Rightisright
Banned
They could use all 40cus and take the loss on the reject dies.Many of the early Next gen leaks said 8TF, and if one assumes that PS5 won't actually hit 2kMHz then it looks to be 8.X TF
They could use all 40cus and take the loss on the reject dies.Many of the early Next gen leaks said 8TF, and if one assumes that PS5 won't actually hit 2kMHz then it looks to be 8.X TF
We will find out soon.
its this one.Maybe I missed it, but I don't know where 8TF comes from.
If anyone is making a stand on leaked specs, it would be 9.2TF based on all that Oberon stuff.
Man I am bookmarking so many posts right now
I wonder if the smart move for Sony is to ditch the PS4 base and make the Pro the new low-end. 4tflop Pro for $299, 8tflop PS5 for $399 would be super compelling, if BC works as well as everyone hopes and even moreso if they sort out cross-buy.
Many of the early Next gen leaks said 8TF, and if one assumes that PS5 won't actually hit 2kMHz then it looks to be 8.X TF
Maybe I missed it, but I don't know where 8TF comes from.
If anyone is making a stand on leaked specs, it would be 9.2TF based on all that Oberon stuff.
yeah, im 50-50 on this whole github leak. its possible if sony is going with $399 but i just dont see it.8TF is really nothing to laugh about or 100% dismiss it. Going by what makes sense for a console hardware form factor then it is around there if Sony takes the same approach they did with the PS4.
I also think 8TF feels too low, but logically if you take the formula of the PS4 and basically copy it with new generation hardware add an SSD and RayTracing then you would be somewhere around there.
In light of Stadia and other things I think that is not what Sony wants though. Also Mark Cerny said 8TF is what is needed for 4K (from an interview a while back).
Even though I am conservative with my estimations on the PS5 I still 8TF would be on the extremely low end of my guesses.
Also does anyone know if Sony specified late/holidays 2020 for their Playstation 5 so far?
If Sony is aiming for $400, 8-9TF is a definitely possibility.yeah, im 50-50 on this whole github leak. its possible if sony is going with $399 but i just dont see it.
so you have the github leaks and penello pointing to 8-9 tflops, and on the other hands multiple devs in the industry saying something completely different to four different journalists.
- Schrier back in march said that both consoles were aiming to beat stadia's 10.7 tflops number. at that point, no one knew about navi not being gcn.
- then colin and reiner came out at e3 and said the devs at e3 told them ps5 was more powerful. at this point, the 12 tflops rumors for the anaconda were already out.
- then klee said both consoles were more powerful than the 5700xt and were aiming for double digit tflops. and ps5 was slightly more powerful.
- then finally jason said both consoles were more powerful than the rtx 2080 which an 8 or even 9 tflops console simply cannot be. 12 definitely more powerful than the rtx 2080.
i think they will go for 449 this time, hitting around 10.4 - 11.4 TF. taking a slight loss if it’s towards 11.If Sony is aiming for $400, 8-9TF is a definitely possibility.
If Sony is going for $500, it'll be similar to SeX, which I think most people assume is $500 too.
One thing that seems unrealistic is ~12TF power at $400.
The 2GHz being stress tests makes sense and I was also told $499 at a loss.
Also Mark Cerny said 8TF is what is needed for 4K (from an interview a while back).
What's wrong with BC? That would be planned wouldn't it?He said you need 8tf to run ps4 games at 4k. As fidelity goes up, so do power requirements.
If it mentions price, and even BC for ps1-3, it's BS.
Why we back to 8TF?
I hope to god the Feb 5 PS meeting is a thing just to get a ballpark like when they said "almost 2 TF" at the PS4 meetingAs long as both are in the same ballpark and easy to maximize, I don't see how it makes that much of a difference. I'm not particularly bothered by a 13tf ps5 and a 12tf XSX. Or 10 and 9 etc.
We need some credible news outside of TF-gate.
I just don't think BC with ps1, 2, and 3 is a realistic expectation. There's no reason I can think of where it makes sense for sony. It would be limited to games they still own all rights to, and it would cut into ps now. They'd need to dump a lot of money to get it working without having a way to easily earn it back.What's wrong with BC? That would be planned wouldn't it?
