This is when Jexhius or someone posts that picture describing the evolution of pantsu in mango/animu over the years.Dresden said:Depends on whether you can substantiate the effect of hemlines on the transitive property of pantsu.
That's an essay based subject though.firehawk12 said:
- Introduction/Thesis
- Examples
- Analysis
- Conclusion
Also applies to undergrad English Lit. :lol
The effect of bows, frills, and ruffles greatly increases the moe factor when used in the proper manner. The placement and detail of such things greatly weighs in on the overall moe factor as well, so it's best to find a balance that doesn't overtake the moe factor with "sexy".Dresden said:Depends on whether you can substantiate the effect of hemlines on the transitive property of pantsu.
It's funny, because they used to teach the "GERC" paragraph here when I was in highschool.Jexhius said:That's an essay based subject though.
Go watch Chu Bra already!InfiniteNine said:The effect of bows, frills, and ruffles greatly increases the moe factor when used in the proper manner. The placement and detail of such things greatly weighs in on the overall moe factor as well, so it's best to find a balance that doesn't overtake the moe factor with "sexy".
InfiniteNine said:The effect of bows, frills, and ruffles greatly increases the moe factor when used in the proper manner. The placement and detail of such things greatly weighs in on the overall moe factor as well, so it's best to find a balance that doesn't overtake the moe factor with "sexy".
Well there are far, far worse tags.doomed1 said:AND I STILL STAND BY IT!
That's what you think. All them writers are seeding their texts deliberately!jman2050 said:I COULD do this, but I know that much of the "in-depth" analysis I have on some series is just stuff only I see and wasn't intended in the work in the first place so I think it's somewhat pointless. That's why when I'm arguing for or against a particular series I try to keep my criticisms and accolades simple. I think the only real exception was the whole Index thing and even then that was more born from stream-of-consciousness type thinking more than anything else.
Wait, what about the Japanese that are all obsessed with Christian symbolism?firehawk12 said:Like Religion in Eva. Because Americans are so Jesus-obsessed, everything has to somehow invoke Jesus or Christianity.
Oh God there be rules now!7Th said:When I said "discussion" and "analysis", I was talking about stuff similar to what Pelleas' Ben posts when he isn't feeling lazy rather than the "thematic analysis", also known as "fanwank" or "stating the obvious", that is so popular among Evangelion fans.and firehawk
Dresden said:Hey, there's a Yuu Kobayashi character breathing heavily in Steins Gate. I thought you'd be all over this, firehawk.
http://i.imgur.com/bYUURl.jpg[IMG]
That said I have no clue why all these women (or men) are throwing themselves at this quack.[/QUOTE]
Maybe I can just skip the first episode and go straight for the scrumptious Kobayashi.
[QUOTE=Jexhius]
Wait, what about the Japanese that are all obsessed with Christian symbolism?[/QUOTE]
The serious but uninformed answer: they're probably in the minority. Much like Muslim or Buddhist writers in Hollywood.
Rukako is so adorable~! Plus he looks up to Okabe since he is taking an interest in his purification abilities and such as well as his gift of the practice sword. Okabe is looking to make him more manly, haha.Dresden said:That said I have no clue why all these women (or men) are throwing themselves at this quack.
Seems like we just saw it!icarus-daedelus said:So when are you going to post a bulleted outline of your rules for what does and doesn't constitute proper animu discussion, eh?
It probably has something to do with having no budget, animators or time in many cases./XX/ said:...Akiyuki Shinbo work, on the other hand, feels like an experimental approach to direction, acute but a bit amateur, and his extreme and non traditional focus in composition certainly takes advantage of digital editing...
I mean, they loaded Evangelion with Christian symbolism deliberately.firehawk12 said:The serious but uninformed answer: they're probably in the minority. Much like Muslim or Buddhist writers in Hollywood.
Jexhius said:I mean, they loaded Evangelion with Christian symbolism deliberately.
Dresden said:That said I have no clue why all these women (or men) are throwing themselves at this quack.
Anno was just fond of throwing shit at the wall. Considering how much of a minority Christians are in Japan, I'd imagine that their use in Eva was more about obfuscation than anything else.Jexhius said:I mean, they loaded Evangelion with Christian symbolism deliberately.
So?BluWacky said:It's a visual novel adaptation...
Yep. This is an example of when authorial intent should at least factor into any conversation about the text.Branduil said:Yeah, but the deliberate reason was because it looked cool. It has no actual meaning related Christianity, which is what a lot of bad analysis misses.
The best work comes from having to make more with less!Jexhius said:It probably has something to do with having no budget, animators or time in many cases.
Well judging from the preview for this episode they are pretty much shoving an entire chapter for the game into one episode. Wonder if they are going to skip over the Titor stuff or infodump? Well I'll find out in a bit!Dresden said:Halfway through Steins;Gate 2 and it should just be called infodumps;weird girls. Too bad I won't have the time to finish it until later tonight.
