• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. Auteur writes and directs his own movies.

Ex. Woody Allen has been an auteur for 40 years.

That's not what an auteur means. Auteur theory is that the director, rather than the screenwriter, is the true "author" of a film and that the decisions the director makes in regards to camera placement, blocking, lighting, editing, performance, etc has more to do with creating the meaning, message, and story of a film than what's on the page.

With this in mind, an auteur is a filmmaker who has an established style and creative vision that carries through their filmography. The idea is sort-of that you could sit down and watch Bridge of Spies without realizing that it's a Spielberg film, but feel that it's cut from the same cloth as the rest of his filmography.

Snyder is the epitome of an Auteur. That's not a qualitative statement though, it doesn't mean his work is made better by this.
 

Lunar15

Member
I have a feeling the OT's going to be pretty mixed because expectations are so low right now. A lot of people will probably come out with a way more positive reaction just because they expected bad but got mediocre. Don't get me wrong, plenty of people will like this movie just fine and always would have. But I'm definitely interested to see what happens due to the bad reviews.
 

gamz

Member
I've never understood "auteur" to mean the director necessarily has to be a writer on the movie.

Yeah, I guess you are right when I look up the definition. I always assumed it's a director that has complete control of their vision, and that includes writing it. Perhaps I'm wrong on that.
 
I really don't want these movies to fail, but I lost all faith in DC with the comics over the past 8 years or so and I can't stand Snyder. It's kind of unfair that I have to slog through his "vision" to get to see the DC characters that I love. I just started watching the flash on tv and despite some of the cringeworthy cw romance stuff, it's a great adaptation of the flash and other dc heroes. I thought they even pulled off firestorm which I didn't think anyone would even attempt. Clearly somebody knows what they're doing somewhere at dc. I just wish it extended to the movies.
 

Blader

Member
And yet this movie still sucks.......*sigh*

Maybe they shouldn't have focused this much on Batman huh

It just sounds like Snyder doesn't know how to do Superman. Seems like he likes the idea of Superman, but is more interested in -- or only capable of -- portraying Superman as a plot device than a character.
 

Farsi

Member
Let's be honest guys, this movie was doomed from the beginning with the fucking stupid title of batman vs superman.

A title like that makes you think this is some 8 year olds mash up hand made movie with action figures.

The fuck you talking about m8? It's the Dawn of Justice that ruins the title. Batman vs Superman sounds like an event.
 

Sephzilla

Member
All are bad. They are way to cheesy for me.

image.php


But the fun/cheese factor of The Flash seems like something the Snyderverse desperately needs
 

jon bones

hot hot hanuman-on-man action
Agreed. Even if all the DCEU stuff crumples, it's good to know that I'll have the CW/CBS universe to fall back on.

it really is a wonderful adaption of these classic characters

All are bad. They are way to cheesy for me.

i think if you treat it like a silver age comic (Americana styled romance arcs included) it makes a lot more sense. it's great fun.
 

Interfectum

Member
IMO they have the movie order backwards. A lot of reviewers are saying how this movie simply sets up for a Justice League movie. If anything we should have had a Justice League movie that sets up a showdown between Superman and Batman. This, IMO, is the main event. You really don't get much more mainstream than a battle royale between the two most popular comic book heroes of all time.

I don't even see what they could possibly do, marketing wise, to make Justice League near as compelling or provocative as the potential of Batman vs. Superman.

What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol
 

Jarmel

Banned
Yeah, I guess you are right when I look up the definition. I always assumed it's a director that has complete control of their vision, and that includes writing it. Perhaps I'm wrong on that.

It has more to do with the work as a whole. Tarantino is definitely an auteur but so is Bay, Nolan, Fincher, Snyder, Wright. Wright's presence can be felt on the editing and music side while Bay and Snyder would be heavier on the visual effects and camerawork (not saying though that Wright is remotely subpar in that area either).
 
Flash and Supergirl are great adaptation of their characters.

And it's not anymore cheesy than ASM2, TDKR or some of the Superman movies lol
I'd say they're less cheesy than any of those but I can see how the love quadrangle: "will they, won't they" stuff can turn people off.
 
IMO they have the movie order backwards. A lot of reviewers are saying how this movie simply sets up for a Justice League movie. If anything we should have had a Justice League movie that sets up a showdown between Superman and Batman. This, IMO, is the main event. You really don't get much more mainstream than a battle royale between the two most popular comic book heroes of all time.

I don't even see what they could possibly do, marketing wise, to make Justice League near as compelling or provocative as the potential of Batman vs. Superman.

What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol

they also blew their Doomsday load early, too.

