what we get now IS the PS5 Pro), there is either your CONTRADICTION or where you are WRONG
- XSX = PS5 Pro > PS5 > Lockhart - there is no PS5 and PS5 Pro, so by virtue of that automatically WRONG
- XSX and PS5 "Pro" could cost up to $800 - technically still UNKNOWN, even though by any possible solid data and estimate we now have this sounds like sheer lunacy. Also, you JUST SAID, THAT VERY DAY, YOU THINK THEY WOULD COST $600. That's $200 dollars, how the hell can you be told one figure and then assume another one so different. So here is another CONTRADICTION.
- PS5 Pro might come out only in 2022 - I don't know, it might? But you will say that this PS5 we are now getting is the Pro? So WRONG?
18 - 03 -2020:
- Now the actual PS5 is what you called the PS5 Pro, there is still also an unannounced base PS5, and they are both coming out in 2020 - congratulations, you managed both to be almost certainly WRONG (99% by now now we know there is not another, less powerful PS5) and to CONTRADICT your earlier statement (PS5 Pro is years in the making) in one single take.
So to conclude, in regards to PS5 in particular you were not just wrong: you managed to be so wrong that you gave THREE completely different stories and you STILL pigeon-holed (no intentional references
I'm gonna be very blunt: based on this track record, I'd rather hear what you have to say and then bet on the exact opposite. Because you were not just wrong, you were statistics-wise abnormally wrong.
No. Maybe. I don't know.
Fair enough. Care to share what the external leak was?
Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
31- 01 - 2020:
- PS5 event in February - WRONG
- PS5 release in October - still UNKNOWN
- PS5 at $499, one model - price part still UNKNOWN, second part WRONG
- Launch games are GT7, MLB The Show 21, Demon's Souls Remastered, Godfall, Legendz - as far as we can tell and all logic now suggests you got 1/5, congratulation. So mostly WRONG
- Teasers for Horizon 2, Spider-Man sequel, 3 new IPs, FF XVI, RE - if we count Miles Morales as a sequel, 3/7 of those you mentioned are confirmed to exist. Let's say UNKNOWN so far?
- PS5 almost on par with XSX, XSX more espensive, XSS worse than PS5 - we don't know the prices, but the rest is CORRECT
- PS5 slogan is "It's time to play" - WRONG, it's actually "Play has no limits"
25 - 02 -2020:
- Base consoles and "mid-gen refreshes" will both be "introduced" at launch for both PS5 and Xbox - First of all, by pure definition a launch console won't be a "mid-gen" refresh, so that makes no sense to begin with. Or why "introducing" a mid-gen console at launch would "cover the whole 7 years cycle" any better than not doing it? However, we don't know yet if Lockhart will really release in 2020, but assuming that is true and being generous on the terminology let's say that it's CORRECT for Microsoft. Still WRONG for Sony. Also, here we have your first unexplained CONTRADICTION (a month earlier you said there's just one PS5)
- One PS5 is 9TF, the other one is to "compete with SXS" - No matter what you are going to call the one real PS5 we are getting, since you are measuring stuff in TFLOPS this is WRONG (PS5 is not 9TF, but neither it's close to XSX's 12).
- Top 2 consoles will be around $600 - I and any industry analyst I read seriously doubt that, but to be fair so far it's still UNKNOWN
- No date for PS5 release - Let's assume you meant "base" PS5 comes out in October, so no contradiction there. But since there is no PS5 Pro (and you yourself will go on to say that what we get now IS the PS5 Pro), there is either your CONTRADICTION or where you are WRONG
- XSX = PS5 Pro > PS5 > Lockhart - there is no PS5 and PS5 Pro, so by virtue of that automatically WRONG
- XSX and PS5 "Pro" could cost up to $800 - technically still UNKNOWN, even though by any possible solid data and estimate we now have this sounds like sheer lunacy. Also, you JUST SAID, THAT VERY DAY, YOU THINK THEY WOULD COST $600. That's $200 dollars, how the hell can you be told one figure and then assume another one so different. So here is another CONTRADICTION.
- PS5 Pro might come out only in 2022 - I don't know, it might? But you will say that this PS5 we are now getting is the Pro? So WRONG?
18 - 03 -2020:
- Now the actual PS5 is what you called the PS5 Pro, there is still also an unannounced base PS5, and they are both coming out in 2020 - congratulations, you managed both to be almost certainly WRONG (99% by now now we know there is not another, less powerful PS5) and to CONTRADICT your earlier statement (PS5 Pro is years in the making) in one single take.
So to conclude, in regards to PS5 in particular you were not just wrong: you managed to be so wrong that you gave THREE completely different stories and you STILL pigeon-holed (no intentional references
I'm gonna be very blunt: based on this track record, I'd rather hear what you have to say and then bet on the exact opposite. Because you were not just wrong, you were statistics-wise abnormally wrong.
Even when I think that Slipspace engine was created to use Xbox one X that doesn't means is true, so there is not FUD there because
Yes because we always remember how to good was Halo 5 for be 60fps not like that unplayable stuff of halo 3 or reach.
Microsoft is limited by their SSD speed. their I/O will take full advantage of that SSD. there was zero reason to go above and beyond because their throughput will max out at 2.4 gbps anyway.
There is a word for someone who in the face of evidence still repeats the same bald faced lie.
