Rocksteady can make a new action adventure game if allowed. Its not like they converted some Batman fandom into a gaming studio.
Sony owns Spiderman, AT&T owns Batman.
Disney has the movie rights to Spiderman, Sony owns the IP.As already mentioned, no they do not, Disney owns Spiderman. Sony has the movie rights to Spiderman and if a sale of WBIE goes through I'd imagine any buyer would want the game rights to the WB properties.
Currently other potential bidders are Take-Two Interactive, Electronic Arts, and Activision Blizzard. Only EA will care about the Batman IP.I’m not saying Rocksteady can’t make a good non-Batman game. Personally, I’d prefer they try something different.
I’m making an argument about pricing. Investors don’t like taking chances on something new. If you bundle that into a deal which puts a price on a studio, you will end up with a lower price.
Since MK is part of WBIE, Microsoft will just buy the whole IP while they are at it.I think if they buy them, and get a ten year license on the likes of DC and MK, Microsoft effectively will be bringing forward a new arms race. They will be signaling the rest of the industry consolidation is a go, and we will be heading down the same path as other industries where there's really only space for 4 or 5 major players.
But who knows.
Currently other potential bidders are Take-Two Interactive, Electronic Arts, and Activision Blizzard. Only EA will care about the Batman IP.
This whole deal is one cant pass up. This is a huge opportunity. MS would be insane not to grab it. Its extremely rare.I think Rocksteady or even WB Montreal would be better gets for MS if MS were to attain the Batman/Superman licenses. MS already has a great fighting franchise in KI and can just hire Iron Galaxy to do a KI 2.
Rocksteady is the kind of elite studio you can't pass up if available.
More than 25Without the I.Ps, 4bn is a bit expensive. I would like to know what I.Ps they would get apart from MK.
If Microsoft do get them, they could easily do something like this.
Put 12 studios on 3yr dev cycles. Which equal 1 AAA game every 4mths or quarter.
Mojang would carry on doing what they do.
They could also have a 3 dedicated RPG studios 4yr dev cycles meaning a AAA RPG every 15 - 18 months (Obsidian, InExile and Playground team 2)
Plus some outliers doing either 2/3/4 or even 5yr cycles.
That would be a pretty compelling 1st party output/offering. Gamepass would become even more unmissable than it already is, and they could tone down their moneyhats for 3rd parties. Obviously one of their goals?
How many do they have today? and how many would this acquisition give them in total?
I honestly don’t see ms buying them....would more than likely be a Chinese owned company that has links in with movie studios as there are a lot of those takeovers happening at the moment (tinfoil hats)
Will wait and see
Ms would be better buying something like sega which has a good foot in Japan and a shitload of unused 1st party ip
the matrix
No, man the Spider Man IP is owned by Marvel/Disney. The movie rights were sold to Sony when Marvel was going through some tough times.Disney has the movie rights to Spiderman, Sony owns the IP.
![]()
Currently other potential bidders are Take-Two Interactive, Electronic Arts, and Activision Blizzard. Only EA will care about the Batman IP.
Disney has the movie rights to Spiderman, Sony owns the IP.
![]()
Last i checked sony released a banger a few weeks ago and is releasing one more potentially before this generation ends, what has MS released lately again?I mean, it would be a game changer.
It would rocket Microsoft so far ahead of Sony's first party studios that you would expect Sony would have to reply.
Would this lead us into the great studio buy out era so many have been predicting?
There was rumours of both Sony and Microsoft looking at Zenimax as well.
Maybe this gets re looked at.