Just a bunch of fuckery happening with this film apparently

yet, i still cant wait to see it. I need to know if it's bad bad or if it's kinda fun bad.
 
What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol

If they were smart, they'd do a gods vs mortal scenario for Justice League. A villain with an actual complex plot instead of just some powerhouse they stick in for a 30 minute fight scene
 
IMO they have the movie order backwards. A lot of reviewers are saying how this movie simply sets up for a Justice League movie. If anything we should have had a Justice League movie that sets up a showdown between Superman and Batman. This, IMO, is the main event. You really don't get much more mainstream than a battle royale between the two most popular comic book heroes of all time.

I don't even see what they could possibly do, marketing wise, to make Justice League near as compelling or provocative as the potential of Batman vs. Superman.

What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol
I agree completely. Should have adapted the run where batman's contingency plans for all the members get used against them.
 

Senoculum

Member
One of my co-workers is going to be crushed if he doesn't end up enjoying this film.

I feel like not letting him know about the reviews so he can set his expectations himself

It's me. I'm that coworker. It's okay; I've made my peace, and I've already bought my tix :p
 

Tobor

Member
IMO they have the movie order backwards. A lot of reviewers are saying how this movie simply sets up for a Justice League movie. If anything we should have had a Justice League movie that sets up a showdown between Superman and Batman. This, IMO, is the main event. You really don't get much more mainstream than a battle royale between the two most popular comic book heroes of all time.

I don't even see what they could possibly do, marketing wise, to make Justice League near as compelling or provocative as the potential of Batman vs. Superman.

What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol

You have a good point. This exact scenario is playing out over at Marvel.
 
They should have done a Wonder Woman movie first, followed by a Ben Affleck solo Batman movie to reintroduce him.

Then you follow up with a new Superman movie that will connect the dots to the Justice League.

Batman vs. Superman is a dumb idea all around. There shouldn't be any hostility or tension between those two. It makes no sense and never has. It's nothing but Comic Book Porn and it doesn't help promote the DCU at all.
 

JB1981

Member
That's not what an auteur means. Auteur theory is that the director, rather than the screenwriter, is the true "author" of a film and that the decisions the director makes in regards to camera placement, blocking, lighting, editing, performance, etc has more to do with creating the meaning, message, and story of a film than what's on the page.

With this in mind, an auteur is a filmmaker who has an established style and creative vision that carries through their filmography. The idea is sort-of that you could sit down and watch Bridge of Spies without realizing that it's a Spielberg film, but feel that it's cut from the same cloth as the rest of his filmography.

Snyder is the epitome of an Auteur. That's not a qualitative statement though, it doesn't mean his work is made better by this.

Snyder has a thematic point of view that carries through his films? Not seeing it.

He has a sense for visuals and not much else. Kubrick was an auteur. His films, regardless of genre, all came back to the same theme: the nature of man. Snyder has no discernible commentary or point of view. The man is not an auetur.
 

Ahasverus

Member
Snyder has a thematic point of view that carries through his films? Not seeing it.

He has a sense for visuals and not much else. Kubrick was an auteur. His films, regardless of genre, all came back to the same theme: the nature of man. Snyder has no discernible commentary or point of view. The man is not an auetur.
His thematic is AWESOME DUDE
 

Poeton

Member
I get the feeling they didn't learn anything from the train wreck that was Green Lantern and possibly added a few more mistakes.
 

Beefy

Member
But the fun/cheese factor of The Flash seems like something the Snyderverse desperately needs

The Flash is probably the best out the lot if I had to pick one. Every one likes a little cheese but I feel a lot of super hero TV shows try to cater for too many demographics.

The main reason I dislike Flash is I don't like the actor. Super Girl and TLOT are just poor. The Arrow started ok then went down hill.
 

Mrbob

Member
IMO they have the movie order backwards. A lot of reviewers are saying how this movie simply sets up for a Justice League movie. If anything we should have had a Justice League movie that sets up a showdown between Superman and Batman. This, IMO, is the main event. You really don't get much more mainstream than a battle royale between the two most popular comic book heroes of all time.

I don't even see what they could possibly do, marketing wise, to make Justice League near as compelling or provocative as the potential of Batman vs. Superman.

What are we going to get another end of the world/universe scenario where the heroes must combine their efforts to thwart a powerful foe? lol
Agreed. Say what you will about Marvel but they have built up Civil War over the years. There is a past where the setup of the movie has legit meaning. I don't understand why DC had to rush into Batman vs Superman. They could have set this up through the next couple of years in various movies.
 
I think they fucked up by starting with their Avengers before they did their Iron Man and Captain America.

This should have been made around 2019 after a couple of Batfleck flicks, another Superman movie, a WW movie and a couple of other JL films.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom