Is this really the case? My brother in law is bringing my four year old nephew to this movie...![]()
4 seems really fucking young for this. Like, really young.
Is this really the case? My brother in law is bringing my four year old nephew to this movie...![]()
Affleck was good in Daredevil the same way people say he's good in BvS and yet he gets hate for Daredevil and praise for Batman.
Apparently both this and MoS had the same editor.
Earlier a user posted it's the same editor from MoS, David Brenner, but not Snyder's other films.
OK that's interesting because it's definitely something that irked me in some of his earlier films but it wasn't as noticeable as it was in MoS.The editor of MoS and BvS was David Brenner, who has not worked with Snyder otherwise.
Affleck was good in Daredevil the same way people say he's good in BvS and yet he gets hate for Daredevil and praise for Batman.
Are spoiler tags no longer required? C'mon seriously.
Other way around.
You know what, as promising as Suicide Squad and WW look I need BvS to flop so they reboot the universe and we can get an authentic take on Lex Luthor. Or just retcon it that he's the real Lex Luthor's son.
I thought he deserved a second chance after The Town, Argo and Gone Girl.
Apparently, people saying the film is shit and his performance as Bruce Wayne is the worst adaptation by an actor yet?
My goodness.
I thought he deserved a second chance after The Town, Argo and Gone Girl.
Apparently, people saying the film is shit and his performance as Bruce Wayne is the worst adaptation by an actor yet?
My goodness.
Kat Jennings
Super Woman? You mean Wonder Woman?
Oh shit, the Justice League takes on the Crime Syndicate in the next movie :0Super Woman? You mean Wonder Woman?
A review mentioned this movie making an 8 year old kid cry within minutes.
Oh shit, the Justice League takes on the Crime Syndicate in the next movie :0
- Ben Affleck suprised me in a good way
Snyder's movies haven't ever really felt like they had editing issues until Man of Steel really
whereupon the people of Mexico (its the Day of the Dead, also, which allows for very tight and spooky imagery) embrace him as they would a god.
I swear if Wonder Woman underperforms and it can be traced in any way back to Snyder I'm going to be so pissed.
You keep saying this and it's just not true. There's a large middle ground between not caring about collateral damage and loudly announcing that people aren't around so that the fighting can happen.Really sounds like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
That was a chief complaint in MoS, now a segment of people are upset that he addressed it.
It isn't Mexico in a Hollywood production without it being Day of the Dead...!
Don't. It's dark, very dark, uncomfortable and unneccessary. Don't give cinemas that money, it sends the wrong message.Maybe dumb question. But I've never seen a movie in 3D in theaters. How is it? Don't want it to take away from my experience. See a early listing for RealD 3D on Friday.
Maybe dumb question. But I've never seen a movie in 3D in theaters. How is it? Don't want it to take away from my experience. See a early listing for RealD 3D on Friday.
He's locked in contract wise, and he's doing more than just directing (producing, etc.).I have to think they take Snyder off JL...
It isn't Mexico in a Hollywood production without it being Day of the Dead...!
Maybe dumb question. But I've never seen a movie in 3D in theaters. How is it? Don't want it to take away from my experience. See a early listing for RealD 3D on Friday.
Yeah, I'm sure by this point Snyder has a play or pay deal that makes it more expensive for WB to dumpHe's locked in contract wise, and he's doing more than just directing (producing, etc.).
He made it brehs
Don't. It's dark, very dark, uncomfortable and unneccessary. Don't give cinemas that money, it sends the wrong message.
Unless a movie is shot/remastered with 3D as an utmost priority, expect it to be a bane on your viewing experience.
Alright thanks guys. Skipped 3D for force awakens too, wasn't sure if should give it a chance here. I'll just see the regular Verison, thanksStay away from 3D in my opinion.
Obiviously the movie is not as bad as the score indicates (but only because the first half exists, the second one was pure shit), but its really a boring movie.
Batman was the best thing.
This is the OT now, I guess?
Maybe dumb question. But I've never seen a movie in 3D in theaters. How is it? Don't want it to take away from my experience. See a early listing for RealD 3D on Friday.
Unless a movie is shot/remastered with 3D as an utmost priority, expect it to be a bane on your viewing experience.
Coming from you, I think I should be relieved.Obiviously the movie is not as bad as the score indicates (but only because the first half exists, the second one was pure shit), but its really a boring movie.
Batman was the best thing.
Just watched the movie, went in with an open mind.
Here's a few, spoiler free, thoughts
* The noticeable bad editing made it feel really disjointed. Not only does it cut from scenes with dramatically different tone; there's also seemingly random continuity across some cuts.
* There was no real chemistry between the characters. I wonder if anyone actually had a good time making the movie. The only 'chemistry' was Batman's disdain for Superman.
* Affleck was a great angry batman. And boy, is he buff. Irons was a great Alfred.
* Eisenberg felt like Joker meets Riddler meets rich kid.
* I simply can't seem to like Cavill's portrayal Superman. If he's not arrogant he's kinda angsty. Superman should be a beacon of positivity - something he could still be, even in an otherwise 'dark' movie.
* There were scenes that were so obviously shoved in just to tease the Justice League movie. Shoved in in ways that it almost broke the fourth wall
* Girlfriend and myself, we couldn't have rolled our eyes harder when the movie went back Man-of-Steel mode, spectacle for spectacle's sake, with no perceivable stakes whatsoever.