THIS!! You have summed up everything I wanted to say, thank you!yeah, im 50-50 on this whole github leak. its possible if sony is going with $399 but i just dont see it.
so you have the github leaks and penello pointing to 8-9 tflops, and on the other hands multiple devs in the industry saying something completely different to four different journalists.
- Schrier back in march said that both consoles were aiming to beat stadia's 10.7 tflops number. at that point, no one knew about navi not being gcn.
- then colin and reiner came out at e3 and said the devs at e3 told them ps5 was more powerful. at this point, the 12 tflops rumors for the anaconda were already out.
- then klee said both consoles were more powerful than the 5700xt and were aiming for double digit tflops. and ps5 was slightly more powerful.
- then finally jason said both consoles were more powerful than the rtx 2080 which an 8 or even 9 tflops console simply cannot be. 12 definitely more powerful than the rtx 2080.
Maybe all or some of it is true or was at some point and it's just that we don't see the whole picture.yeah, im 50-50 on this whole github leak. its possible if sony is going with $399 but i just dont see it.
so you have the github leaks and penello pointing to 8-9 tflops, and on the other hands multiple devs in the industry saying something completely different to four different journalists.
- Schrier back in march said that both consoles were aiming to beat stadia's 10.7 tflops number. at that point, no one knew about navi not being gcn.
- then colin and reiner came out at e3 and said the devs at e3 told them ps5 was more powerful. at this point, the 12 tflops rumors for the anaconda were already out.
- then klee said both consoles were more powerful than the 5700xt and were aiming for double digit tflops. and ps5 was slightly more powerful.
- then finally jason said both consoles were more powerful than the rtx 2080 which an 8 or even 9 tflops console simply cannot be. 12 definitely more powerful than the rtx 2080.
Osiris mentioned a while back hearing that not only would the PS5 be $500, but it'd still be a loss, which points to a decent chance at it being a pretty beefy machine.
Osiris mentioned a while back hearing that not only would the PS5 be $500, but it'd still be a loss, which points to a decent chance at it being a pretty beefy machine.
Gamespot employees would not be informed of price as of this date.
only ones who know price is a limited group of people none of whom would be sharing the info as of this date with anyone as it isn’t final.
I really don't care which is more powerful, in a very short while it won't matter what either of us have said. A very big part of me is rooting for the Xbox team as I am very impressed by what they are doing and putting together. I also like Phil's messaging and the fact that he is actually at least attempting to do what he said that he would. I appreciate that they put together a competent box and their games library actually looks diverse and has me excited for the first time in a long while about Xbox. When I get information it just is what it is. If it said XseX > PS5 that's what I would have shared. Just like I am happy that Heisenberg (Much Respect) has stuck to his guns with saying the exact opposite of what I have as far as the systems are concerned. The info you get is what you get and you cant change it even if you would like to.Man walks into room. Sees Xbox more powerful than ps5z. Walks out crying
Ps5 to have a dual gpu (ended up true)Here's a reason why people shouldn't discredit a leak for getting ONE thing wrong: leaks sometimes don't get everything right.
I remember a MK11 leak which talked about the roster and its dlc, story elements and various stuff. Almost everyone called it fake as fuck and discredited it. I held on to it, however, in order to remember what they said.
Here are some leaks (spoilers abound; take care if you have to play MK11):
------------------------------------------------------------
Jax would go to Kronika's side (ended up true)
Reptile would be seen in the Krypt (ended up true)
Time Travel shenanigans (ended up true)
Shang Tsung would be in the story mode (ended up false; he's only in the introduction of the krypt)
Shao Kahn would have a fatality breaking the opponent's shoulders (ended up false)
Scorpion would be killed by D'Vorah (ended up true)
Joker, Terminator, Nightwolf, Sindel, Spawn as DLC (ended up true)
Reiko, Sareena, Fujin, Sheeva, Ash as DLC (has yet to be proven true or false, but I'm willing to bet that aside from Reiko who became an assist, the others will prove legit; furthermore, Havik being removed as an assist makes me believe he swapped places with Reiko in Kombat Pack 2)
Frost would appear as a Cyborg (ended up true)
Noob Saibot's shadow will fight as a separate character (ended up false; he's part of Noob movelist but not a separate entity)
---------------------------------------------------
So what do we gather from all that?
First of all, the leaker is proven right on many things which no one would be able to actually guess WITHOUT knowing something from the devs or from the leaker's source (it's one thing to guess Spawn in the roster as DLC, but nailing every.single.one of the guest characters? That's way too successful to just be a lucky guess). As well as Jax going to Kronika's side. No way you say this without actually knowing your shit.
But the leak also gets some things wrong. Was it misinformation? Change of plans on the devs' side? A second source which didn't know his/her stuff? Anything is possible.
The thing is, we cannot discredit a leak just because it got ONE thing wrong. Many things change, especially if we're talking about things who are months before becoming final. Maybe Sony intended to be at E3 and the talks with ESA went sour at the last minute. Maybe they'll decide that it's not a good time to unveil a Sci-Fi Naughty Dog game and they'll unveil it later on. Maybe they have all those games ready for an unveiling but they're not sure which of them to unveil (say, they wish to unveil 3 out of those 6 games and they're debating which ones to unveil). Anything's possible.
So just because the leak says more info at E3 and Sony cancels their E3 plans … doesn't mean the leak should be thrown to the garbage bin just yet.
Keep an open mind and read those leaks with a grain of salt, and don't be quick to shit on them just because they got one thing wrong, especially when they say twenty different things.
My two cents.
Few comments:yeah, im 50-50 on this whole github leak. its possible if sony is going with $399 but i just dont see it.
so you have the github leaks and penello pointing to 8-9 tflops, and on the other hands multiple devs in the industry saying something completely different to four different journalists.
- Schrier back in march said that both consoles were aiming to beat stadia's 10.7 tflops number. at that point, no one knew about navi not being gcn.
- then colin and reiner came out at e3 and said the devs at e3 told them ps5 was more powerful. at this point, the 12 tflops rumors for the anaconda were already out.
- then klee said both consoles were more powerful than the 5700xt and were aiming for double digit tflops. and ps5 was slightly more powerful.
- then finally jason said both consoles were more powerful than the rtx 2080 which an 8 or even 9 tflops console simply cannot be. 12 definitely more powerful than the rtx 2080.
It won't be.
I use to believe this also, but I now greatly doubt it as of late.
There are many other points that can be opposite to what you’re saying.Few comments:
1. Navi was well known enough that 10.7GCN wasn’t a hard target to hit. Not sure why his comments got so many legs when a 10.7 GCN card is the min here. He has said he doesn’t know the difference.
2. Has Reiner ever said another peep about this topic? I have a sneaking suspicion that he hasn’t because Sony was using 13 TF GCN dev kits because they were the only ones available and they approximate a lower Navi csrd with the same total “power”.
3. There were essentially no XSX dev kits out at all. This has been confirmed elsewhere. No one knew that the XSX was targeting 12 Tf Navi. Everyone assumed GCn.
4. I’ll ignore the Klee stuff because I think too much faith is put in one person who got info in passing and relished in being back in the “game”. Just because you are a real person and 20 years out of the industry doesn’t mean you have good info.
5. The github lines up with Sonys magic number on price and the info lines up with all of their patents. It’s also the only leak that has been scrubbed from the Internet. That should tell you all you need to know.
I’m guessing that the PS5 is using a 40/40 CU chip and Sony is aggressively chasing clocks which is why the dev kit is the way it is. 40 at 2G puts you at 10.24 or 15 percent less than XSX. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that this is between 36 at 2 or 40 at 2.1 by retail. I believe both are in the cards and it’s all a matter of thermals, acoustics and yields.
they will be utilizing a very custom ssd and the console will sound like a jet engine
Ps5 to have a dual gpu (ended up true)
Would be nice![]()
I’m guessing that the PS5 is using a 40/40 CU chip and Sony is aggressively chasing clocks which is why the dev kit is the way it is. 40 at 2G puts you at 10.24 or 15 percent less than XSX. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that this is between 36 at 2 or 40 at 2.1 by retail. I believe both are in the cards and it’s all a matter of thermals, acoustics and yields.
they will be utilizing a very custom ssd and the console will sound like a jet engine
Few comments:
1. Navi was well known enough that 10.7GCN wasn’t a hard target to hit. Not sure why his comments got so many legs when a 10.7 GCN card is the min here. He has said he doesn’t know the difference.
2. Has Reiner ever said another peep about this topic? I have a sneaking suspicion that he hasn’t because Sony was using 13 TF GCN dev kits because they were the only ones available and they approximate a lower Navi csrd with the same total “power”.
3. There were essentially no XSX dev kits out at all. This has been confirmed elsewhere. No one knew that the XSX was targeting 12 Tf Navi. Everyone assumed GCn.
4. I’ll ignore the Klee stuff because I think too much faith is put in one person who got info in passing and relished in being back in the “game”. Just because you are a real person and 20 years out of the industry doesn’t mean you have good info.
5. The github lines up with Sonys magic number on price and the info lines up with all of their patents. It’s also the only leak that has been scrubbed from the Internet. That should tell you all you need to know.
I’m guessing that the PS5 is using a 40/40 CU chip and Sony is aggressively chasing clocks which is why the dev kit is the way it is. 40 at 2G puts you at 10.24 or 15 percent less than XSX. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that this is between 36 at 2 or 40 at 2.1 by retail. I believe both are in the cards and it’s all a matter of thermals, acoustics and yields.
they will be utilizing a very custom ssd and the console will sound like a jet engine
Oh, you know the answer.why are you definitively stating that XSX is more powerful when you do not know this with any certainty?
9TF would make sense in 2019, that ship has sailed. 5700 xt is not a high end card. Remember that the ps4 pro launched less than 6 months from polaris.
It wouldn’t surprise me if rdna 2 cards hit 15TF.
This generation it will be all about the games. I have no idea what has or has not changed but the last hard spec info I heard was that both were > 10 and X was 11.6 while the 5 was 12.4 I was also told that the ray tracing on one was the same crap that was slapped onto the 1080ti (which I shared a long time ago) and that the performance of BOTH consoles was a bit better that of a 2080 super. Also for the millionth time they are supposedly so close in power that if you were to fart in a room while playing both systems the one you were closest to would have a slight frame rate advantage due to the excess gas helping absorb some of the heat. (I kid) Also I think that I just may get my Bloody Symphony. Thank you uncle Phil.
This generation it will be all about the games. I have no idea what has or has not changed but the last hard spec info I heard was that both were > 10 and X was 11.6 while the 5 was 12.4 I was also told that the ray tracing on one was the same crap that was slapped onto the 1080ti (which I shared a long time ago) and that the performance of BOTH consoles was a bit better that of a 2080 super. Also for the millionth time they are supposedly so close in power that if you were to fart in a room while playing both systems the one you were closest to would have a slight frame rate advantage due to the excess gas helping absorb some of the heat. (I kid) Also I think that I just may get my Bloody Symphony. Thank you uncle Phil.
Thanks Osiris for the details . This spec sheet is recent or few months old (the one where u got the information from )?
who said they want high end?
only people focusing on who is most powerful are here. Sony cares more about about hitting their ideal price range for moving consoles $399 than a TF mecontest.
$399 has been their magic number. Why would they not target that when they can have a really powerful console at that level?
These consoles are planned out a long time ago. Only reason MS is swinging for it withXSX is because Lockhart is in the cards to have an attractive price.
Sony has one console. They aren’t going to go crazy.
we got an .8 TF difference, supposedly. Not looking good for your claims
hey another old poster. Nice to see you back.
ha. Didn’t know if anyone still remembered me.
Saw thatSlimySnake got banned at the other place for two weeks and was posting here...so I returned
He must have got banned there because he breathed too loudly!![]()
Regardless of the outcome. Appreciate your conviction man.This generation it will be all about the games. I have no idea what has or has not changed but the last hard spec info I heard was that both were > 10 and X was 11.6 while the 5 was 12.4 (I am still standing on this hill)I was also told that the ray tracing on one was the same crap that was slapped onto the 1080ti (which I shared a long time ago) and that the performance of BOTH consoles was a bit better that of a 2080 super. Also for the millionth time they are supposedly so close in power that if you were to fart in a room while playing both systems the one you were closest to would have a slight frame rate advantage due to the excess gas helping absorb some of the heat. (I kid) Also I think that I just may get my Bloody Symphony, Thank you uncle Phil.