You wrote "My sources verified to me on the phone that everything this guy mentions is 100% true" "PS5=9TFLOPS and XSX 10TFLOPS"
In what world is that accurate? PS5 reveal date was wrong, release date is unverified, price is unkown but has been speculated to be $499, launch games are unknown but MLB is a yearly franchise, GT7 rumored for a long time and some have speculated a late 2020 or early 2021 release Demon Souls remake has been rumored for a long time various thread on this forum about it, Godfall is a known launch titlee, Legendz was not shown or teased, Horizon Zero dawn was 2 was known and expected for a while, no Spidernan 2 and PS5 slogan is Play Has No Limits. What exactly is accurate when majority of the above have been proven false and those that seem plausible were speculations and rumors that have been going around for a while.
You said there will be 2 PS5 SKU revealed and one would be the Pro and more powerful than the other and that is false. Then the story changed to this one released is the pro and you don't believe a pro will be released 2 - 3yrs after. Xbox lockhart had been rumored since GPU codenames were found in driver updates.
Now you say it was a mistranslation. For the record i think we will see another mid gen refresh so you don't get to claim that is what you meant.
Xbox Series X and PS5 Pro =800$
You are full of it. Last time i called you out then you started changing your story.
You
Less than 10TFLOPS in AMD numbers you said
Someone said
And you said
This is enough evidence that you claimed next gen consoles will not be more than 1080 performance and less than 10TFLOPS
Story changes from 1080 to between 1080 and 1080Ti
Oh but you are redeemed because PS5 is really only just 9TF
Lmao
They are on the same campus, it's the number 1 game of Xbox. If you think the Slipspace engine isn't going to utilize the full power and capabilities of the XSX you aren't paying attention. Why would they even create an engine that takes a 7 year old consoles architectural design as the baseline? That doesn't make any sense. It's a new engine for all future halo games and you think it's optimized for a console that won't be supported with games in 1-2 years. Seems really believable...
Are you advocating for 30fps, and do you believe this is better for first person shooters? Or is your argument, look there's a better Halo that only ran at 30fps so 60fps is overrated?
Do you really need somebody to spell out for you how much bollocks you wrote? OK, fine, I have some time anyway.
31- 01 - 2020:
- PS5 event in February - WRONG
- PS5 release in October - still UNKNOWN
- PS5 at $499, one model - price part still UNKNOWN, second part WRONG
- Launch games are GT7, MLB The Show 21, Demon's Souls Remastered, Godfall, Legendz - as far as we can tell and all logic now suggests you got 1/5, congratulation. So mostly WRONG
- Teasers for Horizon 2, Spider-Man sequel, 3 new IPs, FF XVI, RE - if we count Miles Morales as a sequel, 3/7 of those you mentioned are confirmed to exist. Let's say UNKNOWN so far?
- PS5 almost on par with XSX, XSX more espensive, XSS worse than PS5 - we don't know the prices, but the rest is CORRECT
- PS5 slogan is "It's time to play" - WRONG, it's actually "Play has no limits"
25 - 02 -2020:
- Base consoles and "mid-gen refreshes" will both be "introduced" at launch for both PS5 and Xbox - First of all, by pure definition a launch console won't be a "mid-gen" refresh, so that makes no sense to begin with. Or why "introducing" a mid-gen console at launch would "cover the whole 7 years cycle" any better than not doing it? However, we don't know yet if Lockhart will really release in 2020, but assuming that is true and being generous on the terminology let's say that it's CORRECT for Microsoft. Still WRONG for Sony. Also, here we have your first unexplained CONTRADICTION (a month earlier you said there's just one PS5)
- One PS5 is 9TF, the other one is to "compete with SXS" - No matter what you are going to call the one real PS5 we are getting, since you are measuring stuff in TFLOPS this is WRONG (PS5 is not 9TF, but neither it's close to XSX's 12).
- Top 2 consoles will be around $600 - I and any industry analyst I read seriously doubt that, but to be fair so far it's still UNKNOWN
- No date for PS5 release - Let's assume you meant "base" PS5 comes out in October, so no contradiction there. But since there is no PS5 Pro (and you yourself will go on to say that what we get now IS the PS5 Pro), there is either your CONTRADICTION or where you are WRONG
- XSX = PS5 Pro > PS5 > Lockhart - there is no PS5 and PS5 Pro, so by virtue of that automatically WRONG
- XSX and PS5 "Pro" could cost up to $800 - technically still UNKNOWN, even though by any possible solid data and estimate we now have this sounds like sheer lunacy. Also, you JUST SAID, THAT VERY DAY, YOU THINK THEY WOULD COST $600. That's $200 dollars, how the hell can you be told one figure and then assume another one so different. So here is another CONTRADICTION.
- PS5 Pro might come out only in 2022 - I don't know, it might? But you will say that this PS5 we are now getting is the Pro? So WRONG?
18 - 03 -2020:
- Now the actual PS5 is what you called the PS5 Pro, there is still also an unannounced base PS5, and they are both coming out in 2020 - congratulations, you managed both to be almost certainly WRONG (99% by now now we know there is not another, less powerful PS5) and to CONTRADICT your earlier statement (PS5 Pro is years in the making) in one single take.
So to conclude, in regards to PS5 in particular you were not just wrong: you managed to be so wrong that you gave THREE completely different stories and you STILL pigeon-holed (no intentional references
I'm gonna be very blunt: based on this track record, I'd rather hear what you have to say and then bet on the exact opposite. Because you were not just wrong, you were statistics-wise abnormally wrong.
Not because this how works make a software with a limited money and time to finished, man really don't start a technical discussion you are not able to
I wouldn't be so condescending when talking about software development. I've got a CS degree and I'm a Machine Learning Engineer for more than 5 years. Pretty sure I know enough to contribute in such a discussion.