Oh, certainly. If anyone thought there was any rhyme or reason to it, more fool them.Branduil said:Yeah, but the deliberate reason was because it looked cool. It has no actual meaning related Christianity, which is what a lot of bad analysis misses.
You'd be surprised. Getting married by a fake priest in a fake church is very popular and a lucrative business.Dresden said:Anno was just fond of throwing shit at the wall. Considering how much of a minority Christians are in Japan, I'd imagine that their use in Eva was more about obfuscation than anything else.
So is renting a dog though. I figure it's more about the novelty than anything else.Hellsing321 said:You'd be surprised. Getting married by a fake priest in a fake church is very popular and a lucrative business.
Not quite. It was more an argument that even "non"-heteronormative narratives still fed heteronormative values, with the example of men reading yuri (and girls reading yaoi), but no need to get into that. My tag is still pretty accurate of my argument nonetheless.Hitokage said:The tag is entirely appropriate for your insistence on gender representation in the discussion that inspired it.
eep!Jexhius said:
Reversible's only been going for four months?InfiniteNine said:They are just monthly series so chapters are up accordingly.
It's all about reading from the text instead of into the text. Schools of literary analysis which start from an agenda - be it feminism, Marxism, whatever - and read that into everything annoy me. But literary analysis which takes apart the text and carefully examines the meaning of each word and how they fit with each other can be very enjoyable.Branduil said:Literary analysis is worst analysis.
Actually looking at how many releases there are of WAai! it might be bi-monthly. I'm sure I've been reading Reversible! longer than 4 months anyways.tiff said:Reversible's only been going for four months?
FTFYBranduil said:Literary analysis is BEST analysis.
icarus-daedelus said:That's part of why I find Angel's Egg so interesting and fun*, since it has the unique position of being written/directed by a Japanese man who was also an educated [ex?-]Christian. He mostly appropriates Biblical symbolism for his own devices, in order to talk about faith and doubt in general as opposed to offering any specific commentary on Christianity, although it's also kind of his experiences with religion in allegorical form. Anyway, it's an informed Eastern perspective on Xtianity/Western religion which is, as far as I can tell, somewhat rare in Japanese fiction.
Maybe. Or we've become familiar with each others' opinions to a degree where we know when to stop trending unless the argument escalates for one reason or another to continue it.7Th said:Also, is it me or have OPINIONS discussions in this thread gotten worse lately? I think people kind of used to somewhat justify their OPINIONS in the past; nowadays, we just post what we think and don't bother trying to argument why we think what we think. The Madoka discussion that was had last week and the P&S discussion of a few pages ago are the perfect examples of what I'm talking about. Maybe we just, like duckroll said, realized that nobody actually reads half of what we post in these threads.
Pretty much. Agree to disagree, stalemate, etc.Jexhius said:It's also tricky to have a disagreement about something that ends at a natural point e.g. where both parties realise they've arrived at the 'fundamental disagreement' which is the basis of their disagreement. There's a tendency for both parties to pursue the argument by reframing their original complaints in a slightly different way in an attempt to 'win' the argument until it goes around in circles forever. I guess at least you have a debate there!
I'm terrible at it too, but we just got to keep on fighting. Fight On! Fight On!InfiniteNine said:It's alright I can't really articulate my opinions too well either. <3 I try but I'm not very good at it since I don't do it too often.
Halycon said:3) The Second Coming of THAT Hair
Branduil said:Literary analysis is worst analysis.
Pretty much. I have nothing against it, in theory, but the former type seems to dominate in an irritating way. In addition, it seems to be the type of criticism most prone to being misapplied, though I suppose that ties into the marxist/feminist/whatever schools.hosannainexcelsis said:It's all about reading from the text instead of into the text. Schools of literary analysis which start from an agenda - be it feminism, Marxism, whatever - and read that into everything annoy me. But literary analysis which takes apart the text and carefully examines the meaning of each word and how they fit with each other can be very enjoyable.
7Th said:Oshii wasn't just a Christian, he was a hardore Christian that wanted to be a preiest.
As someone who reads this crap for a living, I'm not sure I'd disagree. :lolSalazar said:I will get back to you when I have mustered an appropriate deprecation. I have been drinking, but the right words will come to me in time.
Well, it's what "we" do with Greek stuff, where because none of that stuff is sacrosanct, it doesn't matter if we have Xena having sex with Ares while throwing that spinning disc around.icarus-daedelus said:That's part of why I find Angel's Egg so interesting and fun*, since it has the unique position of being written/directed by a Japanese man who was also an educated [ex?-]Christian. He mostly appropriates Biblical symbolism for his own devices, in order to talk about faith and doubt in general as opposed to offering any specific commentary on Christianity, although it's also kind of his experiences with religion in allegorical form. Anyway, it's an informed Eastern perspective on Xtianity/Western religion which is, as far as I can tell, somewhat rare in Japanese fiction. Or at least Japanimu.
Authors have an agenda as well. It's about trying to find good fits between the authorial intent and the analytical framework.hosannainexcelsis said:It's all about reading from the text instead of into the text. Schools of literary analysis which start from an agenda - be it feminism, Marxism, whatever - and read that into everything annoy me. But literary analysis which takes apart the text and carefully examines the meaning of each word and how they fit with each other can be very enjoyable.
icarus-daedelus said:You're a pretty coherent drunk, Salazar.
firehawk12 said:As someone who reads this crap for a living, I'm not sure I'd disagree. :lol
I wonder why people write books sometime, other than just to have "wrote a book" on their CV when they're looking for jobs.
doomed1 said:Also, Azu is SUCH Goddamned pander-bait. It's awful.Thankfully, that pander-bait only applies to me when she's got a tan.
Salazar said:I don't like Marxists or feminists much either, Branduil.
That would be detrimental to our true feelings of this "tanned Azu-nyan" and her purpose as a pander-bait character with no real defining features aside from physical attractiveness to the viewers at large. Throw away characters getting some spotlight by appealing to the fanbase with some service needs to be broken down into the why, when, and how of the narrative for maximum effect.Hitokage said:Can we stop typing out lots of words without saying much?
Well no duh they have an agenda. I'd much rather read about how the agenda of the work is presented than read some literary hack's counter-novel-masquerading-as-criticism.firehawk12 said:Authors have an agenda as well. It's about trying to find good fits between the authorial intent and the analytical framework.
7Th said:I'm not asking for "academic discussion"; I'm asking for at least this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scene in Nichijou 2 was fucking boring because it dragged a very simple and elementary joke for too long yet provided no extra character insight or interesting visuals to actually justify its extension. They wasted too much time making the loli-scientist give absolutely unfunny, non-sensical answers to the complaints of the robot girl and then they wasted even more time showing the characters SLOWLY eating pastry and drinking milk in the most straightforwardly shot scene possible as if showing them eating pastry and eating milk was, by itself, something genuinely fun or interesting."
...instead of this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scenes in Nichijou are fucking boring."
It's like the two forces of the internet are converging on each other.Hitokage said:Can we stop typing out lots of words without saying much?
I think it's fair game to call an author out on their bullshit though.Branduil said:Well no duh they have an agenda. I'd much rather read about how the agenda of the work is presented than read some literary hack's counter-novel-masquerading-as-criticism.
Hitokage said:Can we stop typing out lots of words without saying much?
firehawk12 said:This is when Jexhius or someone posts that picture describing the evolution of pantsu in mango/animu over the years.
I found the scene to be shallow and pedantic.7Th said:I'm not asking for "academic discussion"; I'm asking for at least this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scene in Nichijou 2 was fucking boring because it dragged a very simple and elementary joke for too long yet provided no extra character insight or interesting visuals to actually justify its extension. They wasted too much time making the loli-scientist give absolutely unfunny, non-sensical answers to the complaints of the robot girl and then they wasted even more time showing the characters SLOWLY eating pastry and drinking milk in the most straightforwardly shot scene possible as if showing them eating pastry and eating milk was, by itself, something genuinely fun or interesting."
...instead of this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scenes in Nichijou are fucking boring."
firehawk12 said:It's like the two forces of the internet are converging on each other.
Example said:In my opinion, scene with the loli-scientist and the clumsy robot was boring because:
-It was a very simple joke that went on for nearly 5 minutes
-They actually bothered to show the characters eating pastry as slowly as possible while doing absolutely nothing but eating pastry; it was as if they thought that the character eating pastry was something interesting by itself.
-The loli-scientist and the clumsy robot lack the character definition to make their non-sensical conversation interesting.
-The visuals were as straightforward as possible; it didn't have the visual jokes necessary to make up for the lack of written gags.
flawfuls said:And here you go.
http://i.imgur.com/K3YiV.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
There ya go!
[QUOTE=7Th]I used extremely common language to explain why I thought the scene was boring! Maybe a point-by-point explanation would be easier, however.[/QUOTE]
I generally agree with you on your windmill tilting quest, but the internet doesn't work that way. We're living in a 140 character/image macro world now.
And this is when a pair of sunglasses drops down onto the thread and someone says "deal with it".
Hellsing321 said:I found the scene to be shallow and pedantic.
7Th said:I'm not asking for "academic discussion"; I'm asking for at least this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scene in Nichijou 2 was fucking boring because it dragged a very simple and elementary joke for too long yet provided no extra character insight or interesting visuals to actually justify its extension. They wasted too much time making the loli-scientist give absolutely unfunny, non-sensical answers to the complaints of the robot girl and then they wasted even more time showing the characters SLOWLY eating pastry and drinking milk in the most straightforwardly shot scene possible as if showing them eating pastry and eating milk was, by itself, something genuinely fun or interesting."
...instead of this:
"The loli-scientist and clumsy robot scenes in Nichijou are fucking boring."
Steroyd said:I thought it was sweet and endearing.
Now what?